Case: EEOC v. K-Mart Corporation

4:98-cv-03082 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Filed Date: Dec. 11, 1998

Closed Date: Feb. 3, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In December 1998, the Birmingham office of the EEOC brought this suit against K-Mart Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the claimant by not providing the claimant with reasonable accommodation of her religion in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The defendant moved for summary judgment, which was not resolved because the parties reached a settlement by entry of a consent decree in February 2000.

The two year consent decree included an anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation provision; adoption of a policy prohibiting discrimination in the workplace; training for managers and supervisors; posting of notice; and a neutral reference for the claimant.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/14/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11105615/parties/eeoc-v-k-mart-corporation/


Judge(s)

Buttram, H. Dean (Alabama)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Byrd, Mildred (Alabama)

Rose, Jerome C (Alabama)

Attorney for Defendant

Lightfoot, Warren B (Alabama)

Roberts, Stuart Dewane (Alabama)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:98-cv-03082

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. K-Mart Corp.

Feb. 3, 2000

Feb. 3, 2000

Docket
15

4:98-cv-03082

Order [Regarding Defendant's Motion to Compel]

Dec. 29, 1999

Dec. 29, 1999

Order/Opinion
18

4:98-cv-03082

Consent Decree

EEOC v. K-Mart Corp.

Feb. 3, 2000

Feb. 3, 2000

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11105615/eeoc-v-k-mart-corporation/

Last updated Oct. 6, 2026, 7:12 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. K-Mart Corporation
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Dec. 11, 1998

COMPLAINT filed (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/11/1998)

RECAP
2 April 13, 1999

ORDER to show cause deadline created for 4/26/99 why action should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 4(m) filed ( by Judge H D. Buttram ) cm (Former Employee) (Entered: 04/13/1999)

RECAP
3 April 15, 1999

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC order to show cause order [2-1] filed cs (BST) (Entered: 04/16/1999)

RECAP
4 April 27, 1999

ANSWER by defendant K-Mart Corporation w/appear by atty(s) Warren B Lightfoot, Stuart D Roberts filed cs (Former Employee) (Entered: 04/27/1999)

RECAP
5 June 10, 1999

Report of Parties (form 35) of compliance with FRCP 26 filed (Former Employee) (Entered: 06/11/1999)

RECAP
6 June 15, 1999

ORDER scheduling that certain time limits apply as set out in this order;initial disclosure by 7/6/99; discovery cutoff 11/12/99; dispositive motions by 11/29/99 by Judge D. Buttram entered cm (Former Employee) (Entered: 06/15/1999)

RECAP
7 June 30, 1999

NOTICE of compliance by plaintiff EEOC with [6-1] filed cs (Former Employee) (Entered: 06/30/1999)

RECAP
8 June 30, 1999

NOTICE of compliance by defendant K-Mart Corporation with [6-1] filed cs (Former Employee) (Entered: 07/01/1999)

RECAP
9 Nov. 16, 1999

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant K-Mart Corporation to extend time to file dispositive motion ddl until 12/17/99; pla's response ddl until 1/14/00 and dft's reply ddl until 1/21/00 filed cs (Former Employee) Modified on 11/23/1999 (Entered: 11/17/1999)

RECAP
10 Nov. 22, 1999

9 - ORDER granting (get on with it! no further extensions) motion to extend time to file dispositive motion ddl until 12/17/99; pla's response ddl until 1/14/00 and dft's reply ddl until 1/21/00 [9-1] ( by Judge H D. Buttram ) entered cm (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/23/1999)

RECAP
11 Dec. 17, 1999

MOTION by defendant K-Mart Corporation for summary judgment filed cs (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/20/1999)

RECAP
12 Dec. 17, 1999

BRIEF in support of motion for sumjgm by defendant K-Mart Corporation filed cs (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/20/1999)

RECAP
13 Dec. 17, 1999

SUBMISSION of discovery by defendant K-Mart Corporation in support of KMart's brief in support of motion for sumjgm filed cs (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/20/1999)

RECAP
14 Dec. 29, 1999

MOTION by defendant K-Mart Corporation to compel responsese to its 9/30/99 requests for production filed cs w/exhs attach (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

RECAP
15 Dec. 29, 1999

ORDER denying motion to compel responsese to its 9/30/99 requests for production [14-1] filed ( by Judge H D. Buttram ) cm (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

RECAP
16 Jan. 21, 2000

SUBMISSION of discovery by plaintiff EEOC in response to dft's motion for sumjgm filed cs (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/24/2000)

RECAP
17 Feb. 3, 2000

BRIEF-statement of undipsuted facts and memorandum of law in oppositin to dft's motion for sumjgm by plaintiff EEOC filed cs (deemed filed in chambers 1/21/00 per Judge Buttram) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/03/2000)

RECAP
18 Feb. 3, 2000

ORDER (consent degree) dismissing case with terms and conditions as set out in this order; each party shall bear own costs and atty's fees filed ( by Judge H D. Buttram ) cm (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/03/2000)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Alabama

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 11, 1998

Closing Date: Feb. 3, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

K-Mart Corporation

K-Mart Corporation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Alabama 4:98-cv-03082

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Monitoring

Neutral/Positive Reference

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 1000

Order Duration: 2000 - 2002

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation