Case: Barefield v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

3:86-cv-02427 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: May 12, 1986

Closed Date: Aug. 12, 1998

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

Several Black and Hispanic employees filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against their employer, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. They brought this action on behalf of Black and Hispanic workers at the oil and gas production facilities in California's San Joaquin Valley. The complaint alleged that Chevron discriminated against the plaintiff class based on race and national origin with respect to compensation, training, job assignments, and promotion, i…

Several Black and Hispanic employees filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against their employer, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. They brought this action on behalf of Black and Hispanic workers at the oil and gas production facilities in California's San Joaquin Valley. The complaint alleged that Chevron discriminated against the plaintiff class based on race and national origin with respect to compensation, training, job assignments, and promotion, in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), California Gov't Code § 12940 et seq.

On September 9, 1987, the District Court (Judge Thelton E. Henderson) certified the class. Barefield v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., C 86-2427 TEH, 1987 WL 65054 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 1987). The Court also discussed the type of relief available to the class. Barefield v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1232 (N.D. Cal. 1988). The parties eventually reached a settlement agreement, and the Court approved a consent decree on June 24, 1991. The agreement, in which Chevron did not admit any liability, required the defendant to set promotion goals in good faith for various job categories to address work force imbalances.

In order to compensate the plaintiff class members, the consent decree asked Chevron to establish a fund in order to settle emotional distress claims for alleged loss of promotion opportunities or alleged hostile work environment harassment based on race or national origin. A Master would take those claims and hold hearings to determine each claimant's share of the fund. Additionally, the decree provided an opt-out option for individual class members to pursue individual claims against Chevron for incidents that occurred after May 21, 1983.

Three named plaintiffs subsequently opted-out as individual plaintiffs and filed their claims against Chevron. The case went to trial on August 8 - August 17, 1995, and April 23 - May 7, 1996. The parties filed their post-trial briefs on July 12, 1996. Judge Henderson filed a court opinion on January 2, 1997, and subsequently made the judgment with regard to those individual claims. The Court ruled in favor of two of the named plaintiffs on their claims and awarded them $192,000 and $176,000 respectively. Barefield v. Chevron U.S., Inc., C86-2427 TEH, 1997 WL 9888 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 1997). The Court ruled in favor of the defendant Chevron on the other plaintiff's claim. That plaintiff appealed this ruling to the 9th Circuit Court, and the Circuit Court affirmed the lower court's ruling on August 12, 1998. Barefield v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 156 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 1998). This ended the case.

Summary Authors

Emma Bao (7/19/2013)

People


Judge(s)

Choy, Herbert Young Cho (Hawaii)

Hamilton, Phyllis Jean (California)

Henderson, Thelton Eugene (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Alcala, Carlos M. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Alberti, William G (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:86-cv-02427

Docket

Barefield v. Chevron

Feb. 19, 1999

Feb. 19, 1999

Docket

3:86-cv-02427

Opinion

Barefield v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Sept. 9, 1987

Sept. 9, 1987

Order/Opinion

1987 WL 65054

3:86-cv-02427

Order & Opinion

Barefield v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Dec. 6, 1988

Dec. 6, 1988

Order/Opinion

1988 WL 188433

505

3:86-cv-02427

Opinion

Barefield v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Jan. 2, 1997

Jan. 2, 1997

Order/Opinion

1997 WL 9888

97-15451

Opinion

Barefield v. Chevron USA, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Aug. 12, 1998

Aug. 12, 1998

Order/Opinion

156 F.3d 1235

Resources

Docket

Last updated Dec. 18, 2024, 7:16 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 12, 1986

Closing Date: Aug. 12, 1998

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Black and Hispanic workers employed at Chevron U.S.A., Inc. oil production facilities in California's San Joaquin Valley alleging national origin and race discrimination of their employer.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Attorneys fees

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Litigation

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Promotion

Discrimination Prohibition

Utilize objective hiring/promotion criteria

Monitor/Master

Amount Defendant Pays: $368,000

Order Duration: 1991 - None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Training

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Race discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Hispanic

Affected Race(s):

Black