Case: Reid v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co.

1:00-cv-01182 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: May 10, 2000

Closed Date: April 8, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 10, 2000 plaintiffs, African American employees of Lockheed Martin, filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination on the basis of race pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against their employer in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought class certification, an order declaring liability, injunctive and equitable relief, back and front pay, lost benefits, compensatory dama…

On May 10, 2000 plaintiffs, African American employees of Lockheed Martin, filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination on the basis of race pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against their employer in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought class certification, an order declaring liability, injunctive and equitable relief, back and front pay, lost benefits, compensatory damages, emotional distress damages, pain and suffering damages, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees and costs.

Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that they had been systematically excluded from the promotional process by the predominantly Caucasian managerial staff. They also alleged that they had not been provided with necessary opportunities for overtime or training and that they were subjected to a hostile work environment.

The EEOC sought to intervene, but on January 29, 2001 the district court (Judge Forrester) denied this motion. On August 2, 2001 class certification was denied by the district court (Judge Forrester) and the plaintiffs thereafter were ordered to proceed individually. On August 1, 2003 the district court (Judge Forrester) dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of prosecution.

Summary Authors

Michael Perry (7/31/2010)

Related Cases

Yarbrough v. Lockheed Martin Co., Northern District of Georgia (2000)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11703316/parties/reid-v-lockheed-martin-co/


Judge(s)

Baverman, Alan J. (Georgia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Alexander, Josie Anne (Georgia)

Cochran, Johnnie L. Jr. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Ashe, R. Lawrence Jr. (Georgia)

Boice, William H. (Georgia)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:00-cv-01182

Docket (PACER)

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Co

April 8, 2005

April 8, 2005

Docket
1

1:00-cv-01182

Complaint - Class Action

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Co

May 10, 2000

May 10, 2000

Complaint
60

1:00-cv-01182

1:00-cv-01183

Order [Denying EEOC's Motion to Intervene]

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Co.

Jan. 29, 2001

Jan. 29, 2001

Order/Opinion

2001 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 991

1:00-cv-01182

1:00-cv-01183

Order [re: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel]

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Co

March 9, 2001

March 9, 2001

Order/Opinion

199 F.R.D. 379

168

1:00-cv-01182

1:00-cv-01183

Order [re: Class Certification]

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Co

Aug. 2, 2001

Aug. 2, 2001

Order/Opinion

205 F.R.D. 655

184

1:00-cv-01182

Order [of Dismissal]

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Co

Aug. 1, 2003

Aug. 1, 2003

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11703316/reid-v-lockheed-martin-co/

Last updated Oct. 7, 2026, 1:26 a.m.

Docket for: Reid v. Lockheed Martin Co
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 10, 2000

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed and summons(es) issued. Consent form to proceed before U.S. magistrate and pretrial instructions given to attorney; jury demand FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 454453 (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
2 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Melvin Reid (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
3 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Vonda Moore (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
4 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Johnnie West (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
5 May 10, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff Clarence W. Sinkfield (crc) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
6 May 10, 2000

Application for admission of Jock Michael Smith, Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. pro hac vice for plaintiffs (fmm) (Entered: 05/18/2000)

RECAP
May 22, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans APPROVING [6-1] pro hac vice application for Jock Michael Smith (cc) (aar) (Entered: 05/24/2000)

PACER
May 22, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans APPROVING [6-1] pro hac vice application for Jock Michael Smith (cc) (aar)

May 23, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans APPROVING [6-1] pro hac vice application for Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr. (cc) (ck)

June 2, 2000

Proposed Consent Order extending the time to answer [1-1] complaint thru 6/26/00. to ODE (fmm) (Entered: 06/02/2000)

PACER
June 2, 2000

Proposed Consent Order extending the time to answer [1-1] complaint thru 6/26/00. to ODE (fmm)

7 June 8, 2000

CONSENT ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans, extending time to answer [1-1] complaint thru 6/26/00, Answer due 6/26/00 for Lockheed Martin Corp, for Lockheed Martin Co (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

RECAP
June 8, 2000

Added attorney for defendants: William Henry Boice, Daniel F. Piar, R. Lawrence Ashe Jr., Nancy E. Rafuse, Martha Marie Blankenship Wright. (fmm) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

PACER
June 8, 2000

Added attorney for defendants: William Henry Boice, Daniel F. Piar, R. Lawrence Ashe Jr., Nancy E. Rafuse, Martha Marie Blankenship Wright. (fmm)

8 June 9, 2000

MOTION by defendants for direction, and for relief under LR 23(C)(2) with brief in support. (contained w/in response at docu #8) (fmm) Modified on 06/12/2000 (Entered: 06/12/2000)

RECAP
9 June 23, 2000

Response by plaintiffs in opposition to [8-1] motion for direction, [8-2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (fmm) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

RECAP
10 June 26, 2000

ANSWER by defendants to complaint; jury demand. [1-1] Discovery ends 11/23/00 (fmm) Modified on 06/26/2000 (Entered: 06/26/2000)

RECAP
June 26, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [8-1] motion for direction, [8-2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (fmm) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

PACER
June 26, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [8-1] motion for direction, [8-2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (fmm)

11 June 27, 2000

EMERGENCY MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to interview prospective class members and preclude the dfts' communication with potential class members with brief in support. (fmm) (Entered: 06/28/2000)

RECAP
12 June 27, 2000

MOTION by plaintiffs for expedited response and expedite ruling with brief in support. (fmm) Modified on 06/28/2000 (Entered: 06/28/2000)

RECAP
13 June 30, 2000

Preliminary Response by defendants in opposition to [12-1] motion for expedited response, [12-2] motion expedite ruling, [11-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members, [11-2] motion preclude the dfts' communication with potential class members (fmm) (Entered: 07/03/2000)

RECAP
July 3, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [12-1] motion for expedited response, [12-2] motion expedite ruling, [11-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members, [11-2] motion preclude the dfts' communication with potential class members (File in Chambers) (fmm) (Entered: 07/03/2000)

PACER
July 3, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [12-1] motion for expedited response, [12-2] motion expedite ruling, [11-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members, [11-2] motion preclude the dfts' communication with potential class members (File in Chambers) (fmm)

14 July 11, 2000

Certificate of interested persons. (to judge) (crc) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

RECAP
15 July 11, 2000

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by defendants (crc) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

RECAP
16 July 13, 2000

Response by defendants to [11-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members & [11-2] preclude the dfts' communication with potential class members; and reply brief to [8-1] motion for directiono and [8-2] for relief under LR 23(C)(2) (ck) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

RECAP
17 July 14, 2000

Reply brief to [12-1] motion for expedited response, [12-2] motion expedite ruling by plaintiffs. (bek) (Entered: 07/17/2000)

RECAP
18 July 17, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans GRANTING [12-1] motion for expedited response and [12-2] motion expedite ruling, GRANTING [8-1] motion for direction and [8-2] motion for relief under LR 23(C)(2), GRANTING [11-1] motion for leave to interview prospective class members and [11-2] motion preclude the dfts' communication with potential class members as set forth in order. (see order for specifics) (cc) (bek) Modified on 07/17/2000 (Entered: 07/17/2000)

RECAP
July 17, 2000

Terminated submissions. (bek) (Entered: 07/17/2000)

PACER
July 17, 2000

Terminated submissions. (bek)

19 July 26, 2000

Stipulation by parties extending time to file prel planning report thru 7/27/00 to ODE (fmm) (Entered: 07/28/2000)

RECAP
20 July 28, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff for status conference with brief in support. (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
21 July 28, 2000

MOTION by plaintiffs to extend time thru 2/10/01 or 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases for plas to file motion for class certification with brief in support. (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
July 28, 2000

Proposed scheduling order by plaintiffs. (to ODE) (COURT DID NOT APPROVE - PLACED IN CORRESPONDENCE) (ck) Modified on 08/25/2000 (Entered: 08/01/2000)

PACER
July 28, 2000

Proposed scheduling order by plaintiffs. (to ODE) (COURT DID NOT APPROVE - PLACED IN CORRESPONDENCE) (ck) Modified on 08/25/2000

22 July 31, 2000

Stipulation, extending time thru 7/28/00 to file the preliminary planning report with proposed order. (to ODE) (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
23 July 31, 2000

Preliminary Statement and Scheduling Order. (to judge) (ck) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

RECAP
24 Aug. 1, 2000

Amended MOTION by plaintiff amending [20-1] motion for status conference (ck) (Entered: 08/02/2000)

RECAP
Aug. 4, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans GRANTING [22-1] stipulation extending time thru 7/28/00 to file the preliminary planning report (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 08/07/2000)

PACER
Aug. 4, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans APPROVING [23-1] preliminary statement (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

PACER
Aug. 4, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans GRANTING [22-1] stipulation extending time thru 7/28/00 to file the preliminary planning report (cc) (fmm)

Aug. 4, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans APPROVING [23-1] preliminary statement (cc) (fmm)

25 Aug. 14, 2000

Response by defendants to [20-1] motion for status conference, [21-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases for plas to file motion for class certification, [24-1] amended motion for status conference (fmm) (Entered: 08/15/2000)

RECAP
Aug. 15, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [20-1] motion for status conference, [21-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases for plas to file motion for class certification, [24-1] amended motion for status conference (fmm) (Entered: 08/15/2000)

PACER
Aug. 15, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Orinda D. Evans on [20-1] motion for status conference, [21-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases for plas to file motion for class certification, [24-1] amended motion for status conference (fmm)

26 Aug. 24, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans VACATING 8/4/00 endorsed order approving the prel statement and entering this scheduling order. Discovery shall commence the date of this order. Plas discovery as to class certification is to be completed by 12/1/00 and the class cert motion filed by 1/2/01. Dfts shall have until 2/15/01 to conclude disovery relating to class cert and response to pla's class cert motion is due 3/1/01. Pla's reply brief due 3/15/01. All discovery will be stayed from 2/15/01 until the court rules on the motion for class cert and thereafter a discovery schedule will be established on remaining merits. DISMISSING as moot pla's [20-1] motion for status conference, [24-1] amended motion for status conference, [21-1] motion to extend time thru 2/10/01 or 90 days after the production of certain discovery databases for plas to file motion for class certification (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 08/25/2000)

RECAP
Aug. 24, 2000

Terminated submissions. (fmm) (Entered: 08/25/2000)

PACER
Aug. 24, 2000

Terminated submissions. (fmm)

27 Aug. 28, 2000

Stipulation by parties extending time for pla to respond to discovery requests thru 9/18/00 to JOF (fmm) (Entered: 08/31/2000)

RECAP
28 Aug. 30, 2000

ORDER by Judge Orinda D. Evans and by Judge J. Owen Forrester reassigning case to Judge J. O. Forrester (cc) (fmm) Modified on 08/31/2000 (Entered: 08/30/2000)

RECAP
29 Sept. 8, 2000

Notice of filing of original discovery by plaintiffs'. (aar) (Entered: 09/13/2000)

RECAP
Sept. 18, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [27-1] stipulation extending time for pla to respond to discovery requests thru 9/18/00 (cc) (aar) (Entered: 09/18/2000)

PACER
Sept. 18, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [27-1] stipulation extending time for pla to respond to discovery requests thru 9/18/00 (cc) (aar)

30 Sept. 25, 2000

Notice of filing of original discovery by defendants. (aar) (Entered: 09/26/2000)

RECAP
31 Oct. 5, 2000

Attorney appearance for plaintiffs by Angela Joy Mason and J. Keith Givens. (so) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
32 Oct. 11, 2000

TELE-CONFERENCE HELD before Judge J. O. Forrester: Discovery deadline extended 20 days after prior deadline. Extension granted this time up to class certification met and replies. Bump every deadline in Judge Evans order 3 months. The Court will not grant any other extensions outside of extraordinary cause. Parties to prepare and order for the court to sign re: exactly what the deadlin dates are. If movant files a motion to compel, include request, response and brief argument, call CRD and court will see parties in 2-3 days. If deposition problems, call the court and court will call back and resolve. Get copy of transcript and give to Giolito. Giolito to file objections to deadlines w/in 10 days from receipt of transcript or waive. (aar) (Entered: 10/16/2000)

RECAP
Oct. 25, 2000

Steno notes of proceedings held 10/04/00 before Judge J. O. Forrester, by Court Reporter Lois D. Phillips. (aar) (Entered: 10/25/2000)

PACER
Oct. 25, 2000

Steno notes of proceedings held 10/04/00 before Judge J. O. Forrester, by Court Reporter Lois D. Phillips. (aar)

Nov. 13, 2000

Proposed Order (to JOF) (aar) (Entered: 11/14/2000)

PACER
Nov. 13, 2000

Proposed Order (to JOF) (aar)

33 Nov. 17, 2000

ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester that all for plas discovery pertinent to class certification must be completed by 3/1/01 and class certification motion due 4/2/01. For dfts, discovery relating to class certification issued to be completed by 5/15/01 and dfts response to class certification motion due 6/1/01. Pla's reply brief is due 6/15/01. All discovery will be stayed from 5/15/01 pending ruling on class certification. Dft shall have until 11/20/00 to respond to plas' discovery requests. (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 11/20/2000)

RECAP
34 Nov. 20, 2000

Notice of original supplemental discovery and amended objections and responses to plaintiffs' first request for production of documents by defendants'. (aar) (Entered: 11/21/2000)

RECAP
35 Dec. 5, 2000

MOTION by Proposed Intervenor EEOC to intervene with brief in support and proposed order. (fmm) (Entered: 12/05/2000)

RECAP
36 Dec. 5, 2000

MOTION by Proposed Intervenor EEOC for immediate hearing on the motion to intervene with brief in support and proposed order. (fmm) (Entered: 12/05/2000)

RECAP
37 Dec. 6, 2000

ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester DIRECTING parties to respond to [36-1] motion for immediate hearing on the motion to intervene, [35-1] motion to intervene by COB 12/12/00, [36-1] motion and [35-1] motion to be submitted on 12/13/00 (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

RECAP
Dec. 6, 2000

Proposed confidentiality agreement and order governing the exchange and protection of confidential information. (to: JOF) (er) (Entered: 12/07/2000)

PACER
Dec. 6, 2000

Proposed confidentiality agreement and order governing the exchange and protection of confidential information. (to: JOF) (er)

38 Dec. 7, 2000

Response by defendants in opposition to [36-1] motion for immediate hearing on the motion to intervene (jph) (Entered: 12/08/2000)

RECAP
39 Dec. 12, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff to file excess pages limitation. (jph) Modified on 12/13/2000 (Entered: 12/12/2000)

RECAP
40 Dec. 12, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff to compel Responses to first request for production of documents with brief in support. (jph) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

RECAP
41 Dec. 13, 2000

CONSENT ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester, extending time for parties to respond to [36-1] motion for immediate hearing on the motion to intervene, [35-1] motion to intervene thru 12/15/00, [36-1] motion and [35-1] motion to be submitted on 12/18/00 (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/13/2000)

RECAP
42 Dec. 15, 2000

CONSENT MOTION by dfts Lockheed Martin Co and Lockheed Martin Corp to file excess pages limitation . (jph) Modified on 12/19/2000 (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
43 Dec. 15, 2000

Response by defendants in opposition of [35-1] motion to intervene (jph) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
44 Dec. 15, 2000

Memorandum by plaintiffs in support of [35-1] motion to intervene (jph) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

RECAP
45 Dec. 15, 2000

CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND ORDER GOVERNING THE EXCHANGE AND PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION (fmm) (Entered: 12/20/2000)

RECAP
Dec. 15, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [39-1] motion to file excess pages limitation. (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/20/2000)

PACER
Dec. 15, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [39-1] motion to file excess pages limitation. (cc) (fmm)

Dec. 18, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [35-1] motion to intervene (jph) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

PACER
Dec. 18, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [35-1] motion to intervene (jph)

46 Dec. 21, 2000

REPLY by Proposed Intervenor EEOC to response to [35-1] motion to intervene w/affidavits of William J. Lai and Josie A. Alexander (fmm) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

RECAP
Dec. 21, 2000

Proposed Consent order for filing excess pages by Proposed Intervenor EEOC . to JOF (fmm) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

PACER
Dec. 21, 2000

Proposed Consent order for filing excess pages by Proposed Intervenor EEOC . to JOF (fmm)

47 Dec. 22, 2000

Response by defendant in opposition to [40-1] motion to compel Responses to first request for production of documents (jph) (Entered: 12/27/2000)

RECAP
48 Dec. 22, 2000

Stipulation by parties to file excess pages limitation for dfts to oppose pla's motion to compel to JOF (fmm) (Entered: 12/28/2000)

RECAP
Dec. 26, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [36-1] motion for immediate hearing on the motion to intervene (File in Chambers) (fmm) (Entered: 12/26/2000)

PACER
Dec. 26, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [36-1] motion for immediate hearing on the motion to intervene (File in Chambers) (fmm)

49 Dec. 27, 2000

REPLY by plaintiffs to dft's response to [35-1] motion to intervene (fmm) Modified on 12/28/2000 (Entered: 12/28/2000)

RECAP
50 Dec. 27, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file a reply to dfts' responses . (jph) (Entered: 12/28/2000)

RECAP
51 Dec. 29, 2000

Notice of filing original affidavits of Charles T. Burbage, Gary A. Cantwell, and Robert McLaughlin by defendants. (jph) Modified on 01/02/2001 (Entered: 01/02/2001)

RECAP
52 Jan. 2, 2001

CONSENT ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester, extending page limit for EEOC's reply to Lockheed's response in opposition to motion to intervene (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 01/04/2001)

RECAP
Jan. 2, 2001

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [48-1] stipulation to file excess pages limitation for dfts to oppose pla's motion to compel (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 01/04/2001)

PACER
Jan. 2, 2001

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [42-1] motion to file excess pages limitation (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 01/04/2001)

PACER
Jan. 2, 2001

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [48-1] stipulation to file excess pages limitation for dfts to oppose pla's motion to compel (cc) (fmm)

Jan. 2, 2001

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge J. O. Forrester GRANTING [42-1] motion to file excess pages limitation (cc) (fmm)

53 Jan. 4, 2001

Reply by defendants Lockheed Martin Co and Lockheed Martin Corp to plas memorandum in support of EEOC's motions to intervene as a party pla and dft Unions' opposition to EEOC's [35-1] motion to intervene (adg) (Entered: 01/05/2001)

RECAP
Jan. 4, 2001

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [40-1] motion to compel Responses to first request for production of documents (File in Chambers) (fmm) (Entered: 01/04/2001)

PACER
Jan. 4, 2001

SUBMITTED to Judge J. O. Forrester on [40-1] motion to compel Responses to first request for production of documents (File in Chambers) (fmm)

54 Jan. 9, 2001

Reply brief to [47-1] by defendant. (jph) (Entered: 01/10/2001)

RECAP
Jan. 9, 2001

Proposed consent order to file excess pages. (To JOF) (jph) (Entered: 01/10/2001)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 10, 2000

Closing Date: April 8, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Former and current African-American employees of Lockheed Martin in the United States.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Georgia 1:00-cv-01182

Northern District of Georgia 1:00-cv-01183

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Demotion

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discipline

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Testing

Training

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Recommended Citation