Case: Yarbrough v. Lockheed Martin Co.

1:00-cv-01183 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: May 10, 2000

Closed Date: Sept. 26, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 10, 2000 plaintiffs, African American employees of Lockheed Martin, filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination on the basis of race pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against their employer and their union, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought class certification, an order declaring liability, i…

On May 10, 2000 plaintiffs, African American employees of Lockheed Martin, filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination on the basis of race pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against their employer and their union, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought class certification, an order declaring liability, injunctive and equitable relief, back and front pay, lost benefits, compensatory damages, emotional distress damages, pain and suffering damages, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs.

Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that they had been systematically excluded from the promotional process by the predominantly Caucasian managerial staff. They also alleged that they had not been provided with necessary opportunities for overtime or training, that the Union failed to represent them adequately and fairly or to properly process their grievances, that the Union consented to Lockheed's discriminatory practices, and that they were subjected to a hostile work environment.

The EEOC sought to intervene, but on January 29, 2001 the district court (Judge Forrester) denied this motion. On May 9, 2001 the union and the plaintiffs reached an unspecified settlement and the union was formally dismissed from the case on March 25, 2003. On August 2, 2001 class certification was denied by the district court (Judge Forrester) and the plaintiffs thereafter were to proceed individually. On September 26, 2003 the district court (Judge Forrester) dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of prosecution.

Summary Authors

Michael Perry (7/31/2010)

Related Cases

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., Northern District of Georgia (2000)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11703317/parties/yarbrough-v-lockheed-martin-co/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Alexander, Josie Anne (Georgia)

Attorney for Defendant

Ashe, R. Lawrence Jr. (Georgia)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Adams, Raechel (New York)

Arrington, Ronald (District of Columbia)

Barnes, Lynette (North Carolina)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:00-cv-01183

Docket [PACER]

Yarbrough v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

April 8, 2005

April 8, 2005

Docket
1

1:00-cv-01183

Complaint [Original]

Yarbrough v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

May 10, 2000

May 10, 2000

Complaint
79

1:00-cv-01183

Order [Denying EEOC's Motion to Intervene]

Jan. 29, 2001

Jan. 29, 2001

Order/Opinion

2001 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 991

102

1:00-cv-01183

Order [re: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel]

March 12, 2001

March 12, 2001

Order/Opinion

199 F.R.D. 379

284

1:00-cv-01183

Order [re: Class Certification]

Aug. 2, 2001

Aug. 2, 2001

Order/Opinion

205 F.R.D. 655

310

1:00-cv-01183

Order(Dismissing union defendants from the case)

Yarbrough v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

March 25, 2003

March 25, 2003

Order/Opinion
312

1:00-cv-01183

Judgment (Dismissing the case without prejudice)

Yarbrough v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

Sept. 26, 2003

Sept. 26, 2003

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11703317/yarbrough-v-lockheed-martin-co/

Last updated Sept. 17, 2026, 2:40 p.m.

Docket for: Yarbrough v. Lockheed Martin Co
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 10, 2000

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed and summons(es) issued. Consent form to proceed before U.S. magistrate and pretrial instructions given to attorney; jury demand FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 454456 (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
2 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Farris Yarbrough (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
3 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Calvin Combs (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
4 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Edward Kirkland (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
5 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Wendell Carlisle (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
6 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Rita Oliver (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
7 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Joseph Banks (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
8 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Wayne Elliott (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
9 May 10, 2000

Application for admission of Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., Jock Michael Smith pro hac vice for plaintiffs (fmm) (Entered: 05/18/2000)

RECAP
May 23, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans APPROVING [9−1] pro hac vice applications for Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr. and Jock Michael Smith. (cc) (ck) (Entered: 05/25/2000)

PACER
May 23, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans APPROVING [9-1] pro hac vice applications for Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr. and Jock Michael Smith. (cc) (ck)

10 May 25, 2000

EXPEDITED MOTION by defendant International Assoc, defendant International Asso 7 for permission to interview agents with brief in support. (fmm) Modified on 06/01/2000 (Entered: 05/30/2000)

RECAP
May 25, 2000

Added attorney for dfts International Assoc, International Asso 7 : Robert S. Giolito, Megan Elizabeth Gideon, Lesley Ann Troope. (fmm) (Entered: 06/01/2000)

PACER
May 25, 2000

Added attorney for dfts International Assoc, International Asso 7 : Robert S. Giolito, Megan Elizabeth Gideon, Lesley Ann Troope. (fmm)

11 June 1, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans directing pla to respond to [10-1] expedited motion for permission to interview agents by 6/9/00, [10-1] motion for permission to interview agents to be submitted on 6/12/00 (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 06/01/2000)

RECAP
June 2, 2000

Proposed Consent Order extending the time to answer [1−1] complaint thru 6/26/00. to ODE (fmm) (Entered: 06/02/2000)

PACER
June 2, 2000

Proposed Consent Order extending the time to answer [1-1] complaint thru 6/26/00. to ODE (fmm)

12 June 8, 2000

CONSENT ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans, extending time to answer [1-1] complaint thru 6/26/00, Answer due 6/26/00 for International Asso 7, for International Assoc, for Lockheed Martin Corp, for Lockheed Martin Co (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

RECAP
June 8, 2000

Added attorney for dfts Lockheed Martin Co, Lockheed Martin Corp : William Henry Boice, Daniel F. Piar, R. Lawrence Ashe Jr., Nancy E. Rafuse, Martha Marie Blankenship Wright. (fmm) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

PACER
June 8, 2000

Added attorney for dfts Lockheed Martin Co, Lockheed Martin Corp : William Henry Boice, Daniel F. Piar, R. Lawrence Ashe Jr., Nancy E. Rafuse, Martha Marie Blankenship Wright. (fmm)

13 June 9, 2000

MOTION by defendant Lockheed Martin Co, defendant Lockheed Martin Corp for direction, and for relief under LR 23(C)(2) with brief in support. (contained w/in response at docu #13) (fmm) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

RECAP
14 June 9, 2000

Brief by plaintiffs to [10-1] motion for permission to interview agents (fmm) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

RECAP
June 12, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [10-1] motion for permission to interview agents (fmm)

15 June 15, 2000

Reply brief to [10-1] motion for permission to interview agents by dfts International Assoc, International Asso 7 . (fmm) (Entered: 06/19/2000)

RECAP
16 June 23, 2000

Response by plaintiffs in opposition to [13-1] motion for direction, [13-2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (fmm) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

RECAP
17 June 26, 2000

ANSWER by defendant Lockheed Martin Co, defendant Lockheed Martin Corp to complaint [1-1] Discovery ends 11/23/00; jury demand (fmm) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

RECAP
18 June 26, 2000

ANSWER by defendant International Assoc to complaint [1-1] (fmm) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

RECAP
19 June 26, 2000

ANSWER by defendant International Asso 7 to complaint [1-1] (fmm) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

RECAP
June 26, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [13−1] motion for direction, [13−2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (File in Chambers) (fmm) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

PACER
June 26, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [13-1] motion for direction, [13-2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (File in Chambers) (fmm)

20 June 27, 2000

EMERGENCY MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to interview prospective class members, and preclude the dfts'communication with potential class members with brief in support. (fmm) Modified on 06/28/2000 (Entered: 06/28/2000)

RECAP
21 June 27, 2000

MOTION by plaintiffs for expedites response, and for expedite ruling with brief in support. (fmm) (Entered: 06/28/2000)

RECAP
22 June 30, 2000

Preliminary Response by defendant Lockheed Martin Co, defendant Lockheed Martin Corp in opposition to [21-1] motion for expedites response, [21-2] motion for expedite ruling, [20-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members, [20-2] motion preclude the dfts'communication with potential class members (fmm) (Entered: 07/03/2000)

RECAP
23 July 5, 2000

Response by International Assoc, International Asso 7 in opposition [20-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members, [20-2] motion preclude the dfts'communication with potential class members (ck) (Entered: 07/07/2000)

RECAP
July 7, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [20−1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members, [20−2] motion preclude the dfts'communication with potential class members (File in chambers) (ck) (Entered: 07/07/2000)

PACER
July 7, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [20-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members, [20-2] motion preclude the dfts'communication with potential class members (File in chambers) (ck)

24 July 11, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by defendant International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO. (dfb) (Entered: 07/11/2000)

RECAP
25 July 11, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by defendant International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Lodge 709. (dfb) (Entered: 07/11/2000)

RECAP
26 July 11, 2000

Certificate of interested persons. (to judge) (crc) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

RECAP
27 July 11, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by defendant Lockheed Martin Co, and defendant Lockheed Martin Corp (crc) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

RECAP
28 July 13, 2000

Response by defendants to [20-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members and [20-2] preclude the dfts'communication with potential class members; and, reply brief to [13-1] motion for direction and [13-2] for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (ck) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

RECAP
29 July 14, 2000

Reply brief to [21-1] motion for expedites response, [21-2] motion for expedite ruling by plaintiffs. (bek) (Entered: 07/17/2000)

RECAP
30 July 17, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans GRANTING [21-1] motion for expedited response and [21-2] motion for expedite ruling, GRANTING [10-1] motion for permission to interview agents, GRANTING [13-1] motion for direction and [13-2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2), GRANTING [20-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members and [20-2] motion preclude the dfts'communication with potential class members as set forth in order. (see order for specifics) (cc) (bek) (Entered: 07/17/2000)

RECAP
July 17, 2000

Terminated submissions. (bek) (Entered: 07/17/2000)

PACER
July 17, 2000

Terminated submissions. (bek)

31 July 26, 2000

Stipulation by parties extending time to file prel planning report thru 7/27/00 to ODE (fmm) (Entered: 07/28/2000)

RECAP
32 July 28, 2000

MOTION by plaintiffs for status conference with brief in support. (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
33 July 28, 2000

MOTION by plaintiffs to extend time thru 2/10/01 or for 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases to file the motion for certification of class with brief in support. (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
July 28, 2000

Proposed Scheduling order by plaintiffs. (to ODE) (COURT DID NOT APPROVE − PLACED IN CORRESPONDENCE) (ck) Modified on 08/25/2000 (Entered: 08/01/2000)

PACER
July 28, 2000

Proposed Scheduling order by plaintiffs. (to ODE) (COURT DID NOT APPROVE - PLACED IN CORRESPONDENCE) (ck) Modified on 08/25/2000

34 July 31, 2000

Stipulation extending time thru 7/28/00 to file preliminary statement, with proposed order. (to ODE) (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
35 Aug. 1, 2000

Preliminary Statement and Scheduling Order. (to judge) (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
36 Aug. 1, 2000

Amended MOTION by plaintiffs amending [32-1] motion for status conference (ck) (Entered: 08/02/2000)

RECAP
Aug. 4, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans GRANTING [34−1] stipulation extending time thru 7/28/00 to file preliminary statement (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 08/07/2000)

PACER
Aug. 4, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans GRANTING [34-1] stipulation extending time thru 7/28/00 to file preliminary statement (cc) (fmm)

37 Aug. 14, 2000

Response by dfts Lockheed Martin Co, Lockheed Martin Corp to [32-1] motion for status [33-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or for 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases to file the motion for certification of class, [36-1] amended motion for status conference (fmm) (Entered: 08/15/2000)

RECAP
39 Aug. 17, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans establishing scheduling order. Discovery shall commence the date of this order. Pla's discovery as to class cert to be completed by 12/1/00 and motion for class cert to be filed by 1/2/01. Dfts shall have until 2/15/01 to conclude discovery as to the class cert and their response to the class cert motion is due 3/15/01. Pla's reply brief due 3/15/01. Discovery will be stayed from 2/15/01 until the court rules on pending motion for class cert. Thereafter a scheduling order will be issued for remaining issues. (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 08/25/2000)

RECAP
38 Aug. 18, 2000

Response by defendant to [36-1] amend/amended motion [32-1] motion for status conference, [33-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or for 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases to file the motion for certification of class (ck) (Entered: 08/21/2000)

RECAP
Aug. 21, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [36−1] amend/amended motion [32−1] motion for status conference, [33−1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or for 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases to file the motion for certification of class, [32−1] motion for status conference (ck) (Entered: 08/21/2000)

PACER
Aug. 21, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [36-1] amend/amended motion [32-1] motion for status conference, [33-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or for 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases to file the motion for certification of class, [32-1] motion for status conference (ck)

40 Aug. 24, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans DISMISSING as moot plas [32-1] motion for status conference, [36-1] amended motion for status conference, [33-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or for 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases to file the motion for certification of class. (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 08/25/2000)

RECAP
Aug. 24, 2000

Terminated submissions. (fmm) (Entered: 08/25/2000)

PACER
Aug. 24, 2000

Terminated submissions. (fmm)

41 Aug. 28, 2000

Stipulation by parties extending time for pla to respond to discovery requests thru 9/18/00 to JOF (fmm) (Entered: 08/31/2000)

RECAP
42 Aug. 30, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans and Judge J. Owen Forrester, reassigning case to Judge J. O. Forrester (cc) (fmm) Modified on 08/31/2000 (Entered: 08/30/2000)

RECAP
Sept. 15, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [41−1] stipulation extending time for pla to respond to discovery requests thru 9/18/00 (cc) (aar) (Entered: 09/18/2000)

PACER
Sept. 15, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [41-1] stipulation extending time for pla to respond to discovery requests thru 9/18/00 (cc) (aar)

43 Sept. 19, 2000

Notice of filing of original discovery by defendant Lockheed Martin Co, defendant Lockheed Martin Corp. (aar) (Entered: 09/20/2000)

RECAP
44 Oct. 11, 2000

TELE-CONFERENCE HELD before Judge J. O. Forrester: Discovery deadline extended 20 days after prior deadline. Extension granted this time up to class certification met and replies. Bump every deadline in Judge Evan's order 3 months. The Court will not grant any other extensions outside of extraordinary cause. Parties to prepare and order for the court to sign re: exactly what the deadline dates are. If movant files a motion to compel, include request, response and brief argument, call CRD and court will see parties in 2-3 days. If deposition problems, call the court and court will call back and resolve. Get copy of transcript and give to Giolito. Gliolito to file objections to deadlines w/in 10 days from receipt of transcript or waive. (aar) (Entered: 10/16/2000)

RECAP
Oct. 25, 2000

Steno notes of proceedings held 10/04/00 before Judge J. O. Forrester, by Court Reporter Lois D. Phillips. (aar) (Entered: 10/25/2000)

PACER
Oct. 25, 2000

Steno notes of proceedings held 10/04/00 before Judge J. O. Forrester, by Court Reporter Lois D. Phillips. (aar)

45 Nov. 3, 2000

Notice to take deposition of Russ Welber and Pat Disheroon by plaintiffs (jph) (Entered: 11/06/2000)

RECAP
Nov. 13, 2000

Proposed Order (to JOF) (aar) (Entered: 11/14/2000)

PACER
Nov. 13, 2000

Proposed Order (to JOF) (aar)

46 Nov. 17, 2000

ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester that pla's have until 3/1/01 to complete all class certification discovery and motion for class certification due 4/2/01. Dft's shall have until 5/15/01 to complete class certification discovery and response to motion for class certification due 6/1/01. Pla's reply brief due 6/15/01. Discovery stayed from 5/15/01 until ruling on motion for class certification. Dfts shall have until 11/20/00 to respond to pla's discovery requests. (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 11/20/2000)

RECAP
47 Nov. 20, 2000

Notice of filing of original supplemental discovery and amended objections to plaintiffs' first request for production of documents by defendants' Lockheed Martin Co, & Lockheed Martin Corp. (aar) (Entered: 11/21/2000)

RECAP
48 Dec. 5, 2000

MOTION by Equal Employment for an expedited hearing on EEOC's mtn to intervene with brief in support and proposed order. (kt) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

RECAP
49 Dec. 5, 2000

MOTION by Equal Employment for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff with brief in support and proposed order. (kt) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

RECAP
50 Dec. 6, 2000

ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester DIRECTING parties to respond to [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff, [48-1] motion for an expedited hearing on EEOC's mtn to intervene thru 12/12/00 [49-1] motion and [48-1] motion to be submitted on 12/13/00 (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

RECAP
Dec. 6, 2000

Proposed confidentiality agreement by plaintiffs and defendants. (to JOF) (bek) (Entered: 12/07/2000)

PACER
Dec. 6, 2000

Proposed confidentiality agreement by plaintiffs and defendants. (to JOF) (bek)

51 Dec. 7, 2000

Response by defendants Lockheed Martin Co and Lockheed Martin Corp in opposition to [48-1] motion for an expedited hearing on EEOC's mtn to intervene (adg) (Entered: 12/08/2000)

RECAP
52 Dec. 12, 2000

MOTION by plaintiffs to compel defendants' responses to plaintiffs' first request for production of documents with brief in support. (adg) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

RECAP
53 Dec. 12, 2000

MOTION by plaintiffs to file excess pages limitation on motion to compel (adg) Modified on 12/13/2000 (Entered: 12/12/2000)

RECAP
54 Dec. 13, 2000

CONSENT ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester, extending time for parties to respond to [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff, [48-1] motion for an expedited hearing on EEOC's mtn to intervene thru 12/15/00, [49-1] motion and [48-1] motion to be submitted on 12/18/00 (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/13/2000)

RECAP
55 Dec. 15, 2000

Response by defendants Lockheed Martin Co and Lockheed Martin Corp in opposition to EEOC's [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff (adg) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
56 Dec. 15, 2000

CONSENT MOTION by defendants Lockheed Martin Co and Lockheed Martin Corp to file excess pages limitation on response in opposition to the EEOC's motion to intervene as a party plaintiff with proposed order. (to JOF) (adg) Modified on 12/18/2000 (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
57 Dec. 15, 2000

Response by defendants International Assoc and International Asso 7 in opposition to EEOC's [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff (adg) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
58 Dec. 15, 2000

Memorandum by plaintiffs in support of EEOC's [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff (adg) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
59 Dec. 15, 2000

TRANSCRIPT filed for dates of 10/4/00 Court Reporter: Lois Phillips (fmm) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
60 Dec. 15, 2000

CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND ORDER GOVERNING THE EXCHANGE AND PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION (fmm) (Entered: 12/20/2000)

RECAP
Dec. 15, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [53−1] motion to file excess pages limitation on motion to compel (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/20/2000)

PACER
Dec. 15, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [53-1] motion to file excess pages limitation on motion to compel (cc) (fmm)

Dec. 18, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [49−1] motion for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff (adg) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

PACER
Dec. 18, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff (adg)

61 Dec. 20, 2000

ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [56-1] motion to file excess pages limitation on response in opposition to the EEOC's motion to intervene as a party plaintiff (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/21/2000)

RECAP
62 Dec. 21, 2000

REPLY by Proposed Intervenor Equal Employment to response to [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party (fmm) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

RECAP
63 Dec. 21, 2000

REPLY by Proposed Intervenor Equal Employment to Union dfts' response to [49-1] motion for leave to intervene as a party (fmm) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

RECAP
Dec. 21, 2000

Proposed Consent Order for filing excess pages by Proposed Intervenor Equal Employment. to JOF (fmm) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

PACER
Dec. 21, 2000

Proposed Consent Order for filing excess pages by Proposed Intervenor Equal Employment. to JOF (fmm)

Case Details

State / Territory:

Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 10, 2000

Closing Date: Sept. 26, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Former and current African-American employees in the United States from 1996 to the present, who are subject to the Union's discriminatory actions and failure to act and Lockheed's employment and human resources policies.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Georgia 1:00-cv-01183

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

None

Unknown

Source of Relief:

None

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Demotion

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Training

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Recommended Citation