Case: EEOC v. THE VISION CENTER

9:06-cv-00226 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 25, 2006

Closed Date: 2010

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2006, the Houston District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against National Vision, Inc., doing business as The Vision Center, and Mr. S J Charendoff in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging discrimination on the basis of gender, female, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged the defendants subjected the complaining parties to a sexually hostile work environment. The complaining parties inter…

In September 2006, the Houston District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against National Vision, Inc., doing business as The Vision Center, and Mr. S J Charendoff in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging discrimination on the basis of gender, female, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged the defendants subjected the complaining parties to a sexually hostile work environment. The complaining parties intervened in the lawsuit in October 2006. Following discovery, a successful motion for summary judgment by Mr. Charendoff and a pending motion for summary judgment by National Vision, Inc., the remaining parties settled the lawsuit in November 2007 through a consent decree.

The three-year decree, containing anti-discrimination and retaliation paragraphs, requires the defendant to: report on complaints and make other compliance reports, keep records, expunge the employment records of the complainants, provide the complainants with neutral references, post and distribute notice of employee rights, provide EEO training, require certain actions to be taken by Mr. Charendoff, and pay $175,000 to be distributed among four individuals. Following the entry of the decree, a consent motion to dismiss the plaintiffs-intervenors claims was granted. As there is no further docket activity, presumably this case closed in 2010.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (5/6/2008)

Rachel Barr (3/18/2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4389400/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-national-vision-inc/


Judge(s)

Bush, Don D. (Texas)

Heartfield, Thad (Texas)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

9:06-cv-00226

Docket (PACER)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Vision, Inc

Nov. 20, 2007

Nov. 20, 2007

Docket
1

9:06-cv-00226

Original Complaint

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Vision, Inc. d/b/a The Vision Center

Sept. 25, 2006

Sept. 25, 2006

Complaint
3-3

9:06-cv-00226

Plaintiffs-Intervenors’ Original Complaint

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Vision, Inc. d/b/a The Vision Center

Oct. 30, 2006

Oct. 30, 2006

Complaint
22

9:06-cv-00226

Order Denying Motion to Dismiss

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Vision, Inc. d/b/a The Vision Center

March 30, 2007

March 30, 2007

Order/Opinion
74

9:06-cv-00226

Order Granting Defendant Charendoff's Motion for Summary Judgment

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Vision, Inc

Sept. 12, 2007

Sept. 12, 2007

Order/Opinion
79

9:06-cv-00226

Consent Decree

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Vision, Inc

Oct. 24, 2007

Oct. 24, 2007

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4389400/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-national-vision-inc/

Last updated Dec. 20, 2024, 4:01 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 25, 2006

Closing Date: 2010

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

National Vision, Inc. (Lufkin, Texas), Private Entity/Person

S J Charendoff (Lufkin, Texas), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Expungement of Employment Record

Neutral/Positive Reference

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Amount Defendant Pays: 175000

Order Duration: 2007 - 2010

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit