Case: Hawkins v. Groot Industries, Inc.

1:01-cv-01731 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: March 12, 2001

Closed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 12, 2001, two African-Americans who were former employees of Groot Industries filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging racial and national origin harassment and discrimination. Specifically, they alleged that defendants subjected A…

On March 12, 2001, two African-Americans who were former employees of Groot Industries filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging racial and national origin harassment and discrimination. Specifically, they alleged that defendants subjected African Americans and Hispanics to inferior terms and conditions of employment due to their race and national origin, and also discriminated against them in connection with promotions, work assignments, compensation, transfers, discipline and terms and conditions of employment.

Following the filing of complaint, plaintiffs moved to add two more Hispanic plaintiffs as class members and class representatives. On August 5, 2002, the Court (Judge Joan B. Gottschall) granted plaintiffs' motion to add Hispanic plaintiffs with respect to the § 1981 claims, but denied their motion to add under the Title VII claim, because the two Hispanic plaintiffs did not file timely charges of discrimination with the EEOC and their claims did not arise out of sufficiently similarly discriminatory treatment as those allegations found in the African American plaintiffs' EEOC charges.

On March 31, 2003, the Court (Judge Joan B. Gottschall) partly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment against the two African-American plaintiffs, because plaintiffs did not show enough evidence with regard to discriminatory discharge and retaliatory discharge.

The case seemed to develop in favor of defendants. On September 2, 2003, the Court (Judge Gottschall) denied plaintiffs' motion for class certification and on the same day, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment against the two Hispanic plaintiffs, because the two plaintiffs did not present enough evidence to support their discriminatory discharge and hostile work environment claims.

In light of this, on September 29, 2004, the parties agreed to a tentative settlement on an individual basis, and the plaintiffs' counsel moved to dismiss the case with leave to reinstate within 60 days. The Court granted plaintiffs' motion.

Summary Authors

Kunyi Zhang (10/30/2010)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5271483/parties/hawkins-v-groot-ind-inc/


Judge(s)

Gottschall, Joan B. (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Asonye, Uche O. (Illinois)

Molina, Nydia (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Dugan, William Francis (Illinois)

Metz, David Elliot (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-01731

Docket

Dec. 6, 2004

Dec. 6, 2004

Docket
1

1:01-cv-01731

Class Action Complaint

March 12, 2001

March 12, 2001

Complaint
35

1:01-cv-01731

Order (plaintiffs' motion to amend complaint is granted in part and denied in part)

Aug. 5, 2002

Aug. 5, 2002

Order/Opinion

210 F.R.D. 226

119

1:01-cv-01731

Memorandum Opinion and Order (defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Anderson Hawkins and Larry Woodfork is granted in part and denied in part)

March 31, 2003

March 31, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 1720069

130

1:01-cv-01731

Second Amended Class Action Complaint

Aug. 12, 2003

Aug. 12, 2003

Complaint
133

1:01-cv-01731

Order (plaintiffs' motion for class certification is denied)

Sept. 2, 2003

Sept. 2, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 22057238

134

1:01-cv-01731

Memorandum Opinion and Order (defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs Enrique Hernandez and Javier Guerrero is granted)

Sept. 2, 2003

Sept. 2, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 22078382

160

1:01-cv-01731

Order (the case is dismissed with leave to reinstate within 60 days)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5271483/hawkins-v-groot-ind-inc/

Last updated April 19, 2025, 12:37 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
119

MINUTE ORDER of 3/31/03 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Anderson Hawkins is granted in part and denied in part [26-1], as is defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Larry Woodfork [24-1]. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. Mailed notice (ar)

March 31, 2003

March 31, 2003

RECAP
134

MINUTE ORDER of 9/2/03 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Enrique Hernandez [58-1] is granted, as is defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Javier Guerrero [55-1]. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. Mailed notice (yp)

Sept. 2, 2003

Sept. 2, 2003

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Private Employment Class Actions

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 12, 2001

Closing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are former Black and Hispanic employees of defendants.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Groot Industries, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Groot Recycling and Waste Services, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Voluntary Dismissal

Amount Defendant Pays: Unknown

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discipline

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Hispanic

Affected Race(s):

Black

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits