Case: EEOC v. Bashas' Inc.

2:05-cv-02382 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Aug. 17, 2005

Closed Date: 2014

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 17, 2005, non-Navajo Native Americans filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued Bashas’ Inc. and the Navajo Nation under Title VII. The plaintiffs, represented by the EEOC, asked the court for injunctive relief, back pay, and punitive damages. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that Bashas’ Inc. engaged in unlawful employment practices by discriminating against the plaintiffs on the basis of their national origin, and tha…

On August 17, 2005, non-Navajo Native Americans filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued Bashas’ Inc. and the Navajo Nation under Title VII. The plaintiffs, represented by the EEOC, asked the court for injunctive relief, back pay, and punitive damages. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that Bashas’ Inc. engaged in unlawful employment practices by discriminating against the plaintiffs on the basis of their national origin, and that Bashas’ Inc. failed to make and preserve records relevant to the determination of whether unlawful employment practices had been committed.

On December 14, 2006, District Judge Stephen M. McNamee ordered a stay on the proceedings pending the appeals in the EEOC v. Peabody Western Coal case. Judge McNamee found that the complaint filed by the EEOC in the Peabody case were substantial identical to the complaint filed against Bashas’ Inc, and so the instant case should be stayed. On December 14, 2006, November 18, 2010, and April 6, 2012 Judge Stephen M. McNamee ordered further stays of proceedings pending developments in the Peabody case.

On September 26, 2014 the Peabody case was decided against the EEOC. Judge W. Fletcher of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that Navajo hiring preferences was a political classification, not a classification based on national origin. As such, the preferences were not a violation of Title VII.

On November 12, 2014 Judge Stephen M. McNamee dismissed with prejudice the case in accordance with the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Peabody. 828 F.Supp.2d 1056.

 

Summary Authors

Gabriela Hybel (10/23/2016)

Related Cases

EEOC v. Peabody Coal Company, District of Arizona (2001)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4132088/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-bashas-inc/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:05-cv-02382

Docket

EEOC v. Bashas' Inc., et al

Nov. 12, 2014

Nov. 12, 2014

Docket
1

2:05-cv-02382

Complaint

EEOC v. Bashas' Inc., et al

Aug. 17, 2005

Aug. 17, 2005

Complaint
38

2:05-cv-02382

Memorandum of Decision and Order [Regarding Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings]

EEOC v. Bashas' Inc., et al

Dec. 14, 2006

Dec. 14, 2006

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4132088/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-bashas-inc/

Last updated Aug. 18, 2025, 1:33 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
51

ORDER granting 50 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; Katherine J Kruse is withdrawn as counsel for plaintiff; Mary Jo ONeill, Sally C Shanley, and Lucila G Rosas remain as counsel of record for the EEOC. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 1/14/10.(REW, )

Jan. 14, 2010

Jan. 14, 2010

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 17, 2005

Closing Date: 2014

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Navajo Nation (Tuba City, Arizona), Private Entity/Person

Bashas' Inc. (Tuba City, Arizona), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Affected Race(s):

American Indian/Alaskan Native

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits