Case: Neal v. Director, DC Department of Corrections

1:93-cv-02420 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: Nov. 24, 1993

Closed Date: 1995

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

None

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attrorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4643208/parties/bonds-v-dc/


Judge(s)

Lamberth, Royce C. (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Buchanan, Avis E. (District of Columbia)

Burke, Susan L. (District of Columbia)

Gately, Mary Elizabeth (District of Columbia)

Kaplan, Warren K. (District of Columbia)

Liss, Jeffrey Fred (District of Columbia)

Pennington-Cross, Carla G. (District of Columbia)

Sellers, Joseph Marc (District of Columbia)

Warin, Roger E (District of Columbia)

Webber, Christine E. (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Lamberth, Royce C. (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Buchanan, Avis E. (District of Columbia)

Burke, Susan L. (District of Columbia)

Gately, Mary Elizabeth (District of Columbia)

Kaplan, Warren K. (District of Columbia)

Liss, Jeffrey Fred (District of Columbia)

Pennington-Cross, Carla G. (District of Columbia)

Sellers, Joseph Marc (District of Columbia)

Warin, Roger E (District of Columbia)

Webber, Christine E. (District of Columbia)

Williams, Ted Justice (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Amato, Maria-Claudia T. (District of Columbia)

Back, Mark D. (District of Columbia)

Bell, Lisa Annette (District of Columbia)

Brennan, Bruce Edward (District of Columbia)

Burroughs, Carol Elaine (District of Columbia)

Earl, William Johnson Jr. (District of Columbia)

Efros, Ellen A. (District of Columbia)

Grossman, Martin L. (District of Columbia)

Rigsby, Robert (District of Columbia)

Robinson, Jo Anne (District of Columbia)

Schultz, Nancy S. (District of Columbia)

Valentine, George C. (District of Columbia)

Wasserman, Michael F. (District of Columbia)

Zielinski, Michael Edward (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:93-cv-02420

Docket

Nov. 12, 2009

Nov. 12, 2009

Docket
352

1:93-cv-02420

Opinion II - Equitable Relief for Individual Named Plaintiffs

1995 WL 517249

Aug. 9, 1995

Aug. 9, 1995

Order/Opinion
356

1:93-cv-02420

Memorandum Opinion IV - Procedures for Absent Class Members

1995 WL 517246

Aug. 9, 1995

Aug. 9, 1995

Order/Opinion
355

1:93-cv-02420

Opinion III - Class Wide Injunctive Relief

1995 WL 517244

Aug. 9, 1995

Aug. 9, 1995

Order/Opinion
350

1:93-cv-02420

Opinion I - Final Judgment on Jury Verdicts

1995 WL 517248

Aug. 9, 1995

Aug. 9, 1995

Order/Opinion

1:93-cv-02420

Consent Decree

June 28, 1999

June 28, 1999

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4643208/bonds-v-dc/

Last updated Aug. 8, 2022, 3:03 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
2371

ORDER denying 2368 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 11/22/2005. (lcrcl1, )

Nov. 22, 2005

Nov. 22, 2005

RECAP
2372

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 11/22/2005. (lcrcl1, )

Nov. 22, 2005

Nov. 22, 2005

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 24, 1993

Closing Date: 1995

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

8 named plaintiffs representing class of all current/former female DCDOC employees from 4/1/1989-3/1/95 subjected to sexual harassment and all current/former male DCDOC employees from 4/4/1991-3/1/95 subjected to retaliation for opposing sexual harassment

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

District of Columbia, Federal

Walter B. Ridley (Washington), Federal

Margaret A. Moore (Washington), Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Amount Defendant Pays: $1,761,213

Content of Injunction:

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Monitoring

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Issues

General:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination-area:

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Hiring

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Gender:

Female