Case: EEOC v. Olsten Staffing Services, Corp. and Adecco North America, Llc

1:02-cv-00786 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: March 22, 2002

Closed Date: Sept. 29, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 2002, the Atlanta District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Olsten Staffing Services, Corp. and Adecco North America, L.L.C. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The only document publicly available regarding this case is the docket; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. After several discovery disputes, the parties settled in September 2003 through a settlement agreement.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (6/19/2007)

People


Judge(s)

Cooper, Clarence (Georgia)

Judge(s)

Cooper, Clarence (Georgia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:02-cv-00786

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Olsten Staffing Services, Corp. and Adecco North America, LLC

Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Docket
32

1:02-cv-00786

Order [Grants Motion to Compel]

EEOC vs. ASI Staffing, Inc. d/b/a Olsten Staffing Services and Adecco North American, LLC

June 10, 2003

June 10, 2003

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 8, 2022, 3:23 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed. Consent form to proceed before U.S. magistrate and pretrial instructions given to attorney; jury demand (syh) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

March 22, 2002

March 22, 2002

Summons issued for defendants. (slc) (Entered: 03/27/2002)

March 25, 2002

March 25, 2002

2

Return of service executed 3/27/02 as to Olsten Staffing Svc on original complaint (lme) (Entered: 04/22/2002)

April 19, 2002

April 19, 2002

3

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Adecco North America, mailed 4/30/02. Answer due by 6/29/02 for Adecco North America. (slc) (Entered: 05/08/2002)

May 6, 2002

May 6, 2002

4

Joint MOTION to extend time thru 06/3/02 for dfts to respond to [1-1] complaint . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 05/08/2002)

May 7, 2002

May 7, 2002

5

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [4-1] joint motion to extend time thru 06/3/02 for dft Olsten to respond to [1-1] complaint, Answer due 6/3/02 for Olsten Staffing Svc . (cc) (slc) (Entered: 05/29/2002)

May 24, 2002

May 24, 2002

6

Joint MOTION to extend time thru 06/10/02 w/in which dfts may respond to [1-1] complaint . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 06/05/2002)

June 3, 2002

June 3, 2002

7

ANSWER by defendant Olsten Staffing Svc to complaint [1-1]. Discovery ends 11/7/02. (slc) (Entered: 06/11/2002)

June 10, 2002

June 10, 2002

8

ANSWER by defendant Adecco North America to complaint [1-1]. (slc) (Entered: 06/11/2002)

June 10, 2002

June 10, 2002

9

Preliminary Report and Discovery Schedule. (to judge) (slc) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

July 10, 2002

July 10, 2002

10

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by plaintiff. (slc) (Entered: 07/17/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

12

AMENDED ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by plaintiff. (slc) (Entered: 07/19/2002)

July 18, 2002

July 18, 2002

13

Dft's Certificate of interested persons. (to judge) (slc) (Entered: 07/30/2002)

July 29, 2002

July 29, 2002

14

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by defendant Olsten Staffing Svc. (slc) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

Aug. 2, 2002

Aug. 2, 2002

15

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by defendant Adecco North America. (slc) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

Aug. 2, 2002

Aug. 2, 2002

16

Attorney appearance for plaintiff by Steven Mark Tapper. (slc) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

Aug. 2, 2002

Aug. 2, 2002

17

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 12/25/02 of discovery period . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 11/13/2002)

Nov. 8, 2002

Nov. 8, 2002

18

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [17-1] joint motion to extend time thru 12/25/02 of discovery period. Discovery ends 12/25/02 NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 25, 2002

Nov. 25, 2002

19

MOTION by pla to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts , for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion , and to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery with brief in support. (lme) (Entered: 12/26/2002)

Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

20

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 02/04/03 within which defendants may file dispositive motions . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 01/08/2003)

Jan. 7, 2003

Jan. 7, 2003

21

MOTION by defendants to extend time within which defendants may respond to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts with brief support and proposed order. (slc) (Entered: 01/13/2003)

Jan. 10, 2003

Jan. 10, 2003

22

Amended MOTION by plaintiff amending [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery . (slc) (Entered: 01/15/2003)

Jan. 14, 2003

Jan. 14, 2003

23

CONSENT MOTION to extend time for the filing of dispositive motions for either 10 days following the entry of an order denying [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts or 20 days following the conslusion of discovery period . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

Jan. 28, 2003

Jan. 28, 2003

24

MOTION by defendants to extend time within which to respond [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts . (slc) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

Feb. 5, 2003

Feb. 5, 2003

25

Response by defendants in opposition to [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests. (slc) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

Feb. 5, 2003

Feb. 5, 2003

26

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [23-1] joint motion to extend time for the filing of dispositive motions following a ruling on [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests. Court will establish a new deadline following a ruling on this motion. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

Feb. 6, 2003

Feb. 6, 2003

SUBMITTED to Judge Clarence Cooper on [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery. (slc) (Entered: 02/12/2003)

Feb. 12, 2003

Feb. 12, 2003

27

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 02/26/03 within which plaintiff may file a reply to defendants' [25-1] response to plaintiff's [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 02/25/2003)

Feb. 24, 2003

Feb. 24, 2003

SUBMITTED to Judge Clarence Cooper on [21-1] motion to extend time within which defendants may respond to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [22-1] amend/amended motion [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery, [24-1] motion to extend time within which to respond [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts. (FILE IN CHAMBERS) (slc) (Entered: 02/25/2003)

Feb. 25, 2003

Feb. 25, 2003

28

REPLY by plaintiff to response to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts. (slc) (Entered: 02/28/2003)

Feb. 26, 2003

Feb. 26, 2003

29

CONSENT ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper, ALLOWING plaintiff to file excess pages in its reply brief to defendants' response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel . (cc) (slc) (Entered: 03/04/2003)

March 3, 2003

March 3, 2003

30

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [27-1] joint motion to extend time thru 02/26/03 within which plaintiff may file a reply to defendants' [25-1] response to plaintiff's [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 03/06/2003)

March 5, 2003

March 5, 2003

31

MOTION by counsel for plaintiff, Amy Loggins for leave of absence of 12 weeks with brief in support. (slc) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

March 12, 2003

March 12, 2003

32

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, GRANTING [22-1] motion amending [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, and [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery, GRANTING [21-1] motion to extend time within which defendants may respond to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, GRANTING [24-1] motion to extend time within which to respond [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests, DENYING [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion by EEOC, GRANTING [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery; Discovery ends 7/25/03 GRANTING [20-1] joint motion to extend time thru 02/04/03 within which defendants may file dispositive motions. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 06/12/2003)

June 10, 2003

June 10, 2003

33

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 09/01/03 of discovery to take to deposition of Kathy Fionte . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 07/29/2003)

July 25, 2003

July 25, 2003

35

CONSENT MOTION to extend time for dispositive motion deadline throughand including 9/16/03 (to CC) (vs) (Entered: 08/27/2003)

Aug. 26, 2003

Aug. 26, 2003

36

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [35-1] joint motion to extend time for dispositive motion deadline throughand including 9/16/03 (cc) (vs) (Entered: 09/04/2003)

Sept. 3, 2003

Sept. 3, 2003

37

Notice of Settlement Agreement . (to cc) (vs) Modified on 09/17/2003 (Entered: 09/17/2003)

Sept. 16, 2003

Sept. 16, 2003

38

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper pursuant to the Settlement Agreement filed with the court on 9/16/03, this action is hereby dismissed. (cc) (vs) Modified on 10/06/2003 (Entered: 09/29/2003)

Sept. 26, 2003

Sept. 26, 2003

Case terminated. (vs) (Entered: 09/29/2003)

Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Case Details

State / Territory: Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 22, 2002

Closing Date: Sept. 29, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Olsten Staffing Services, Corp. (McGuire Woods), Private Entity/Person

Adecco North America, LLC, Private Entity/Person

Olsen Staffing Services, Corp., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits