Case: EEOC v. VENTURA FOODS LLC

0:05-cv-00663 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: March 31, 2005

Closed Date: Sept. 1, 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 2005, the Minneapolis District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Ventura Foods, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violatoin of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, discrimination on the basis of age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act. Specifically, the complaint alleges the defendant instituted and maintained a policy contained in its Severance Agreement and General Release requiring termi…
In March 2005, the Minneapolis District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Ventura Foods, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violatoin of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, discrimination on the basis of age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act. Specifically, the complaint alleges the defendant instituted and maintained a policy contained in its Severance Agreement and General Release requiring terminated employees to waive their rights to file discrimination charges with the EEOC in exchange for severance payment, which is retaliatory under Title VII and the ADEA. After some discovery and filing of summary judgment motions by both parties, the parties settled in September 2006 through a consent decree.The two-year decree, containing a non-retaliation clause, requires the defendant to: no longer contractually require employees or former employees to agree not file charges with the EEOC, pay employees who refused to sign the agreement the enhanced severance amount, inform former employees of the severance of the contract clause, waive the limitations period for filing discrimination charges with the EEOC, and permit monitoring by the EEOC. The docket sheet does not show any further enforcement; the case was presumably closed in 2008.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (9/28/2007)

Clearinghouse (6/12/2017)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4713517/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-ventura-foods-llc/


Judge(s)

Kyle, Richard House (Minnesota)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

0:05-cv-00663

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Ventura Foods LLC

Sept. 1, 2006

Sept. 1, 2006

Docket
1

0:05-cv-00663

Complaint

EEOC v. Ventura Foods LLC

March 31, 2005

March 31, 2005

Complaint
52

0:05-cv-00663

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Ventura Foods LLC

Sept. 1, 2006

Sept. 1, 2006

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4713517/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-ventura-foods-llc/

Last updated Aug. 4, 2025, 12:03 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
52

CONSENT DECREE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 09/01/06. (rhks) Modified on 9/1/2006 (JME).

Sept. 1, 2006

Sept. 1, 2006

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Minnesota

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 31, 2005

Closing Date: Sept. 1, 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Ventura Foods, LLC (Albert Lea, Minnesota), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Retaliation Prohibition

Reporting

Monitoring

Order Duration: 2006 - 2008

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits