Case: EEOC v. TAYLOR MADE DIGITAL SYTEMS, INC.

3:05-cv-03952 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2005

Closed Date: 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 29, 2005, the EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under Title I and Title VII against Taylor Made Digital Systems. The EEOC sought injunctive relief and damages, alleging that the defendant discriminated against one of its employees on the basis of her sex and race. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant discriminated against the employee by refusing to allow her to return to her previous position after her pregnancy, d…

On September 29, 2005, the EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under Title I and Title VII against Taylor Made Digital Systems. The EEOC sought injunctive relief and damages, alleging that the defendant discriminated against one of its employees on the basis of her sex and race.

Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant discriminated against the employee by refusing to allow her to return to her previous position after her pregnancy, despite the fact that she could perform all her job functions. The complaint also alleges that the defendant replaced, demoted, and eventually terminated the employee on account of her being female/pregnant and African American. The suit was filed after the employee filed an initial charge with the EEOC alleging violations of Title VII by the defendant.

On December 21, 2005, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint against Rioch Corporations, a successor to the original defendant, Taylor Made Digital Systems.

On October 18, 2006, the court (Judge Maxine M. Chesney) entered a consent decree. The consent decree required the defendant to pay $30,600 to the employee who brought the initial charge. The defendant also agreed to comply with Title VII, not to engage in retaliation against any employee because of the employee's opposition to discrimination, and to continue to post an anti-discrimination policy on its company intranet. Finally, the consent decree required all inquiries about the employee who filed the initial charge to be directed to a specific member of human resources, who was prohibited from referring to the present lawsuit. The consent decree terminated after one year.

Summary Authors

Priyah Kaul (11/22/2014)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5737779/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-taylor-made-digital-system-inc/


Judge(s)

Chesney, Maxine M. (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Hill Maxion, Sanya P. (California)

Peck, Jonathan T. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Bowles, Richard T. (California)

Sullivan, Mary P. (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:05-cv-03952

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Taylor Made Digital System, Inc.

Oct. 18, 2006

Oct. 18, 2006

Docket
1

3:05-cv-03952

Complaint

EEOC v. Taylor Made Digital System, Inc.

Sept. 29, 2005

Sept. 29, 2005

Complaint
10

3:05-cv-03952

First Amended Complaint

EEOC v. Taylor Made Digital System, Inc.

Dec. 21, 2005

Dec. 21, 2005

Complaint
24

3:05-cv-03952

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Taylor Made Digital System, Inc.

Oct. 18, 2006

Oct. 18, 2006

Settlement Agreement

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5737779/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-taylor-made-digital-system-inc/

Last updated April 18, 2025, 8:50 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
9

ORDER GRANTING [Docket No. 7] Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Answer due by 12/27/5. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/30/2005. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2005)

Nov. 30, 2005

Nov. 30, 2005

RECAP
18

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/31/2006. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2006)

March 31, 2006

March 31, 2006

RECAP
21

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MEDIATION CUT-OFF DATE. The mediation cutoff date of June 30, 2006 is extended to July 31, 2006. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 9, 2006. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF)

May 9, 2006

May 9, 2006

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 29, 2005

Closing Date: 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Taylor Made Digital System, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Neutral/Positive Reference

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Amount Defendant Pays: 30,600

Order Duration: 2006 - 2007

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Demotion

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Pregnancy discrimination

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits