Case: EEOC v. Walmart Stores, Inc.

2:99-cv-00414 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Filed Date: March 4, 1999

Closed Date: Jan. 23, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 1999, the EEOC San Francisco District Office filed this suit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., America's largest retail chain, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to the docket and the Court's judgment, Wal-Mart violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. Specifically, an EEOC press release states that Wal-Mart utilized a pre-employment questionnaire that sought information about possible disabi…

In March 1999, the EEOC San Francisco District Office filed this suit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., America's largest retail chain, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to the docket and the Court's judgment, Wal-Mart violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. Specifically, an EEOC press release states that Wal-Mart utilized a pre-employment questionnaire that sought information about possible disabilities from applicants before making offers of employment. After some discovery disputes and a failed settlement conference, the parties settled the case in December 2001 through a consent decree.

The very extensive four-year consent decree settled not only this case but also twelve other pending cases against Wal-Mart and required that Wal-Mart pay a total of $6,800,000 ($3,562,491.94 for this case and $3,237,508.10 for the other twelve). Additional requirements of the decree included: compliance with non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses; establishment of a $3,000,000 settlement fund; posting of ADA compliance notices; appointment of a Claims Administrator, Special Master, and ADA Coordinator; ADA training; record keeping; audits; and performance evaluations.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (6/4/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/33559457/parties/equal-employment-v-wal-mart-stores-inc/


Judge(s)

Burrell, Garland Ellis (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Kelley, David T. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Borelli, Kelly L. (California)

Fox, John C. (California)

Muzingo, Gregory S (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:99-cv-00414

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores

Nov. 3, 2005

Nov. 3, 2005

Docket
78

2:99-cv-00414

Judgment

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Oct. 11, 2001

Oct. 11, 2001

Order/Opinion
98

2:99-cv-00414

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Dec. 17, 2001

Dec. 17, 2001

Settlement Agreement

2:99-cv-00414

Comprehensiev EEOC, Wal-Mart Settlement Resolves Disability Lawsuit

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores

No Court

Dec. 17, 2001

Dec. 17, 2001

Press Release

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/33559457/equal-employment-v-wal-mart-stores-inc/

Last updated July 19, 2026, 5:47 a.m.

Docket for: Equal Employment v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 4, 1999

COMPLAINT, fee status waived, assigned to Judge Garland E. Burrell referred to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd (old) (Entered: 03/05/1999)

RECAP
2 March 4, 1999

ORDER setting scheduling conference for 9:00 6/14/99 before Judge Garland E. Burrell (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 03/05/1999)

RECAP
3 March 17, 1999

WAIVER OF SERVICE by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc on 3/5/99 (dd) (Entered: 03/18/1999)

RECAP
4 May 4, 1999

ANSWER by defendant (dd) (Entered: 05/04/1999)

RECAP
5 May 28, 1999

JOINT STATUS REPORT submitted by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (old) (Entered: 06/01/1999)

RECAP
6 June 3, 1999

STATUS ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING the joint status report submitted by the parties, obviated the need for the 6/14/99 status conference; pretrial conference set for 2:30 12/11/00; trial set for 9:00 3/6/01; pltf's designation of expert witnesses due 6/21/00; dft's due 7/5/00; last hrg on dispositive motions set for 9:00 10/23/00; discovery ddl set for 8/23/00 (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 06/03/1999)

RECAP
7 May 30, 2000

STIPULATED MOTION for continuance of the scheduling order dates motion TO BE HEARD by Judge Garland E. Burrell; Motion Hearing not noticed (hk) (Entered: 06/01/2000)

RECAP
May 30, 2000

LODGED substitution of counsel by plaintiff (hk)

8 June 2, 2000

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING SUBSTITUTING attorney David T. Kelley for Equal Employment and substituting attorney Lynn Palma (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 06/02/2000)

RECAP
9 June 2, 2000

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING motion for continuance of the scheduling order dates [7-1] GRANTED pltf's expert disclosure date is 12/21/00; dft's expt disclosure 1/5/01; discovery ddl set for 2/23/01; motion filing ddl set for 9:00 4/30/01; pretrial conference set for 3:30 6/11/01; trial set for 9:00 9/25/01 (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 06/02/2000)

RECAP
10 Feb. 16, 2001

JOINT MOTION to reschedule the date of the hearing on dispositive motions and the pretrial conference by plaintiff and defendant ; motion TO BE HEARD by Judge Garland E. Burrell; Motion Hearing not noticed (ar) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

RECAP
11 Feb. 21, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING that the motion to reschedule the date of the hearing on dispositive motions and the pretrial conference by plaintiff and defendant [10-1] is GRANTED; the 6/3/99 status order is further modified as follows: the last hearing date for motions is SET for 9:00 6/18/01; final pretrial conference SET for 3:30 7/30/01; trial remains SET for 9:00 9/25/01 ; because of the short time-period between the final pretrial conference and the trial date, parties should seek in a timely manner to have the assigned Magistrate Judge preside as their settlement conference judge, should they decide to have this court convene a settlement conference (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 02/21/2001)

RECAP
12 March 2, 2001

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to compel discovery responses by plaintiff Equal Employment ; Motion Hearing Set for 10:00 03/23/01 (ar) (Entered: 03/05/2001)

RECAP
13 March 23, 2001

MINUTES of pltf's motion to compel before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd: due to the parties failure to appear at the scheduled hearing and their further failure to file a joint discovery stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 37-251(c), the Court dropped the matter from calendar [12-1] (ar) (Entered: 03/26/2001)

RECAP
14 April 19, 2001

THIRD JOINT MOTION to extend discovery and to reschedule the date of the hearing on dispositive motions and, if necessary, the pretrial conference by plaintiff and defendant ; Motion Hearing not noticed (ar) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

RECAP
15 April 19, 2001

JOINT MOTION to seek the Magistrate Judge's asistance in settlement and waiver of disqualification by plaintiff and defendant ; Motion Hearing not noticed (ar) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

RECAP
16 April 19, 2001

PROOF OF SERVICE of joint motion to seek the Magistrate judge's assistance and third joint moiton to extend discovery (ar) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

RECAP
17 April 23, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING motion to extend discovery and to reschedule the date of the hearing on dispositive motions and, if necessary, the pretrial conference by plaintiff and defendant [14-1] DENIED (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 04/23/2001)

RECAP
18 April 24, 2001

MINUTES of telephonic conference re the parties joint motion for settlement conference and waiver of disqualification before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd: after hearing, the court denied the parties joint motion for settlement conference without prejudice (ar) (Entered: 04/25/2001)

RECAP
19 July 23, 2001

JOINT MOTION to bifurcate issues of liability and relief on class issues with supporting memorandum by defendant and pltf ; hearing not noticed (kdc) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

RECAP
20 July 23, 2001

JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT (STIPUTLATIONS) from plaintiff, defendant (kdc) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

RECAP
21 July 23, 2001

JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT from plaintiff, defendant (kdc) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

RECAP
22 July 23, 2001

DFT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND POINTS OF LAW submitted by plaintiff, defendant (kdc) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

RECAP
23 July 23, 2001

UNDISPUTED FACTS by plaintiff, defendant to which there is no evidentiary objection (kdc) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

RECAP
July 23, 2001

LODGED proposeed jury instructions by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (kdc)

July 23, 2001

LODGED proposed jury instructions with citations by plaintiff Equal Employment (kdc)

24 July 30, 2001

MINUTES of pretrial conference before Judge Garland E. Burrell further pretrial conference SET for 10:00 8/21/01; jury trial SET for 9:00 9/25/01 (old) (Entered: 07/31/2001)

RECAP
25 July 31, 2001

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell: final telephonic pretrial conference held 10:00 8/21/01; trial set for 9:00 9/25/01; any party may object to this order within 10 court days after the date it is filed; exhibit A through C attached; voir dire and jury instructions attached (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

RECAP
26 July 31, 2001

COURT NOTICE: from Courtroom Deputy M. Gomez that at the request of the parties, a settlement conference has been scheduled for 9:30 08/09/01, before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd; the parties are to submit confidential settlement conference statements to the Court by 08/02/01; settlement conference SET for 9:30 8/9/01 (cc: all counsel) (ar) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

RECAP
27 Aug. 6, 2001

. . .NOTICE by plaintiff Equal Employment of hearing telephonic supplemental final pretrial conference set for 10:30 3/21/02 () (ds) (Entered: 08/07/2001)

RECAP
28 Aug. 6, 2001

COURT NOTICE: settlement conference CONTINUED TO 9:30 8/20/01 before Magistrate Judge Drozd ; confidential settlement conference statements to be submitted to the court by 8/13/01 (cc: all counsel) (ds) (Entered: 08/07/2001)

RECAP
29 Aug. 13, 2001

JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL STATEMENT from plaintiff Equal Employment, defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (lm) (Entered: 08/14/2001)

RECAP
30 Aug. 21, 2001

MINUTES of pretrial conference before Judge Garland E. Burrell: telephonic appearance; further pretrial conference SET for 3:30 4/15/02; 2nd phase of trial SET for 9:00 6/11/02 (old) (Entered: 08/22/2001)

RECAP
32 Aug. 22, 2001

NOTICE by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc of association of attorney Kelly Borelli (mm1) (Entered: 08/23/2001)

RECAP
Aug. 22, 2001

LODGED Application of Gregory S Muzingo for Admission Pro Hac Vice & Order by defendant (mm1)

31 Aug. 23, 2001

AMENDED FINAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell: supplemental telephonic final PTC held on 8/21/01; first phase of trial SET for 9:00 9/25/01; any party may file written objections w/in ten court days after the date this Order is filed; any response due w/in ten court days thereafter; exhibits A-C attached (cc: all counsel) (old) Modified on 08/23/2001 (Entered: 08/23/2001)

RECAP
34 Aug. 23, 2001

MINUTES of settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd: after settlement negotiations, the case did not settle (ar) (Entered: 08/24/2001)

RECAP
33 Aug. 24, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING that the pro hac vice application is GRANTED attorney Gregory S Muzingo allowed to appear pro hac vice for defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 08/24/2001)

RECAP
Aug. 24, 2001

LODGED Application of Gregory S Muzingo for Admission Pro Hac Vice & Order by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (mm1)

Aug. 24, 2001

LODGED Document: Application of Gregory S Muzingo for admission Pro Hac Vice & Order lodged on 8/24/01 (NOT TO BE SIGNED PER JUDGE)(Judge signed identical copy on 8/22/01) (mm1)

35 Sept. 4, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING that counsel's request for a one-day extension of time w/in which to file the Stipulation Re Evidentiary Disagreements is GRANTED; parties provided w/ a fax of this order prior to official service (cc: all counsel) (old) Modified on 09/05/2001 (Entered: 09/04/2001)

RECAP
36 Sept. 5, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING the parties request for the September 10 filing date is GRANTED; If the parties desire to dismiss the Sanders claims as indicated, they should do that (cc: all counsel) (lm) (Entered: 09/06/2001)

RECAP
37 Sept. 7, 2001

OBJECTION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc to pretrial order [31-1] (kdc) (Entered: 09/10/2001)

RECAP
38 Sept. 10, 2001

JOINT TRIAL brief submitted by plaintiff, defendant (kdc) (Entered: 09/12/2001)

RECAP
39 Sept. 10, 2001

JOINT MOTION to modify procedures set forth in the court's amended final pretrial order by plaintiff Equal Employment, defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc motion TO BE HEARD by Judge Garland Burrell ; Motion Hearing Set For 9:00 9/25/01 (kdc) (Entered: 09/12/2001)

RECAP
40 Sept. 10, 2001

JOINT MOTION for severance of the claims relating to Steven Sanders, and to dismiss by plaintiff, defendant motion TO BE HEARD by Judge Garland E. Burrell ; Motion Hearing Set For 9:00 9/25/01 (kdc) (Entered: 09/12/2001)

RECAP
41 Sept. 10, 2001

STIPULATED DISMISSAL of Claim Five pursuant FRCP 41(a)(1) (kdc) (Entered: 09/12/2001)

RECAP
42 Sept. 13, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING motion for severance of the claims relating to Steven Sanders, and to dismiss by plaintiff, defendant [40-1] DENIED, motion to modify procedures set forth in the court's amended final pretrial order by plaintiff Equal Employment, defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc [39-1] DENIED trial RESET for 9:00 10/2/01 (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 09/14/2001)

RECAP
43 Sept. 13, 2001

MINUTE ORDER trial set for 9:00 10/2/01 (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 09/14/2001)

RECAP
44 Sept. 18, 2001

MOTION for extention of time to file joint pleadings by plaintiff Equal Employment motion TO BE HEARD by Judge Garland E. Burrell ; Motion Hearing Set For 9:00 10/2/01 (kdc) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

RECAP
45 Sept. 18, 2001

PROPOSED VERDICT form by plaintiff Equal Employment (kdc) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

RECAP
46 Sept. 18, 2001

STIPULATION on evidentiary disagreements by pltf (kdc) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

RECAP
47 Sept. 18, 2001

TRIAL brief submitted by plaintiff Equal Employment (kdc) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

RECAP
48 Sept. 18, 2001

STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF Claims One and Two (kdc) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

RECAP
49 Sept. 18, 2001

EXHIBITS by plaintiff Equal Employment to pltf's brief [47-1] (kdc) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

RECAP
Sept. 18, 2001

LODGED proposed disputed jruy instructions with citations by plaintiff Equal Employment (kdc)

50 Sept. 21, 2001

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE submitted by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (pink sheet - certificate of service not signed) (mm1) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

RECAP
51 Sept. 21, 2001

TRIAL brief submitted by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (pink sheet - certificate of service not signed) (mm1) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

RECAP
52 Sept. 21, 2001

STATEMENT by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc concerning the nature of the case (pink sheet - certificate of service not signed) (mm1) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

RECAP
53 Sept. 21, 2001

OBJECTIONS by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc to pltf's Special Jury Instructions #'s 34 & 35 (pink sheet - certificate of service not signed) (mm1) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

RECAP
54 Sept. 21, 2001

PROPOSED STATEMENT by plaintiff Equal Employment (mm1) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

RECAP
55 Sept. 21, 2001

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE submitted by plaintiff Equal Employment (mm1) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

RECAP
Sept. 21, 2001

LODGED Joint Proposed Jury Instructions with citations by plaintiff, defendant (mm1)

57 Sept. 25, 2001

JOINT MOTION requesting the court to conduct a supplemental final pretrial conference by plaintiff, defendant motion TO BE HEARD by Judge Garland E. Burrell ; Motion Hearing Set For 9:00 10/2/01 (kdc) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
61 Sept. 25, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING the parties to do additional work on proposed closing jury instructions (cc: all counsel) (lm) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
62 Sept. 25, 2001

RESPONSE by plaintiff Equal Employment to Trial Brief [51-1] (mm1) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
63 Sept. 25, 2001

NOTICE re Partial Joint Proposed Findings & Conclusions of Law by plaintiff Equal Employment (pink sheet - document not signed by defense counsel) (mm1) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
56 Sept. 26, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING defendant's objection to pretrial order [37-1] STRICKEN from the record (cc: all counsel) (lm) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
58 Sept. 26, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING dft's voir dire [50-1] STRICKEN from the record (cc: all counsel) (lm) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
59 Sept. 26, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING dft's objection to pltf's special jury instructions nos 34 & 35 [53-1] STRICKEN from the record (cc: all counsel) (lm) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
60 Sept. 26, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING dtf's statement concerning the nature of the case [52-1] STRICKEN from the record (cc: all counsel) (lm) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
64 Sept. 26, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING pltf's in limine motions [46-1] DENIED; (cc: all counsel) (lm) (Entered: 09/27/2001)

RECAP
65 Sept. 27, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING defendant WalMart Trial Brief [51-1] STRICKEN (cc: all counsel) (mm1) (Entered: 09/27/2001)

RECAP
66 Sept. 28, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING Partial Joint Proposed Findings & Conclusions of Law [63-1] STRICKEN (cc: all counsel) (mm1) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

RECAP
67 Sept. 28, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING that the punitive damage phase of the trial is bifurcated and will occur at the time set for the damage phase of the trial; only the first portion of pltf's provided verdict form will be used at the trial; the Court has drafter two instructions for the parties' consideration, which are attached; revised voir dire is also attached, which is identical to what was previously sent except the trial days have been modified (cc: all counsel) (old) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
Sept. 28, 2001

LODGED commission proposed jury instructions w/ citations by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (old)

Sept. 28, 2001

LODGED joint proposed jury instructions w/ citations (old)

Sept. 28, 2001

LODGED joint proposed jury instructions w/ Judge Burrell's Standard Instructions (old)

69 Oct. 1, 2001

RESPONSE by plaintiff Equal Employment to Order [66-1] (ds) (Entered: 10/02/2001)

RECAP
70 Oct. 1, 2001

REQUEST by plaintiff Equal Employment for substitution of exhibits (ds) (Entered: 10/02/2001)

RECAP
71 Oct. 1, 2001

REQUEST by plaintiff Equal Employment to use graphics during opening and examination (ds) (Entered: 10/02/2001)

RECAP
68 Oct. 2, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING trial set for 9:00 10/10/01 ; attached page of proposed voir dire concerning the trial schedule shows when court will be in session for trial; (cc: all counsel) (ds) Modified on 10/02/2001 (Entered: 10/02/2001)

RECAP
72 Oct. 2, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING parties to finalize proposed jury instructions; jury instructions, a preliminary Instruction No 2 and a proposed verdict form are attached (cc: all counsel) (kdc) Modified on 10/03/2001 (Entered: 10/03/2001)

RECAP
73 Oct. 2, 2001

REQUEST by plaintiff Equal Employment for one week extension of trial date (kdc) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

RECAP
74 Oct. 2, 2001

DECLARATION of A R Koopah DDS in support of request for continuance [73-1] (kdc) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

RECAP
75 Oct. 4, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING revised proposed verdict form and jury instructions 11 and 14 (cc: all counsel) (mdp) (Entered: 10/09/2001)

RECAP
Oct. 4, 2001

LODGED proposed jury instruction on intent by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (kdc)

76 Oct. 9, 2001

JOINT MOTION to modify the court's 8/23/01 amended final pretrial order to extend the notice to potential class members by plaintiff, defendant ; hearing not noticed (kdc) (Entered: 10/10/2001)

RECAP
77 Oct. 9, 2001

ADMISSION OF LIABILITY and stipulation for entry of judgment on liability by defendant (kdc) (Entered: 10/10/2001)

RECAP
84 Oct. 9, 2001

STIPULATION for entry of judgment (kdc) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

RECAP
Oct. 9, 2001

LODGED judgment submitted (kdc)

78 Oct. 11, 2001

JUDGMENT by Judge Garland E. Burrell: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Wal-Mart Stores violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by engaging in a practice of making disability related inquiries (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 10/11/2001)

RECAP
79 Oct. 11, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING motion to modify the court's 8/23/01 amended final pretrial order to extend the notice to potential class members by plaintiff, defendant [76-1] GRANTED (cc: all counsel) (kdc) (Entered: 10/11/2001)

RECAP
80 Oct. 22, 2001

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to shorten time for scheduling the hearing by plaintiff Equal Employment ; Motion Hearing not noticed (ar) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

RECAP
81 Oct. 22, 2001

MOTION to compel and to shorten the time to respond by plaintiff Equal Employment ; Motion Hearing Set for 11/09/01 (ar) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

RECAP
82 Oct. 22, 2001

AFFIDAVIT of Lynn L. Palma in support of of plaintiff's motion to compel and to shorten time to respond [81-1], and of expedited consideration [80-1] (ar) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

RECAP
83 Oct. 30, 2001

ORDER SHORTENING TIME by Dale A Drozd Magistrate Judge ORDERING motion to shorten time for scheduling the hearing by plaintiff Equal Employment [80-1] GRANTED; motion to compel and to shorten the time to respond by plaintiff Equal Employment [81-1] HEARING SET FOR 10:00 11/9/01; dft's written opposition, if any, shall be filed and served by 11/07/01; any reply will be heard at the hearing (cc: all counsel) (ar) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

RECAP
85 Nov. 7, 2001

UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time within which to commence notice to putative class members by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc ; Motion TO BE HEARD by Judge Garland E Burrell; Motion hearing not noticed (mm1) (Entered: 11/08/2001)

RECAP
86 Nov. 9, 2001

MINUTES before Magistrate Judge Dale A Drozd motion to compel and to shorten the time to respond by plaintiff Employment [81-1] GRANTED; defense counsel tp provide responses on or before close of business on 11/13/01; court to prepare written order (mm1) (Entered: 11/13/2001)

RECAP
87 Nov. 9, 2001

ORDER by Judge Garland E. Burrell ORDERING motion for extension of time within which to commence notice to putative class members by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc [85-1] GRANTED (cc: all counsel) (daw) (Entered: 11/13/2001)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 4, 1999

Closing Date: Jan. 23, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of California 2:99-cv-00414

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Auditing

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Monitoring

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Utilize objective hiring/promotion criteria

Utilize objective job description

Amount Defendant Pays: 6800000

Order Duration: 2001 - 2005

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Medical Exam / Inquiry

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Recommended Citation