Case: EEOC v. JAYCO ACQUISITION AND HOLDING CO., INC dba COMPTO

1:98-cv-00065 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: July 13, 1998

Closed Date: May 4, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Memphis office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, against Jayco Acquisition and Holding Company, Inc., d/b/a Compton's Oak Grove Lodge Inc. The complaint, filed in July 1998, alleged age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the charging party was discharged because of her age (71).

Defendant moved to dismiss the case in August 1998, but the motion was denied in October 1998. In May 1999 the parties settled and agreed to a consent decree. The decree, which was good for 18 months, included non-discrimination and non-retaliation provisions, as well as a requirement that Defendant post a notice concerning the decree for one year. Defendant was also required to pay the charging party a total of $20,000 in back pay and liquidated damages.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Glassman (6/1/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:98-cv-00065

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. JAYCO Acquisition and Holding Company, Inc.

May 4, 1999

May 4, 1999

Docket
1

1:98-cv-00065

Complaint

EEOC v. JAYCO Acquisition and Holding Company, Inc.

July 13, 1998

July 13, 1998

Complaint
7

1:98-cv-00065

Order

EEOC v. JAYCO Acquisition and Holding Company, Inc.

Oct. 15, 1998

Oct. 15, 1998

Order/Opinion
18

1:98-cv-00065

Order

EEOC v. JAYCO Acquisition

Dec. 14, 1998

Dec. 14, 1998

Order/Opinion
23

1:98-cv-00065

Consent Decree

EEOC v. JAYCO Acquisition and Holding Company, Inc.

May 4, 1999

May 4, 1999

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

Last updated Sept. 5, 2022, 3:12 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT with jury demand, no summons issued (cdw) (Entered: 07/14/1998)

July 13, 1998

July 13, 1998

2

MOTION by deft to dismiss (vjt) (Entered: 08/31/1998)

Aug. 31, 1998

Aug. 31, 1998

3

BRIEF by deft in support of motion to dismiss [2-1] (vjt) (Entered: 08/31/1998)

Aug. 31, 1998

Aug. 31, 1998

4

RESPONSE in Opposition by pltf to deft's motion to dismiss [2-1] (vjt) (Entered: 09/15/1998)

Sept. 14, 1998

Sept. 14, 1998

5

MEMORANDUM by pltf in support of response to deft's motion to dismiss [4-1] (vjt) (Entered: 09/15/1998)

Sept. 14, 1998

Sept. 14, 1998

6

REPLY by deft to pltf's response to motion to dismiss [2-1] (vjt) (Entered: 09/24/1998)

Sept. 24, 1998

Sept. 24, 1998

SUMMONS issued as to JAYCO Acquisition & Compton's Oak Grove Lodge Inc (vjt) (Entered: 10/05/1998)

Oct. 5, 1998

Oct. 5, 1998

8

ANSWER by defendant (vjt) (Entered: 10/27/1998)

Oct. 26, 1998

Oct. 26, 1998

9

SCHEDULING ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright; jury trial set for 11:00 on 9/20/99 in Batesville; discovery due 8/6/99; pretrial info sheet due 8/20/99 (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 10/30/1998)

Oct. 29, 1998

Oct. 29, 1998

10

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant JAYCO Acquisition by serving J. T. Compton on 10/20/98 (former empl) (Entered: 11/02/1998)

Oct. 30, 1998

Oct. 30, 1998

11

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant JAYCO Acquisition d/b/a Compton's Oak Grove Lodge, Inc. by serving J. T. Compton on 10/20/98 (former empl) (Entered: 11/02/1998)

Oct. 30, 1998

Oct. 30, 1998

12

MOTION by defendant to strike EEOC summons or in the alternative to dismiss (former empl) (Entered: 11/05/1998)

Nov. 4, 1998

Nov. 4, 1998

13

OBJECTIONS by defendant JAYCO Acquisition to discovery (former empl) (Entered: 11/05/1998)

Nov. 4, 1998

Nov. 4, 1998

14

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION by plaintiff to deft Compton's Oak Grove Lodge, Inc.'s motion to strike or, alternatively, [12-1] motion to dismiss [12-2] (bsm) (Entered: 11/16/1998)

Nov. 16, 1998

Nov. 16, 1998

15

RESPONSE In Opposition by plaintiff to deft Compton's Oak Grove Lodge, Inc's objection to discovery (bsm) (Entered: 11/16/1998)

Nov. 16, 1998

Nov. 16, 1998

16

REPLY by defendant in support of motion to strike [12-1] or in the alternative to dismiss [12-2] (vjt) (Entered: 11/25/1998)

Nov. 24, 1998

Nov. 24, 1998

17

BRIEF by defendant in support of motion to strike, or in the alternative to dismiss [16-1] (vjt) (Entered: 11/25/1998)

Nov. 24, 1998

Nov. 24, 1998

18

ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright denying deft's motion to strike EEOC summons [12-1] or, to dismiss; the Court instructs the pltf that it may move to amend its summons and complt to reflect the addition of Compton's as a party-deft (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 12/15/1998)

Dec. 14, 1998

Dec. 14, 1998

19

MOTION by pltf for costs of service of summons (vjt) (Entered: 04/05/1999)

April 5, 1999

April 5, 1999

20

MEMORANDUM by pltf in support of motion for costs of service of summons [19-1] (vjt) (Entered: 04/05/1999)

April 5, 1999

April 5, 1999

21

RESPONSE by deft to pltf's motion for costs of service of summons [19- 1] (vjt) (Entered: 04/16/1999)

April 16, 1999

April 16, 1999

22

ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright denying pltf's motion for costs of service of summons [19-1] (cc: all counsel) EOD 5/3/99 (vjt) (Entered: 05/03/1999)

May 3, 1999

May 3, 1999

Case Details

State / Territory: Arkansas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 13, 1998

Closing Date: May 4, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

JAYCO Acquisition and Holding Company, Inc. (Mountatin View, Arkansas), Private Entity/Person

JAYCO Acquisition and Holding Company, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 20000

Order Duration: 1999 - 2000

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discrimination-basis:

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits