Case: EEOC v. Ceisel Masonry, Inc.

1:06-cv-02075 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: April 13, 2006

Closed Date: 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 13, 2006, the Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff sued Ceisel Masonry under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S. Code § 1981. The plaintiffs, representing named Hispanic employees of Ceisel Masonry and a class of other Hispanic employees of Ceisel Masonry, asked the court for injunctive relief enjoining the defendant from discriminating against employees based on national …

On April 13, 2006, the Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff sued Ceisel Masonry under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S. Code § 1981. The plaintiffs, representing named Hispanic employees of Ceisel Masonry and a class of other Hispanic employees of Ceisel Masonry, asked the court for injunctive relief enjoining the defendant from discriminating against employees based on national origin, and monetary relief to compensate for losses. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant had created a hostile work environment. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had engaged in unlawful employment practices in harassing Hispanic employees and retaliating against these employees when they complained.

The parties engaged in discovery for the next two years. In August of 2008, both parties filed motions for partial summary judgment.

On January 23, 2009, Judge Harry D. Leinenweber denied all motions. He held that an issue of fact remained as to harassment; an employer's foreman did not act act as a supervisor creating liability for the employer; and the defendants assertion of a positive defense that employee had failed to take preventive or corrective measures could not be decided by summary judgment. 594 F.Supp.2d 1018 (N.D.Ill. 2009).

On May 22, 2009 the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber approved a consent decree between the two parties. Specifically, the decree ordered an injunction enjoining harassment based on national origin and an injunction enjoining retaliation against persons who complain about violations of Title VII or Section 1981. The decree also ordered Ceisel Masonry to implement anti-harassment and anti-discriminatory policies, training, supervisory accountability systems, postings of notice, record keeping, and reporting. The decree ordered $500,000 in monetary damages to class members and a total of $220,000 for the three named employee complainants.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (7/30/2008)

Gabriela Hybel (11/7/2016)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5479304/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-ceisel-masonry-inc/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Gochanour, Gregory M. (Illinois)

Hendrickson, John C. (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Alikhan, Saira Janine (Illinois)

Bruch, Julie A. (Illinois)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Kliebard, Kenneth Michael (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:06-cv-02075

Docket [PACER]

Feb. 12, 2010

Feb. 12, 2010

Docket
1

1:06-cv-02075

[Complaint]

April 13, 2006

April 13, 2006

Complaint

1:06-cv-02075

Intervenors' Complaint

June 8, 2006

June 8, 2006

Complaint
20

1:06-cv-02075

Unopposed Motion for Reassignment Based on Relatedness

July 5, 2006

July 5, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief
78

1:06-cv-02075

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Jan. 23, 2009

Jan. 23, 2009

Order/Opinion
95

1:06-cv-02075

Consent Decree

May 22, 2009

May 22, 2009

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5479304/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-ceisel-masonry-inc/

Last updated Aug. 13, 2025, 12:03 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
78

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/23/2009:Mailed notice(wp, )

Jan. 23, 2009

Jan. 23, 2009

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 13, 2006

Closing Date: 2009

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Ceisel Masonry, Inc. (Northbrook, IL), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Attorneys fees

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Training

Amount Defendant Pays: 860,000

Order Duration: 2009 - 2012

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Race discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Hispanic

Affected Race(s):

Race, unspecified

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit