Case: EEOC v. THE APOTHECARY SHOP OF SCOTTSDALE, INC.

2:06-cv-02324 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2006

Closed Date: Oct. 17, 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2006 the Phoenix District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Apothecary Shop of Gilbert, Inc. and Apothecary Shop of Scottsdale, Inc., doing business as Apothecary Shops of Arizona, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona alleging discrimination on the basis of race, African-American, and gender, female, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the complainant was terminated from her managerial po…
In September 2006 the Phoenix District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Apothecary Shop of Gilbert, Inc. and Apothecary Shop of Scottsdale, Inc., doing business as Apothecary Shops of Arizona, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona alleging discrimination on the basis of race, African-American, and gender, female, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the complainant was terminated from her managerial position and replaced by a white male with a disciplinary history. The complaining party intervened in the lawsuit in August 2007. Following some discovery, the parties settled the lawsuit in April 2008 through a consent decree. The eighteen-month decree, containing anti-discrimination language, required the defendant to: make compliance reports, keep records, expunge the complainant's employment record and provide a neutral reference, post and distribute notice of employee rights, provide EEO training, implement a complaint resolution process, implement discipline and termination policies in a non-discriminatory manner, and pay $70,000 to the complainant as compensatory damages. The docket sheet shows that no further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2009.

Summary Authors

David Friedman (5/23/2008)

Clearinghouse (6/7/2017)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4722960/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-apothecary-shop-of-scottsdale/

Judge(s)

Carroll, Earl Hamblin (Arizona)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:06-cv-02324

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Apothecary Shop of Scottsdale, Inc.

April 17, 2008

April 17, 2008

Docket
1

2:06-cv-02324

Complaint

EEOC v. Apothecary Shop of Scottsdale, Inc., d/b/a Apothecary Shops of Arizona; and Apothecary Shop of Gilbert, Inc.,

Sept. 28, 2006

Sept. 28, 2006

Complaint
4

2:06-cv-02324

Amended Complaint

EEOC v. Apothecary Shop of Scottsdale, Inc., d/b/a Apothecary Shops of Arizona; and Apothecary Shop of Gilbert, Inc.,

Oct. 4, 2006

Oct. 4, 2006

Complaint
37

2:06-cv-02324

Complaint

Hines v. Apothecary Shop of Scottsdale

Oct. 9, 2007

Oct. 9, 2007

Complaint
71

2:06-cv-02324

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Apothecary Shop of Scottsdale

April 17, 2008

April 17, 2008

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4722960/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-apothecary-shop-of-scottsdale/

Last updated July 2, 2025, 3:16 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
30

ORDER re 24 MOTION to Intervene. That parties have to 8/13/07 to respond to motion 24 and reply by proposed intervenor due 8/17/07. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 8/8/07. (DMT, )

Aug. 9, 2007

Aug. 9, 2007

RECAP

Case Details