Case: EEOC v. QUICK QUALITY RESTAURANT INC

7:04-cv-02472 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: April 2, 2004

Closed Date: Oct. 11, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC's New York City office filed this national origin discrimination lawsuit against the defendants Quick Quality Restaurant, Inc. and Candu Management, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (White Plains) on 03/29/2004. The defendants owned five Burger King restaurants in the state of New York. EEOC alleged on behalf of four former employees of the defendants' Fishkill, New York restaurant that the defendants terminated them on the basis of their…

The EEOC's New York City office filed this national origin discrimination lawsuit against the defendants Quick Quality Restaurant, Inc. and Candu Management, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (White Plains) on 03/29/2004. The defendants owned five Burger King restaurants in the state of New York. EEOC alleged on behalf of four former employees of the defendants' Fishkill, New York restaurant that the defendants terminated them on the basis of their Arab or Middle Eastern descent. The individual complainants intervened in the lawsuit.

A jury trial was held before Magistrate Judge George A. Yanthis from 09/19/2005 to 09/27/2005. The jury reached a verdict for the defendants. EEOC filed motions for a new trial motion and to amend/alter judgment, both of which were subsequently denied. Thereafter EEOC filed an appeal to the Second Circuit but the appeal was dismissed. EEOC v. Quick Quality Restaurant, Inc., 2006 WL 375173 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).

Summary Authors

Justin Kanter (6/13/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4926466/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-quick-quality-restaurant-inc/


Judge(s)

Yanthis, George A. (New York)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

7:04-cv-02472

Docket

EEOC v. Quick Quality Restaurant Inc, et al

Feb. 17, 2006

Feb. 17, 2006

Docket
2

7:04-cv-02472

Complaint

EEOC v. Quick Quality Restaurant Inc, et al

April 2, 2004

April 2, 2004

Complaint
42

7:04-cv-02472

Memorandum Decision and Order [re: Resolution of Discovery Disputes]

EEOC v. Quick Quality Restaurant Inc, et al

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

Order/Opinion
73

7:04-cv-02472

Decision and Order

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Quick Quality Restaurants, Inc.

Feb. 16, 2006

Feb. 16, 2006

Order/Opinion

2006 WL 375173

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4926466/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-quick-quality-restaurant-inc/

Last updated Aug. 19, 2025, 3:30 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link

Summons Issued

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER

Summons Issued

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER

Case Designation

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER

Case Designation

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER

Case Designated ECF

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER

Case Designated ECF

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER
1

Complaint

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER
1

Complaint

March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

PACER
2

Complaint

April 2, 2004

April 2, 2004

PACER
2

Complaint

April 2, 2004

April 2, 2004

PACER

Note Rejection of Attempted Paper Filing in ECF Case

June 14, 2004

June 14, 2004

PACER

Note Rejection of Attempted Paper Filing in ECF Case

June 14, 2004

June 14, 2004

PACER
3

Motion to Intervene

June 18, 2004

June 18, 2004

PACER
3

Motion to Intervene

June 18, 2004

June 18, 2004

PACER
4

Answer to Complaint

June 21, 2004

June 21, 2004

PACER
4

Answer to Complaint

June 21, 2004

June 21, 2004

PACER
5

Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement

June 22, 2004

June 22, 2004

PACER
5

Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement

June 22, 2004

June 22, 2004

PACER

Case Redesignation

July 23, 2004

July 23, 2004

PACER

Case Redesignation

July 23, 2004

July 23, 2004

PACER
7

Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment

July 23, 2004

July 23, 2004

PACER
7

Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment

July 23, 2004

July 23, 2004

PACER
6

Scheduling Order

July 26, 2004

July 26, 2004

PACER
6

Scheduling Order

July 26, 2004

July 26, 2004

PACER

Mail Notice to Attorney(s)

Aug. 2, 2004

Aug. 2, 2004

PACER

Mail Notice to Attorney(s)

Aug. 2, 2004

Aug. 2, 2004

PACER
8

Motion to Intervene

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

PACER
8

Motion to Intervene

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

PACER

Motion Hearing

Oct. 1, 2004

Oct. 1, 2004

PACER

Motion Hearing

Oct. 1, 2004

Oct. 1, 2004

PACER
9

Scheduling Order

Oct. 26, 2004

Oct. 26, 2004

PACER
9

Scheduling Order

Oct. 26, 2004

Oct. 26, 2004

PACER
10

Motion for Leave to Appear

Nov. 17, 2004

Nov. 17, 2004

PACER
10

Motion for Leave to Appear

Nov. 17, 2004

Nov. 17, 2004

PACER
11

Letter

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

PACER
11

Letter

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

PACER
12

Letter

April 21, 2005

April 21, 2005

PACER
12

Letter

April 21, 2005

April 21, 2005

PACER
13

Letter

May 2, 2005

May 2, 2005

PACER
13

Letter

May 2, 2005

May 2, 2005

PACER
14

Letter

June 27, 2005

June 27, 2005

PACER
14

Letter

June 27, 2005

June 27, 2005

PACER

Set Deadlines/Hearings

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER

Set Deadlines/Hearings

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER
15

Letter

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER
15

Letter

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER
16

Letter

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER
16

Letter

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER
17

Letter

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER
17

Letter

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

PACER

Pretrial Conference - Interim

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER

Pretrial Conference - Interim

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER
18

Letter

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER
18

Letter

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER
19

Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER
19

Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge

July 15, 2005

July 15, 2005

PACER
20

Order

July 19, 2005

July 19, 2005

PACER
20

Order

July 19, 2005

July 19, 2005

PACER
21

Letter

July 19, 2005

July 19, 2005

PACER
21

Letter

July 19, 2005

July 19, 2005

PACER
22

Proposed Jury Instructions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
22

Proposed Jury Instructions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
23

Proposed Voir Dire Questions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
23

Proposed Voir Dire Questions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
24

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
24

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
25

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
25

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
26

Witness List

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
26

Witness List

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
27

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
27

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
28

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
28

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
29

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
29

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
30

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
30

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
31

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
31

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
32

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
32

Motion in Limine

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
33

Trial Memorandum

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
33

Trial Memorandum

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
34

Proposed Jury Instructions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
34

Proposed Jury Instructions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
35

Proposed Voir Dire Questions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
35

Proposed Voir Dire Questions

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
36

Witness List

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
36

Witness List

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
39

Letter

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
39

Letter

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
40

Letter

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
40

Letter

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
41

Letter

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
41

Letter

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
42

Order

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
42

Order

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

PACER
37

Motion in Limine

Sept. 7, 2005

Sept. 7, 2005

PACER
37

Motion in Limine

Sept. 7, 2005

Sept. 7, 2005

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 2, 2004

Closing Date: Oct. 11, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Candu Management, Inc. (Fishkill, NY), Private Entity/Person

Quick Quality Restaurant, Inc. (Fishkill, NY), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Arab/Afgani/Middle Eastern

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit