Case: EEOC v. MIRABILE INVESTMENT CORPORATION and OLIVE OIL ASSOCIATES (d/b/a POPEYE'S CHICKEN AND BISCUIT RESTAURANT)

2:04-cv-02775 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2004

Closed Date: July 20, 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2004, the Memphis Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Mirabile Investment Corporation and Olive Oil Associates (doing business as Popeye's Chicken and Biscuit Restaurant) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the consent decree that the complaint alleged that the defendant subjected six of the charging parties, female employe…

In September 2004, the Memphis Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Mirabile Investment Corporation and Olive Oil Associates (doing business as Popeye's Chicken and Biscuit Restaurant) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the consent decree that the complaint alleged that the defendant subjected six of the charging parties, female employees, to a sexually hostile work environment and terminated one of the charging parties, a female employee, in retaliation for her complaints of sexual harassment, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After some discovery, the parties settled the lawsuit in July 2005 through a consent decree.

The three-year decree, containing non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the defendant to: adopt a new policy regarding workplace harassment, post its anti-retaliation policy, regularly report to the EEOC regarding complaints about harassment, provide anti-retaliation training for all its employees, and pay $95,000 to be distributed among six charging parties. The docket sheet does not show any further enforcement; the case was presumably closed in 2008.

Summary Authors

David Friedman (10/2/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4642003/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-mirabile-investment-corporation/


Judge(s)

Breen, J. Daniel (Tennessee)

Pham, Tu M. (Tennessee)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:04-cv-02775

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Mirabile Investment Corporation

July 25, 2005

July 25, 2005

Docket
27

2:04-cv-02775

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Mirabile Investment Corporation

July 20, 2005

July 20, 2005

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4642003/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-mirabile-investment-corporation/

Last updated Aug. 18, 2025, 1:33 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
18

PROTECTIVE ORDER: Protective order entered relating to dft's new worth and related financial information and entitled to protection in accordance with FRCvP 26(c). Signed by Judge Tu M. Pham. (jae, )

April 22, 2005

April 22, 2005

RECAP
22

ORDER granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Discovery completion ddl is extended until 5/18/05. Signed by Judge Tu M. Pham. (jae, )

May 6, 2005

May 6, 2005

RECAP
26

ORDER granting 24 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen. (jae, )

May 10, 2005

May 10, 2005

RECAP
27

CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen. (ehg, )

July 20, 2005

July 20, 2005

RECAP
28

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE . Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen. (ehg, )

July 25, 2005

July 25, 2005

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Tennessee

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 28, 2004

Closing Date: July 20, 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Olive Oil Associates (Memphis, Tennessee), Private Entity/Person

Mirabile Investment Corporation (Memphis, Tennessee), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: 95000

Order Duration: 2005 - 2008

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits