Case: EEOC v. LA BRANCHE & CO INC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LA Branche & Co., Inc.

EEOC v. La Branche & Co Inc

EEOC v. La Branche & Co Inc, et al

EEOC v. La Branche & Co Inc

Carly Knight, Frank Dobbin, Alexandra Kalev

COMPLAINT against LA Branche & Co., Inc.. Document filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(jmi, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2005 (kco, ). (Entered: 09/28/2005)

SUMMONS ISSUED as to LA Branche & Co., Inc.. (jmi, ) (Entered: 09/28/2005)

Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton is so designated. (jmi, ) (Entered: 09/28/2005)

Case Designated ECF. (jmi, ) (Entered: 09/28/2005)

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Mark B. Stumer dated 10/6/05 re: No pre-motion conference is necessary. Mr. Servidio may intervene as of right. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/13/05) (sac, ) (Entered: 10/17/2005)

FIRST MOTION to Intervene. Document filed by Peter Servidio. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4)(Stumer, Mark) (Entered: 10/25/2005)

STIPULATION AND ORDER: the time for defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to 12/22/05. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 11/28/05) (db, ) (Entered: 11/28/2005)

Set Answer Due Date purs. to 4 Stipulation and Order as to LA Branche & Co., Inc. answer due on 12/22/2005. (db, ) (Entered: 11/28/2005)

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion, Memo of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene, Affirmation in Support and Complaint in Intervention served on LaBranche & Co., Inc. c/o Kenneth Gavsie, Esq. on December 8, 2005. Service was made by MAIL (FED EX). Document filed by Peter Servidio. (Stumer, Mark) (Entered: 12/08/2005)

RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by LA Branche & Co., Inc..(Klein, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/22/2005)

ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by LA Branche & Co., Inc..(Klein, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/22/2005)

ORDER FOR INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 4/03/2006 at 03:30 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, Courtroom 15C. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 2/28/2006) (lb, ) (Entered: 03/02/2006)

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Jeffrey S. Klein dated 3/10/06 re: Application GRANTED. The 4/3/06 initial pretrial conference is adjourned to 4/26/06 at 5:00 p.m. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/13/06) (db, ) (Entered: 03/15/2006)

Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 4/26/2006 05:00 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. (db, ) (Entered: 03/15/2006)

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Scheindlin from Mark Stumer dated 3/16/06: Peter Servidio's motion to intervene is hereby granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion. (docket number 3). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/17/06) (cd, ) (Entered: 03/20/2006)

WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Anthony Corso waiver sent on 4/3/2006, answer due 6/2/2006; Alfred Hayward waiver sent on 4/3/2006, answer due 6/2/2006; LA Branche & Co., Inc. waiver sent on 4/3/2006, answer due 6/2/2006. Document filed by Peter Servidio. (Stumer, Mark) (Entered: 04/03/2006)

ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by Anthony Corso, Alfred Hayward, LA Branche & Co., Inc..(Klein, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/11/2006)

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for settlement. Referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/26/06) (kco, ) Modified on 5/1/2006 (kco, ). (Entered: 04/27/2006)

SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 1/9/2007. Final Pretrial Conference is set for 11/14/2006 at 4:30 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Pretrial Order due by 2/21/2007. All other deadlines are set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/26/06) (kco, ) (Entered: 04/27/2006)

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/26/06) (kco, ) (Entered: 04/27/2006)

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Douglas F. Eaton : Settlement Conference held on 6/13/2006. (The parties were unable to reach a settlement. Judge Eaton made a recommendation for their consideration) (js, ) (Entered: 06/16/2006)

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Douglas F. Eaton : Settlement Conference held on 6/13/2006. No settlement reached. (db, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006)

Judge Douglas F. Eaton is no longer assigned to case. (cd, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006)

CONSENT DECREE AND JUDGMENT settling action. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/11/06) (Attachments: # 1 notice of right to appeal)(ml, ) (Entered: 08/15/2006)

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: This action is dismissed with prejudice against LaBranche & Co. Inc., Anthony Corso and Alfred Hayward, without costs to either party. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 9/19/2006) (lb, ) (Entered: 09/20/2006)

FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING FOR NON-ECF DOCUMENT - FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct 17 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, 16 Consent Judgment Provide Administrative Closure(LETTER). Document filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Ranis, Michael) Modified on 10/5/2006 (kg). (Entered: 10/04/2006)

***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Michael Bruce Ranis to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document No. 18 Letter. This document is not filed via ECF. (kg) (Entered: 10/05/2006)

ORDER the above-captioned case was settled by the parties in a Consent Decree approved by the Court on August 11,2006. The Consent Decree requires the Court to retain jurisdiction for three years from the date of entry. Therefore, this Court will retain jurisdiction until the Consent Decree expires on August 11, 2009. Until such time, the action may be reinstated as to defendant LaBranche & Co., Inc., if need be. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/25/2006) (jmi, ) (Entered: 10/26/2006)

ORDER: intervenor-plaintiff Peter Servidio requested a pre-motion conference to resolve a fee dispute between himself and his former attorney, Mark Stumer. Because this fee dispute is not sufficiently related to the main action to fall within