Case: EEOC v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

1:99-cv-07829 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Dec. 2, 1999

Closed Date: 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In December 1999, the Chicago Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Armstrong World Industries, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the Opinion that the complaint alleged the defendant failed to promote the complainant to a plant manager position from her floating manager position based upon her sex, female. In February 2000, the defendant successfully motioned for a change of venue, transferring the lawsuit to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Following some hearings and discovery, the defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted in February 2002 when plaintiff failed to show defendant did not, at the time of its promotion decision, honestly believe the reason given for not interviewing and not promoting the complainant.

Summary Authors

David Friedman (11/26/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11037272/parties/eeoc-v-armstron-world-ind/


Judge(s)

Bernthal, David G. (Illinois)

Guzman, Ronald A. (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Carson, June Wallace (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Berner, Eileen B (Illinois)

Gelb, Aaron R. (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:99-cv-07829

Docket

EEOC v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

June 20, 2000

June 20, 2000

Docket

2:00-cv-02157

Docket [Transferred]

EEOC v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

June 2, 2003

June 2, 2003

Docket
27

2:00-cv-02157

Opinion

EEOC v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Feb. 15, 2002

Feb. 15, 2002

Order/Opinion

185 F.Supp.2d 932

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11037272/eeoc-v-armstron-world-ind/

Last updated April 5, 2025, 10:33 a.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Armstron World Ind
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Dec. 2, 1999

COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of John C. Hendrickson, Jean Powers Kamp, Keith L Spence as attorney(s) for plaintiff ( no summons(es) issued.) (Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (fce) (Entered: 12/03/1999)

RECAP
2 Dec. 23, 1999

MOTION by EEOC to amend the complaint (Attachment) ; Notice (jmp) Modified on 12/27/1999 (Entered: 12/27/1999)

RECAP
3 Dec. 27, 1999

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Edward C. Jepson Jr. and Eileen B. Berner (fce) (Entered: 12/28/1999)

RECAP
4 Dec. 29, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 12/29/99 by Hon. Ronald A. Guzman : Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint is granted [2-1]. Telephoned notice (fce) (Entered: 12/30/1999)

RECAP
5 Jan. 6, 2000

WAIVER of service of summons as to defendant Armstrong World Ind sent on 12/3/99 (hp) (Entered: 01/07/2000)

RECAP
6 Feb. 1, 2000

ANSWER by defendant to plaintiff's complaint [1-1] (yap) (Entered: 02/02/2000)

RECAP
7 Feb. 3, 2000

MOTION by Armstrong World Ind for change of venue ; Notice (jmp) (Entered: 02/14/2000)

RECAP
8 Feb. 10, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/10/00 by Hon. Ronald A. Guzman : Defendant's motion for change of venue is granted [7-1]. It is hereby ordered that this action is hereby transferred to the United States District Court, Central District of Illinois terminating case Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 02/14/2000)

RECAP
Feb. 24, 2000

SCHEDULE set on 2/24/00 by Hon. Ronald A. Guzman : Status hearing set to 9:30 3/17/00 . A brief joint status report, not to exceed three pages, unless absolutely unavoidable, is due within 7 days of this order. If a joint report cannot be prepared, individual reports are to be filed. All previously set ruling dates, dates for oral argument and trial dates are hereby stricken. All filing dates, discovery cutoff dates and briefing schedules to stand. Mailed notice (tbk)

9 March 1, 2000

JOINT STATUS REPORT. (vmj) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
June 6, 2000

CERTIFIED AND TRANSMITTED the complete record to the USDC for the Central District of Illinois consisting of one volumes of pleadings, certified copy of transfer order and docket entries, transmittal letter, and certificate, via certified mail no. Z-141-050-938. : Mailed copy of transmittal letter to counsel of record. (jmp)

June 12, 2000

ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet received from NDIL (case #99-CV-7829); document #s 2-5, 7, 8 and 9 received; docket mailed to all counsel advising of new case number for Danville/Urbana Division is 00-2157. Case referred to Mag. Judge David G. Bernthal (SK, ilcd) (Entered: 06/13/2000)

PACER
10 June 14, 2000

ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of transferred record dated 06/06/00, new case no. 00-2157. (hp) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
11 June 20, 2000

RETURN of U. S. Post Office Receipt #Z-141-050-938 on 06/12/00. (jmp) (Entered: 06/20/2000)

RECAP
July 14, 2000

MINUTE-ENTRY: by Mag. Judge David G. Bernthal. Pursuant to Atty Jepson and Atty Spence's request, the Rule 16 conference scheduled for 7/19/00 at 1:45 will be converted from personal appearance to telephone. The Court will initiate the call. All other directives in this Court's 6/16/00 Order remain in force. All counsel notified by telephone this date. (cc: all counsel) (SLJ, ilcd) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

PACER
July 19, 2000

MINUTE-ENTRY: by Mag. Judge David G. Bernthal. Rule 16 conference held at 1:45 on 7/19/00 before the Honorable Michael P. McCuskey and the Honorable David G. Bernthal. Appearance of pla by Keith Spence and Jean Kamp. Appearance of dft by Eileen Berner. Court approved Parties proposed discovery plan. Discovery deadlines and hearing dates set. Estimated length of jury trial is 5 days. Option to consent to Magistrate Judge offered. Alternative dispute resolution discussed. Written Order incorporating deadlines and hearing dates to be entered. (cc: all counsel) (SLJ, ilcd) (Entered: 07/19/2000)

PACER
12 July 21, 2000

DISCOVERY ORDER entered by Mag. Judge David G. Bernthal. The ddl for amendment of pleadings and joining additional parties is 11/1/00. Pla to disclose experts and provide expert reports by 12/1/00. Pla to make any such experts available for deposition by 2/1/00. Dft to disclose experts and provide expert reports by 1/5/01. Dft to make any such experts available for deposition by 2/1/01. Discovery is limited as follows: (a) A maximum of 25 interrogatories by each party to any other party. (b) A maximum of 10 depositions by pla and 10 by dft. All discovery, including deposition of experts, to be completed by 2/1/01 . The ddl for filing case dispositive motions is 2/8/01 . Responses thereto shall be filed by 3/2/01, and replies by 3/16/01. This matter is scheduled for final pretrial conference at 4:00 on 8/17/01 by personal appearance and set for jury selection and jury trial at 9:30 on 8/27/01 before the Honorable Michael P. McCuskey sitting in Urbana. Case is Number 5 on the Court calendar. (cc: all counsel) (SLJ, ilcd) (Entered: 07/21/2000)

PACER
13 Jan. 12, 2001

MOTION by defendant Armstrong World Ind to extend dates in discovery order (SLJ, ilcd) (Entered: 01/12/2001)

PACER
Jan. 16, 2001

MINUTE-ENTRY: by Mag. Judge David G. Bernthal. A motion hearing regarding the pending Defendant's Motion to extend dates in discovery order [13-1] is scheduled at 9:30 1/31/01 by telephone conference call. The Court will initiate the call. (cc: all counsel) (SLJ, ilcd) (Entered: 01/16/2001)

PACER
Jan. 31, 2001

MINUTE-ENTRY: by Mag. Judge David G. Bernthal; hearing held re dft's motion to extend dates in discovery order [13-1] with no appearance by pla and with appearance by atty Edward C Jepson Jr for dft. Court grants motion to extend dates in discovery order [13-1]. Discovery ddl extended to 5/1/01 and motion filing ddl for filing case dispositive motions extended to 5/8/01 . Atty Jepson advised of settlement conference options (cc: all counsel). (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

PACER
14 April 24, 2001

MOTION by defendant Armstrong World Ind to extend time for filing dispositive motions until 5/22/01 . (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 04/24/2001)

PACER
April 30, 2001

ENDORSED ORDER on its face by Mag. Judge David G. Bernthal granting motion to extend time for filing dispositive motions until 5/22/01 [14-1]; Mtn filing ddl extended to 5/22/01 (cc: all counsel). (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

PACER
15 May 22, 2001

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Aaron R Gelb for defendant (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 05/22/2001)

PACER
16 May 22, 2001

MOTION by defendant for summary judgment (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 05/22/2001)

PACER
17 May 22, 2001

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of motion for summary judgment [16-1] by defendant (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 05/22/2001)

PACER
18 May 22, 2001

STATEMENT OF FACTS ( undispute) by defendant in support of motion for summary judgment [16-1] (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 05/22/2001)

PACER
19 June 5, 2001

UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to extend time for additional 14 days to file its response to dft's motion for summary judgment (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 06/05/2001)

PACER
June 6, 2001

ENDORSED ORDER on its face by Judge Michael P. McCuskey granting unopposed motion to extend time for additional 14 days to file its response to dft's motion for summary judgment [19-1]; response ddl re motion for summary judgment [16-1] reset to 6/26/01 (cc: all counsel). (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 06/06/2001)

PACER
20 June 26, 2001

MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION to motion for summary judgment [16-1] by plaintiff EEOC (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 06/27/2001)

PACER
21 June 26, 2001

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to dft's statement of undisputed facts [18-1] (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 06/27/2001)

PACER
22 June 26, 2001

STATEMENT OF FACTS (undisputed) by plaintiff EEOC in support of memorandum in opposition to dft's motion for summary judgment [20-1] (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 06/27/2001)

PACER
24 July 6, 2001

RESPONSE by defendant Armstrong World Ind to Pla EEOC's Stmt of Additional Undisputed Facts [22-1] (SLJ, ilcd) (Entered: 07/06/2001)

PACER
25 July 6, 2001

REPLY by defendant Armstrong World Ind to response to motion for summary judgment [16-1] (MT, ilcd) (Entered: 07/06/2001)

PACER
July 11, 2001

MINUTE-ENTRY: by Judge Michael P. McCuskey. On the Court's own motion, the final pretrial conference set for 4:00, 8/17/01 and the jury trial set to begin at 9:30 on 8/27/01 are VACATED and will be reset pending ruling on the motion for summary judgment presently before the Court. (cc: all counsel) (SLJ, ilcd) (Entered: 07/11/2001)

PACER
26 Oct. 9, 2001

LETTER to Judge McCuskey with attachments. (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 10/10/2001)

PACER
27 Feb. 15, 2002

ORDER by Judge Michael P. McCuskey granting motion for summary judgment [16-1]. Judgment is entered in favor of dft and against pla. Case terminated. The parties shall be responsible for their own court costs. See written Order (cc: all counsel). (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2002)

PACER
28 Feb. 15, 2002

JUDGMENT in a civil case entered (cc: all counsel) (KM, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2002)

PACER
June 2, 2003

ARCHIVES FILE sent to FRC, Chicago on 05/23/03, Accession No. 021 03 0128 Box No. 29 of 44 Location 791324 - 791367 (MT, ilcd) (Entered: 06/03/2003)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 2, 1999

Closing Date: 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:99-cv-07829

Central District of Illinois 2:00-cv-02157

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation