Case: Johnson v. Tulsa, Okla.

4:94-cv-00039 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: Jan. 14, 1994

Closed Date: 2010

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 17, 1997, a group of former and current African-American personnel from the city police department filed suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and Title VII,42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq, against the City of Tulsa in the District Court of the Northern District of Oklahoma. The plaintiffs, represented by numerous private counselors, asked the court for injunctive relief alleging that the Tulsa Police Department (TPD) systematically discriminated against African-American employees. Specif…

On September 17, 1997, a group of former and current African-American personnel from the city police department filed suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and Title VII,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq, against the City of Tulsa in the District Court of the Northern District of Oklahoma. The plaintiffs, represented by numerous private counselors, asked the court for injunctive relief alleging that the Tulsa Police Department (TPD) systematically discriminated against African-American employees. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that the TPD discriminated in its promotions, hiring, training, and retaliatory discharging of employees.

The case began when a single plaintiff filed suit against the City on January 14, 1994. He asked the court for injunctive relief and damages. The Court (Judge Kern) stayed the case in order to facilitate settlement, but an agreement was never reached. On February 14, 1996, the stay was lifted. The plaintiff then motioned for more members to join the case, ultimately resulting in the Court (Judge Holmes) approving a class consisting of all current and future African-American employees of the Tulsa Police Department (TPD). Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 24015151 WL 1 (N.D.O.K. 2003).

According to the Court's opinion from May 12, 2003, the case was effectively stayed for settlement negotiations through the end of 1998, but, when those negotiations failed to result in a settlement, the parties commenced active discovery. From 1998 until 2001, the litigation was hard-fought with several failed settlement attempts, and each of the parties invested countless hours in preparation and incurred millions of dollars in attorney fees and costs. Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 24015151 WL 1 (N.D.O.K. 2003).

Then, on April 1, 2002, a proposed consent decree was filed. Then-Mayor Susan Savage executed the April 2002 Decree on behalf of the City. The incoming mayor, William LaFortune, who took office later that day, had the opportunity to agree to the adoption of the proposed settlement or to reject it at any time on or before noon on Friday, April 5, 2002. After no objections were made, the Court (Judge Holmes) preliminarily approved the settlement. Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 24015151 WL 2 (N.D.O.K. 2003).

On May 2, 2002 the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) moved to intervene in the case. On May 22, 2002, the FOP filed a motion requesting that the Court reject the April 2002 Decree, primarily on the grounds that it violated the FOP's rights as the "exclusive bargaining agent" for all TPD officers. The FOP was the only objector to the April 2002 Decree. Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 24015151 WL 2 (N.D.O.K. 2003).

To complicate matters more, on August 16, 2002, Mayor LaFortune and the City filed a statement withdrawing the City's support for the April 2002 Decree in its current form. Because of the City's withdrawal of support, the Court (Judge Holmes) rejected the decree. Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 24015151 WL 3 (N.D.O.K. 2003).

On December 2, 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit (Judge Hartz, Judge Briscoe, Judge Lucero), handed down an order denying the FOP for a writ of mandamus against the City.

On December 3, 2002, the plaintiffs and the City filed a second consent decree, and acknowledged within it, that the FOP had not agreed to its terms. Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 24015151 WL 4 (N.D.O.K. 2003). On December 10, 2002, the FOP lodged a formal brief objecting to the proposed settlement decree.

On December 13, 2002, the Court (Judge Holmes) ruled that the FOP did not have a right to reject the settlement and force the litigation to trial. The Court justified this decision by saying the FOP did not have the right to intervene before a settlement was reached without first justifying that its rights were impaired. Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 24015151 WL 5 (N.D.O.K. 2003).

On May 12, 2003, the Court (Judge Holmes) approved the decree. The settlement allowed for all individual claims to be addressed by the Court. It gave back pay and front pay to those who were denied promotions and compensatory damages to those who had been wrongfully terminated. It awarded plaintiffs attorney's fees, and held that both parties protect the decree from third parties (i.e. the FOP). Furthermore, the decree set benchmarks that could be met from a statistical and policy promotion standpoint as to ensure the fair practice of non-discrimination with TPD employees. Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 489 F.3d 1095-1096 (N.D.O.K. 2007).

However, the case was far from over. The plaintiffs sent letters of noncompliance to the court several times, as the independent auditor charged with following the decree's provisions failed to do so, and many statistical benchmarks were not met. As such, these all had to be litigated in court in front of the Judge presiding over compliance. Then, there came the issue over whether the plaintiffs lawyers should be reimbursed for their work in enforcing the decree.

On April 20, 2005, the District Court (Judge Kern) granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs motion to award attorney's fees arising from compliance actions. This decision was appealed.

On July 10, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals of the 10th Circuit (Judge Hartz, Judge Ebel, Judge O'Brien) reversed and remanded the District Courts ruling. Thus, the plaintiff's attorneys were paid, and the case had no further proceedings on the docket as of February 22, 2008. The case is technically still open, and will not be closed until the parties move the Court to do so.

Summary Authors

Matthew Aibel (4/3/2008)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4824545/parties/johnson-v-tulsa-city-of/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Barber, Lewis Jr. (Ohio)

Blakemore, Robert Murray (Oklahoma)

Attorney for Defendant

Abernathy, Christopher Lee (Oklahoma)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Ashe, R. Lawrence Jr. (Georgia)

Bingham, Donald Mitchell (Oklahoma)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:94-cv-00039

Docket

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

Sept. 8, 2010

Sept. 8, 2010

Docket
97

4:94-cv-00039

First Amended Class Complaint

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

Sept. 19, 1997

Sept. 19, 1997

Complaint

4:94-cv-00039

Order Denying Writ of Mandamus

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

Order/Opinion
1026

4:94-cv-00039

Order approving consent decree

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

May 12, 2003

May 12, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 24015151

1165

4:94-cv-00039

Order of injunctive restraint against Fraternal Order of Police

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 26376

05-05064

Order and opinion from appeals court awarding attorney's fees

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

June 14, 2007

June 14, 2007

Order/Opinion

489 F.3d 1089

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4824545/johnson-v-tulsa-city-of/

Last updated Oct. 29, 2026, 6:27 p.m.

Docket for: Johnson v. Tulsa, City of
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Jan. 14, 1994

COMPLAINT (Summons(es) issued); Consent form sent (ksb, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 01/18/1994)

RECAP
Feb. 1, 1994

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Tulsa, City of on 1/21/94 by cert mail. (fe, Dpty Clk)

2 Feb. 16, 1994

MOTION by defendant Tulsa, City of to extend time to answer.(O2J) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/16/1994)

RECAP
3 Feb. 17, 1994

ORDER by Chief Judge James O. Ellison; granting motion to extend time to answer [2-1]l. Deft is given until 2/25/94. (cc: mvnt counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/17/1994)

RECAP
4 Feb. 25, 1994

ANSWER by defendant Tulsa, City of to [1-1]. (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/25/1994)

RECAP
March 23, 1994

MINUTE ORDER: CASE MGMT/STATUS HRG set for 1:50 4/15/94 before Magistrate John L. Wagner (cc: all counsel) (bjm, Dpty Clk)

April 12, 1994

CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN Received. (to file) (fe, Dpty Clk)

5 April 15, 1994

SCHEDULING ORDER Magistrate John L. Wagner motion filing ddl set for 10/14/94 discovery due 10/3/94 proposed pretrial order due 11/25/94 ; PRETRIAL CONF set for 11:00 12/2/94 ; JURY TRIAL set for 9:30 1/17/95; ETT 3 days. (sjm, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 04/15/1994)

RECAP
April 15, 1994

MINUTES: by Magistrate John L. Wagner ; Status hearing held 4/15/94; schedo entered; sett conf req after 5/15/94; no to adj. (sjm, Dpty Clk)

6 April 18, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Wolfe SETTLMT CONF set for 1:30 6/27/94 before Magistrate Jeffrey S. Wolfe; stmts due 6/20/94. (JSW-MJ) (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 04/18/1994)

RECAP
7 June 1, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to extend time to file witness list.(O2J) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/01/1994)

RECAP
8 June 3, 1994

ORDER by Chief Judge James O. Ellison; granting motion to extend time to file witness list [7-1]. Pltf is given until 6/16/94. (cc: mvnt counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/06/1994)

RECAP
9 June 16, 1994

JOINT MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson, defendant Tulsa, City of to extend time to file witn lists(O2J) (djh, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/17/1994)

RECAP
June 16, 1994

MINUTE ORDER: Case is transferred to the docket of and reassigned to Judge Terry C. Kern from Chief Judge James O. Ellison ; HEREAFTER, the case will be referred to as the New Case Number 94-C-39-K and all files should be marked accordingly.(JOE-J) (cc: all counsel) (djh, Dpty Clk)

10 June 21, 1994

ORDER by Judge Terry C. Kern; granting motion to extend time to file witn lists [9-1]. Ptys are given until 6/23/94. (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/22/1994)

RECAP
11 June 22, 1994

WITNESS list by defendant Tulsa, City of (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/23/1994)

RECAP
12 June 22, 1994

MOTION by defendant Tulsa, City of for leave to appear w/ rep having ltd auth at stlmnt conf -o2jsw (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/23/1994)

RECAP
13 June 23, 1994

WITNESS list by plaintiff Roy C Johnson (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/24/1994)

RECAP
June 28, 1994

MINUTE ORDER: finding the motion for leave to appear w/ rep having ltd auth at stlmnt conf [12-1] moot as settlement conf was held. (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk)

14 July 1, 1994

ORDER by Judge Terry C. Kern; Discovery ddl; Motion filing ddl; Pretrial order ddl; Pretrial conference; Jury trial all strickeni. CASE STAYED in order to facilitate the settlement process. (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 07/05/1994)

RECAP
15 Aug. 8, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to withdraw attorney Guinise M Marshall -o2j (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/09/1994)

RECAP
16 Aug. 23, 1994

ORDER by Judge Terry C. Kern granting motion to withdraw attorney Guinise M Marshall [15-1] (cc: mvt counsel) (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

RECAP
March 7, 1995

MINUTE ORDER: Case transferred and reassigned to Judge Sven E. Holmes from the docket of Judge Terry Kern. Hereafter, the case will be referred to with the new case number, 94cv39-H and all files should be marked accordingly. (TCK) (cc: all counsel) (pll, Dpty Clk)

April 13, 1995

MINUTE ORDER: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned from Magistrate Judge Wagner to Magistrate Judge Frank McCarthy under the supervision of the assigned district judge for all further proceedings in accordance with their jurisdiction pursuant to FRCP. (TRB-J) (cc: all counsel) (lmc, Dpty Clk)

May 12, 1995

MINUTE ORDER: IT IS ORDERED THAT this case was stayed on July 1, 1994, to facilitate the parties' settlement negotiations. The Court has not received any indication as to the status of such settlement negotiations. The parties are asked to submit a joint status report within 14 days. (SEH-J) (cc: all counsel) (lmc, Dpty Clk)

17 May 30, 1995

Joint STATUS REPORT by plaintiff Roy C Johnson, defendant Tulsa, City of (lmc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 05/31/1995)

RECAP
Feb. 6, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ordered that a STATUS HRG is set for 2:30 p.m. on 2/14/96 before Judge Holmes.(SEH-J) (cc: all counsel) (djh, Dpty Clk)

18 Feb. 14, 1996

MOTION by defendant Tulsa, City of to withdraw attorney Robert H. Garner (O2Jbycnsl) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/14/1996)

RECAP
19 Feb. 14, 1996

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Tulsa, City of by Paul F Prather (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/14/1996)

RECAP
20 Feb. 14, 1996

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Tulsa, City of by Ellen R Hinchee (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/14/1996)

RECAP
21 Feb. 14, 1996

ORDER by Judge Sven Erik Holmes granting motion to withdraw attorney Robert H. Garner [18-1] for Tulsa, City of (cc: mvt counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/15/1996)

RECAP
22 Feb. 14, 1996

STANDARD SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Sven Erik Holmes: mot/lim due 8/1/96; discovery due 7/1/96; proposed pretrial order due 9/6/96; PRETRIAL CONF set for 3:30 p.m. on 9/13/96 ; JURY TRIAL set for 9:30 a.m. on 10/21/96 before Judge Holmes.(See Ord for frthr ddls) (cc: all counsel) (djh, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/15/1996)

RECAP
Feb. 14, 1996

MINUTES: by Judge Sven Erik Holmes ; Status hearing held 2/14/96, Discussion re: Status/case and stay is lifted ; Sched ord entered. (G. Dorrough-Ct rptr) (djh, Dpty Clk) Modified on 02/26/1996

23 Feb. 29, 1996

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Wagner SETTLMT CONF set for 1:30 7/25/96 before Magistrate John L. Wagner (cc: all counsel) (sjm, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/29/1996)

RECAP
24 May 1, 1996

MOTION w/ brf by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to certify class action, or, in the alternative, for joinder of addl parties (o2lc) (mail cpy rtrnd) (seal, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 05/02/1996)

RECAP
25 May 1, 1996

MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to extend ddl to join addl parties, or to amend complaint (o2lc) (mail cpy rtrnd) (seal, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 05/02/1996)

RECAP
26 May 24, 1996

RESPONSE by defendant Tulsa, City of to motion to certify class action [24-1], to motion for joinder of addl parties [24-2] (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 05/28/1996)

RECAP
27 June 3, 1996

WITNESS list by defendant Tulsa, City of (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/04/1996)

RECAP
28 June 4, 1996

...MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to change rply ddl re motion for clas action or to join addl parties (o2j) (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/05/1996)

RECAP
29 June 14, 1996

MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to change rply to motion for class action or joinder of addl parties (o2j) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/17/1996)

RECAP
June 14, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: It is ordered that plaintiff's motion to change reply deadline to his motion for class action or joinder of additional parties [29-1] and motion to certify class action [24-1], [24-2] is granted; reply deadline extended to 6/18/96 (SEH-J) (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk)

30 June 17, 1996

MOTION by defendant Tulsa, City of, plaintiff Roy C Johnson to amend scheduling order ddls (o2j) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/18/1996)

RECAP
31 June 18, 1996

REPLY by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to dfdt's response to pla's motion to certify class action [24-1] or for joinder of addl parties [24-2] (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/19/1996)

RECAP
June 21, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: It is ordered that plaintiff's motion to change reply deadline regarding its motion for class action or to join additional parties [28-1] is granted; setting reply deadline to motion to certify class action [24-1] and for joinder of additional parties [24-2] to: 6/14/96 (SEH-J) (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk)

June 21, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: It is ordered that the joint motion to amend scheduling order deadlines [30-1] is granted; present scheduling order deadlines are stricken ; the Court will reschedule a status conference for the purpose of setting future scheduling deadlines and notify the parties of the date for such conference (SEH-J) (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk)

June 25, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ordered that a Motion to certify class action [24-1] HRG is set for 1:15 p.m. on 8/5/96 before Judge Holmes. (cc: all counsel) (djh, Dpty Clk)

32 June 28, 1996

MOTION by defendant Tulsa, City of, plaintiff Roy C Johnson to continue settlement conf (o2jlw) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 07/01/1996)

RECAP
June 28, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: referring to Magistrate John L. Wagner the motion to continue settlement conf [32-1] (fe, Dpty Clk)

33 July 2, 1996

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Wagner granting the joint motion to continue settlement conf [32-1]; the court will reschedule a settlement conference upon the joint application of the parties (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 07/03/1996)

RECAP
July 2, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: finding the motion to continue settlement conf [32-1] moot. (sjm, Dpty Clk)

Aug. 5, 1996

MINUTES: by Judge Sven Erik Holmes: Pltf req cont of 60 days-Ct grnts & Mot Hrg re: certify class action [24-1] & joinder of addl parties [24-2] is cont to 2:30 p.m. on 10/4/96; Any frthr filings re: this matter due by 9/27/96; ct will consider joinder only on those indivs w/separate filings.(G. Dorrough-CR) (djh, Dpty Clk)

34 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Rufus Newsome (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
35 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Deborah D Dickens (mail copy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
36 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Albert Young (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
37 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Derrick L Lewis (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
38 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Marvin Blades (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
39 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Debbie R Crisp (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
40 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Deborah J Daniels (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
41 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Walter E Busby, Jr. (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
42 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Tyrone D Lynn (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
43 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Cornelious D Finley (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
44 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Tammara McKinney-Olden (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
45 Aug. 26, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Ray D Nelson (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 08/27/1996)

RECAP
46 Sept. 4, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Mark A Moore (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/05/1996)

RECAP
47 Sept. 4, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Dwight E Jackson (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/05/1996)

RECAP
48 Sept. 4, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Gary L Pitts (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/05/1996)

RECAP
49 Sept. 4, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Nancy E Reed (mail cpy rtrnd) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/05/1996)

RECAP
50 Sept. 5, 1996

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff Roy C Johnson by Robert Issac Mayes Jr (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/09/1996)

RECAP
51 Sept. 27, 1996

EVIDENTIARY BRIEF by plaintiff Roy C Johnson in support of its reply [31-1] to dfdt's motion to certify class action [24-1] and for joinder of addl parties [24-2] (mail, no env) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/30/1996)

RECAP
52 Oct. 2, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Walter Busby, Jr. (lmc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 10/04/1996)

RECAP
53 Oct. 4, 1996

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff Roy C Johnson by Guinise M Marshall (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 10/07/1996)

RECAP
Oct. 4, 1996

MINUTES: by Judge Sven Erik Holmes Mot Hrg on certify class action [24-1] on 10/4/96; discussion re: class certif; ptf hs conducted addtl disc & announces witn are available in the ctrm today-pltf submits evid w/testmny/witn; pltf may submit joinder/16 addtl pltfs w/proper mots & pltf may submit proper interrog by 11/4/96; resp are due by 11/25/96; hrg set for 2:30 p.m. on 11/25/96; ct moves the resp date up to 11/22/96; pltf req 5 days to present interrog to deft, allow deft 30 days, & then set hrg-City obj-Ct ord dates remain as set & if any prob, pty to file mot & ct will reconvene for such matter.(G. Dorrough-CR) (djh, Dpty Clk)

54 Oct. 8, 1996

ORDER by Judge Sven Erik Holmes stating that to be considered for joinder under Rule 20, each prospective pla must file by 11/4/96 an individual motion for permissive joinder setting forth the specific allegations of fact that form the basis of the potential pla's clms and the reasons why such allegations satisfy the requirements of Rule 20; dfdt will have untl 11/22/96 to respond to each such motion; the Court continues the period for discovery until 11/4/96; dfdt will have until 11/22/96 to rsp to pla's motion for class certification; any problems with discovery which jeopardize ddls set forth herein should be brough promptly before the Court for disposition; Court will hold a hearing on pending motions to certify class action [24-1] and for joinder of addl parties [24-2] for 2:30 on 11/25/96 (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 10/09/1996)

RECAP
Oct. 8, 1996

TRANSCRIPT of motion hrg (excerpt) before Judge Sven Erik Holmes for date of: 8/5/96 (C/R Glen Dorrough); 9 pages (fe, Dpty Clk)

Oct. 15, 1996

TRANSCRIPT of motion hrg before Judge Sven Erik Holmes for date(s) of: 10/4/96 (C/R Glen R. Dorrough; 42 pgs) (crp, Dpty Clk)

Oct. 15, 1996

TRANSCRIPT of motion hrg before Judge Sven Erik Holmes for date(s) of: 8/5/96 (C/R Glen R. Dorrough; 22 pgs) (crp, Dpty Clk)

55 Oct. 24, 1996

MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to shorten time to resp to discovery, or in the alternative, to extend discovery ddln (O2J) (mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 10/25/1996)

RECAP
Oct. 24, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ordered that a Discovery HRG is set for 2:15 p.m. on 10/25/96 before Judge Holmes. Copies of all outstanding discovery is to be brought to court. (SEH-J) (cc: all counsel & pties phoned by CRD) (djh, Dpty Clk)

Oct. 25, 1996

MINUTES: by Judge Sven Erik Holmes Disc Hrg held 10/25/96; pltf req ext/tm taking depos frm 11/4/96 to 11/12/96-deft states they can resp by 11/25/96; proper interrog subm due 11/12/96 & resp due 11/25/96; ea prospectv pltf to file by 11/12/96 indiv mot/permissive joinder setting forth spec alleg of fact tht form the basis of the potential pltf's clms & the reasons why such alleg satisfy the req of Rule 20 & resp due 11/25/96; period of disc extended to 11/12/96 & resp 11/25/96.(G. Dorrough-CR) (djh, Dpty Clk)

56 Nov. 1, 1996

MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to compel, and for sanctions (C2J) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/01/1996)

RECAP
57 Nov. 1, 1996

RESPONSE by defendant Tulsa, City of to motion to compel [56-1] (djh, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/04/1996)

RECAP
Nov. 1, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ordered that a HRG on the Motion to Compel is set for 2:00 p.m. on 11/1/96 before Judge Holmes. (SEH-J) (cc: all counsel & pties phoned by CRD) (djh, Dpty Clk)

Nov. 1, 1996

MINUTES: by Judge Sven Erik Holmes Mot hrg on mot/compel held 11/1/96 ; argmts heard; deft's resp to pltf's mot/comp was filed; pties to immed file bfr close/bus Monday, 11/4/96 a jt sched/discvry & any prot ord, if desired; phone conf will be set immed if there are any frthr probs; City states it is willing to stipul pltf entitled to permissive joinder-ct states a mot would need to be filed; class certif will be last issue to be determined. (G. Dorrough-CR) (djh, Dpty Clk)

58 Nov. 4, 1996

NOTICE by defendant Tulsa, City of of taking deposition of 5 people on various dates (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/06/1996)

RECAP
59 Nov. 6, 1996

MOTION by plaintiff Roy C Johnson to change time to resp (reply) to m/certify class (C2J) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/07/1996)

RECAP
Nov. 8, 1996

MINUTE ORDER: granting motion to change time to resp (reply) to m/certify class [59-1]. Plaintiff granted to 11/19/96 to respond in further support of pltf. mo/certify class. (cc: all counsel) (fe, Dpty Clk)

60 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Mark A Moore to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
61 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Dwight E Jackson to mtn for class action [24-1] or alternatively, joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
62 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Steven L Gibbs to mtn for class action [24-1] or alternatively, joinder of addtl parties [24-2] (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
63 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Paula D Anderson to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively, joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
64 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Deborah J Daniels-Fleak to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
65 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Debbie R Crisp to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively, joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
66 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Debra D Dickens to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
67 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Nancy E Reed to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
68 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Tammara McKinney-Olden to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
69 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Rufus E Newsome to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
70 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Tyrone D Lynn to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
71 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Marvin Blades to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
72 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Walter E Busby Jr to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
73 Nov. 12, 1996

AMENDED MOTION by unknown Derrek L Lewis to motion for class action [24-1] or alternatively joinder of addtl parties [24-2] and brf in supp (C2J, mail-cpy rtnd) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Oklahoma

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Private Employment Class Actions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 14, 1994

Closing Date: 2010

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All African- American persons who were or would be sworn personnel of the Tulsa Police Department and all African-American persons who were former personnel of the TPD and whose employment terminated on or after Jan 14, 1992

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

City

City of Tulsa

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Oklahoma 4:94-cv-00039

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 05-05064

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 03-05086

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2003 - 2008

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Promotion

Training

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Recommended Citation