Case: EEOC v. BEST CLOTHING MFG.

1:02-cv-05081 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: Sept. 19, 2002

Closed Date: 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2002, the New York District Office of the EEOC brought this lawsuit against Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc., also known as New Era Knitting Mills, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation o Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant required female workers to wear shirts that came up to the neck with sleeves that reached below the elbow in the factory without making the same requirements of male workers. A default judgment was entered against the defendant in July 2005, requiring the defendant to: make compliance reports to the EEOC, allow the EEOC access for monitoring purposes, develop an anti-discrimination policy, provide EEO training, and pay $28,176 to be distributed among five complaining parties.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (12/8/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5371707/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-best-clothing-manufacturing-inc/


Judge(s)

Glasser, Israel Leo (New York)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:02-cv-05081

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc

June 6, 2006

June 6, 2006

Docket
1

1:02-cv-05081

Complaint

EEOC v. Best Clothing Manufacturing Inc., d/b/a New Era Knitting Mills, Inc.

Sept. 19, 2002

Sept. 19, 2002

Complaint
20

1:02-cv-05081

Judgment

EEOC v. Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc. d/b/a New Era Knitting Mills, Inc.

April 15, 2003

April 15, 2003

Order/Opinion
30

1:02-cv-05081

Report and Recommendation

EEOC v. Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc., a/k/a New Era Knitting Mills, Inc.

March 11, 2005

March 11, 2005

Magistrate Report/Recommendation
33

1:02-cv-05081

Memorandum and Order [Re: Report]

EEOC v. Best Clothing Mfg., Inc.

July 7, 2005

July 7, 2005

Order/Opinion

2005 WL 1594153

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5371707/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-best-clothing-manufacturing-inc/

Last updated Oct. 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m.

Docket for: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 19, 2002

Complaint filed and summons issued as to defendant(s) Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc. Filing fee $150.00. Jury trial demanded.. Filed by Robert D. Rose on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Joe, Victor) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

RECAP
2 Nov. 1, 2002

SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 11/21/2002 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate-Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 10/28/02. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

RECAP
3 Nov. 6, 2002

Letter dated 11/4/02 from Robert Rose to Clerk of Court advising that the EEOC is moving to a new office. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

RECAP
4 Nov. 18, 2002

ANSWER to Complaint by Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc.(Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

RECAP
5 Nov. 18, 2002

DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc.(Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

RECAP
6 Nov. 28, 2002

ORDER endorsed on letter dated 11/15/02 from Allen Roberts to Magistrate Pohorelsky. The 11/21/02 conference is adjourned to 12/19/02 at 4:00. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 11/18/02. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
7 Dec. 20, 2002

SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 12/19/02. Factual discovery to be completed by 6/16/03; dispositive motions to be made by 7/29/03; final pretrial conference is set for 8/7/03 at 9:30.(Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

RECAP
8 Feb. 10, 2003

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney as to Allen B. Roberts filed by Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 02/11/2003)

RECAP
9 Feb. 10, 2003

MEMORANDUM in Support of 8 MOTION for Allen B. Roberts to Withdraw as Attorney.(Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 02/11/2003)

RECAP
10 Feb. 10, 2003

AFFIDAVIT of Allen B. Roberts in Support of 8 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 02/11/2003)

RECAP
11 Feb. 19, 2003

ORDER signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 2/11/03. A hearing on the motion by defendant's counsel to withdraw from representation of the defendant is hereby scheduled for 3/6/03 at 10:30. The 2/13/03 settlement conference is adjourned sine die.(Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 02/19/2003)

RECAP
12 Feb. 19, 2003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: Motion by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.'s to withdraw as attorney was served on Aron Lefkowitz on 2/13/03. A copy of Magistrate Pohorelsky's order of 2/11/03 was served on 2/12/03. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 02/20/2003)

RECAP
13 March 6, 2003

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky : Docket Call held on 3/6/2003. A hearing on an order to show cause issued today will be held on 3/25/03 at 11:30. The motion to withdraw is granted, provided, however, that outgoing counsel shall serve the order to show cause on the defendant by the close of business on 3/11/03 and file proof of such service. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 03/10/2003)

RECAP
14 March 11, 2003

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Dft is ordered to show cause on 3/25/03 at 11:30am why the answer should not be stricken and why a default judgment should not be entered against it for failing to appear and defend in this action. A corporation may not appear except by counsel. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 3/6/03. (Fahey, Lauren) (Entered: 03/11/2003)

RECAP
15 March 11, 2003

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Order to Show Cause, dated 3/6/03, served on Aron Lefkowitz on 3/7/03. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 03/18/2003)

RECAP
16 March 25, 2003

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky : Show Cause Hearing held on 3/25/2003. Counsel for pltf present; No appearance for dft. Report and recommendation made on the record that dft's answer be stricken and that a default judgment be entered against the dft. (Tape #37: 2203-3081.) (Fahey, Lauren) (Entered: 03/26/2003)

RECAP
17 March 25, 2003

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky: Status Conference held on 3/25/2003. Report and recommendation made on the record that the defendant's answer be stricken and that a default judgment be entered against defendant. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 03/26/2003)

RECAP
18 April 2, 2003

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 3/25/03 before Judge Magistrate Pohorelsky. Court Transcriber: Elizabeth Barron. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

RECAP
19 April 11, 2003

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Pohorelsky. The answer is stricken and a default judgment is entered. Case is referred to Magistrate for damages inquest. Signed by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 4/10/03. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 04/11/2003)

RECAP
20 April 16, 2003

JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiff against defendant. Defendant's answer is stricken and a default judgment is entered against defendant. Signed by Judge Clerk of Court on 4/15/03. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 04/16/2003)

RECAP
21 April 16, 2003

ORDER: Damages inquest before Magistrate Pohorelsky is set for 5/5/2003 at 04:00 PM. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 4/16/03. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 04/17/2003)

RECAP
22 May 5, 2003

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky : Scheduling Conference held on 5/5/2003. Counsel for pltf present; No appearance for dft. The next conf is adjourned sine die. Submissions regarding the inquest referred to this USMJ are to be submitted in accordance with the separate scheduling order to be entered by the court. (Fahey, Lauren) (Entered: 05/06/2003)

RECAP
23 May 6, 2003

ORDER: See document for the schedule for submissions and other proceedings regarding the inquest. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky, on 5/6/03. (Fahey, Lauren) (Entered: 05/06/2003)

RECAP
24 May 15, 2003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: A copy of Magistrate Pohorelsky's order dated 5/6/03 was served on defendant on 5/14/03. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 05/22/2003)

RECAP
25 July 21, 2003

MEMORANDUM in Support of damages filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 07/24/2003)

RECAP
26 July 21, 2003

AFFIDAVIT of Yolanda Simon in Support of damages filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 07/24/2003)

RECAP
28 July 21, 2003

AFFIDAVIT of Robert D. Rose in Support of damages filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 07/24/2003)

RECAP
27 July 24, 2003

AFFIDAVIT of Esther Gutierrez in Support of damages filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 07/24/2003)

RECAP
29 July 28, 2003

ORDER referring case to Magistrate for a report and recommendation on damages. Signed by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 7/24/03. (Rodriguez, Angela) (Entered: 07/28/2003)

RECAP
30 March 11, 2005

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Motion for default judgment, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2005. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 3/11/2005. (Pohorelsky, Viktor) (Entered: 03/11/2005)

RECAP
33 July 7, 2005

Memorandum and Order adopting in part the Report and Recommendation dated March 11, 2005 as to 30 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court enters judgment in favor of the EEOC against defendant as follows: awarding Yolanda Simon $21 ,176.00, and granting the following injunctive relief as set forth more fully in paragraph 2 of the affidavit of Robert D. Rose: (1) requiring defendant to implement anti-discrimination policies and procedures; (2) training defendant's employees with respect to federal anti-discrimination laws; (3) allowing the EEOC to monitor defendant's compliance with the judgment; and (4) requiring defendant to submit periodic reports to the EEOC to ensure compliance with the judgment.Counsel for p laintiff shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on the defendant by regular mail and electronically file proof of such service in the record.After entering the judgment in this case, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on July 7, 2005. (Kathawala, Rene)

RECAP
35 July 12, 2005

CLERK'S JUDGMENT directing that the Report and Recommendation of Mag Pohorelsky dated 3/11/05 is adopted in part; and that judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff, EEOC and against deft Best Clothing Manufacturing, Inc. a/k/a New Era Kn itting Mills, Inc. as follows: Yolanda Simon is awarded $21,176.00 and the following injunctive relieve, as set forth more fully in the affidavit of Robert D. Rose, is granted: 1. requiring deft to implement anti-discrimination policies and pro cedures; 2. training deft's employees with respect to Federal anti-discrimination laws; 3. allowing the EEOC to monitor deft's compliance with the judgment; and 4. requiring deft to submit periodic reports to the EEOC to ensure compliance with the judgment . Ordered by Robert C. Heinemann, Clerk of Court on 7/8/05. c/m with appeal pkg.(Fernandez, Erica)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 19, 2002

Closing Date: 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Best Clothing Manuracturing, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of New York 1:02-cv-05081

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Monitoring

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: 28176

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Pay / Benefits

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation