Case: EEOC v. INTERIM EXECUTIVE RECRUITING

2:99-cv-02455 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Filed Date: Sept. 14, 1999

Closed Date: Aug. 7, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC's Birmingham office filed this suit on September 14, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama against Interim Executive Recruiting. The EEOC alleged age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

The case settled, and in August 2000 a consent decree was entered. Interim agreed to pay the complainant $47,500 and conduct training for its managers at the Birmingham location.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/19/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:99-cv-02455

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Interim Executive Recruiting

Aug. 7, 2000

Aug. 7, 2000

Docket
10

2:99-cv-02455

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Interim Executive Recruiting

Aug. 7, 2000

Aug. 7, 2000

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4127193/eeoc-v-interim-executive/

Last updated Aug. 6, 2022, 3:20 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed (SRJ) (Entered: 09/16/1999)

Sept. 14, 1999

Sept. 14, 1999

PACER
2

ANSWER to complaint by dft w/appear by atty(s) David W Proctor, Gerald L Maatman, Jr(NA) & Julie S Lucht(NA) filed cs (SWB) (Entered: 12/08/1999)

Dec. 7, 1999

Dec. 7, 1999

PACER
3

SUMMONS and complaint returned executed: upon defendant Interim Executive on 11/15/99 filed (SWB) (Entered: 12/08/1999)

Dec. 8, 1999

Dec. 8, 1999

PACER
4

MOTION by defendant for attorney Julie Sherman Lucht to appear pro hac vice filed cs (SRJ) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

Jan. 12, 2000

Jan. 12, 2000

PACER
5

MOTION by defendant for attorney Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., to appear pro hac vice filed cs (SRJ) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

Jan. 12, 2000

Jan. 12, 2000

PACER
6

5 - ORDER granting motion for attorney Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., to appear pro hac vice [5-1] ( by Chief Judge U W. Clemon ) entered cm (SWB) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

Jan. 25, 2000

Jan. 25, 2000

PACER
7

4 - ORDER granting motion for attorney Julie Sherman Lucht to appear pro hac vice [4-1] ( by Chief Judge U W. Clemon ) entered cm (SWB) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

Jan. 25, 2000

Jan. 25, 2000

PACER
8

Report of Parties (form 35) of compliance with FRCP 26 filed (SWB) (Entered: 02/08/2000)

Feb. 8, 2000

Feb. 8, 2000

PACER
9

ORDER (Scheduling) that the dates agreed to by the parties in their planning meeting are adopted & binding upon the parties by Chief Judge U W. Clemon entered cm (SWB) (Entered: 02/15/2000)

Feb. 15, 2000

Feb. 15, 2000

PACER
10

ORDER(Consent Decree) stating specific provisions in A-K; that dft pay said person $23,750.00 in back, less taxes & w/holding deductions & $23,750.00 in liquidated damages; said person will be given 21 days to consider release before signing (see exhs A & B att) dismissing case filed ( by Chief Judge U W. Clemon ) cm (SWB) (Entered: 08/07/2000)

Aug. 7, 2000

Aug. 7, 2000

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Alabama

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 14, 1999

Closing Date: Aug. 7, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Interim Exexcutive Recruiting (Birmingham), Private Entity/Person

Interim Executive Recruiting, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 47500

Order Duration: 2000 - 2000

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-basis:

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits