Case: EEOC v. City of Sheffield Fire Department

3:99-cv-01691 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Filed Date: June 30, 1999

Closed Date: 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On June 30, 1999, the EEOC filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act against the City of Sheffield, the Civil Service Board of the City of Sheffield, and the Civil Service Board members in their official and individual capacities. The EEOC's complaint alleged that defendants discriminated against three firefighters over the age of 40 when they promoted a younger employee with less seniority to the position …

On June 30, 1999, the EEOC filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act against the City of Sheffield, the Civil Service Board of the City of Sheffield, and the Civil Service Board members in their official and individual capacities. The EEOC's complaint alleged that defendants discriminated against three firefighters over the age of 40 when they promoted a younger employee with less seniority to the position of assistant fire chief.

On March 20, 2000, this case was consolidated with a related complaint filed by a firefighter against the same defendants, Love v. City of Sheffield, 99-CV-2995. On September 19, 2000, the defendants moved to dismiss the EEOC's complaint on the basis of governmental immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. On February 6, 2001, the District Court (Judge Sharon L. Blackburn) denied the motion to dismiss, holding that the Civil Service Board, while created by state legislation, was not an arm or agent of the state and therefore not entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.

On August 31, 2001, defendants moved for summary judgment in two separate motions, claiming that they were not the plaintiffs' employers, that the claims were time-barred, that the plaintiffs were not qualified for the position, and that plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing suit. In an opinion dated September 30, 2002, the District Court denied both motions.

For reasons that the docket does not make clear, nothing much happened for the next two years. The parties finally settled in 2005, and on April 5, 2005, the District Court entered a consent decree. The agreement awarded monetary damages to the plaintiffs in the amount of $15,000, inclusive of all attorney's fees and costs. Defendants stipulated that they would not utilize age as a factor in promotion decisions, except as permitted by law. Further, two of the plaintiffs, one retroactively and posthumously, were promoted to captain.

Summary Authors

Tifani Sadek (10/9/2013)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5384130/parties/eeoc-v-sheffield-city-of/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:99-cv-01691

3:91-cv-02995

Docket

Love v. City of Sheffield

Dec. 3, 2004

Dec. 3, 2004

Docket

3:99-cv-01691

Docket

EEOC v. City of Sheffield

April 5, 2005

April 5, 2005

Docket
31

3:99-cv-01691

Memorandum Opinion and Order [Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint]

EEOC v. City of Sheffield

Feb. 6, 2001

Feb. 6, 2001

Order/Opinion
72

3:99-cv-01691

Amended Memorandum Opinion [Motion for Summary Judgment]

EEOC v. City of Sheffield

Sept. 30, 2002

Sept. 30, 2002

Order/Opinion
93

3:99-cv-01691

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Sheffield

April 5, 2005

April 5, 2005

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5384130/eeoc-v-sheffield-city-of/

Last updated Aug. 18, 2025, 12:42 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
69

MEMORANDUM opinion filed ( by Judge Sharon L. Blackburn ) cm (KAM)

Sept. 30, 2002

Sept. 30, 2002

RECAP
72

MEMORANDUM opinion (amended) filed ( by Judge Sharon L. Blackburn ) cm (KAM)

Sept. 30, 2002

Sept. 30, 2002

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Alabama

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 30, 1999

Closing Date: 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Sheffield Fire Department firemen over the age of 40 in the who were passed up by younger firemen for the position of assistant fire chief

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City of Sheffield (Sheffield), City

Defendant Type(s):

Fire

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Promotion

Discrimination Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 15000

Order Duration: 2005 - None

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Race, unspecified

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Suit Related / Consolidated with EEOC Suit