Case: EEOC v. RITE AID CORPORATION

2:03-cv-73405 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: Sept. 8, 2003

Closed Date: May 26, 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Detroit office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, against Rite Aid Corporation. The complaint, filed in September 2003, alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; specifically that the Defendant had subjected the charging party to a sexually hostile work environment by propositioning her for oral sex and touching her in a sexual nature. In May 2004 there was a stipulated order to dismiss the case for unknown reasons.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Glassman (6/22/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11791773/parties/eeoc-v-rite-aid-corp/

Judge(s)

Cleland, Robert Hardy (Michigan)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dawkins, Robert K. (Michigan)

Klein, Tammy C. (Michigan)

Attorney for Defendant

Brown, Malcolm D. (Michigan)

Patterson, Scott T. (Michigan)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

2:03-cv-73405

Docket

EEOC v. Rite Aid Corporation

May 26, 2004

May 26, 2004

Docket
1

2:03-cv-73405

Complaint

EEOC v. Rite Aid Corporation

Sept. 8, 2003

Sept. 8, 2003

Complaint
10

2:03-cv-73405

Agreed Order for Dismissal

EEOC v. Rite Aid Corporation

May 26, 2004

May 26, 2004

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11791773/eeoc-v-rite-aid-corp/

Last updated Nov. 4, 2026, 5:13 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Rite Aid Corp
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 8, 2003

COMPLAINT with jury demand (ew) (Entered: 09/10/2003)

RECAP
2 Oct. 9, 2003

ORDER by Judge Robert H. Cleland, Rule 16 and Rule 26(f) scheduling consultation [EOD Date 10/14/03] (ew) (Entered: 10/14/2003)

RECAP
3 Oct. 24, 2003

AFFIRMATIVE defenses by defendant Rite Aid Corp (dh) (Entered: 10/27/2003)

RECAP
4 Nov. 14, 2003

DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) (ew) (Entered: 11/17/2003)

RECAP
5 Dec. 3, 2003

INITIAL WITNESS list by defendant Rite Aid Corp with proof of service (dh) (Entered: 12/04/2003)

RECAP
6 Dec. 18, 2003

PRETRIAL scheduling order by Judge Robert H. Cleland - setting deadline for amended pleadings for 3/1/04, setting deadline for witness list for 2/2/04, setting deadline for expert witness list for 5/17/04, setting deadline for discovery for 5/31/04, setting deadline for filing dispositive motions for 6/30/04, setting deadline for final pretrial order for 9/27/04, setting final pretrial conference for 10/4/04, setting deadline for jury instructions for 9/27/04, setting trailing trial docket for 9/10/04 (ew) (Entered: 12/24/2003)

RECAP
7 Feb. 2, 2004

WITNESS LIST by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (CGre, ) (Entered: 02/14/2004)

RECAP
8 Feb. 2, 2004

WITNESS LIST by Rite Aid Corporation. (CGre, ) (Entered: 02/14/2004)

8 Feb. 2, 2004

WITNESS LIST by Rite Aid Corporation. (CGre, ) (Entered: 02/14/2004)

RECAP
9 Feb. 2, 2004

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rite Aid Corporation re 8 Witness List. (CGre, ) (Entered: 02/14/2004)

RECAP
10 May 26, 2004

STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by Honorable Robert H Cleland. (DHame, ) (Entered: 05/28/2004)

RECAP

None

Case Details

State / Territory:

Michigan

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 8, 2003

Closing Date: May 26, 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Rite Aid Corporation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Michigan 2:03-cv-73405

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation