Case: EEOC v. Exelon Generation Co., LLC

1:05-cv-05660 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2005

Closed Date: Oct. 5, 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2005, the Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Exelon Generation Co., Inc., Byron Nuclear Power Station (formerly known as Commonwealth Edison Company, Nuclear Division) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the four charging parties, disabled individuals, by refusing to: allow them to work overtime, promote them to certain positions, and maintain the confidentiality…
In September 2005, the Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Exelon Generation Co., Inc., Byron Nuclear Power Station (formerly known as Commonwealth Edison Company, Nuclear Division) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the four charging parties, disabled individuals, by refusing to: allow them to work overtime, promote them to certain positions, and maintain the confidentiality of medical and personnel records in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"). The parties submitted a proposed consent decree to the court on the same day that the complaint was filed. The court approved the consent decree in early October 2005, about a week after the complaint was filed. The two-year decree, containing non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the defendant to: post a notice of the consent decree, report to the EEOC at specified intervals, maintain relevant records, adopt and distribute an anti-discrimination policy, provide ADA training, and pay $217,498.27 to be divided among the four charging parties. The decree was entered in 2005 and scheduled to last until 2007. No further docket entries exist, so the case is closed.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (8/10/2007)

Clearinghouse (12/20/2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/12149927/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-exelon-generation-co-llc/


Judge(s)

St. Eve, Amy J. (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:05-cv-05660

Docket (PACER)

Oct. 5, 2005

Oct. 5, 2005

Docket
1

1:05-cv-05660

Complaint

Sept. 30, 2005

Sept. 30, 2005

Complaint
9

1:05-cv-05660

Consent Decree

Oct. 5, 2005

Oct. 5, 2005

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/12149927/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-exelon-generation-co-llc/

Last updated Nov. 19, 2025, 10:23 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Jury Demand.(mb, ) (Entered: 10/03/2005)

Sept. 30, 2005

Sept. 30, 2005

2

CIVIL Cover Sheet (mb, ) (Entered: 10/03/2005)

Sept. 30, 2005

Sept. 30, 2005

3

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by John C. Hendrickson, Diane Ilene Smason (mb, ) (Entered: 10/03/2005)

Sept. 30, 2005

Sept. 30, 2005

4

JOINT MOTION for entry of consent decree (amb, ) (Entered: 10/03/2005)

Sept. 30, 2005

Sept. 30, 2005

5

NOTICE of Motion by all parties for presentment of motion for entry of conent decree 4 before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 10/5/2005 at 09:00 AM. (amb, ) (Entered: 10/03/2005)

Sept. 30, 2005

Sept. 30, 2005

7

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Exelon Generation Co., LLC by Susan H. Rider and Jennifer M. McMahon, Susan Helene Rider (ar, ) (Entered: 10/06/2005)

Oct. 4, 2005

Oct. 4, 2005

6

WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Exelon Generation Co., LLC waiver sent on 10/3/2005, answer due 12/2/2005. (Smason, Diane) (Entered: 10/05/2005)

Oct. 5, 2005

Oct. 5, 2005

8

MINUTE entry before Judge Amy J. St. Eve: Enter Consent Decree and Notice to all defendant's employees. Joint Motion for entry of Consent Decree 4 is granted. This Decree shall be in effect for two years, until 10/5/07. This court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Consent Decree. This case is dismissed with leave to reinstate by or on 10/5/07. Each party to this Decree shall bear its own expenses and costs. EEOC and defendant shall bear its own attorneys' fees. Case terminated. Mailed notice (lcw, ) (Entered: 10/07/2005)

Oct. 5, 2005

Oct. 5, 2005

9

CONSENT DECREE Signed by Judge Amy J. St. Eve on 10/5/2005.(lcw, ) (Entered: 10/07/2005)

Oct. 5, 2005

Oct. 5, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 30, 2005

Closing Date: Oct. 5, 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Exelon Generation Co. LLC, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:05-cv-05660

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Monitoring

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 217498.27

Order Duration: 2005 - 2007

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Promotion

Training

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits