Case: EEOC v. Excel Corporation

2:01-cv-00364 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: May 24, 2001

Closed Date: June 28, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 2001, the San Antonio District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Excel Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. The charging parties intervened in the lawsuit in February 2002. Following a transfer of venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, some discovery and mediation, the parties settled the lawsuit in June 2002 through a consent decree.

The one year decree, containing an anti-retaliation clause, required the defendant to: distribute a notice regarding employee rights to all managers for signature and pay $20,000 to be distributed among two complainants.

Summary Authors

David Friedman (1/11/2008)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11200464/parties/eeoc-v-excel-corporation/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Cummings, Donald Edward (Texas)

Dominguez, Leticia (Texas)

Dominguez, Francisco X (Texas)

Harwin, Robert B (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant

Morris, S Tom (Texas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:01-cv-00364

Docket [PACER]

July 5, 2002

July 5, 2002

Docket
32

2:01-cv-00364

Consent Decree

June 28, 2002

June 28, 2002

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11200464/eeoc-v-excel-corporation/

Last updated Nov. 3, 2026, 9:17 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Excel Corporation
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 24, 2001

DEMAND for jury trial by plaintiff EEOC (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
2 July 6, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Excel Corporation 7/5/01 (1) (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
3 July 13, 2001

TRANSFER ORDER Transferring case to the docket of Judge Garnett Thomas Eisele (signed by Judge David Briones) Copies to counsel: 7/13/01 Page(s) 1 (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
4 July 23, 2001

ANSWER to Complaint by defendant Excel Corporation (5) (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
5 Aug. 16, 2001

MOTION by defendant to transfer venue (14) (djs) Modified on 10/01/2001 (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
6 Aug. 28, 2001

RESPONSE by plaintiff to [5-1] motion to transfer venue (13)(djs) Modified on 10/01/2001 (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
7 Sept. 10, 2001

REPLY by defendant to response to [5-1] motion to transfer venue (5) (djs) Modified on 10/01/2001 (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
8 Sept. 25, 2001

ORDER OF TRANSFER granting [5-1] motion to transfer venue to the ND/TX Amarillo Division (signed by Judge Garnett Thomas Eisele) Copies to counsel: 9/25/01 Page(s) 4 (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
Oct. 1, 2001

Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from District of WD/TX El Paso Division (EP-01-cv-169) (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

PACER
Oct. 1, 2001

Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from District of WD/TX El Paso Division (EP-01-cv-169) (djs)

9 Oct. 3, 2001

ORIGINAL RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER setting Joining of Parties on 11/16/01; Amending of Pleadings on 3/29/02; Discovery cutoff 4/1/02; Deadline for filing of dispositive motions 4/15/02; Pretrial materials (Designation of Experts) due on 12/3/01. Parties shall be ready for trial by 6/3/02. Counsel shall file a joint report setting forth the status of settlement negotiations by 1/4/02. Parties opposing affirmative relief must file a written designation of expert witnesses by 12/24/01. Summary Judgment deadline 4/1/02 and deadline for Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures is 5/6/02. ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 10/3/01 Page(s): 3 (plh) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

RECAP
10 Oct. 5, 2001

MOTION by Excel Corporation to substitute S Tom Morris for Charles C High, Jr. (5) (plh) (Entered: 10/05/2001)

RECAP
11 Oct. 17, 2001

ORDER SUBSTITUTING NEW COUNSEL granting [10-1] motion to substitute S Tom Morris for Charles C High, Jr. ; terminated attorney Charles C High Jr for Excel Corporation ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 10/17/01 Page(s) 2 (jeh) (Entered: 10/17/2001)

RECAP
12 Oct. 23, 2001

AGREED ORDER - The Original Rule 16 Scheduling Order dted 10/2/01 is amended in the following respects. The Rule 26(f) conference is deferred until Friday, 11/2/01, and the Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures will be exchanged within 14 days after the Rule 26(f) conference. (Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 10/23/01 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

RECAP
13 Dec. 4, 2001

Designation of Experts by plaintiff EEOC (2) (jeh) (Entered: 12/04/2001)

RECAP
14 Dec. 5, 2001

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DESIGNATE EXPERTS denying [13-1] designation. The Court construes this pleading as a motion for an unspecified extension of time to designate experts. (Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 12/5/01 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 12/05/2001)

RECAP
15 Dec. 20, 2001

Designation of Experts by defendant Excel Corporation (2) (jeh) (Entered: 12/20/2001)

RECAP
16 Jan. 3, 2002

JOINT STATUS REPORT by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation (2) (jeh) (Entered: 01/03/2002)

RECAP
17 Jan. 14, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to amend [9-1] Scheduling order (4) (jeh) (Entered: 01/14/2002)

RECAP
18 Jan. 16, 2002

NOTICE of attorney appearance for plaintiff EEOC by Selena N Solis (2) (jeh) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

RECAP
19 Feb. 8, 2002

MOTION to intervene by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro (6) (jeh) (Entered: 02/08/2002)

RECAP
20 Feb. 8, 2002

MEMORANDUM by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro in support of [19-1] motion to intervene by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro (3) (jeh) (Entered: 02/08/2002)

RECAP
21 Feb. 12, 2002

ORDER granting [17-1] motion to amend [9-1] Scheduling order resetting scheduling order deadlines: Parties shall be ready for trial by 8/5/02; Deadline for filing Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures 7/8/02; Amending of Pleadings on 5/31/02; Discovery deadline on 6/1/02; Deadline for filing of dispositive motions, except motions in limine, by 6/17/02; Motions for summary judgment 6/3/02 ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 2/12/02 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 02/12/2002)

RECAP
22 Feb. 12, 2002

ORDER granting [19-1] motion to intervene by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro. The Clerk will file the Intervenors' complaint in intervention upon its prompt tender in proper form for filing. ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 2/12/02 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 02/12/2002)

RECAP
23 Feb. 13, 2002

ORDER referring case to Mediation; Type of ADR: Non-Binding Mediation Requested by: Court. Order of the Court that on or before 3/1/02, the parties in this case tender to the Clerk a written document indicating the name of the mediator chosen by the parties and an agreed time, date and place for mediation. Parties shall meet prior to mediation for the purposes of settling this case and after this meeting, tender to the Clerk for filing on or before 3/1/02 a joint settlement conference status report. Parties to this action shall convene a mediation conference on all claims and/or counter-claims, such conference and all subsequent conferences to be completed on or before 3/22/02. ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 2/13/02 Page(s): 3 (plh) (Entered: 02/13/2002)

RECAP
24 Feb. 22, 2002

Intervenor's COMPLAINT by Francisco nmn Acosta, Sergio Castro against defendant Excel Corporation (3) (jeh) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
25 Feb. 22, 2002

ANSWER by defendant Excel Corporation to [24-1] intervenor complaint (2) (jeh) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
26 Feb. 27, 2002

JOINT SETTLEMENT STATUS REPORT by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation, intervenor-plaintiff Francisco nmn Acosta, intervenor-plaintiff Sergio Castro, intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation; Parties have not been able to resolve this case. (3) (jeh) (Entered: 02/27/2002)

RECAP
27 Feb. 27, 2002

JOINT NOTICE of MEDIATION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation, intervenor-plaintiff Francisco nmn Acosta, intervenor-plaintiff Sergio Castro, intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation - Mike Loftin designated as mediator; mediation set for 3/12/02 @ 10:00 a.m., Underwood Law Firm, Amarillo, Texas (2) (jeh) (Entered: 02/27/2002)

RECAP
28 March 15, 2002

Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary. Filed by ADR Provider Mike Loftin . Attorneys in attendance Donald Edward Cummings, S Tom Morris, Selena N Solis. Prv Fee: $1200.00 Disposition: DNS (2) (jeh) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

RECAP
29 June 21, 2002

Letter from defendant - confirming that this case is settled and a consent decree will be presented for entry as soon as signatures of all counsel can be obtained (1) (djs) (Entered: 06/21/2002)

RECAP
30 June 24, 2002

ORDER - The Court having been informed that the above-styled case has settled, all pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk will terminate all pending motions. The parties are to tender an agreed order of dismissal within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson) Copies to counsel: 6/24/02 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 06/24/2002)

RECAP
31 June 25, 2002

JOINT MOTION to Enter Consent Decree by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation, intervenor-plaintiff Francisco nmn Acosta, intervenor-plaintiff Sergio Castro, intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation (2) (jeh) (Entered: 06/26/2002)

RECAP
32 June 28, 2002

CONSENT DECREEE for intervenor-plaintiffs Francisco Acosta and Sergio Castro against intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation. This Consent Decree resolves the allegations raised by the EEOC and the Intervenors in the above-captioned civil action. The Court retains jurisdiction of this action for a period of one year and may enter such other and further relief as it deems appropriate to ensure implementation and enforcement of the provisions of this Decree. Within 10 days after the date of this Decree, Deft Excel Corp, in settlement of this dispute, shall pay a total sum of $20,000.00 ($12,000.00 to Francisco Acosta and $8,000.00 to Sergio Castro). Such payments shall be made by separate checks and mailed to Donald E. Cummings, Esq., Lubbock, TX. The parties to this Decree shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees incurred in this action. (signed by Judge Mary Lou Robinson) Copies to counsel: 6/28/02 Page(s): 7 (jeh) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

RECAP
June 28, 2002

Case closed (jeh) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

PACER
June 28, 2002

Case closed (jeh)

33 July 5, 2002

RELEASE by Francisco nmn Acosta (2) (plh) (Entered: 07/05/2002)

RECAP
34 July 5, 2002

RELEASE by Sergio Castro (2) (plh) (Entered: 07/05/2002)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 24, 2001

Closing Date: June 28, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Excel Corporation

Excel Corporation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Texas 2:01-cv-00364

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 20000

Order Duration: 2002 - 2003

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discipline

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation