Case: EEOC v. GILLMAN MITSUBISHI

5:02-cv-00504 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: May 23, 2002

Closed Date: May 28, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 2002, the San Antonio office of the EEOC brought this Title VII suit against Gillman Mitsubishi in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the charging party by firing him after he complained to the defendant's general manager about negative remarks made about his religion by his direct supervisor. The charging party intervened in the suit in September 2002. The parties reached a settlement, and the court dismissed the case in March 2003. The settlement paid the charging party $75,000 in compensatory relief, including attorney's fees. No other information about the settlement agreement was made available.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/6/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/33174072/parties/equal-employment-v-gillman-mitsubishi/


Judge(s)

Furgeson, William Royal (Texas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Gutierrez, Linda (Texas)

Harwin, Robert B. (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant

Marsh, Elizabeth M. (Texas)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Goldberg, Jeffrey A. (Texas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

5:02-cv-00504

Docket

EEOC v. Gillman Mitsubishi, et al.

May 28, 2003

May 28, 2003

Docket
10

5:02-cv-00504

Order Granting Motion to Consolidate

EEOC v. Gillman Mitsubishi, et al.

Sept. 10, 2002

Sept. 10, 2002

Order/Opinion

EEOC Litigation Settlement Report (April 2003)

EEOC v. Gillman Mitsubishi, et al.

No Court

April 30, 2003

April 30, 2003

Press Release

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/33174072/equal-employment-v-gillman-mitsubishi/

Last updated Sept. 29, 2026, 10 p.m.

Docket for: Equal Employment v. Gillman Mitsubishi
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 23, 2002

Complaint filed. (Pages: 5) (ep) (Entered: 05/24/2002)

RECAP
May 23, 2002

Case assigned to Honorable Docket IV (ep) (Entered: 05/24/2002)

PACER
May 23, 2002

Case assigned to Honorable Docket IV (ep)

2 July 3, 2002

Waiver of Service by Gillman Mitsubishi ; Notice and Request Mailed on 6/28/02; Answer due on 8/27/02 for Gillman Mitsubishi (rg) (Entered: 07/05/2002)

RECAP
3 July 19, 2002

First Amended complaint by Equal Employment, amending complaint [1-1] (Pages: 6) (rg) (Entered: 07/22/2002)

RECAP
4 Aug. 2, 2002

Answer by Gillman Mitsubishi (rg) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

RECAP
5 Aug. 7, 2002

"ORDER" Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this Order. (rg) (Entered: 08/08/2002)

RECAP
6 Aug. 7, 2002

ORDERED that the plaintiff(s) confer with defendant(s) to submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court by 10/3/02. (rg) (Entered: 08/08/2002)

RECAP
7 Aug. 19, 2002

Unopposed Motion by Michael Lebo to intervene (kc) (Entered: 08/20/2002)

RECAP
Aug. 19, 2002

Received "Intervenor's Original Complaint" (kc) (Entered: 08/20/2002)

PACER
Aug. 19, 2002

Received "Intervenor's Original Complaint" (kc)

8 Sept. 5, 2002

Non-consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate by Equal Employment (rg) (Entered: 09/06/2002)

RECAP
9 Sept. 6, 2002

Non-consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate by Gillman Mitsubishi (rg) (Entered: 09/09/2002)

RECAP
10 Sept. 10, 2002

Order granting motion to intervene [7-1] (rg) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

RECAP
11 Sept. 10, 2002

Intervenor's complaint against Gillman Mitsubishi (Pages: 6) (rg) (Entered: 09/12/2002)

RECAP
12 Sept. 19, 2002

Notice of filing Submission of Proposed Scheduling Order by Equal Employment, Gillman Mitsubishi, Michael Lebo (rg) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

RECAP
13 Sept. 19, 2002

Notice of filing Report of Parties' Rule 26(f) Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan by Equal Employment, Gillman Mitsubishi, Michael Lebo (rg) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

RECAP
14 Sept. 20, 2002

Answer by Gillman Mitsubishi to intervenor complaint [11-1] (rg) (Entered: 09/23/2002)

RECAP
15 Sept. 26, 2002

Scheduling order setting ; Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 11/4/02 Joining of parties, amending of pleadings on 1/31/03 Discovery cutoff 5/9/03 Deadline for filing of all motions 6/6/03 ; Jury Selection set for 9:00 9/22/03 ; Jury trial set for 9:00 9/22/03 (rg1) (Entered: 09/27/2002)

RECAP
16 Oct. 23, 2002

Alternate Dispute Resolution Report filed by Equal Employment, Party(s) do not agree to Alternate Dispute Resolution (rg) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

RECAP
17 Nov. 4, 2002

Alternate Dispute Resolution Report filed by Gillman Mitsubishi, Party(s) do not agree to Alternate Dispute Resolution (rg) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

RECAP
18 Nov. 5, 2002

Alternate Dispute Resolution Report filed by Michael Lebo, Party(s) do not agree to Alternate Dispute Resolution (rg) (Entered: 11/06/2002)

RECAP
19 Nov. 18, 2002

Combined Witness, Exhibit and Expert List by Equal Employment (rg) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

RECAP
20 Nov. 19, 2002

Designation of expert witness filed by Michael Lebo (rg) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

RECAP
21 Nov. 19, 2002

Witness List by Michael Lebo (rg) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

RECAP
22 Nov. 19, 2002

Proposed Exhibit list by Michael Lebo (rg) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

RECAP
23 Jan. 24, 2003

Motion by Equal Employment to substitute attorney Judith G. Taylor in place of Cynthia M. Cano, and for (Cynthia M. Cano) to withdraw as attorney (rg) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

RECAP
24 Jan. 29, 2003

Order granting motion to substitute attorney Judith G. Taylor in place of Cynthia M. Cano [23-1] attorney Cynthia M. Cano for Equal Employment terminated; attorney Judith G. Gaylor added, granting motion for (Cynthia M. Cano) to withdraw as attorney [23-2] signed by Honorable Orlando L. Garcia (rg) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

RECAP
25 Feb. 24, 2003

Notice of attorney appearance for Equal Employment by David C. Rivela (rg) (Entered: 02/25/2003)

RECAP
26 March 7, 2003

ORDER reassigning case to Judge Royal Furgeson signed by Honorable James R. Nowlin (rg) (Entered: 03/12/2003)

RECAP
March 7, 2003

Case reassigned from Honorable Docket IV to Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (rg) (Entered: 03/12/2003)

PACER
March 7, 2003

Case reassigned from Honorable Docket IV to Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (rg)

27 April 23, 2003

First Amended Designation of Witnesses by Michael Lebo (rg) (Entered: 04/23/2003)

RECAP
28 April 30, 2003

Notice of Alternate Dispute Resolution Outcome by Terry S. Bickerton settled during ADR (rg) (Entered: 05/01/2003)

RECAP
29 May 23, 2003

Joint motion by Equal Employment, Gillman Mitsubishi, Michael Lebo to dismiss action with prejudice (rg) (Entered: 05/27/2003)

RECAP
30 May 28, 2003

ORDER granting joint motion to dismiss action with prejudice [29-1] signed by Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (rg) (Entered: 05/29/2003)

RECAP
May 28, 2003

Case closed (rg) (Entered: 05/29/2003)

PACER
May 28, 2003

Case closed (rg)

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 23, 2002

Closing Date: May 28, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Gillman Mitsubishi

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Western District of Texas 5:02-cv-00504

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Amount Defendant Pays: 75000

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation