Case: EEOC v. HORIZON/CMS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

1:97-cv-00362 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico

Filed Date: March 19, 1997

Closed Date: Sept. 12, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 1997, the EEOC's Phoenix office filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico against Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation, a state-wide proprietor of over 20 long-term care facilities, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. In essence, the EEOC claimed that the defendant violated the law when it refused to provide modified job duties for several pregnant CNAs who were placed o…

In March 1997, the EEOC's Phoenix office filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico against Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation, a state-wide proprietor of over 20 long-term care facilities, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. In essence, the EEOC claimed that the defendant violated the law when it refused to provide modified job duties for several pregnant CNAs who were placed on lifting restrictions by their physicians and instead terminated their jobs or laid them off. There were a couple major discovery battles in the spring of 1998 that went to the EEOC. Each side moved for summary judgment and, in June 1998, a motion hearing resulted in the EEOC's loss of its disparate impact claim. There was a six day jury trial in September 1998 but, upon its conclusion, the court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP Rule 52(c). The EEOC appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit but, upon appealing, dropped their appeal of the dismissal and instead pursued an appeal of the District Court's grant of summary judgment for the defendant on the disparate impact claim. The Tenth Circuit reversed and remanded in October 2000. The parties had received a new trial date in the District Court but, in August 2001, submitted a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice that ended the case. The stipulation's terms specify that the court would retain jurisdiction over the case for three years to "ensure that both parties abide by their respective obligations." But the filed document does not specify what those obligations were.

Summary Authors

Margo Schlanger (8/7/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:97-cv-00362

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare

Sept. 12, 2001

Sept. 12, 2001

Docket
72

1:97-cv-00362

Order [Granting Motion to Compel]

EEOC v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp.

April 22, 1998

April 22, 1998

Order/Opinion
119

1:97-cv-00362

Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment

EEOC v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation

June 24, 1998

June 24, 1998

Order/Opinion
118

1:97-cv-00362

Memorandum Opinion and Order

EEOC v. Horizon/CMA Healthcare Corporation

June 24, 1998

June 24, 1998

Order/Opinion
178

1:97-cv-00362

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

EEOC v. Horizon/CMS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Oct. 1, 1998

Oct. 1, 1998

Order/Opinion
179

1:97-cv-00362

Judgment

EEOC v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation

Oct. 1, 1998

Oct. 1, 1998

Order/Opinion

1:97-cv-00362

98-02328

[USCA] Judgment

EEOC v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Oct. 30, 2000

Oct. 30, 2000

Order/Opinion

220 F.3d 1184

196

1:97-cv-00362

Stipulation of Dismissal

EEOC v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp.

Aug. 31, 2001

Aug. 31, 2001

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4842336/eeoc-v-horizoncms-healthca/

Last updated Aug. 19, 2025, 3:50 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
118

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi denying motion for summary judgment [105-1] by EEOC; granting in part and denying in part motion for summary judgment [97-1] and granting motion for partial summary judgment as to deft's third affirmative defense [80-1] as further described herein (cc: all counsel, electronically) (jrm) Modified on 06/25/1998

June 24, 1998

June 24, 1998

RECAP
119

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi granting partial summary judgment [118-1] (cc: all counsel, electronically) (jrm) Modified on 06/25/1998

June 24, 1998

June 24, 1998

RECAP
135

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi granting motion for order to limit testimony of Dr Cleveland Pardue [127-1] and granting motion in the alternative, for leave of court to depose Dr Pardue with fees and costs assessed against pltf [127-2] (cc: all counsel, electronically) (jrm)

Sept. 3, 1998

Sept. 3, 1998

RECAP
178

FINDINGS of fact and conclusions of law by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi and Order granting deft's mtn to dismiss pursuant to Rule 52(c) FRCP (cc: all counsel, electronically) (jrm)

Oct. 1, 1998

Oct. 1, 1998

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: New Mexico

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 19, 1997

Closing Date: Sept. 12, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

Settlement

None

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Pregnancy discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits