Case: Wagner v. Nutrasweet Co.

1:92-cv-02418 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: April 8, 1992

Closed Date: 1995

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 8, 1992, a former female employee of defendant filed a lawsuit against defendant under the Equal Pay Act, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Chicago Division. The plaintiff, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging discriminatory compensation and discriminatory termination based on sex. Later on, other former female employees of defendant joined the action …

On April 8, 1992, a former female employee of defendant filed a lawsuit against defendant under the Equal Pay Act, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Chicago Division. The plaintiff, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging discriminatory compensation and discriminatory termination based on sex. Later on, other former female employees of defendant joined the action as plaintiffs.

Defendant argued that plaintiffs could not maintain a cause of action because each signed a release in which they knowingly and voluntarily released defendant from any and all claims arising from their employment or separation of employment. On October 17, 1994, the court (Judge Castillo) held that the plaintiffs' failure to tender redeployment pay barred their claims. Moreover, the court denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification on the ground that the proposed class failed to meet the typicality and commonality requirements.

On August 29, 1995, the court (Judge Castillo) granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, holding that evidence did not support the plaintiff's discriminatory compensation and gender discrimination claim.

The plaintiffs appealed. On September 5, 1996, the 7th Circuit (Judge Wood) affirmed part of the district court's decision, but vacated the order denying request for class certification.

In light of the appellate opinion, on January 1997, the district court (Judge Castillo) granted the plaintiffs' motion for class certification. However, on June 15, 1998, the parties reached a settlement, and the court (Judge Castillo) approved the settlement. The terms of the settlement are not available.

Summary Authors

Kunyi Zhang (11/23/2010)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9997304/parties/wagner-v-nutrasweet-co/


Judge(s)

Castillo, Rubén (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Burger, Joan Harlow (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Abram, Thomas G. (Illinois)

Belmont, Carlys Elizabeth (Illinois)

Donmoyer, Karen Taylor (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:92-cv-02418

Docket

July 21, 1998

July 21, 1998

Docket
97

1:92-cv-02418

Memorandum Opinion and Order (Denied class certification)

Oct. 13, 1994

Oct. 13, 1994

Order/Opinion

873 F.Supp. 87

139

1:92-cv-02418

Memorandum Opinion and Order (Motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Wagner granted)

Aug. 29, 1995

Aug. 29, 1995

Order/Opinion

900 F.Supp. 959

1:92-cv-02418

7th Circuit Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Sept. 5, 1996

Sept. 5, 1996

Order/Opinion

95 F.3d 527

158

1:92-cv-02418

Memorandum Opinion and Order (motion for class certification granted)

Jan. 9, 1997

Jan. 9, 1997

Order/Opinion

170 F.R.D. 448

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9997304/wagner-v-nutrasweet-co/

Last updated Sept. 22, 2026, 8:02 p.m.

Docket for: Wagner v. Nutrasweet Co
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 8, 1992

COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of Paul William Mollica, Laurie Arden Wardell, Joan Harlow Burger, Thomas R. Meites as attorney(s) for plaintiff with Rule 39 affidavits ( 1 and 1 copy summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 thru 1-7) (tlm) (Entered: 04/14/1992)

RECAP
2 April 8, 1992

CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENT (tlm) (Entered: 04/14/1992)

RECAP
3 April 9, 1992

NOTICE of written consent to join as a party plaintiff by Catherine E. Wagner; notice of filing. (tlm) (Entered: 04/15/1992)

RECAP
April 14, 1992

RECEIPT regarding payment of filing fee paid; on 4/8/92 in the amount of $ 120.00, receipt # 392159. (tlm) (Entered: 04/14/1992)

PACER
April 14, 1992

MAILED copy of complaint &docket sheet to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and cover letter. (tlm) Modified on 04/14/1992 (Entered: 04/14/1992)

PACER
April 14, 1992

RECEIPT regarding payment of filing fee paid; on 4/8/92 in the amount of $ 120.00, receipt # 392159. (tlm)

April 14, 1992

MAILED copy of complaint & docket sheet to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and cover letter. (tlm) Modified on 04/14/1992

4 May 21, 1992

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Richard C. Robin, Thomas G. Abram, Edward C. Jepson Jr., Carlys Elizabeth Belmont, Karen L. Taylor (fce) (Entered: 05/21/1992)

RECAP
5 May 21, 1992

RULE 39 Affidavit of Richard C. Robin (fce) (Entered: 05/21/1992)

RECAP
6 May 21, 1992

RULE 39 Affidavit of Thomas G. Abram (fce) (Entered: 05/21/1992)

RECAP
7 May 21, 1992

RULE 39 Affidavit of Edward C. Jepson Jr. (fce) (Entered: 05/21/1992)

RECAP
8 May 21, 1992

RULE 39 Affidavit of Carlys Elizabeth Belmont (fce) (Entered: 05/21/1992)

RECAP
9 May 21, 1992

RULE 39 Affidavit of Karen L. Taylor (fce) (Entered: 05/21/1992)

RECAP
10 May 21, 1992

MOTION by defendant to extend time to answer or otherwise plead ; notice of motion (Exhibit). (tlm) (Entered: 05/22/1992)

RECAP
11 May 21, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 5/21/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Defendant's motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead [10-1] is entered and continued to 05/28/92 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 05/22/1992)

RECAP
12 June 9, 1992

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT and affirmative defenses by defendant; notice of filing. (tlm) (Entered: 06/10/1992)

RECAP
13 June 30, 1992

CONSOLIDATED MOTION by plaintiff to certify a class action and for leave to give notice (Exhibits) ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 07/06/1992)

RECAP
14 June 30, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 6/30/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : On plaintiff's motion to certify a class action [13-1] defendant to respond by 08/20/92; plaintiff's reply brief due 9/3/92. Status hearing held and continued to 12/18/92 at 9:30 a.m. All discovery is referred to Magistrate Pallmeyer. No notice (tlm) (Entered: 07/06/1992)

RECAP
15 July 9, 1992

REFERRAL ORDER of 07/08/92: Case referred to the calendar of Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer pursuant to General Rule 2.41(b). to hear and enter order(s) on discovery motion (s). Mailed notice (vkd) (Entered: 07/13/1992)

RECAP
16 July 23, 1992

MOTION by plaintiff to compel discovery (Exhibits); notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 07/24/1992)

RECAP
17 July 23, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 7/23/92 by Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : Answer grief to motion due 08/13/92. [16-1] Reply to answer brief due 8/20/92. Ruling on motion to compel discovery set for 08/28/92 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 07/24/1992)

RECAP
18 July 30, 1992

MOTION by defendant to file brief in excess of 15 pages ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 07/31/1992)

RECAP
19 July 30, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 7/30/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Defendant's motion for leave to file memorandum in opposition to plaintiff's consolidated motion to certify class in excess of 15 pages is granted. [18-1] Plaintiff may file its reply in excess of 15 pages. [13-1] Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 07/31/1992)

RECAP
20 July 30, 1992

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by defendant in opposition to plaintiff's consolidated motion to certify a class action (Exhibits); notice of filing. [13-1] (tlm) (Entered: 07/31/1992)

RECAP
21 Aug. 13, 1992

UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff for enlargement of time to file reply to motion for certification to 09/03/92 ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

RECAP
22 Aug. 13, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 8/13/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Plaintiff's motion for for an enlargement of time to file its reply brief to the motion for class certification to 09/10/92 is granted. [21-1] Defendant granted to 09/20/92 in which to file a surreply. The parties to accelerate discovery on the class certification issue. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

RECAP
23 Aug. 13, 1992

MOTION by defendant for enlargement of time to file response to plaintiff's motion to compel ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

RECAP
24 Aug. 13, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 8/13/92 by Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : Defendant's motion is granted. [23-1 ]Defendant to file response to plaintiff's motion to compel or or before [16-1] 08/27/92. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

RECAP
25 Aug. 13, 1992

SECOND MOTION by plaintiff to compel discovery (Exhibit) ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

RECAP
26 Aug. 13, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 8/13/92 by Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : Answer brief to motion to compel discovery [25-1] due 08/20/92. Reply to answer brief due 8/25/92. Ruling on 2nd motion to compel discovery set for 08/26/92 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

RECAP
27 Aug. 20, 1992

OPPOSITION by defendant to plaintiff's first motion to compel discovery; notice off filing (Exhibits). [16-1] (tlm) (Entered: 08/21/1992)

RECAP
28 Aug. 20, 1992

RESPONSE by defendant to plaintiff's second motion to compel discovery; notice of filing. [25-1] (tlm) (Entered: 08/21/1992)

RECAP
29 Aug. 25, 1992

REPLY MEMORANDUM by plaintiff on the second motion to compel (Attachment). [25-1] (tlm) (Entered: 08/26/1992)

RECAP
30 Aug. 26, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 8/26/92 by Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : Plaintiff's second motion to compel discovery [25-1], is granted with respect to bonus information and denied as to information and documents for the years 1986 and 1987 not already produced. Ruling on plaintiff's first motion to compel discovery [16-1] set for 08/28/92 is stricken and reset to 8/31/92 at 4:00 p.m. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 08/27/1992)

RECAP
31 Aug. 28, 1992

REPLY MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion to compel discovery (Exhibit). [16-1] (tlm) (Entered: 09/01/1992)

RECAP
32 Aug. 31, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 8/31/92 by Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : Status hearing set for 10/15/92 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents withheld under "self-cirtical analysis" privilege is granted. The Court's 08/26/92 minute order is amended to reflect the ruling made that day: that Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery dating back to 1986 is allowed; provided, however, that with respect to employees who left NutraSweet prior to 1988, Defendant is not required to produce salary and bonus data at this time. With Plaintiff's agreement, the court defers ruling on her motion to compel production of information regarding the identity of persons who made promotion and salary decisions with respect to proposed class members, pending ruling on the motion for class certification. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 09/01/1992)

RECAP
33 Sept. 3, 1992

MOTION by plaintiff for extension of time within which to file plaintiff's reply in support of motion for class certification ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 09/04/1992)

RECAP
34 Sept. 3, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 9/3/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to 09/24/92 within which to file plaintiff's reply in support of motion for class certification is granted. [33-1] Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 09/04/1992)

RECAP
35 Sept. 8, 1992

SUPPLEMLENTAL AFFIDAVIT of Peggy Jude; notice of filing. (tlm) (Entered: 09/09/1992)

RECAP
36 Sept. 11, 1992

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file first amended complaint (Exhibits) ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 09/16/1992)

RECAP
37 Sept. 11, 1992

CORRECTED MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file first amended complaint (Exhibits) ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 09/16/1992)

RECAP
38 Sept. 11, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 9/11/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Answer brief to corrected motion for leave to file first amended complaint isdue 09/18/92. [37-1] Reply to answer brief due 9/25/92 Status hearing set for 10/06/92 at 8:45 a.m. No notice (tlm) (Entered: 09/16/1992)

RECAP
39 Sept. 16, 1992

NOTICE by plaintiff of filing notice of written consent to join as a party plaintiff (Attachments). (fce) (Entered: 09/21/1992)

RECAP
40 Sept. 18, 1992

MEMORANDUM of law by defendant in opposition to plaintiff's motion to file first amended complaint; Notice of filing (Exhibits). (lal) (Entered: 09/21/1992)

RECAP
41 Sept. 21, 1992

MOTION by defendant for entry of agreed protective order (Attachment); amended notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 09/22/1992)

RECAP
42 Sept. 21, 1992

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding motion. [41-1] (tlm) (Entered: 09/22/1992)

RECAP
43 Sept. 21, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 9/21/92 by Hon. Wayne R. Andersen : Defendant's motion for entry of agreed protective order is granted. [41-1] Enter Agreed Protective Order. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 09/22/1992)

RECAP
44 Sept. 25, 1992

REPLY MEMOR by plaintiff in support of motion for leave to amend to add additional plaintiffs; notice of filing. [37-1], [36-1] (tlm) (Entered: 09/28/1992)

RECAP
45 Oct. 5, 1992

NOTICE OF FILING right to sue letters of proposed additional plaintiffs by plaintiff (Attachments). (tlm) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

RECAP
46 Oct. 6, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 10/6/92 by Hon. Milton I. Shadur : Motion of plaintiff of rleave to file amended complaint is granted. [37-1] [36-1] Plaintiff's reply brief on the class certification issue is due by 11/6/92. Defendant's [13-1] sur-reply brief is due by 12/7/92. No notice (tlm) (Entered: 10/08/1992)

RECAP
47 Oct. 6, 1992

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiff; jury demand; notice of filing. (tlm) (Entered: 10/09/1992)

RECAP
48 Oct. 26, 1992

ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT and affirmative defenses by defendant; notice of filing. (tlm) (Entered: 10/27/1992)

RECAP
49 Nov. 5, 1992

MOTION by plaintiffs for enlargement of time to file reply brief in support of motion for class certification ; notice of motion. (fce) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

RECAP
50 Nov. 5, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 11/5/92 by Hon. Milton I. Shadur : Granting plaintiff's motion to enlarge time to and including 11/13/92 within which to file reply brief in support of motion for class certification. [49-1] No notice (fce) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

RECAP
51 Nov. 13, 1992

MOTION by defendant for enlargement of time to file sur-reply to plaintiff's motion for class certification ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

RECAP
52 Nov. 13, 1992

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file brief in excess of 15 pages, and to file a sur-reply ; notice of motion. (tlm) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

RECAP
53 Nov. 13, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 11/13/92 by Hon. Milton I. Shadur : Motion of plaintiff for leave to file brief in excess of 15 pages in support of class certification is granted. [52-1] Defendant's motion for enlargement of time to 12/14/92 within which to file sur-reply is granted. [51-1] Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply is denied without prejudice. [52-2] No notice (tlm) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

RECAP
54 Nov. 13, 1992

Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order) (fce) (Entered: 12/02/1992)

RECAP
55 Dec. 9, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 12/9/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Status hearing set for 12/18/92 is reset to 01/25/93 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice (tlm) (Entered: 12/11/1992)

RECAP
56 Dec. 10, 1992

MINUTE ORDER of 12/10/92 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Status hearing set for 01/25/93 at 9:30 a.m. Defendant's motion for an enlargement of time to 12/30/92 in which to file its sur-reply to plaintiffs' motion for class certification is granted. [56-1] Mailed notice (tlm) Modified on 02/03/1993 (Entered: 12/15/1992)

RECAP
57 Jan. 6, 1993

APPENDIX in support of motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Weissman's claims filed by plaintiff; notice of filing. (tlm) Modified on 02/03/1993 (Entered: 01/07/1993)

RECAP
58 Jan. 28, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 1/28/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Defendant orally withdraws the motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Harrison, Weissman and Wagner. Parties withdraw their previously filed brief on the motion for class certification and will re-brief that motion as follows: Plaintiff's motion for class certification is due 02/16/93 and defendant's response is due 03/16/93. [13-1] [20-1] Mailed notice (tlm) Modified on 02/03/1993 (Entered: 01/29/1993)

RECAP
59 Feb. 16, 1993

Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 09/21/92.) (tlm) (Entered: 02/16/1993)

RECAP
60 March 16, 1993

CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM by defendants in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to certify class action (Attachment); notice of filing. [13-2] (tlm) (Entered: 03/18/1993)

RECAP
61 March 16, 1993

APPENDIX to defendants' consolidated memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to certify class action. [60-1] (tlm) (Entered: 03/18/1993)

RECAP
62 June 18, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 6/18/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Status hearing set for 07/21/93 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice (ldg) (Entered: 06/21/1993)

RECAP
63 July 21, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 7/21/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Status hearing held; continued to 11/03/93 at 9:30 a.m. No notice (cjg) (Entered: 07/22/1993)

RECAP
64 Aug. 24, 1993

MOTION by Nutrasweet Co for extension of time within which to file it's motion for summary judgment ; Notice of motion(fce) Modified on 08/26/1993 (Entered: 08/26/1993)

RECAP
65 Aug. 24, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 8/24/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Denying motion for extension of time within which to file it's motion for summary judgment [64-1] without prejudice for the reasons stated in open court. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 08/26/1993)

RECAP
66 Aug. 26, 1993

MOTION by defendant Nutrasweet Co for extension of time within which to file its motion for summary judgment ; Notice of motion (eav) (Entered: 09/03/1993)

RECAP
67 Aug. 26, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 8/26/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Defendant's motion for extension of time to file motion for summary judgment by September 8, 1993 is granted. [66-1] Responsive brief due September 15, 1993; reply brief September 22, 1993. No notice (eav) (Entered: 09/03/1993)

RECAP
68 Sept. 7, 1993

MOTION by defendant Nutrasweet Co to file brief in excess of 15 pages ; Notice of motion (eav) (Entered: 09/08/1993)

RECAP
69 Sept. 7, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 9/7/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Defendant's motion to file its consolidated memorandum in support of its motion for judgment in excess of 15 pages is granted. [68-1] No notice (eav) (Entered: 09/08/1993)

RECAP
70 Sept. 8, 1993

CONSOLIDATED MOTION by defendant Nutrasweet Co for summary judgment as to the named plaintiffs' claims (eav) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

RECAP
71 Sept. 8, 1993

APPENDIX filed by defendant Nutrasweet Co in support of consolidated motion for summary judgment [70-1] (eav) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

RECAP
72 Sept. 8, 1993

CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM by defendant Nutrasweet Co in support of motion for summary judgment as to the named plaintiffs' claims [70-1] (eav) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

RECAP
73 Sept. 8, 1993

RULE 12(m) Statement of material facts as to which there is no dispute submitted in support of its consolidated motion for summary judgment by defendant Nutrasweet Co (eav) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

RECAP
74 Sept. 8, 1993

NOTICE of filing by defendant Nutrasweet Co regarding memorandum [72-1], regarding documents [71-1], regarding motion for summary judgment as to the named plaintiffs' claims [70-1] (eav) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

RECAP
75 Sept. 14, 1993

RULE 56(F) MOTION by plaintiff Catherine Wagner for an extension of time to respond to summary judgment (Exhibits); Notice of motion (eav) (Entered: 09/16/1993)

RECAP
76 Sept. 14, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 9/14/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Plaintiffs' Rule 56(f) motion for an extension of time to respond to defendant's summary judgment motion is granted. [75-1] Plaintiffs are granted until September 28, 1993 in which to respond and the reply brief is extended to October 8, 1993. No notice (eav) (Entered: 09/16/1993)

RECAP
77 Sept. 28, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff Catherine Wagner for leave to file a memorandum in excess of the fifteen page limit ; Notice of motion (eav) (Entered: 09/29/1993)

RECAP
78 Sept. 28, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 9/28/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a memorandum in excess of 15 pages is granted. [77-1] No notice (eav) (Entered: 09/29/1993)

RECAP
79 Sept. 28, 1993

RESPONSE by plaintiff Catherine Wagner to defendant's consolidated memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment as to the named plaintiffs' claims [70-1] (eav) (Entered: 09/29/1993)

RECAP
80 Sept. 28, 1993

ATTACHMENTS by plaintiff Catherine Wagner in support of memorandum in opposition to NutraSweet's consolidated motion for summary judgment. (eav) (Entered: 09/29/1993)

RECAP
81 Sept. 28, 1993

NOTICE of filing by plaintiff Catherine Wagner regarding motion response [79-1] (eav) (Entered: 09/29/1993)

RECAP
82 Sept. 29, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 9/29/93 by Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Pallmeyer on July 9, 1992 for ruling on discovery motions. Such motions were granted in part and denied in part on August 26, 1992 (Doc. No. 30) and August 31, 1992 (Doc. No. 32). No further discovery motions are pending and defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment before the Honorable Brian Barnett Duff. It appearing that all matters relating to this referral are resolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge. No notice (eav) (Entered: 09/30/1993)

RECAP
83 Oct. 5, 1993

REPLY by defendant Nutrasweet Co regarding memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment against the named plaintiff [72-1] ; Notice of filing (eav) (Entered: 10/06/1993)

RECAP
84 Oct. 5, 1993

RESPONSE by defendant Nutrasweet Co to plaintiffs' Rule 12(N) statement of additional material facts (eav) (Entered: 10/06/1993)

RECAP
85 Oct. 5, 1993

SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX filed by defendant Nutrasweet Co in support of consolidated motion for summary judgment [70-1] (Attachments) (eav) (Entered: 10/06/1993)

RECAP
86 Nov. 3, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 11/3/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Status hearing held; continued to 02 Feb 94 at 9:30 a.m. No notice (eav) (Entered: 11/04/1993)

RECAP
87 Dec. 8, 1993

RESPONSE by defendant Nutrasweet Co to plaintiffs' motion to add supplemental authority (eav) (Entered: 12/09/1993)

RECAP
88 Dec. 9, 1993

MOTION by plaintiffs to add supplemental authority ; Notice of motion. (fce) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

RECAP
89 Dec. 9, 1993

MINUTE ORDER of 12/9/93 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Striking plaintiffs' motion to add supplemental authority [88-1] No notice (fce) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

RECAP
90 Feb. 2, 1994

MINUTE ORDER of 2/2/94 by Hon. Brian Barnett Duff : Status hearing reset for 03/08/94 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vkd) (Entered: 02/11/1994)

RECAP
May 25, 1994

EXECUTIVE committee order of 05/25/94 Case reassigned to Hon. Ruben Castillo (fce) (Entered: 05/26/1994)

PACER
May 25, 1994

EXECUTIVE committee order of 05/25/94 Case reassigned to Hon. Ruben Castillo (fce)

91 May 26, 1994

MINUTE ORDER of 5/26/94 by Hon. Ruben Castillo : Status hearing set for 06/14/94 at 10:30 a.m. (See reverse of minute order). Mailed notice (vkd) (Entered: 05/27/1994)

RECAP
92 June 9, 1994

JOINT STATUS REPORT by parties. (fce) (Entered: 06/10/1994)

RECAP
93 June 14, 1994

MINUTE ORDER of 6/14/94 by Hon. Ruben Castillo : Status hearing held ; continued to 08/02/94 at 10:30 am. No notice (fce) (Entered: 06/17/1994)

RECAP
94 Aug. 1, 1994

MINUTE ORDER of 8/1/94 by Hon. Ruben Castillo: Status hearing set for 12 Sep 94 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 08/02/1994)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Private Employment Class Actions

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 8, 1992

Closing Date: 1995

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are former female employees of defendant.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

The Nutrasweet Company

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:92-cv-02418

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: unknown

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Pay / Benefits

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation