Case: EEOC v. SSA Marine

2:03-cv-07020 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2003

Closed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed this failure-to-hire case against Stevedoring Services of America, Inc. (SSA) on September 30, 2003 on behalf of a female job applicant. The EEOC alleged that SSA's decision not to hire the employee constituted sex discrimination and violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.). The EEOC sought monetary and injunctive relief. The parties reached a settlement agreement, which the Court entered as a consent decree on Octo…

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed this failure-to-hire case against Stevedoring Services of America, Inc. (SSA) on September 30, 2003 on behalf of a female job applicant. The EEOC alleged that SSA's decision not to hire the employee constituted sex discrimination and violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.). The EEOC sought monetary and injunctive relief.

The parties reached a settlement agreement, which the Court entered as a consent decree on October 29, 2004. The decree, which was to last two years, set out a comprehensive set of injunctive provisions to remedy the applicant's injury. The applicant would be hired to a chassis mechanic position with a 60-day probationary period during which she could only be fired for cause. SSA would be required to retain a monitor for the 60-day period to ensure that the applicant be provided equal employment opportunity. If SSA fired the employee, Monitor would make an independent determination of whether the firing was for cause and based on the same standards to which other chassis mechanics at SSA are held. If the termination was not for cause, the applicant would keeps her job and receives $50,000 as a penalty. The Monitor also would have discretion to award up to $50,000 to the applicant as a penalty if SSA undertook a for-cause termination in a situation in which circumstances within SSA's knowledge and control had undermined the applicant's ability to perform.

The decree also contained injuctive provisions designed to eliminate sex discrimination from SSA's hiring process. SSA would be required to, among other things, develop hiring procedures that comply with Title VII, create objective hiring criteria, proved annual training on Title VII-compliant recruiting/hiring to managerial and supervisory staff, develop job descriptions, hire a consultant, and submit to semiannual EEOC hiring audits.

At some point the monitor invoked the penalty provisions of the decree. As the monitor's report is unavailable to the Clearinghouse, it is not clear which penalty provision was invoked.

SSA moved to vacate the monitor's award of $50,000 on August 3, 2006. The EEOC moved for imposition of an additional $50,000 penalty and the costs of defending against SSA's motion. The Court (Judge Percy Anderson) orally denied both motions on November 3, 2006. SSA apparently continued to refuse to pay the $50,000, so the EEOC filed a motion to enforce the consent decree and for sanctions. The Court orally denied the EEOC's motion without prejudice, ruling that even though SSA's refusal to pay the $50,000 penalty was indefensible the EEOC's motion was procedurally improper. A confidential settlement conference was held on October 17, 2007. The docketed minutes of the conference state, "The case is completely settled. The settlement is placed on the record." The Clearinghouse has been unable to ascertain the exact outcome of this issue. The case is closed.

Summary Authors

Kenneth Gray (7/15/2013)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7901445/parties/useeoc-v-ssa-marine-inc/


Judge(s)

Abrams, Paul L. (California)

Anderson, Percy (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Fisher, Truth (California)

Jr, James J (California)

McMullen, James J Jr (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:03-cv-07020

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. SSA Marine Inc, et al

Oct. 17, 2007

Oct. 17, 2007

Docket
63

2:03-cv-07020

[Proposed] Consent Decree; Order; signed

EEOC vs. SSA Marine, Inc., SteveDoring Services of America, In

Oct. 29, 2004

Oct. 29, 2004

Settlement Agreement

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7901445/useeoc-v-ssa-marine-inc/

Last updated July 15, 2026, 5:28 a.m.

Docket for: USEEOC v. SSA Marine Inc
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 30, 2003

COMPLAINT filed Summons(es) 20 days issued referred to Discovery Paul L. Abrams (rrey) (Entered: 10/02/2003)

RECAP
2 Sept. 30, 2003

CERTIFICATION AS TO INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff USEEOC (rrey) (Entered: 10/02/2003)

RECAP
3 Oct. 9, 2003

ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge J. S. Letts ordering case rtn to Clk for random reassignment purs to GO 224; Case reassigned from Judge J. S. Letts to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings ; The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge [ CV 03-7020 PA (PLAx)] (cc:all counsel) (rn) . (Entered: 10/09/2003)

RECAP
4 Oct. 16, 2003

STANDING ORDER re all counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure & Local Rules of the Central District of CA (See document for further details) by Judge Percy Anderson (ir) (Entered: 10/20/2003)

RECAP
5 Nov. 5, 2003

WAIVER OF SERVICE of SUMMONS by defendant SSA Marine Inc sent by plf on 10/3/03, signed by Truth Fisher of Gordan & Rees. (bp) (Entered: 11/07/2003)

RECAP
6 Dec. 1, 2003

NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson ordering Defendant's Answer to complaint submitted on 11/26/03 is not to be fld but instead rejected; Denial based on: Local Rule 83-1.5 No Certification of Interested parties and/or no copies (ir) (Entered: 12/03/2003)

RECAP
7 Dec. 4, 2003

ANSWER filed by defendant SSA Marine formerly known as Stevedoring Services of America Inc to complaint [1-1] (ir) (Entered: 12/05/2003)

RECAP
8 Dec. 4, 2003

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc formerly known as Stevedoring Services of America Inc (ir) (Entered: 12/05/2003)

RECAP
9 Dec. 8, 2003

SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL AND ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson Scheduling conf set for 10:30 1/19/04 ; Counsel shall meet at least 21 days in advance of the Scheduling Conference to prepare a jointly signed report for the Court to be submitted no less than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference (See document for further details) (ir) (Entered: 12/08/2003)

RECAP
10 Dec. 11, 2003

MINUTES: IN CHAMBERS; Court hereby continues the scheduling conference set for 1/19/04 to 10:30 1/26/04 IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Percy Anderson CR: Not Reported (ir) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

RECAP
11 Jan. 8, 2004

JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed; est length of trial 5-7 court days. (shb, ) (Entered: 01/12/2004)

RECAP
12 Jan. 14, 2004

NOTICE AND REQUEST of Settlement Procedure Selection (Sp1) filed; Parties request To Appear Before Magistrate Judge for settlement proceedings; Settlement procedure selection request Granted By Order of Percy Anderson (ir, ) (Entered: 01/14/2004)

RECAP
13 Jan. 16, 2004

MINUTES [In Chambers]. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Abrams for a settlement conference. It is ORDERED that plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) confer with each other and set a date and time for a settlement conference, after clearing the date with Magistrate Judge Abrams' clerk, Christianna Howard, 213) 894-7103. Please note that settlement conferences are usually conducted on Thursdays and begin at 9:30 a.m. (ch, ) (Entered: 01/16/2004)

RECAP
14 Jan. 16, 2004

MINUTES: IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER; Court has received the parties joint 26(f) report and finds that a scheduling conference is not necessary. Dates set by the Court in this action are listed in the "Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates" attached to this order. Scheduling conference currently on calendar for Monday 1/26/04 is hereby vacated and matter taken off calendar. Jury Trial set for 9/28/04 at 9:00. 9/23/03 File Final Trial Exhibit Stipulation. 9/20/04 Hearing on motions in limine at 1:30, Hearing on Disputed Jury Instructions at 1:30. 9/3/04 Final Pretrial Conference at 1:30, Motions in limine to be filed, Proposed Voir Dire Questions and Agreed-to Statement of Case. 8/20/04 Lodge Pretrial Conference Order and Pretrial Exhibit Stipulation, File Contentions of Fact and Law, Exhibit and Witness list, File Status Report regarding Settlement, File Agreed upon set of Instructions and Verdict Forms, File Joint Statement regarding Disputed Instructions, Verdicts, etc. 8/2/04 Last date to Conduct Settlement Conference. 7/26/04 Last day for hearing motions. 7/19/04 Discovery cut-off. 4/25/04 Last day to amend pleading or add parties IT IS SO ORDERED by the Honorable Percy Anderson. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir, ) (Entered: 01/20/2004)

RECAP
15 Jan. 20, 2004

CIVIL TRIAL ORDER: Matter is set for trial before the Honorable Percy Anderson, Courtroom No 15 (1st Floor Spring Street Level) United States Courthouse 312 N Spring Street LA, CA; Court's procedures and requirements for civil trials are set forth below (See document for further specific details) by Judge Percy Anderson (ir, ) (Entered: 01/20/2004)

RECAP
16 Jan. 20, 2004

SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: Establishing a Discovery cut-off date of 7/19/04. Setting motion cut-off date of 7/26/04. Setting Final Pretrial Conference for 9/3/04 at 1:30. Setting Jury Trial date of 9/28/04 at 9:00 (See document for further details).(ir, ) (Entered: 01/20/2004)

RECAP
17 Jan. 29, 2004

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Paul L. Abrams. Settlement Conference set for 6/3/2004 at 9:30 AM before Honorable Paul L. Abrams. Counsel who will try the case and a person with full settlement authority must be present for the conference. No later than 5/27/04, each party shall submit a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Abrams, room 926, or fax to (213) 894-8534.(pcl, ) (Entered: 01/29/2004)

RECAP
18 May 26, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams to Continue the Settlement Conference to 6/9/2004 at 9:00 AM. Note: Changes made by Court.(nhac, ) Modified on 6/10/2004 (ch, ). (Entered: 05/27/2004)

RECAP
19 June 9, 2004

MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Settlement Conference held. No settlement was reached by parties. If counsel believe that further settlement conferences would be beneficial, counsel should contact the court clerk at 213) 894-7103 to schedule such conferences. Tape #: 04-19/614-998. (ch, ) (Entered: 06/10/2004)

RECAP
20 July 8, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson to extend the Discovery cut-off date to 8/2/2004. This stipulation does not effect the other dates set by the Court in this action.(nhac, ) (Entered: 07/09/2004)

RECAP
21 July 15, 2004

EX PARTE APPLICATION to shorten time to hear motion to modify FRCP Rule 30(a)(2)(A) filed by Defendant SSA Marine Inc. Lodged PROPOSED ORDER AND MOTION. (yc, ) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
22 July 15, 2004

AFFIDAVIT OF DANA C JOHNSON in support of re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order 21 and in support of the underlying motion to modify FRCP Rule 30 filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (yc, ) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
23 July 15, 2004

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. re 21 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order, 22 Motion Related Document, (yc, ) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
24 July 19, 2004

PROPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY RULE 30(a)(2)(A) to Allow the Taking of Nine Additional Depositions filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (ch, ) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
25 July 19, 2004

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME AND MOTION TO ALLOW THE TAKING OF ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS by Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court GRANTS plaintiff leave to take a total of 15 depositions, but will also require that defendants first identify the subjects on which each already-named witness has discoverable information. GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, plaintiff's ex parte application is GRANTED, and plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED IN PART. NO LATER THAN 7/22/04, defendants shall identify, in writing, the subjects of information relevant to this action that each already-named witness possesses. The ten deposition limit set forth in Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(A) is hereby waived, and plaintiff may take no more than 15 depositions total in this matter. The parties shall cooperate in setting a mutually agreeable schedule for depositions that is compatible with any deadlines imposed by the District Court.(ch, ) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
July 19, 2004

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff EEOC's Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time to Hear Motion to Modify FRCP Rule 30(a)(2)(A) or, in the alternative, Modifying FRCP Rule 30 to Allow the Taking of 10 Additional Depositions submitted by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (ch, )

26 Aug. 10, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson DENYING to continue trial and pre-trial conference dates until February and March 2005, respectively.(nhac, ) (Entered: 08/11/2004)

RECAP
27 Aug. 20, 2004

MEMORANDUM of CONTENTIONS of FACT and LAW filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
28 Aug. 20, 2004

PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT Form filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc.(nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
29 Aug. 20, 2004

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc of Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law 27 and Proposed Special Verdict Form 28 were served on 8/20/04. (nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
30 Aug. 20, 2004

PROPOSED JOINT List of Exhibits filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc.(nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
31 Aug. 20, 2004

PRE-TRIAL Exhibit Stipulation filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc.(nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
32 Aug. 20, 2004

JOINT TRIAL Witness Estimate Form filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc.(nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
33 Aug. 20, 2004

DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS filed by the parties. (nhac, ) Modified on 8/24/2004 (nhac, ). (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
34 Aug. 20, 2004

MEMORANDUM of CONTENTIONS of FACT and LAW filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
35 Aug. 20, 2004

PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT Form filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
36 Aug. 20, 2004

JOINT JURY Instructions (Agreed Upon Instructions) filed. (nhac, ) (Entered: 08/24/2004)

RECAP
37 Aug. 27, 2004

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc.(nhac, ) (Entered: 09/02/2004)

RECAP
38 Aug. 27, 2004

PROPOSED STATEMENT of the Case filed by Defendant SSA Marine Inc. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/02/2004)

RECAP
39 Sept. 3, 2004

MINUTES: Pretrial Conference held before Judge Percy Anderson. The parties shall file a joint statement of the case no later than 9/10/04. A Telephone Conference set for 9/7/04 at 3:00 PM. A further pretrial conference is set for 9/20/04 at 1:30 pm.Court Reporter: Jennifer Cheshire. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
40 Sept. 3, 2004

MOTION IN LIMINE to Exclude All Evidence of or Reference to the Composition of SSA Marines Workforce In Terms of Female Vs. Male Employees filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc, formerly known as Stevedoring Services of America Inc. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
41 Sept. 3, 2004

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION IN LIMINE to Prohibit Reference to or Introduction of Evidence of Speculative Damages filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc, formerly known as Stevedoring Services of America Inc. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
42 Sept. 3, 2004

MOTION IN LIMINE #1 to Preclude Evidence Supporting Defendants Affirmative Defenses filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
43 Sept. 3, 2004

DECLARATION of Dana C Johnson in Support of Plaintiff EEOC Motion #1 to Preclude Evidence Supporting Defendants Affirmative Defenses 42 filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
44 Sept. 3, 2004

MOTION IN LIMINE # 2 to Preclude The Testimony of Mike Fogarty and Laurence Bear filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
45 Sept. 3, 2004

DECLARATION of Dana C. Johnson in support of Motion in Limine #2 to Preclude The Testimony of Mike Fogarty and Laurence Bear 44 filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
46 Sept. 3, 2004

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
47 Sept. 3, 2004

PROPOSED STATEMENT of the Case filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/09/2004)

RECAP
48 Sept. 7, 2004

MINUTES: Telephonic Status Conference held before Judge Percy Anderson. Court and counsel confer regarding a further settlement conference. The parties do not object to appearing before this Court for a further settlement conference.Court Reporter: Nancy Smith-Wells. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

RECAP
50 Sept. 7, 2004

JOINT STATEMENT of the Case filed. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
49 Sept. 9, 2004

MINUTES (In Chambers): It is Ordered by Judge Percy Anderson that the parties shall appear for a Settlement Conference on 9/15/04 at 1:30 PM. in Courtroom 15...Each party shall deliver to Chambers a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement on or before September 13. See documents for further details.Court Reporter: None Present. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

RECAP
51 Sept. 13, 2004

OPPOSITION to Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to or Introduction of Evidence of Speculative Damages 41 filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/15/2004)

RECAP
52 Sept. 13, 2004

OPPOSITION to Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence of Defendants Workplace Composition 40 filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/15/2004)

RECAP
53 Sept. 13, 2004

OPPOSITION to Motion in Limine # 2 to Preclude The Testimony of Mike Fogarty and Laurence Bear 44 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/15/2004)

RECAP
54 Sept. 13, 2004

OPPOSITION to Motion in Limine #1 to Preclude Evidence Supporting Defendants Affirmative Defenses 42 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/15/2004)

RECAP
55 Sept. 14, 2004

APPLICATION for Order Granting Telephonic Appearance at the Further Pretrial Conference Scheduled for 9/20/04 at 1:30 pm filed by defendants SSA Marine Inc, Stevedoring Services of America Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

RECAP
56 Sept. 14, 2004

DECLARATION of Jim McMullen in support of Application for Order Granting Telephonic Appearance 55 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

RECAP
57 Sept. 14, 2004

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc re Defenant SSA Marine, Incs Application for Order Granting Telephonic Appearance 55 ; Declaration of Jim McMullen 56 were served on 9/14/04. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

RECAP
58 Sept. 16, 2004

ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson : granting Application of Defendant SSA Marine requesting lead trial counsel for SSA Marine to appear telephonically at the further pretrial conference 55 . It is hereby Ordered that Mr. McMullen shall be allowed to participate in the 9/20/04 further pretrial conference via telephone and shall call in by dialing 213-894-0800 promptly at 1:30 pm. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/17/2004)

RECAP
59 Sept. 17, 2004

TRIAL BRIEF filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/20/2004)

RECAP
60 Sept. 20, 2004

MINUTES: Pretrial Conference held before Judge Percy Anderson. The parties indicated that the matter is nearing settlement. No later than noon 9/23/04 the parties shall notify the Court that the case has settled. If the matter is not completely settled the parties shall appear for a further pretrial conference and motions in limine on 9/24/04 at 1:30 PM. Court Reporter: Jennifer Cheshire. (nhac, ) (Entered: 09/23/2004)

RECAP
61 Sept. 24, 2004

MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge Percy Anderson :settlement is placed on the record;Court Reporter: Nancy Smith Wells. (lc, ) (Entered: 09/29/2004)

RECAP
62 Sept. 27, 2004

ORDER that court having been advised action has been settled, dismisses the action without prejudice, without costs with right to reopen within 30 days if settlement is not consummated by Judge Percy Anderson (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(lc, ) (Entered: 09/29/2004)

RECAP
63 Oct. 29, 2004

CONSENT DECREE; ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson, (see document for details)(bp, ) (Entered: 11/02/2004)

RECAP
64 Aug. 3, 2006

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Vacate monitor award filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/28/2006 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. Lodged proposed order. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/09/2006)

RECAP
65 Aug. 3, 2006

MEMORANDUM of points and authorities in Support of MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/09/2006)

RECAP
66 Aug. 3, 2006

NOTICE OF LODGMENT OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/09/2006)

RECAP
67 Aug. 3, 2006

NOTICE OF LODGMENT OF FOREIGN AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/09/2006)

RECAP
68 Aug. 3, 2006

DECLARATION of Truth Fisher in support of MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/09/2006)

RECAP
69 Aug. 3, 2006

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc, re MOTION to Vacate 64, Memorandum in Support of Motion 65, Motion Related Document 66, Motion Related Document 67, Declaration (Motion related) 68, was served on 8/3/06. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/09/2006)

RECAP
70 Aug. 14, 2006

OPPOSITION to MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/15/2006)

RECAP
71 Aug. 24, 2006

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson : Continuing the MOTION to Vacate 64 . Motion set for hearing on 10/2/2006 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson.(bp, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006)

RECAP
72 Aug. 24, 2006

REPLY Brief in support of MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/30/2006)

RECAP
73 Aug. 24, 2006

DECLARATION of Truth Fisher in support of reply brief in support of MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/30/2006)

RECAP
74 Aug. 24, 2006

DECLARATION of Rusty Copeland in support of reply brief in support of MOTION to Vacate 64 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/30/2006)

RECAP
75 Aug. 24, 2006

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc, re Declaration (Motion related) 73, Declaration (Motion related) 74, Reply (Motion related) 72, was served on 8/24/06. (bp, ) (Entered: 08/30/2006)

RECAP
76 Sept. 29, 2006

APPLICATION for Evidentiary Hearing filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 10/02/2006)

RECAP
77 Oct. 3, 2006

OPPOSITION to APPLICATION for Hearing 76 filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (bp, ) (Entered: 10/04/2006)

RECAP
78 Oct. 16, 2006

REPLY BRIEF in support of APPLICATION for Hearing 76 filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp, ) (Entered: 10/18/2006)

RECAP
79 Nov. 3, 2006

MINUTES: The court therefore denies, without prejudice, the EEOC's request to assess an additional $50,000.00 penalty and $1,850.00 in attorneys' fees against defendant. The courtg therefore denies defendant's motion to vacate monitor award. Judge Percy Anderson :Court Reporter: N/A. (bp, ) (Entered: 11/13/2006)

RECAP
80 July 11, 2007

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Enforce the Court's Order and Motion for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Motion set for hearing on 8/6/2007 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. Lodged Proposed Order. (jl) (Entered: 07/18/2007)

RECAP
81 July 11, 2007

MOTION to Enforce the Court's Order and Motion for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Motion set for hearing on 8/6/2007 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (jl) (Entered: 07/18/2007)

RECAP
82 July 11, 2007

DECLARATION of Victor Viramontes Re: Exhibits in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce 81 filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (jl) (Entered: 07/18/2007)

RECAP
83 July 11, 2007

DECLARATION of Ann Y. Park Re: Fees and Costs for Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce the Court's Order and Motion for Sanctions 81 filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (jl) (Entered: 07/18/2007)

RECAP
84 July 11, 2007

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, re Declaration (Motion related) 82, Declaration (Motion related) 83, MOTION to Enforce 81, MOTION to Enforce 80 served on EEOC's Motion to Enforce the Court's Order and Motion for Sanctions; Notice of Motion to Enforce the Court's Order and Motion for Sanctions; Declaration of Anna Y. Park Re: Fees and Costs; Declaration of Victor Viramontes re: Exhibits in Support. (jl) (Entered: 07/18/2007)

RECAP
85 July 19, 2007

NOTICE OF ERRATA TO MOTION to Enforce 80 filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (bp) (Entered: 08/01/2007)

RECAP
86 July 23, 2007

Opposition to MOTION to Enforce 81 filed by Defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp) (Entered: 08/02/2007)

RECAP
87 July 23, 2007

DECLARATION of Truth Fisher in support of opposition to MOTION to Enforce 81 filed by Defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp) (Entered: 08/03/2007)

RECAP
88 July 23, 2007

DECLARATION of James J. McMullen in support of opposition to MOTION to Enforce 81 filed by Defendant SSA Marine Inc. (bp) (Entered: 08/03/2007)

RECAP
89 July 23, 2007

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant SSA Marine Inc, re Declaration (Motion related) 87, Declaration (Motion related) 88, MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion 86 served on 7/23/07. (bp) (Entered: 08/03/2007)

RECAP
91 July 30, 2007

REPLY in support of MOTION to Enforce the Court's Order and Motion for Sanctions 81 filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (ad) (Entered: 08/16/2007)

RECAP
90 Aug. 6, 2007

MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Percy Anderson : While defendant's continued refusal to pay the $50,000 penalty may well be indefensible, the EEOC's present motion is not the procedurally proper vehicle to obtain the relief it seeks. The court therefore denies the EEOC's motion without prejudice to any future efforts the EEOC or Rita Gartner may initiate to enforce the terms of the consent decree, the monitor's award, or the letter of understanding between defendant and Rita Gartner.Court Reporter: Bridget Montero.(bp) (Entered: 08/08/2007)

RECAP
92 Sept. 20, 2007

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Percy Anderson : Before the court is parties' joint request for settlement conference; settlement conference set 10/17/07 2:30 PM; each party shall deliver to chambers a confidential settlement conference statement submitted IN CAMERA and not filed, not to exceed 5 pages on or before 10/15/07. (see document for other instructions)(lc) (Entered: 09/24/2007)

RECAP
93 Oct. 17, 2007

MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Judge Percy Anderson. The case is completely settled. The settlement is placed on the record.Court Reporter: Leandra Amber.(rj) (Entered: 10/19/2007)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 30, 2003

Closing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of a female job applicant

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Stevedore Services of America, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Central District of California 2:03-cv-07020

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Auditing

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Follow recruitment, hiring, or promotion protocols

Hire

Monitoring

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Utilize objective hiring/promotion criteria

Utilize objective job description

Order Duration: 2004 - 2006

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation