Case: EEOC v. VICTOR-ARCH, INC.

5:04-cv-00561 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: May 12, 2004

Closed Date: March 11, 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 2004, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Victor-Arch, Inc., d/b/a Archibald's Drive Thru, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. According to the consent decree, the defendant discriminated against the three charging parties, female applicants and employees, by denying them employment or continued employment in violation of Title …

In May 2004, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Victor-Arch, Inc., d/b/a Archibald's Drive Thru, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. According to the consent decree, the defendant discriminated against the three charging parties, female applicants and employees, by denying them employment or continued employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After the defendant answered the complaint in September 2004, the parties seemed to have reached a tentative settlement in January 2005. The parties put the final settlement into writing in March 2005 when they entered into a consent decree.

The three-year decree prohibited the defendant from retaliating or discriminating. In addition, it required the defendant to: revise its jobs descriptions, employee handbook, and policies; provide Title VII training for all its employees; post a notice of the decree; report to the EEOC at specified intervals; and pay $13,000 to be divided among the three charging parties. The docket sheet shows that no further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2008.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (7/30/2007)

Clearinghouse (6/7/2017)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

5:04-cv-00561

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Victor-Arch, Inc.

April 4, 2005

April 4, 2005

Docket
11

5:04-cv-00561

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Victor-Arch, Inc.

March 11, 2005

March 11, 2005

Settlement Agreement
13

5:04-cv-00561

Stipulation and Order of Dismissal

EEOC v. Victor-Arch, Inc.

April 5, 2005

April 5, 2005

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 5, 2024, 3:03 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against defendants, Victor-Arch and DOES. (No Filing fee due) Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(de, ) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

May 12, 2004

May 12, 2004

20 Day Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery)[1] as to DOES, Victor-Arch. (de, ) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

May 12, 2004

May 12, 2004

2

CERTIFICATION of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (de, ) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

May 12, 2004

May 12, 2004

3

NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PILOT PROGRAM filed.(de, ) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

May 12, 2004

May 12, 2004

FAX number for Attorney Dana C Johnson, Anna Y Park is 213-894-1301. (de, ) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

May 12, 2004

May 12, 2004

4

ORDER by Judge David O. Carter Settlement Conference set for 8/23/2004 08:30 AM before Honorable David O. Carter.(dmjr, ) (Entered: 05/21/2004)

May 18, 2004

May 18, 2004

5

NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: Order, Set/Reset Hearings[4] was docketed on the wrong case, it should have been docketed on SACV 04-561 DOC (dmjr, ) (Entered: 05/21/2004)

May 21, 2004

May 21, 2004

6

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed upon Theodore J. Bataskis filed by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (am, ) (Entered: 07/13/2004)

July 12, 2004

July 12, 2004

7

CERTIFICATION of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Victor-Arch Inc. (mg, ) (Entered: 09/30/2004)

Sept. 21, 2004

Sept. 21, 2004

8

ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery)[1] filed by defendant Victor-Arch Inc d/b/a Archibalds Drive Thru.(mg, ) (Entered: 09/30/2004)

Sept. 21, 2004

Sept. 21, 2004

9

MINUTES OF before Judge Robert J. Timlin : This matter is set for a Scheduling Conference set for 1/14/2005 03:30 PM before Honorable Robert J. Timlin.Court Reporter: None. (am, ) (Entered: 10/01/2004)

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

10

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND CONTINUANCE OF ALL DATES. THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that all dates shall be continued for 60 days, during which the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the matter. The new status conference date shall be 3/14/05 at 8:30 AM. IT IS SO ORDERED, by Judge Robert J. Timlin. (de, ) (Entered: 01/05/2005)

Jan. 4, 2005

Jan. 4, 2005

11

CONSENT DECREE ORDER by Judge Robert J. Timlin, that the term "Defendant" shall include the named defendant in this action and each of its employees, shareholder, officer, directors, agents, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries division or affilitate organizations or corporations, whether previously or hereafter affiliated in any manner. The term "Plaintiff" shall mean the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (see original document for detailed information)(am, ) (Entered: 03/14/2005)

March 11, 2005

March 11, 2005

12

MINUTES by Chief Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Proceedings - Order Regarding Joint Status Report. The Court orders the parties in the action to meet and confer within 10 days of the date of this Order and to file a joint status report within 15 days thereafter consisting of not more than 2 pages. This report shall include: 1) Summary of the case (briefly describe the facts surrounding your case); 2) Status of the case (previous ruling, pending motions, what, if any, future action will be required); 3) suggestion of procedures that would result in resolution of the case. Additionally Plaintiff shall forward a courtesy copy of the filed joint status report to Chief Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk, ) (Entered: 04/05/2005)

April 4, 2005

April 4, 2005

13

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Robert J. Timlin : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(mrgo, ) (Entered: 04/05/2005)

April 4, 2005

April 4, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 12, 2004

Closing Date: March 11, 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Victor-Arch, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 13000

Order Duration: 2005 - 2008

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Monitoring

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Hiring

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits