Case: Cooper v. IBM Personal Pension Plan

3:99-cv-00829 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Nov. 1, 1999

Closed Date: Jan. 16, 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On October 16, 2005 the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit based on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §1001 against IBM Personal Pension Plan in United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The plaintiffs alleged that amendments made to their pension plans when it was transformed from a traditional cash balance plan to a defined benefit plan based on a point system constituted age discrimination. Specifically they alleged that the change…

On October 16, 2005 the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit based on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §1001 against IBM Personal Pension Plan in United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The plaintiffs alleged that amendments made to their pension plans when it was transformed from a traditional cash balance plan to a defined benefit plan based on a point system constituted age discrimination. Specifically they alleged that the changes were discriminatory because rather than defining benefits by salary at retirement the plan now defined benefits based on time served and salary and awarded interest to employees who left IBM before retirement. Hence the benefits for an employee who spent 20 years at IBM between the ages of 25 and 45 would be greater than those for an employee who spent 20 years at IBM at the same salary between the ages of 45 and 65. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought damages and attorneys' fees and costs.

On September 17, 2001 the district court (Judge Murphy) certified the suit as a class action and separated three classes depending on how long the relevant members had been with IBM. On July 31, 2003 the court granted the plaintiffs summary judgment and found that the pension plan did discriminate based on age. Before appeal the case moved to the determination of damages and two settlement agreements were reached with the subclasses and were approved by the court on January 10, 2005 and August 16, 2005. The settlement agreement set total damages to be paid to the plaintiff's and their attorneys at $1,714,293,000 should the district court's ruling regarding liability be upheld on appeal.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (Judge Easterbrook, Judge Bauer, and Judge Manion) heard arguments on February 16, 2006 and reversed the district court on August 7, 2006. The court held that the alleged age discrimination stemmed only from the effect of time on money through compound interest and that this did not constitute age discrimination. The case was concluded on January 16, 2007 when the Supreme Court denied plaintiffs' petition for a writ of certiorari.

Summary Authors

Michael Perry (8/21/2010)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4741019/parties/cooper-v-ibm-personal-pension/


Judge(s)

Bauer, William Joseph (Illinois)

Cohn, Gerald B. (Illinois)

Easterbrook, Frank Hoover (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Carr, William K. (Colorado)

Attorney for Defendant
Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Bruce, Stephen (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

05-03588

Docket

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Jan. 22, 2007

Jan. 22, 2007

Docket

3:99-cv-00829

Docket [PACER]

Feb. 11, 2008

Feb. 11, 2008

Docket
41

3:99-cv-00829

Second Amended Complaint

Oct. 16, 2000

Oct. 16, 2000

Complaint
193

3:99-cv-00829

Order (Granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denying defendant's motion to dismiss)

July 31, 2003

July 31, 2003

Order/Opinion

274 F.Supp.2d 1010

285

3:99-cv-00829

Final Order as to Subclass 3

Jan. 10, 2005

Jan. 10, 2005

Order/Opinion
358

3:99-cv-00829

Memorandum and Order (Awarding fees and costs)

Aug. 16, 2005

Aug. 16, 2005

Order/Opinion

2005 WL 1981501

359

3:99-cv-00829

Memorandum and Order (Approving settlement agreement as to subclasses 1 and 2).

Aug. 16, 2005

Aug. 16, 2005

Order/Opinion
360

3:99-cv-00829

Judgment in a Civil Case

Aug. 16, 2005

Aug. 16, 2005

Order/Opinion

05-03588

Opinion (Reversing the District Court)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Aug. 7, 2006

Aug. 7, 2006

Order/Opinion

457 F.3d 636

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4741019/cooper-v-ibm-personal-pension/

Last updated April 6, 2025, 1:59 p.m.

Docket for: Cooper v. IBM Personal Pension
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 1, 1999

COMPLAINT Filing fee pd $ 150.00 receipt # 300 63667 (car) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

PACER
Nov. 1, 1999

Magistrate identification: Mag/Judge Clifford J. Proud (car) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

PACER
2 Nov. 9, 1999

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER #138 Case reassigned to Judge G. P. Murphy (cc: all counsel) (myz) (Entered: 11/16/1999)

PACER
3 Dec. 3, 1999

AMENDED COMPLAINT [1−1] by plaintiff Kathi Cooper (dmb) (Entered: 12/09/1999)

PACER
4 Jan. 3, 2000

CJRA Track C assigned by Judge G. P. Murphy; trial set for presumptive month of 3/01 before Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (dmb) (Entered: 01/05/2000)

PACER
5 Jan. 20, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff Kathi Cooper to certify class action (tjh) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

PACER
6 Jan. 20, 2000

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Kathi Cooper in support of motion to certify class action [5−1] (tjh) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

PACER
7 Feb. 17, 2000

STIPULATION (MOTION) by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension, and plaintiff Kathi Cooper to extend time to answer (tjh) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

PACER
8 Feb. 22, 2000

ORDER by Mag/Judge Clifford J. Proud granting motion to extend time to 3/14/00 to answer [7−1] (cc: all counsel) (dmw) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

PACER
10 March 10, 2000

CONSENT MOTION by Ameritech for extension of time to answer the complaint (fe) (Entered: 03/15/2000)

PACER
9 March 14, 2000

NOTICE of hearing re motion for class certification [5−1] ORAL ARGUMENTS set 1:30 PM on 4/17/00 before Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (lmc) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

PACER
11 March 20, 2000

ORDER by Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion for extension of time to answer the complaint [10−1]; defendants shall answer the amended complaint on or before 4/03/00 [3−1] ; status conf set for 1:30 PM on 4/17/00 before Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL; brief ddl set 4/3/00 . The Court will address the need for a briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion for class certification [5−1] at the status conference (cc: all counsel) (myz) (Entered: 03/23/2000)

PACER
12 March 30, 2000

NOTICE of Telephone Sched/Disc Conf set for 9:00 AM on 5/15/00 before Mag/Judge Clifford J. Proud in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (dmw) (Entered: 03/31/2000)

PACER
13 April 3, 2000

ANSWER by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension to [3−1] with affirmative defenses (acm) (Entered: 04/05/2000)

PACER
14 April 17, 2000

MINUTES (lc) of hearing on status conference before Judge G. P. Murphy ; Status conference held 4/17/00 motion to class action [5−1] resp due 5/12/00 ; Court will notify Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud to cancel conf set for 5/15/00 at 9:00 AM (C/R: Molly Clayton) (dmw) (Entered: 04/25/2000)

PACER
15 May 12, 2000

MOTION by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension to dismiss Count I of First Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to the 1999 plan amendments and Count II in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (acm) (Entered: 05/15/2000)

PACER
16 May 12, 2000

BRIEF (MEMORANDUM) by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension in support of motion to dismiss Count I of the First Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to the 1999 plan amendments and Count II in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [15−1] (acm) (Entered: 05/15/2000)

PACER
17 May 12, 2000

MEMORANDUM by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension in opposition to motion to certify class action [5−1] (acm) (Entered: 05/15/2000)

PACER
19 May 19, 2000

NOTICE of hearing re motion to dismiss [15−1],motion for class certification [5−1] ORAL ARGUMENTS set 3:00 PM on 7/31/00 before Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (lmc) (Entered: 05/19/2000)

PACER
20 May 31, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff Kathi Cooper to extend time to file reply in support of motion for class certification and memo in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss (acm) (Entered: 06/06/2000)

PACER
21 June 7, 2000

ORDER by Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion to extend time to file reply in support of motion for class certification and memo in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss [20−1]; motion to certify class action [5−1] reply due 6/19/00 (cc: all counsel) (myz) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

PACER
22 June 19, 2000

NOTICE of change of address as to attorney William K. Carr (myz) (Entered: 06/23/2000)

PACER
23 June 19, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff Kathi Cooper to file reply in support of motion for class certification in excess of page limitation (myz) (Entered: 06/23/2000)

PACER
24 June 19, 2000

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Kathi Cooper in opposition to motion to dismiss Count I of First Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to the 1999 plan amendments and Count II in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [15−1] (myz) . (Entered: 06/23/2000)

PACER
June 19, 2000

VOLUME NUMBER 2 created, beginning with document number 24. (myz) (Entered: 07/11/2000)

PACER
June 26, 2000

VOLUME NUMBER 3 created, beginning with document number 25. (myz) (Entered: 07/11/2000)

PACER
26 June 27, 2000

ORDER by Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion to file reply in support of motion for class certification in excess of page limitation [23−1] (cc: all counsel) (myz) (Entered: 06/30/2000)

PACER
27 June 27, 2000

REPLY by plaintiff Kathi Cooper in support to motion to certify class action [5−1] (myz) (Entered: 06/30/2000)

PACER
28 June 27, 2000

CONSENT MOTION by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension to extend time to reply to plaintiff's response in opposition to defendants motion opposing class certification and motion to dismiss (myz) (Entered: 06/30/2000)

PACER
25 June 29, 2000

NOTICE of hearing re motion for class certification [5−1] ORAL ARGUMENTS RESET at 1:30 PM on 8/21/00 before Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (lmc) (Entered: 06/29/2000)

PACER
29 July 5, 2000

REPLY by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension to response to motion to dismiss Count I of First Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to the 1999 plan amendments and Count II in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [15−1] (myz) (Entered: 07/11/2000)

PACER
30 July 5, 2000

ORDER by Judge G. P. Murphy denying motion to extend time to reply to plaintiff's response in opposition to defendants motion opposing class certification [28−1]. As to the request for additional time to file a reply in support of defendants' motion to dismiss, however, the motion for extension of tim eis granted. Defendants' reply shall be filed no later than 7/06/00 (cc: all counsel) (myz) (Entered: 07/11/2000)

PACER
31 July 18, 2000

NOTICE of hearing re motion for class certification [5−1] ORAL ARGUMENTS set 1:30 PM on 9/5/00 before Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (lmc) (Entered: 07/18/2000)

PACER
32 Aug. 29, 2000

MOTION by defendants for leave to supplement pending motion papers (four recent cases attached) (acm) Modified on 09/07/2000 (Entered: 08/31/2000)

PACER
33 Aug. 30, 2000

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Kathi Cooper in opposition to motion for leave to supplement pending motion papers [32−1] (tjh) (Entered: 08/31/2000)

PACER
35 Sept. 6, 2000

ORDER by Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion for leave to supplement pending motion papers (four recent cases are attached to) [32−1] (cc: all counsel) (acm) Modified on 09/07/2000 (Entered: 09/07/2000)

PACER
36 Sept. 12, 2000

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension on the standing issue re motion to dismiss Count I of First Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to the 1999 plan amendments and Count II in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [15−1] (tjh) (Entered: 09/13/2000)

PACER
37 Sept. 13, 2000

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION by plaintiff Kathi Cooper re motion to dismiss Count I of First Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to the 1999 plan amendments and Count II in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [15−1] (tjh) (Entered: 09/14/2000)

PACER
38 Sept. 15, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff Kathi Cooper for leave to file second amended complaint (tjh) (Entered: 09/20/2000)

PACER
39 Oct. 4, 2000

RESPONSE by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension to motion for leave to file second amended complaint [38−1] (tjh) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

PACER
40 Oct. 16, 2000

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion for leave to file second amended complaint [38−1], denying motion to dismiss Count I of First Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to the 1999 plan amendments and Count II in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as moot [15−1], dismissing without prejudice to refiling motion to certify class action [5−1]; directing the clerk to file secind amended complaint instanter ; brief ddl set for 11/15/00 for parties to agree to a schedule including a deadline for discovery related related to the class certification and once the briefing is complete the motion for class certification will be set for hearing (cc: all counsel) (fe) (Entered: 10/18/2000)

PACER
41 Oct. 16, 2000

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [3−1] by plaintiff Kathi Cooper, terminating unknown Ameritech; adding Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim (fe) (Entered: 10/18/2000)

PACER
42 Oct. 31, 2000

MOTION by defendants for extension of time of responsive pleading date from November 1 to November 8, 2000 (fe) (Entered: 11/03/2000)

PACER
43 Nov. 7, 2000

ORDER by Mag/Judge Clifford J. Proud granting motion for extension of time of responsive pleading date from November 1 to November 8, 2000 [42−1] (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 11/09/2000)

PACER
44 Nov. 7, 2000

ANSWER by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension to second amended complaint [41−1] (tjh) (Entered: 11/09/2000)

PACER
45 Nov. 13, 2000

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff Kathi Cooper by William K. Carr (fe) (Entered: 11/17/2000)

PACER
Nov. 14, 2000

JOINT REPORT of parties and proposed scheduling and discovery order by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim received and submitted to Mag/Judge Clifford J. Proud (tjh) Modified on 11/14/2000 (Entered: 11/14/2000)

PACER
Nov. 14, 2000

TRANSCRIPT of Motion for Class Certification; held 9/5/00; 1 volume(s) Court Reporter: Molly Clayton (tjh) (Entered: 11/16/2000)

PACER
46 Nov. 15, 2000

ORDER by Mag/Judge Clifford J. Proud adopting joint report of the parties regarding class certification briefing schedule ... see order for specifics ... (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 11/21/2000)

PACER
47 Nov. 15, 2000

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy of the following: plaintiffs shall file renewed motion for class certification (brief ddl set) on or before 12/20/00; defendants' shall file response on or before 1/22/01; plaintiffs shall file reply on or before 1/29/01 motion for class certification [5−1] is set for hearing on 1:30 PM on 2/12/01 before Chief Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 11/21/2000)

PACER
48 Dec. 21, 2000

RENEWED MOTION by plaintiffs Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim for class certification (myz) (Entered: 12/28/2000)

PACER
49 Dec. 21, 2000

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim in support of motion for class certification [48−1] (myz) (Entered: 12/28/2000)

PACER
50 Jan. 19, 2001

CONSENT MOTION by defendant IBM Corporation for extension of time to file response to motion for class certification (tjh) (Entered: 01/24/2001)

PACER
51 Jan. 25, 2001

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion for extension of time to file response to motion for class certification [50−1], motion for class certification [48−1] resp due 1/29/01 (cc: all counsel) (dmw) (Entered: 01/29/2001)

PACER
52 Jan. 29, 2001

MEMORANDUM by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension in opposition to motion for class certification [48−1] (fe) (Entered: 01/30/2001)

PACER
53 Feb. 5, 2001

REPLY by plaintiff Kathi Cooper, plaintiff Beth Harrington, plaintiff Matthew Hillesheim in support of plaintiffs' renewed motion for class certification [48−1] (tjh) (Entered: 02/08/2001)

PACER
54 Feb. 8, 2001

MOTION by defendants to postpone hearing or for alternative relief (fe) (Entered: 02/16/2001)

PACER
55 Feb. 9, 2001

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion to postpone hearing or for alternative relief [54−1] ; the class certification hrg is reset for 9:00 AM on 3/26/01 before Chief Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (fe) (Entered: 02/16/2001)

PACER
56 March 26, 2001

MINUTES of hearing on Motion for Class Certification (jmf) before Chief Judge G. P. Murphy. The Court grants parties 10 days to file additional briefs re [48−1]. The matter is taken under advisement until review of the supplemental briefs ; In−court hearing held 3/26/01 (C/R: Molly Clayton) (myz) (Entered: 03/29/2001)

PACER
March 29, 2001

TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; held 3/26/01; 1 volume(s) Court Reporter: Molly Clayton (fe) (Entered: 03/30/2001)

PACER
58 April 3, 2001

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy ...see order for specifics... (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

PACER
57 April 5, 2001

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF by defendants IBM Corporation and IBM Personal Pension in opposition to plaintiffs renewed motion for class certification [48−1] (scj) Modified on 04/10/2001 (Entered: 04/10/2001)

PACER
59 April 9, 2001

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim regarding renewed motion for class certification [48−1] (tjh) (Entered: 04/12/2001)

PACER
60 April 17, 2001

MOTION by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension to strike plaintiffs' supplemental brief in support of renewed motion for class certification (tjh) (Entered: 04/19/2001)

PACER
61 April 27, 2001

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to motion to strike plaintiffs' supplemental brief in support of renewed motion for class certification [60−1] (car) (Entered: 05/03/2001)

PACER
62 May 21, 2001

MOTION by defendant IBM Corporation, defendant IBM Personal Pension for leave to file supplemental authority for pending class certification motion (jmf) (Entered: 05/31/2001)

PACER
63 June 4, 2001

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion for leave to file supplemental authority for pending class certification motion [62−1] ; brief ddl set 6/15/01 (cc: all counsel) (scj) (Entered: 06/08/2001)

PACER
65 July 20, 2001

MOTION by defendants for protective order (dmw) (Entered: 07/23/2001)

PACER
66 July 24, 2001

ORDER by Mag/Judge Clifford J. Proud recusing himself as magistrate; Magistrate now becomes Gerald B. Cohn (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 07/30/2001)

PACER
July 24, 2001

Magistrate identification: Mag/Judge Gerald B. Cohn (tjh) (Entered: 07/30/2001)

PACER
67 Aug. 8, 2001

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, and Matthew Hillesheim in opposition to motion for protective order [65−1] (scj) (Entered: 08/10/2001)

PACER
68 Aug. 20, 2001

REPLY by defendants IBM Corporation and IBM Personal Pension re motion for protection order [65−1] (scj) (Entered: 08/22/2001)

PACER
Aug. 20, 2001

VOLUME NUMBER 4 created, beginning with document number 68. (tjh) (Entered: 09/25/2001)

PACER
69 Aug. 31, 2001

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn granting motion for protective order [65−1] (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 09/06/2001)

PACER
70 Sept. 17, 2001

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy denying motion to strike plaintiffs' supplemental brief in support of renewed motion for class certification [60−1]; granting motion for class certification [48−1] and defining the class and subclasses (see Order for specifics); the Court appoints plaintiffs as class representatives and appoints Steven A. Katz, Douglas R. Sprong, and William K. Carr as counsel for the class and subclasses (cc: all counsel) (car) Modified on 09/18/2001 (Entered: 09/18/2001)

PACER
71 Sept. 20, 2001

MOTION by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, and Matthew Hillesheim to amend class certification order (tjh) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

PACER
72 Sept. 27, 2001

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff Kathi Cooper by John H. Evans, Robert F. Hill (fe) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

PACER
73 Oct. 3, 2001

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion to amend class certification order [71−1] adding attorney Robert F. Hill and John H. Evans as counsel for the class and subclasses nunc pro tunc 9/17/01 (cc: all counsel) (fe) (Entered: 10/05/2001)

PACER
74 Oct. 9, 2001

JOINT MOTION to withdraw Michael S. Horne as counsel for defendants IBM Corporation and IBM Personal Pension and substituting with Jeffrey G. Huvelle and Robert D. Wick (scj) (Entered: 10/10/2001)

PACER
75 Oct. 22, 2001

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn granting motion to withdraw Michael S. Horne as counsel for defendants IBM Corporation and IBM Personal Pension and substituting with Jeffrey G. Huvelle and Robert D. Wick [74−1] withdrawing attorney Michael S. Horne for IBM Pension and for IBM Corporation ; adding attorney Jeffrey G Huvelle and Robert D Wick for defendants IBM Corporation and IBM Personal Pension (cc: all counsel) (scj) (Entered: 10/29/2001)

PACER
76 Nov. 20, 2001

JOINT MOTION by plaintiffs &defendants regarding joint report of parties and proposed scheduling and discovery order (to continue) (dmw) (Entered: 11/26/2001)

PACER
77 Nov. 29, 2001

SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn ; presumptive trial reset for 1/03 and final prtrl conf set 12/9/02 before Chief Judge G. P. Murphy in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL; settlement conf set 9:00 AM on 12/2/02 before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL; disp mtn filing ddl 10/15/02; discovery ddl set 9/20/02 (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 12/04/2001)

PACER
78 Feb. 8, 2002

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn resetting settlement conf at 9:00 AM on 12/5/02 before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 02/12/2002)

PACER
80 Feb. 21, 2002

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn granting motion for extension of time to file amended complaint [79−1] up to and including 3/7/02 (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 03/01/2002)

PACER
81 April 3, 2002

MOTION by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim for filing of agreed protective order (tjh) (Entered: 04/09/2002)

PACER
82 April 12, 2002

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn granting motion for filing of agreed protective order [81−1] (cc: all counsel) (dmw) (Entered: 04/17/2002)

PACER
83 April 18, 2002

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy denying motion for filing of agreed protective order [81−1]; vacating Magistrate Judge Cohn's 4/12/02 order [82−1] order (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 04/18/2002)

PACER
84 July 15, 2002

MOTION by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim to suspend local rule 7.1(g) and for leave to file brief in excess of ten pages (tjh) (Entered: 07/17/2002)

PACER
85 July 17, 2002

REQUESTS for admission by defendants (dmw) (Entered: 07/19/2002)

PACER
86 July 18, 2002

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion to suspend local rule 7.1(g) [84−1] and for leave to file brief in excess of ten pages [84−2] (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 07/24/2002)

PACER
87 July 18, 2002

MOTION by Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim for partial summary judgment on count 1 received on 7/15/02 (tjh) (Entered: 07/24/2002)

PACER
88 July 18, 2002

BRIEF (MEMORANDUM) by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, and Matthew Hillesheim in support of motion for partial summary judgment on count 1 received on 7/15/02 [87−1] (attachments located in expando folder) (tjh) (Entered: 07/24/2002)

PACER
89 July 25, 2002

MOTION by defendants IBM Corporation, IBM Personal Pension to suspend the packet rule for dispositive motions (order) , and to modify the page limit , and to extend the time for filing for their opposition to plaintiffs' pending motion for partial summary judgment (dlr) (Entered: 07/29/2002)

PACER
90 July 29, 2002

ORDER by Chief Judge G. P. Murphy granting motion to suspend the packet rule for dispositive motions (order) [89−1], to modify the page limit [89−2], and to extend the time for filing for their opposition to plaintiffs' pending motion for partial summary judgment [89−3]; response to motion for partial summary judgment on count 1 received on 7/15/02 [87−1] due 9/20/02 (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

PACER
91 Aug. 9, 2002

MOTION by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim for extension of time to respond to defendants' requests for admission and third set of interrogatories (tjh) (Entered: 08/13/2002)

PACER
92 Aug. 9, 2002

MOTION by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim to compel discovery (tjh) (Entered: 08/13/2002)

PACER
93 Aug. 12, 2002

MOTION by plaintiffs' Kathi Cooper, Beth Harrington, Matthew Hillesheim for extension of time to respond to requests for admission (tjh) (Entered: 08/13/2002)

PACER
94 Aug. 14, 2002

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn granting motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' requests for admission and third set of interrogatories [91−1] (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 08/15/2002)

PACER
95 Aug. 14, 2002

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn granting motion for extension of time to respond to requests for admission [93−1] (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 08/15/2002)

PACER
Aug. 19, 2002

FILE checked out by Kwik Kopy consisting of 4 volumes pleadings and 1 appendix to doc 88. Record due back 8/29/02 (trb) (Entered: 08/21/2002)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Private Employment Class Actions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 1, 1999

Closing Date: Jan. 16, 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All individuals who participated in the IBM Personal Pension Plan at any time after December 31, 1994.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

IBM Personal Pension Plan

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Illinois 3:99-cv-00829

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 05-03588

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Pay / Benefits

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

Recommended Citation