Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Thank you!

DONATE

Case: EEOC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. / Expo Design Center

2:05-cv-73258 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: Aug. 24, 2005

Closed Date: 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In August 2005, the EEOC district office in Detroit, Michigan brought this action against Home Deport USA, Inc. and Expo Design Center, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it refused to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs, which led to his discharge for failing to attend work on Sundays.

After a failed defense motion for summary judgment the parties settled and a consent decree was entered in May 2007. The defendant defendant agreed to pay the aggrieved party $25,157.21 and refrain from retaliating and discriminating on the basis of religion. The terms of the agreement run for two years. The docket sheet does not show any further enforcement; the case was presumably closed in 2009.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/25/2007)

Clearinghouse (6/12/2017)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:05-cv-73258

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

May 16, 2007

May 16, 2007

Docket
1

2:05-cv-73258

Complaint

EEOC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Aug. 24, 2005

Aug. 24, 2005

Complaint
17

2:05-cv-73258

Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

EEOC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Aug. 25, 2006

Aug. 25, 2006

Order/Opinion
35

2:05-cv-73258

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

May 16, 2007

May 16, 2007

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

Last updated Nov. 30, 2022, 3:08 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Home Depot U. S. A, Incorporated, Expo Design Center.(RHutc, ) Modified on 12/19/2005 (RHutc, ). (Entered: 08/24/2005)

Aug. 24, 2005

Aug. 24, 2005

2

ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by all defendants.(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 09/23/2005)

Sept. 23, 2005

Sept. 23, 2005

3

DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f).(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 10/17/2005)

Oct. 17, 2005

Oct. 17, 2005

4

SCHEDULING ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 7/13/2006 01:45 PM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 4/28/2006 Discovery due by 3/31/2006. Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (Refer to image for additional dates)(CMot, ) (Entered: 10/18/2005)

Oct. 18, 2005

Oct. 18, 2005

5

ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses (Amended) by all defendants.(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 10/20/2005)

Oct. 20, 2005

Oct. 20, 2005

7

WITNESS LIST by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Rapport, Adele) (Entered: 12/28/2005)

Dec. 28, 2005

Dec. 28, 2005

8

MOTION TO EXTEND Discovery by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Mengesha, Trina) (Entered: 03/07/2006)

March 7, 2006

March 7, 2006

Minute Entry -Motion Hearing held on 3/21/2006 re 8 MOTION TO EXTEND Discovery filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, before Honorable Marianne O Battani. Disposition: HELD(Court Reporter ALLEN BURNHAM) (BThe, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006)

March 21, 2006

March 21, 2006

9

ORDER granting 8 Motion to Extend Discovery- Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (CMot, ) (Entered: 03/22/2006)

March 22, 2006

March 22, 2006

10

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 9/26/2006 01:45 PM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 5/17/2006 Discovery due by 4/19/2006. Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (Refer to image for additional dates)(CMot, ) (Entered: 03/22/2006)

March 22, 2006

March 22, 2006

11

Supplemental WITNESS LIST by Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporated (Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 04/18/2006)

April 18, 2006

April 18, 2006

12

MOTION for Summary Judgment by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits# 2 Exhibit 1 Employment App# 3 Exhibit 2 Assoc Acknowledgement# 4 Exhibit 3 Orientation Checklist# 5 Exhibit 4 Job Profile# 6 Exhibit 5 Availability Info# 7 Exhibit 6 Accommodation Request# 8 Exhibit 7 Memo to File# 9 Exhibit 8 Fr Hawrish Note# 10 Exhibit 9 Archbishop Antony Note# 11 Exhibit 10 Fr. Hawrish Ltr# 12 Exhibit 11 D'Anjou Letter# 13 Exhibit 12 Discpline Notice# 14 Exhibit 13 Fax to Cooper# 15 Exhibit 14 Fax to Cooper# 16 Exhibit 15 Discipline Notice# 17 Exhibit 16 Discipline Notice# 18 Exhibit 17 Discipline Notice# 19 Exhibit 18 Stoiko Resume# 20 Exhibit 19 EXPO Profile# 21 Exhibit 20 Attendance Guidelines# 22 Exhibit 21 EEOC Charge# 23 Exhibit 22 HD Position Statement# 24 Exhibit 23 HD Supp Position Stmt# 25 Exhibit 24 Associates Weekly Schedules# 26 Exhibit 25 Dept Schedules# 27 Exhibit 26 Meadows Dep# 28 Exhibit 27 D'Anjou Affidavit# 29 Exhibit 28 Hansard Opinion# 30 Exhibit 29 Karvelis Opinion# 31 Exhibit 30 Riselay Opinion# 32 Exhibit 31 George Opinion# 33 Exhibit 32 George 2 Opinion# 34 Exhibit 33 Baker Opinion# 35 Exhibit 34 Baker 2 Opinion# 36 Exhibit 35 Elsaadi Aff# 37 Exhibit 36 Grant Aff# 38 Exhibit 37 Laurain Aff# 39 Exhibit 38 Aron Opinion# 40 Exhibit 39 Jones Deposition# 41 Exhibit 40 Stoiko Deposition)(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 05/17/2006)

May 17, 2006

May 17, 2006

13

NOTICE of hearing on 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 6/14/2006. Replies due by 6/27/2006. Motion Hearing set for 8/23/2006 02:00 PM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. (See image for additional details.)(CMot, ) (Entered: 05/19/2006)

May 19, 2006

May 19, 2006

Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: Settlement Conference set for 11/30/2006 01:45 PM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. (CMot, ) (Entered: 05/19/2006)

May 19, 2006

May 19, 2006

15

RESPONSE to 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment Response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attendance Policy# 2 Exhibit Letter from Andrew Stoiko dated 2-6-04# 3 Exhibit Letter to Andrew Stoiko dated 2-26-04# 4 Exhibit Letter from Fr. Richard Hawrish# 5 Exhibit Letter from Archbishop Antony# 6 Exhibit Position Statement dated 5-21-05# 7 Exhibit Fax to Cooper from Stoiko dated 4-24-04# 8 Exhibit Fax to Cooper from Stoiko dated 5-4-04# 9 Exhibit Stoiko Affidavit# 10 Exhibit Grant Affidavit# 11 Exhibit Elsaadi Affidavit# 12 Exhibit EEOC v Robert Bosch Opinion# 13 Exhibit Stoiko's Availability form# 14 Exhibit Stoiko Deposition Transcript# 15 Exhibit Stoiko Deposition Transcript# 16 Exhibit Jones Deposition Transcript# 17 Exhibit Cooper Deposition Transcript# 18 Exhibit Meadows Deposition Transcript)(Mengesha, Trina) (Entered: 06/14/2006)

June 14, 2006

June 14, 2006

16

REPLY to Response re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit Ex 1 Cooper Dep# 3 Exhibit Ex 2 Jones Dep)(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 06/27/2006)

June 27, 2006

June 27, 2006

Minute Entry -Motion Hearing held on 8/23/2006 re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Expo Design Center,, Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporated, before Honorable Marianne O Battani. (Court Reporter Rene Twedt) (CMot, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006)

Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

17

ORDER denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment- Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (BThe, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006)

Aug. 25, 2006

Aug. 25, 2006

18

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on August 23, 2006 of Motion for Summary Judgment (PPaul, ) (Entered: 09/12/2006)

Sept. 12, 2006

Sept. 12, 2006

Minute Entry -Settlement Conference held on 11/30/2006 before Honorable Marianne O Battani. (Court Reporter Allen Burnham) (CMot, ) (Entered: 11/30/2006)

Nov. 30, 2006

Nov. 30, 2006

19

TRIAL MANAGEMENT ORDER: Jury Trial set for 4/10/2007 09:00 AM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/3/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (SEE IMAGE FOR FURTHER DETAILS)(BThe, ) (Entered: 12/14/2006)

Dec. 14, 2006

Dec. 14, 2006

20

AMENDED TRIAL MANAGEMENT ORDER: Jury Trial reset for 5/29/2007 09:00 AM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 4/17/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Marianne O Battani. Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (SEE IMAGE FOR FURTHER DETAILS)(BThe, ) (Entered: 01/17/2007)

Jan. 17, 2007

Jan. 17, 2007

21

MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1 Complaint# 3 Exhibit 2 Stoiko Dep# 4 Exhibit 3 D'Anjou Aff# 5 Exhibit 4 Guide for Attendance# 6 Exhibit 5 Availability Info# 7 Exhibit 6 Stoiko Letter# 8 Exhibit 7 Jones Memo# 9 Exhibit 8 Cooper Dep# 10 Exhibit 9 Kitchen Dept Schedule# 11 Exhibit 10 Discipline Notice# 12 Exhibit 11 Discipline Notice# 13 Exhibit 12 Discpline Notice# 14 Exhibit 13 Discipline Notice# 15 Exhibit 14 EEOC Website# 16 Exhibit 15 Karvelis Case# 17 Exhibit 16 George Case# 18 Exhibit 17 Baker Case# 19 Exhibit 18 George Case# 20 Exhibit 19 Baker Case# 21 Exhibit 20 HD Policies)(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 02/05/2007)

Feb. 5, 2007

Feb. 5, 2007

22

MOTION in Limine to Cut-Off Stoiko's Damages And Limit His Back Pay by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1 Stoiko Dep# 3 Exhibit 2 D'Anjou Affidavit# 4 Exhibit 3 Kitchen Schedule# 5 Exhibit 4 Stoiko Pay Stubs# 6 Exhibit 5 Layton Affidavit# 7 Exhibit 6 Meadows Dep# 8 Exhibit 7 Lindemann & Grossman# 9 Exhibit 8 Supp Lindemann# 10 Exhibit 9 EEOC Foothills Case)(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 02/05/2007)

Feb. 5, 2007

Feb. 5, 2007

23

MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1 Complaint# 3 Exhibit 2 HD Policies# 4 Exhibit 3 Stoiko Dep# 5 Exhibit 4 D'Anjou Affidavit# 6 Exhibit 5 Availability Info# 7 Exhibit 6 Stoiko Letter# 8 Exhibit 7 Jones Memo# 9 Exhibit 8 Cooper Dep# 10 Exhibit 9 Stoiko Fax to Cooper# 11 Exhibit 10 Discipline Notice# 12 Exhibit 11 Stoiko EEOC Charge# 13 Exhibit 12 Stoiko Application# 14 Exhibit 13 Carter Case# 15 Exhibit 14 EEOC Website# 16 Exhibit 15 Karvelis EEOC Charge# 17 Exhibit 16 Karvelis Notice of Dismiss# 18 Exhibit 17 Karvelis Case# 19 Exhibit 18 Neal Case# 20 Exhibit 19 EEOC Rose Case)(Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 02/05/2007)

Feb. 5, 2007

Feb. 5, 2007

24

NOTICE of Appearance by Cathleen C. Jansen on behalf of all defendants. (Jansen, Cathleen) (Entered: 02/12/2007)

Feb. 12, 2007

Feb. 12, 2007

25

ORDER with Stipulation to Extend Time to File Response to Motion in Limine. Responses due by 3/9/2007. Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (BThe, ) (Entered: 02/16/2007)

Feb. 16, 2007

Feb. 16, 2007

26

NOTICE of Appearance by Dale R. Price, Jr on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Price, Dale) (Entered: 03/09/2007)

March 9, 2007

March 9, 2007

27

RESPONSE to 21 MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Price, Dale) (Entered: 03/09/2007)

March 9, 2007

March 9, 2007

29

RESPONSE to 22 MOTION in Limine to Cut-Off Stoiko's Damages And Limit His Back Pay filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Mengesha, Trina) (Entered: 03/09/2007)

March 9, 2007

March 9, 2007

30

REPLY to Response re 22 MOTION in Limine to Cut-Off Stoiko's Damages And Limit His Back Pay filed by all defendants. (Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 03/23/2007)

March 23, 2007

March 23, 2007

31

REPLY to Response re 23 MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief filed by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit Ex 1 Jones Termination Notice) (Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 03/23/2007)

March 23, 2007

March 23, 2007

32

REPLY to Response re 21 MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages filed by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit Ex 1-Jones Termination Notice# 3 Exhibit Ex 2-Excerpt SJ Transcript) (Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 03/23/2007)

March 23, 2007

March 23, 2007

33

EXHIBIT 8 - Supplement re 21 MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages , 23 MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief by all defendants (Dewitt, Charles) (Entered: 04/17/2007)

April 17, 2007

April 17, 2007

Minute Entry -Motion Hearing held on 4/17/2007 re 21 MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Punitive Damages; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Punitive Damages filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporated, Expo Design Center, 22 MOTION in Limine to Cut-Off Stoiko's Damages And Limit His Back Pay filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporated, Expo Design Center, 23 MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief MOTION in Limine (1) To Preclude The EEOC From Requesting Injunctive Relief; (2) To Strike The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief; and (3) For Declaratory/Summary Judgment Concerning The EEOC's Request For Injunctive Relief filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporated, Expo Design Center, Final Pretrial Conference held on 4/17/2007 before Honorable Marianne O Battani. (Court Reporter Allen Burnham) (CMot) (Entered: 04/17/2007)

April 17, 2007

April 17, 2007

34

ORDER granting 21 Motion in Limine; granting 22 Motion in Limine; granting 23 Motion in Limine. Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (BThe) (Entered: 04/18/2007)

April 18, 2007

April 18, 2007

35

CONSENT DECREE Signed by Honorable Marianne O Battani. (BThe) (Entered: 05/16/2007)

May 16, 2007

May 16, 2007

Case Details

State / Territory: Michigan

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 24, 2005

Closing Date: 2009

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Home Depot USA, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 25157.21

Order Duration: 2007 - 2009

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Reporting

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-area:

Accommodation / Leave

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discipline

Discrimination-basis:

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits