Case: EEOC v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

2:01-cv-00251 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: April 9, 2001

Closed Date: March 11, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In April 2001, the Baltimore District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Ford Motor Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The only document publicly available regarding this case is the docket; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the docket that the complaint alleged sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A charging party intervened in the suit in November 2001. After some discovery disputes, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in January 2002 which was never resolved. The parties took part in a settlement conference later that month. After some additional discovery disputes, the parties finally settled in March 2002 through a consent decree, the contents of which are unknown.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/26/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:01-cv-00251

Docket

EEOC v. Ford Motor Company

Sept. 13, 2005

Sept. 13, 2005

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 9, 2022, 3:13 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; jury demand, fee waived. (clerk) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

April 9, 2001

April 9, 2001

Jury Trial Flag (clerk) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

April 9, 2001

April 9, 2001

SUMMONS (1 original with one copy each) issued for Ford Motor Company. MAILED TO ATTORNEY. Mg. ntc., ect. forms mailed. (clerk) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

April 10, 2001

April 10, 2001

2

ANSWER to Complaint by Ford Motor Company (Attorney Thomas Michael Lucas, Ruth Goodboe, Kristina H. Vaquera), (cdod) (Entered: 08/03/2001)

Aug. 2, 2001

Aug. 2, 2001

Referred for 16(b) Conference (cdod) (Entered: 08/03/2001)

Aug. 3, 2001

Aug. 3, 2001

3

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ford Motor Company 7/13/01 (cdod) (Entered: 08/03/2001)

Aug. 3, 2001

Aug. 3, 2001

4

ORDER: 26(f) attorneys' conference set 8/20/01 at 2:00 p.m.; 16(b) scheduling conference set 2:00 p.m. 8/27/01; initial disclosure 9/10/01; no party required to respond to discovery sooner than 9/21/01; entered and filed 8/10/01; (signed by Magistrate Judge F. B. Stillman) Copies Mailed: 8/10/01 (afor) (Entered: 08/10/2001)

Aug. 10, 2001

Aug. 10, 2001

5

Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Ford Motor Company (cdod) (Entered: 08/17/2001)

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

6

MOTION by Ford Motor Company Lisa C. Jern for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 receipt #30955 with attached proposed order (cdod) Modified on 08/17/2001 (Entered: 08/17/2001)

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

6

MOTION by Ford Motor Company Brenda B. Page for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 receipt #30955 (cdod) Modified on 08/17/2001 (Entered: 08/17/2001)

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

6

Application to Qualify As A Foreign Attorney Under Local Rule 83.1(D) filed by defendant Ford Motor Company [6-1] motion by Ford Motor Company Brenda B. Page for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 by Ford Motor Company (cdod) (Entered: 08/17/2001)

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

6

Application to Qualify As A Foreing Attorney Under Local Rule 83.1(D) filed by defendant Ford Motor Company [6-1] motion by Ford Motor Company Lisa C. Jern for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 by Ford Motor Company (cdod) (Entered: 08/17/2001)

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

7

ORDER granting [6-1] motion by Ford Motor Company Brenda B. Page for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00, granting [6-1] motion by Ford Motor Company Lisa C. Jern for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 entered and filed 08/17/01 ( signed by Judge Jerome B. Friedman ) Copies Mailed: 08/17/01 [EOD Date: 8/17/01] (cdod) (Entered: 08/17/2001)

Aug. 17, 2001

Aug. 17, 2001

16(b) Conference held (cdod) (Entered: 08/28/2001)

Aug. 27, 2001

Aug. 27, 2001

8

Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order: Setting Jury Trial for 10:00 am on 2/11/02 at Norfolk. Proposed voir dire and typewritten jury instructions, with authorities in support thereof, shall be delivered to the Clerk on or before 02/04/02. Expert witnesses to be identified by 10/11/01; disclosure outlined in Rule 26 (a)(2)(B) by 11/13/01; response to disclosure by 12/13/01; rebuttal by 12/28/01; discovery by plaintiff(s) on or before 12/03/01 and defendant(s) on or before 12/31/01; in lieu of witness at trial concluded by 01/07/02; pretrial disclosures to be delivered to all counsel and parties on or before 01/18/02; objections delivered by 01/23/02; an attorney's conference is set for 01/18/02 at 2:00 pm; a final pretrial conference shall be conducted on 01/25/02 at 10:30 am entered 08/27/01 filed 08/28/01 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller ) Copies Mailed: 08/28/01 (cdod) Modified on 08/28/2001 (Entered: 08/28/2001)

Aug. 28, 2001

Aug. 28, 2001

9

MOTION by Ford Motor Company by Thomas M. Lucas for Thomas G. Reynolds, IV for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 (cdod) (Entered: 10/17/2001)

Oct. 17, 2001

Oct. 17, 2001

10

Document(s) filed by defendant Ford Motor Company [9-1] motion by Ford Motor Company by Thomas M. Lucas for Thomas G. Reynolds, IV for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 (application to qualify as a foreign atty. included with a formal motion and proposed order) (cdod) (Entered: 10/17/2001)

Oct. 17, 2001

Oct. 17, 2001

So Ordered: granting [9-1] motion by Ford Motor Company by Thomas M. Lucas for Thomas G. Reynolds, IV for admission pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt #31776 entered and filed 10/18/01 ( signed by Judge Henry C. Morgan Jr. ) Copies Mailed: 10/18/01 (cdod) (Entered: 10/18/2001)

Oct. 18, 2001

Oct. 18, 2001

11

MOTION by Tina Marie Hampton to Intervene (cdod) (Entered: 11/08/2001)

Nov. 7, 2001

Nov. 7, 2001

12

MEMORANDUM by Tina Marie Hampton in support of [11-1] motion to Intervene received (cdod) (Entered: 11/08/2001)

Nov. 7, 2001

Nov. 7, 2001

13

RESPONSE by Ford Motor Company to [11-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Intervene received (cdod) (Entered: 11/20/2001)

Nov. 19, 2001

Nov. 19, 2001

14

NOTICE of Hearing: on the Motion to Intervene set for 11/29/01 at 11:00 am (cdod) (Entered: 11/23/2001)

Nov. 21, 2001

Nov. 21, 2001

Motion hearing re: [11-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Intervene set at 11:00 11/29/01 (cdod) (Entered: 11/23/2001)

Nov. 23, 2001

Nov. 23, 2001

15

REPLY by Tina Marie Hampton to response to [11-1] motion to Intervene received (cdod) (Entered: 11/23/2001)

Nov. 23, 2001

Nov. 23, 2001

Motion hearing held re: [11-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Intervene by Tina Marie Hampton (cdod) (Entered: 11/29/2001)

Nov. 29, 2001

Nov. 29, 2001

16

Minute entry: Tommy E. Mill, USMJ. Gloria Smith OCR. Came on for motion to intervene. Plaintiff appeared through Amy Garber. Movant appeared with counsel, Ann K. Sullivan. Defendant appeared through Thomas M. Lucas and Kristina H. Vaquera. Affidavit of Tina Marie Hampton executed and filed in open court. Court Granted Motion to Intervene with modifications. Court to prepare an order. (cdod) (Entered: 11/29/2001)

Nov. 29, 2001

Nov. 29, 2001

17

AFFIDAVIT by Tina Marie Hampton filed in open court. (cdod) (Entered: 11/29/2001)

Nov. 29, 2001

Nov. 29, 2001

18

ORDER granting in part, denying in part [11-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Intervene; counsel for Ms. Hampton is ordered to serve,by 12/03/01, a notice of deposition of Ford on the limited issue of Ms. Hampton's claim for front and back pay. This deposition is the only discovery Ms. Hampton will be allowed to take. Counsel fo Ms. Hampton is to have access to all discovery previously propounded in this case, and may take part in any further discovery. entered and filed 11/29/01 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller ) Copies Mailed: 11/29/01 [EOD Date: 11/29/01] (cdod) (Entered: 11/29/2001)

Nov. 29, 2001

Nov. 29, 2001

20

ORDER that depositions of Ford MOtor Co.'s witnesses on damages be taken in the Norfolk division of EDVA; denying plaintiff's request to require Ford Motor Co. to produce a Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) witness or provide documents; entered and filed 12/18/01 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller ) Copies Mailed: 12/19/01 [EOD Date: 12/19/01] (cdod) (Entered: 12/19/2001)

Dec. 18, 2001

Dec. 18, 2001

21

MOTION by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation for the opening brief in support of Ford's motion for summary judgment (cdod) (Entered: 12/19/2001)

Dec. 19, 2001

Dec. 19, 2001

22

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [21-1] motion for extension of page limitation received (cdod) (Entered: 12/19/2001)

Dec. 19, 2001

Dec. 19, 2001

23

MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Tina Marie Hampton to Quash subpoenas issued to Barbara Byers and Dr. Susan Feister (clerk) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

23

OBJECTION by movant Tina Marie Hampton to subpoenas issued to Barbara Byers and Dr. Susan Feister. (clerk) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

24

NOTICE of withdrawal of motion to extend time relating to rebuttal evidence (document no. [19]), by Tina Marie Hampton (clerk) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

25

MOTION by Ford Motor Company for Summary Judgment with proposed brief supporting this in excess of page limitation (cdod) (Entered: 12/27/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

27

MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time to respond to motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Ford (cdod) (Entered: 12/27/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

26

MEMORANDUM by Tina Marie Hampton in opposition to [21-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation received. (cdod) (Entered: 12/27/2001)

Dec. 26, 2001

Dec. 26, 2001

28

RESPONSE by Equal Employment to [27-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment received. (cdod) (Entered: 12/27/2001)

Dec. 27, 2001

Dec. 27, 2001

29

RESPONSE by Equal Employment to [21-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation received (cdod) (Entered: 12/31/2001)

Dec. 31, 2001

Dec. 31, 2001

30

RESPONSE by Ford Motor Company to [27-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time received (cdod) (Entered: 01/07/2002)

Jan. 2, 2002

Jan. 2, 2002

30

REPLY to response to [21-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation received (cdod) (Entered: 01/07/2002)

Jan. 2, 2002

Jan. 2, 2002

31

RESPONSE by Equal Employment to [25-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for Summary Judgment received (cdod) (Entered: 01/07/2002)

Jan. 2, 2002

Jan. 2, 2002

32

MOTION by Tina Marie Hampton in limine to exclude evidence of past sexual history (cdod) (Entered: 01/07/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

34

REPLY by Tina Marie Hampton to response to [27-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time received (cdod) (Entered: 01/07/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

34

REPLY by Tina Marie Hampton to response to [21-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation received. (cdod) (Entered: 01/07/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

35

Emergency MOTION by Ford Motor Company for Mental Examination of Plaintiffs (cdod) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

36

MEMORANDUM in support of [35-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for Mental Examination of Plaintiffs received (cdod) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

Motion hearing re: [27-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time set at 11:00 1/16/02, [21-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation set at 11:00 1/16/02, [19-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time set at 11:00 1/16/02 (cdod) (Entered: 01/09/2002)

Jan. 9, 2002

Jan. 9, 2002

37

MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Tina Marie Hampton in limine To Strike The Testimony Of Dr. Peter Ash and Prohibit Supplementation of Dr. Ash's Expert Report (cdod) (Entered: 01/11/2002)

Jan. 10, 2002

Jan. 10, 2002

38

NOTICE of Hearing: for 01/16/02 at 11:00 am on the Motion for Extension of Page Limitation and Motion for Extension of Time filed by counsel for defendant (cdod) (Entered: 01/11/2002)

Jan. 11, 2002

Jan. 11, 2002

39

MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Tina Marie Hampton in limine to Strike The Testimony of Suzanne B. Roski (cdod) (Entered: 01/15/2002)

Jan. 14, 2002

Jan. 14, 2002

40

MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Tina Marie Hampton to Compel Ford's Production Of Witnesses And Documents Responsive To Plaintiff, Tina Marie Hampton F.R.C.P. 30(B)(6) (cdod) (Entered: 01/15/2002)

Jan. 15, 2002

Jan. 15, 2002

41

MOTION by Ford Motor Company to Continue Trial (cdod) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 15, 2002

Jan. 15, 2002

42

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [41-1] motion to Continue Trial received (cdod) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 15, 2002

Jan. 15, 2002

Motion hearing held re: [40-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Compel by Tina Marie Hampton, [41-1] motion by Ford Motor Company to Continue Trial by Ford Motor Company, [35-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for Mental Examination of Plaintiffs by Ford Motor Company, [27-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time by Tina Marie Hampton, [21-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation by Ford Motor Company (nlyt) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

43

Minute entry: COURT PROCEEDINGS (TEM, USMJ) (GLORIA SMITH, O.C.R.) Matter came on for hearing on pending motions. Arguments heard. Motions decied as follows: motion by deft for page extension (#21) - DENIED; motion by plft Hampton to extend time to answer (#27) - MOOT; emergency motion by deft for Mental Examination (#35) - DENIED; motion by pltf Hampton to compel (#40) - MOOT; motion by deft to continue trial (#41) - DENIED. Court to prepare order. (nlyt) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

Settlement Conference set on 1/28/02 at 2:00 p.m. (nlyt) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

44

ORDER mooting [40-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Compel, denying [41-1] motion by Ford Motor Company to Continue Trial, denying [35-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for Mental Examination of Plaintiffs, mooting [27-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton to Extend Time, denying [21-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for extension of page limitation; entered and filed 01/17/02 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller ) Copies 01/17/02 [EOD Date: 1/17/02] (cdod) (Entered: 01/17/2002)

Jan. 17, 2002

Jan. 17, 2002

45

MOTION by Ford Motor Company for Summary Judgment (cdod) (Entered: 01/17/2002)

Jan. 17, 2002

Jan. 17, 2002

46

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [45-1] motion for Summary Judgment received (cdod) (Entered: 01/17/2002)

Jan. 17, 2002

Jan. 17, 2002

47

NOTICE of Filing Affidavits by Ford Motor Company (cdod) (Entered: 01/17/2002)

Jan. 17, 2002

Jan. 17, 2002

48

AFFIDAVIT of Robert F. Burnop Re: [46-1] support memorandum by Ford Motor Company (cdod) (Entered: 01/17/2002)

Jan. 17, 2002

Jan. 17, 2002

49

Agreed ORDER to file pleadings under seal; agreed, entered and filed 01/22/02 ( signed by Judge Jerome B. Friedman ) Copies Mailed: 01/22/02 [EOD Date: 1/22/02] (cdod) (Entered: 01/22/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

50

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in opposition to [32-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton in limine received and filed UNDER SEAL (cdod) (Entered: 01/22/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

51

MOTION by Ford Motor Company to Admit Evidence At Trial Under Federal Rule of Evidence 412(b) filed UNDER SEAL (cdod) (Entered: 01/22/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

52

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [51-1] motion to Admit Evidence At Trial Under Federal Rule of Evidence 412(b) received and filed UNDER SEAL (cdod) (Entered: 01/22/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

53

MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Tina Marie Hampton to Deem Ford's Motion for Summary Judgment Untimely Pursuant to Local Rule 56(a) and in Violation of Local Rule 56(b) and 7(e)(3) (cdod) (Entered: 01/22/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

54

RESPONSE by Ford Motor Company to [37-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton in limine To Strike The Testimony Of Dr. Peter Ash and Prohibit Supplementation of Dr. Ash's Expert Report received (cdod) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

55

TRANSCRIPT for dates of 01/16/02 by OCR Gloria S. Smith (cdod) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

56

OBJECTION by plaintiff Tina Marie Hampton to [45-1] motion by Ford Motor Company for Summary Judgment (cdod) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

57

MOTION by Tina Marie Hampton for an Advisory Jury (cdod) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 23, 2002

Jan. 23, 2002

59

OBJECTION by defendant Ford Motor Company to Plaintiff EEOC's Trial Exhibits (cdod) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

60

OBJECTION by defendant Ford Motor Company to Plaintiff Hampton's Trial Exhibits (cdod) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

61

MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Tina Marie Hampton to Deem Ford's Failure To Provide Objections To Hampton's 26(a)(3) Disclosures Of Exhibits A Waiver (cdod) Modified on 01/24/2002 (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

62

OBJECTION by defendant Ford Motor Company to Plaintiff Hampton's Witness List (cdod) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

63

MOTION by Ford Motor Company in limine to Exclude Evidence Of Incidents Of Alleged Sexual Harassment Not Related To Charging Parties, Incidents Of Alleged Sexual Harassment Occurring After The Charging Parties Discontinued Working At Ford's Norfolk Assembly Plant And Other Charges of Sexual Harassment Filed Against Ford (cdod) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

64

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [63-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

65

MOTION by Ford Motor Company in limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Plaintiff EEOC's Claim For Injunctive Relief (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

66

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [65-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

67

MOTION by Ford Motor Company in limine With Respect To Dr. Barbara Byers' Expected Expert Testimony (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

68

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [67-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

69

MOTION by Ford Motor Company in limine To Exclude Hampton's Calendar (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

70

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [69-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

71

MOTION by Ford Motor Company in limine To Exclude All Evidence Of Alleged Incidents Of Time-Barred Conduct And Incidents Of Harassment Other Than Those Specifically Identified By Plaintiffs As The Basis For Their Complaint (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

72

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [71-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

73

MOTION by Ford Motor Company in limine To Exclude Arguments And Evidence Regarding Punitive Damages (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

74

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [73-1] motion in limine received. (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

76

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [75-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

77

RESPONSE by Ford Motor Company to [39-1] motion by Tina Marie Hampton in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

78

MOTION by Ford Motor Company in limine With Respect To Dr. Barbara Byers' Expected Expert Testimony (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

79

MEMORANDUM by Ford Motor Company in support of [78-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

Pre-Trial Conference held (cdod) (Entered: 01/29/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

80

Final Pretrial Order; Court further grants plaintiff Hampton's Motion to Strike the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as the motion failed to comply with the Local Rule 56; there was no proposed statement of undisputed facts and the statement of facts in the brief was laced with argumentative statements rather than facts; signed in the presence of counsel and entered 01/25/02; filed 01/28/02 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller ) (cdod) (Entered: 01/28/2002)

Jan. 28, 2002

Jan. 28, 2002

Settlement Conference held (cdod) (Entered: 01/30/2002)

Jan. 28, 2002

Jan. 28, 2002

81

RESPONSE by Tina Marie Hampton to [51-1] motion by Ford Motor Company to Admit Evidence At Trial Under Federal Rule of Evidence 412(b) received UNDER SEAL (cdod) (Entered: 01/29/2002)

Jan. 29, 2002

Jan. 29, 2002

81

Rebuttal Brief to Ford's [50-1] opposition memorandum received by plaintiff Hampton UNDER SEAL (cdod) (Entered: 01/29/2002)

Jan. 29, 2002

Jan. 29, 2002

82

Response by Equal Employment to [51-1] motion by Ford Motor Company to Admit Evidence At Trial Under Federal Rule of Evidence 412(b) received. (cdod) (Entered: 01/30/2002)

Jan. 29, 2002

Jan. 29, 2002

83

MEMORANDUM by Tina Marie Hampton in opposition to [75-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 02/01/2002)

Jan. 31, 2002

Jan. 31, 2002

84

MEMORANDUM by Tina Marie Hampton in opposition to [69-1] motion in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 02/01/2002)

Jan. 31, 2002

Jan. 31, 2002

85

RESPONSE by Tina Marie Hampton to [65-1] motion by Ford Motor Company in limine received (cdod) (Entered: 02/01/2002)

Jan. 31, 2002

Jan. 31, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: Virginia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 9, 2001

Closing Date: March 11, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Ford Motor Company, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit