Case: EEOC v. ROBERT L REEVES & ASSOCIATES

2:00-cv-10515 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2000

Closed Date: 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2000, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against the law firm Robert L Reeves & Associates in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging discrimination on the basis of gender, female, and pregnancy-based discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However i…

In September 2000, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against the law firm Robert L Reeves & Associates in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging discrimination on the basis of gender, female, and pregnancy-based discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However it appears from the various motions that the defendant was accused of maintaining a sexually hostile environment and terminating the employment of some complainants based upon their pregnancies.

Following extensive discovery and a series of successful motions for partial summary judgment for the defendant, the District Court granted summary judgment for the defendant as to the remaining claimants and entered final judgment for the defendants in March 2002. The EEOC appealed this decision to the U.S. Appeals Court for the Ninth Circuit in May 2002, which reversed and remanded the decision back to the District Court. Following this remand and extensive discovery, the case was heard before a jury in October 2005. The jury found in favor of the defendants, and judgment was entered in November 2005. Costs were taxed against the EEOC in the amount of $7,234.49, and attorney expenses were granted in the amount of $1,022,653.69 ($995,780.72 in attorneys' fees and $26,872.97 in expenses). The EEOC appealed the judgment to the U.S. Appeals Court for the Ninth Circuit again in January 2006, which affirmed the District Court's judgment for the defendant in February 2008.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (4/23/2008)

People


Judge(s)

Tevrizian, Dickran M. Jr. (California)

Zarefsky, Ralph (California)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Miller Savitt, Linda C (California)

Schaedel, John P. (Louisiana)

Judge(s)

Tevrizian, Dickran M. Jr. (California)

Zarefsky, Ralph (California)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Miller Savitt, Linda C (California)

Schaedel, John P. (Louisiana)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Docket (PACER)

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

Oct. 18, 2006 Docket
27

Order Denying Ex-Parte Application for Protective Order

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

May 25, 2001 Order/Opinion
73

Order Denying Plaintiff's U.S. EEOC's Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Ordering Clarification of the Magistrate Judge's Protective Order

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

July 27, 2001 Order/Opinion
114

Order on Motion to Compel [in part]

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

Sept. 6, 2001 Order/Opinion
133

Order Denying Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Court Order to Compel Witness for Deposition

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

Sept. 19, 2001 Order/Opinion
137

Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [in part]

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

Sept. 24, 2001 Order/Opinion
155

Revised Partial Summary Judgment Order

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

Oct. 18, 2001 Order/Opinion
192

Order

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

Nov. 30, 2001 Order/Opinion
225

Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [in part]

U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

Jan. 22, 2002 Order/Opinion
288

Order on Summary Judgment

EEOC v. Robert L Reeves & Associates

2003 WL 1634013, 2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 9019

Feb. 19, 2002 Order/Opinion

Docket

Last updated May 13, 2022

ECF Number Description Date Link
1

COMPLAINT filed Summons(es) issued referred to Discovery Ralph Zarefsky (jag) (Entered: 10/04/2000)

Sept. 29, 2000
2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff US EEOC (jag) (Entered: 10/04/2000)

Sept. 29, 2000
3

STANDING ORDER WITH REGARD TO NEWLY FILED CASES by Judge Dickran Tevrizian (pj) (Entered: 10/04/2000)

Oct. 2, 2000
4

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Robert L Reeves & (pj) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

Dec. 5, 2000
5

ANSWER filed by defendant Robert L. Reeves & Assoc a Professional Law corp incorrectly sued & served as Robert L Reeves & Associates a Professional Corp to complaint [1-1] (pj) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

Dec. 5, 2000
6

ORDER by Judge Dickran Tevrizian ; IN COURT HEARING RE: SETTING SCHED CONF set on 10:00 3/5/01 (pj) (Entered: 12/15/2000)

Dec. 14, 2000
7

EX PARTE APPLICATION filed by plaintiff US EEOC for protective order to stay the depo of Sharon Carbone (pj) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

Dec. 21, 2000
8

MEMORANDUM of p&a IN SUPPORT by plaintiff US EEOC of exparte motion for protective order to stay the depo of Sharon Carbone [7-1] (pj) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

Dec. 21, 2000
9

NOTICE by plaintiff US EEOC to exparte appl for protective order to stay the depo of Sharon Carbone [7-1] (pj) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

Dec. 21, 2000
10

MINUTES: In Judge Zarefsky's absence, Crt will be ruling on plfs Ex Parte appl. GRANT in part Plfs exparte appl for protective order to stay the depo of Sharon Carbone. [7-1] by Discovery Robert N. Block CR: 479 (Scan Only) (pj) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

Dec. 22, 2000
11

MINUTES: Dfts ex parte appl seeking in effect a mod of the crt's prior rulong plfs ex parte appl is DENIED by Discovery Robert N. Block CR: n/a (P Send) (pj) (Entered: 12/27/2000)

Dec. 26, 2000
12

OPPOSITION by plaintiff US EEOC to ex parte appl for ord to proceed with the depo of Sharon Carbone on 12/26/00 (pj) (Entered: 12/29/2000)

Dec. 27, 2000
13

NOTICE of defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc exparte application to set the deposition of Sharon Carbone for 12/27/00 (jp) (Entered: 12/29/2000)

Dec. 28, 2000
14

OPPOSITION by defendant Robert L Reeves & to exparte appl for protective order to stay the depo of Sharon Carbone [7-1] (jp) (Entered: 12/29/2000)

Dec. 28, 2000
15

INITIAL DISCLOSURES FOR EARLY MEETING of Cnsl & for Rule 26 Meeting filed by plaintiff (ir) (Entered: 01/29/2001)

Jan. 26, 2001
16

NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Dickran Tevrizian; IT IS HEREBY ORD the Initial Disclosures is NOT to be fld, but instead REJECTED, & is ORD rtn to cnsl. (Effective 12/1/00 L/R 6 will no longer regulate the early meeting & the L/R 6.8 status conf instead, the ptys will confer & make disclosures under the sched set by FRCP 26(f) & No proof of svc attch to docs) (jp) (Entered: 02/02/2001)

Jan. 30, 2001
18

JOINT REPORT OF EARLY MEETING OF COUNSEL filed. Estimated length of trial 12 to 15 days (jp) (Entered: 02/12/2001)

Feb. 5, 2001
17

NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Dickran Tevrizian; IT IS HEREBY ORD the Joint Report is to be fld & Proc. The Filing date is ORD to the date the doc was stamped "rcvd but not fld" w/the Clk. (jp) (Entered: 02/12/2001)

Feb. 8, 2001
19

JOINT REPORT OF EARLY MEETING OF COUNSEL filed. Estimated length of trial 12 to 15 days (jp) (Entered: 02/22/2001)

Feb. 22, 2001
20

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF SCHED CONF and ORDER by Judge Dickran Tevrizian that the hrg sched conference is CONT to 10:00 on 4/2/01 (jp) (Entered: 03/07/2001)

March 6, 2001
21

MINUTES before Judge Dickran Tevrizian: Scheduling Conf if held. Crt sets the fol dates: discovery cutoff set for 12/31/01; pretrial conference set for 1:30 2/25/02; jury trial set for 9:30 3/26/02 (Est 7 days) ; Crt advises cnsl of LR 23. Crt fur advises cnsl of FRCP 16 & 26. CR: Lori Muraoka (jp) (Entered: 04/05/2001)

April 2, 2001
22

ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Dickran Tevrizian that the establishing a DCO date of 12/31/01; Setting the Final Pretrial conf for 02/25/02 @ 1:30 P.M.; Setting 03/26/02 @ 9:30 A.M. as the Trial date; Re: preparation for J/T (jp) (Entered: 04/05/2001)

April 2, 2001
23

FIRST MOTION by plaintiff US EEOC to compel discov resp from dft to plf's 1st request to produce docs ; motion hearing set for 10:00 6/4/01 (DISCOVERY MATTER) (jp) (Entered: 05/21/2001)

May 18, 2001
24

EX PARTE APPLICATION filed by plaintiff US EEOC for protective order re deposition of Judith Ignacio quilaton set for 5/30/01 (jp) (Entered: 05/24/2001)

May 23, 2001
25

DECLARATION of KATHLEEN MULLIGAN by plaintiff US EEOC in suppt of exparte appl for protective order re deposition of Judith Ignacio quilaton set for 5/30/01 [24-1] (jp) (Entered: 05/24/2001)

May 23, 2001
26

AMENDED DECLARATION OF MAILING by plaintiff US EEOC on 5/23/01 of Plf's exparte appl for PROTO re depo of Judith Ignacio; Decl of Kathleen Mulligan in suppt. (jp) (Entered: 05/24/2001)

May 24, 2001
27

ORDER by Discovery Ralph Zarefsky, denying plaintiff's exparte application for protective order re deposition of Judith Ignacio quilaton set for 5/30/01 [24-1] (bp) (Entered: 05/29/2001)

May 25, 2001
28

OPPOSITION by defendant Robert L Reeves, to exparte motion for protective order re deposition of Judith Ignacio quilaton set for 5/30/01 [24-1] (yc) (Entered: 05/29/2001)

May 25, 2001
29

REPLY BRIEF by plaintiff US EEOC in suppt of motion to compel discov resp from dft to plf's 1st request to produce docs [23-1] (jp) (Entered: 05/30/2001)

May 25, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: [Propsd] Ord granting exparte appl for stay of & PROTO re the deposition of Judith Ignacio Quilaton set for 5/30/01; Lodged 5/25/01 (jp) (Entered: 06/04/2001)

May 29, 2001
30

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW by defendant Robert L Reeves (to joint stipulation re plf's motion to compel discovery) [23-1] (jp) (Entered: 05/31/2001)

May 30, 2001
31

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by plaintiff US EEOC for protective order [Joint Stip of facts] re dft's resp to plf's 1st req for production of docs [USDC LR 7.15.2]; Plf's decl; motion hearing set for 10:00 6/18/01 (jp) (Entered: 06/04/2001)

June 1, 2001
32

MINUTES before Discovery Ralph Zarefsky: Plf's 1st motion to compel discov resp from dft to plf's 1st request to produce docs [23-1]. Plf's mot is GRANTED in part & DENIED in part. CR: CV 01-17 (jp) (Entered: 06/08/2001)

June 4, 2001
33

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Robert L Reeves & Associates for leave to amend answer ; Decl of John P. Schaedel; motion hearing set for 10:00 7/9/01 (jp) (Entered: 06/12/2001)

June 11, 2001
34

NOTICE OF LODGMENT by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc of amended answer to unverified complaint; Lodged Answer (jp) (Entered: 06/12/2001)

June 11, 2001
35

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW by plaintiff US EEOC in resp to dft's motion for protective order [Joint Stip of facts] re dft's resp to plf's 1st req for production of docs [31-1] (jp) (Entered: 06/12/2001)

June 11, 2001

TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 6/4/01. (ghap) (Entered: 06/14/2001)

June 12, 2001
37

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc withdrawing motion for protective order. The Crt's Ord of 06/04/01 on plf EEOC's mot to compel addressed & disposed of the issues raised by the motion for PROTO. (jp) (Entered: 06/15/2001)

June 14, 2001
38

NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Dickran Tevrizian IT IS HEREBY ORD: The Mot for review & reconsideration is NOT to be fld, but instead REJECTED & is ORD rtn to cnsl; rcd date 6/18/01 (Local Ruel 7.4.2 Written ntc of mot lacking or timeliness of ntc incorrect) (ir) (Entered: 06/25/2001)

June 20, 2001
39

NOTICE OF MOTION by plaintiff US EEOC for review & reconsideration of Mag Judge's Ord on Plf's mot to compel ; motion hearing set for 10:00 7/16/01 (ir) (Entered: 06/25/2001)

June 22, 2001
40

MOTION by plaintiff US EEOC for review , and for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's Order on plf's motion to compel (no hrg date set) (jp) (Entered: 06/26/2001)

June 26, 2001
41

EX PARTE APPLICATION filed by plaintiff US EEOC to shorten time to file motion to quash subpoenas issd by dfts to CA State University at Long Beach ; Lodged Order; Motion for quash subpoenas & Ntc of mot & ord for mot to quahs subpoenas. (jp) (Entered: 06/28/2001)

June 26, 2001
42

DECLARATION of KATHLEEN MULLIGAN by plaintiff US EEOC in opposition to dft's motion to amend answer [33-1] (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

June 28, 2001
43

OPPOSITION by plaintiff US EEOC to motion to amend answer [33-1] (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

June 28, 2001
44

EX PARTE APPLICATION filed by plaintiff US EEOC for order shortening time on plf EEO'S proposed motions to quash subpoenas ; Lodged propsd ord (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

June 28, 2001
45

OPPOSITION by defendant Robert L Reeves & to exparte appl to shortening time on plf EEO'S proposed motions to quash subpoenas [44-1] (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

June 28, 2001
46

DECLARATION of JOHN P. SCHAEDEL by defendant Robert L Reeves & Associates (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

June 28, 2001
47

DECLARATION of RICHARD M. WILNER by defendant Robert L Reeves & Associates (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

June 28, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: [Proposed] Order on plf's exparte motion to shorten time by plaintiff US EEOC; Lodged 6/28/01 (jp) (Entered: 07/02/2001)

June 29, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: [Proposed] Order on plf's exparte motion to shorten time by plaintiff US EEOC; Lodged 06/26/01 (jp) (Entered: 07/02/2001)

June 29, 2001
48

MINUTES before Judge Dickran Tevrizian: Plf's motion for review [40-1] and reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's Order on plf's motion to compel [40-2]. The crt Ord the above-ref mot TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION upon the expireation of time for filing briefs. No apr by cnsl/ptys will be necessary. Cnsl shall be notified of the Crt's ruling by FAX/mail when the mtr is decided. CR: N/A (Psend) (jp) (Entered: 07/02/2001)

July 2, 2001
49

CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc to exparte applications on motions to shorten time to file motion to quash subpoenas issd by dfts to CA State University at Long Beach, Kimco Staffing Solution, Farmers & Merchants Bank, Doheny Eye Institute, Employment Dev Dept, University of Southern CA Dental School [41-1] (jp) (Entered: 07/03/2001)

July 2, 2001
50

REPLY by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc to plf's opp to motion for leave to amend answer [33-1] (jp) (Entered: 07/03/2001)

July 2, 2001
52

ORDER by Discovery Ralph Zarefsky plf's exparte appl for order shortening time on plf EEO'S motions to quash subpoenas svd on Kimco Staffing, Doheny Eye Institute, Southern CA Dental School, Farmers & Merchants Bank & EDD [44-1] is DENIED. (PSEND) (jp) (Entered: 07/03/2001)

July 2, 2001
53

OPPOSITION by defendant Robert L Reeves & to motion for review [40-1], motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's Order on plf's motion to compel [40-2] (bp) (Entered: 07/05/2001)

July 2, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; notice of proposed motion and proposed motion to quash subpoena. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; memorandum of points and authorities. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; memorandum of points and authorities in support of EEOC's proposed motion to quash. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; notice of proposed motion to quash subpoena issued by defendant to Farmers and Merchants. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; memorandum of points and authorities in support of the EEOC's proposed motion to quash defendant's subpoena duces tecum. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; notice of proposed motion and proposed motion to quash subpoena issued by USC Dental School. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; memorandum of points and authorities in support of EEOC's proposed motion to quash defendants' subpoena duces tecum. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; notice of proposed motion to quash subpoena issued by defendant. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; notice of proposed motion to quash subpoena issued by dft to Kimco staffing solution. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED; declaration of Gregory L. McClinton in support of EEOC's proposed motions to quash defendant's subpoenas duces tecum. (bp) (Entered: 07/09/2001)

July 9, 2001
54

REPLY Brief by plaintiff US EEOC in support of motion for review [40-1] (bp) (Entered: 07/10/2001)

July 9, 2001
55

MINUTES: granting defendants motion for leave to amend answer [33-1] by Judge Dickran Tevrizian CR: Lori Muraoka (bp) (Entered: 07/11/2001)

July 9, 2001
56

ANSWER filed by defendant Robert L Reeves & to complaint [1-1] (bp) (Entered: 07/11/2001)

July 9, 2001
57

ORDER that the court grants defendant's motion for leave to amend answer. This court deems defendant's proposed first amended answer filed and served as of the date of this order by Judge Dickran Tevrizian (bp) (Entered: 07/11/2001)

July 9, 2001
58

OPPOSITION by defendant Robert L Reeves & to motion for review [40-1], motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's Order on plf's motion to compel [40-2] (bp) (Entered: 07/11/2001)

July 10, 2001
59

NOTICE OF ERRATA by defendant Robert L Reeves & correcting motion opposition [58-1] (bp) (Entered: 07/11/2001)

July 10, 2001
66

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Robert L Reeves & to compel pla's interrog responses (jnt stip of facts). Motion hearing set for 10:00 8/6/01. Lodged order. (sv) (Entered: 07/20/2001)

July 11, 2001
67

DECLARATION of RICHARD WILNER, Esq. by defendant Robert L Reeves & (sv) (Entered: 07/20/2001)

July 11, 2001
68

MOTION by defendant Robert L Reeves to compel pla's resp to interrogs (jnt stip oof facts). Motion hearing set for 10:00 8/6/01. (sv) (Entered: 07/20/2001)

July 11, 2001
60

RECEIPT OF TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 7/9/01 (Re:) CR: Lori Muraoka-18/Dorothy Babykin/Crt House. (ghap) (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 13, 2001

TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 7/9/01. (ghap) (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 13, 2001
61

DECLARATION of KATHLEEN MULLIGAN IN OPP by plaintiff US EEOC to Dfts mot to compel interrogatory responses (pj) (Entered: 07/18/2001)

July 13, 2001
62

SUPPL DECLARATION of KATHLEEN MULLIGAN IN OPP to decl of Richard Wilner fld 7/11/01 by plaintiff US EEOC (pj) (Entered: 07/18/2001)

July 13, 2001
63

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Robert L Reeves & to compel the US Postal Service to comply with civil subpoena ; motion hearing set for 10:00 8/6/01 Lodged order (pj) (Entered: 07/18/2001)

July 17, 2001
65

NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Discovery Ralph Zarefsky that the doc entitled Mot to compel pla's es[, jnt stip, ntc of mot, decl of Wilner, prop ord is to be filed and processed. (sv) (Entered: 07/20/2001)

July 18, 2001
69

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc to compel plf EEOC'S production of documents & inspection of things, set one & two ; motion hearing set for 10:00 8/6/01 (jp) (Entered: 07/23/2001)

July 20, 2001
70

JOINT STIPULATION OF FACTS RE defendant motion to compel plf EEOC'S production of documents & inspection of things, set one & two [69-1] (jp) (Entered: 07/23/2001)

July 20, 2001
71

DECLARATION of JOHN P. SCHAEDEL by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc re joint stip re dft's motion to compel plf EEOC'S production of documents & inspection of things, set one & two [69-1] (jp) (Entered: 07/23/2001)

July 20, 2001
72

DECLARATION of GREGORY L. McCLINTON by plaintiff US EEOC in opposition to dft's motion to compel plf EEOC'S production of documents & inspection of things, set one & two [69-1] (jp) (Entered: 07/23/2001)

July 20, 2001
89

NOTICE OF MOTION by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc to enforce previously svd on CA State University at Long Beach ; motion hearing set for 10:00 8/6/01 (jp) (Entered: 08/10/2001)

July 23, 2001
90

MOTION to enforce previously svd on CA State University at Long Beach [89-1] filed by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc (jp) (Entered: 08/10/2001)

July 23, 2001
91

DECLARATION of JOHN P. SCHAEDEL by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc in suppt of motion to enforce previously svd on CA State University at Long Beach [89-1] (jp) (Entered: 08/10/2001)

July 23, 2001
73

ORDER by Judge Dickran Tevrizian plf's motion for review & reconsideration of Mag Judge's Ord on Plf's mot to compel [39-1], [40-1], [40-2] & ORDERING clarification of the Magistrate Judge's PROTO. (Send) (jp) (Entered: 07/30/2001)

July 27, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: DISCOVERY MATTER [PROPOSED] ORDER by defendant; Lodged 7/10/01 (jp) (Entered: 07/30/2001)

July 27, 2001

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: [Proposed] Order by defendant; Lodged 7/2/01 (jp) (Entered: 07/30/2001)

July 27, 2001
74

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Kathleen Mulligan [61-1] by plaintiff US EEOC in opposition to dft's motion to compel documetns (Sets one (1) & two (2)) (jp) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

July 30, 2001
75

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW by plaintiff US EEOC in responses to dft's motion to compel pla's interrog responses & documents [66-1], & [68-1] (jp) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

July 30, 2001
76

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of KATHLEEN MULLIGAN by plaintiff US EEOC in opposition to dft's motion to compel plf's interrog responses (jnt stip of facts) [66-1] & decl of Richard Wilner fld 7/11/01 (jp) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

July 30, 2001
78

REPLY BRIEF by defendant Robert L Reeves & Associates re dft's motion to compel pla's interrog responses (joint stip of facts). [66-1] (jp) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

July 30, 2001
79

DECLARATION of GREGORY L. McCLINTON by plaintiff US EEOC re refusal of dft to include EEOC'S preliminary statement in dft's motion to enforce subpoena issued to CA State University at Long Beach & request for sanctions (jp) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

July 30, 2001
80

OPPOSITION filed by defendant Robert L Reeves & Associates to dft's motion to enforce subpoeans previously svd on CA State University & re: dft's refusal to Incorporate EEOC's plf EEOC's preliminary statement (jp) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

July 30, 2001
84

REPLY BRIEF by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc re joint stip of facts re dft's motion to compel plf EEOC'S production of documents [69-1] (jp) (Entered: 08/09/2001)

July 30, 2001
81

ORDER clarifying protective order by Discovery Ralph Zarefsky. Absent stipulation of the parties, documents produced in the category covered by request No. 5 at issue before the court on 6/4/01, shall be shown only to counsel of record in connection with this case, and duly retained expert witnesses (see document for details) (bp) (Entered: 08/02/2001)

Aug. 1, 2001
82

DECLARATION of John P. Schaedel by defendant Robert L Reeves & in opposition to EEOC's request for sanctions in connection with defendant's dfts motion to compel the US Postal Service to comply with civil subpoena [63-1] [64-1] (bp) (Entered: 08/02/2001)

Aug. 1, 2001
83

DECLARATION of RICHARD M. WILNER by defendant Robert L Reeves & Assoc (jp) (Entered: 08/06/2001)

Aug. 3, 2001

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 29, 2000

Closing Date: 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Robert L Reeves & Associates (Pasadena, California), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Pregnancy discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits