Case: Radmanovich v. Combined Ins. Co.

1:01-cv-09502 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Dec. 13, 2001

Closed Date: 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 13, 2001, one current and nine former female agents and supervisors of defendant filed a lawsuit against defendant under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Chicago Branch. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging that they had been discriminated by defendant in, inter alia, promotions, training, compensensation, hours, transfers and job assignm…

On December 13, 2001, one current and nine former female agents and supervisors of defendant filed a lawsuit against defendant under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Chicago Branch. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging that they had been discriminated by defendant in, inter alia, promotions, training, compensensation, hours, transfers and job assignments based on sex. The Complaint further alleged a pattern or practice of gender-based harassment at defendant as well as a hostile work environment.

The case was assigned to Judge James H. Alesia. On February 5, 2002, Judge Alesia concluded that joinder of the plaintiffs was improper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 and dismissed plaintiffs' complaint without prejudice.

On February 26,counsel for plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint, naming Ms. Radmanovich as the sole class representative. In addition, plaintiffs' counsel filed nine additional cases on behalf of the other plaintiffs who were originally named in the action.

Eight of the nine additional suits were brought as individual actions, while one of them, the Palmer action was filed as another putative class action.

On May 1, 2003, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. However, on June 26, 2003, Judge Alesia denied the motion on the ground that the proposed class would be "totally unmanageable."

In November, 2003, the parties agreed to mediation in an effort to settle all of the pending cases. On March 3, 2004, the mediator proposed that all of the foregoing cases be settled for a totla payment by defendant of $8.5 million. On March 12, 2004, the parties indicated that they would accept the mediator's proposal.

On January 12, 2005, the court (Judge James Zagel) approved the parties' settlement.

 

Summary Authors

Kunyi Zhang (11/24/2010)

Related Cases

Palmer v. Combined Ins. Co. of Am., Northern District of Illinois (2002)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4251087/parties/radmanovich-v-combined-ins-co/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Beck-Fries, Bonnie Lou (Illinois)

Benassi, Patricia Clarke (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Bey, Sheryl Marie (Illinois)

Bradford, Tracy Lee (Illinois)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Aylstock, Bryan (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-09502

Docket

Radmanovich v.Combined Ins. Co.

Feb. 15, 2007

Feb. 15, 2007

Docket
1

1:01-cv-09502

Complaint

Radmanovich v.Combined Ins. Co.

Dec. 13, 2001

Dec. 13, 2001

Complaint
65

1:01-cv-09502

Motion to Reassign Related Case

Radmanovich v.Combined Ins. Co.

Sept. 4, 2003

Sept. 4, 2003

Pleading / Motion / Brief
111

1:01-cv-09502

Corrected Stipulation of Settlement and Consent Decree

Radmanovich v.Combined Ins. Co.

Jan. 12, 2005

Jan. 12, 2005

Settlement Agreement
80

1:01-cv-09502

Order Approving Settlement

Radmanovich v.Combined Ins. Co.

Jan. 12, 2005

Jan. 12, 2005

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4251087/radmanovich-v-combined-ins-co/

Last updated Dec. 18, 2024, 7:16 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Private Employment Class Actions

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 13, 2001

Closing Date: 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are former female employees of defendant.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Combined Insurance Company of America, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Content of Injunction:

Promotion

Discrimination Prohibition

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Monitor/Master

Amount Defendant Pays: 8.5 Million

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Training

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits