Case: EEOC v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS, INC., WASTE MANAGEMENT,

1:98-cv-00515 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: Aug. 14, 1998

Closed Date: April 1, 1999

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In August 1998, the San Antonio District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Waste Management of Texas, Inc., d/b/a Longhorn Disposal, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to the consent decree, the complaint alleged discrimination on the basis of national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, it was alleged that the defendant subjected the charging party, a M…

In August 1998, the San Antonio District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Waste Management of Texas, Inc., d/b/a Longhorn Disposal, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to the consent decree, the complaint alleged discrimination on the basis of national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, it was alleged that the defendant subjected the charging party, a Mexican employee, to an ethically hostile work environment, resulting in his constructive discharge. In addition, the defendant utilized an impermissible "English only" policy. After some discovery disputes, the parties settled through a consent decree in April 1999.

The two-year decree, containing non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the defendant to: provide EEO training to its supervisors and managers, post a Title VII notice, provide the charging party with a neutral reference, and pay $85,000 to the charging party.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (6/11/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10786758/parties/eeoc-v-waste-mgmt-of-tx/


Judge(s)

Nowlin, James Robertson (Texas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Biggs, Susan B. (Texas)

Dolezal, Trey Langston (Texas)

Pittard, R. Chris (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant

Mierl, Steven L. (Texas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:98-cv-00515

Docket

EEOC v. Waste Management of Texas, Inc.

April 1, 1999

April 1, 1999

Docket
43

1:98-cv-00515

Order [Granting Motion to Partially Dismiss]

EEOC v. Waste Management of Texas, Inc.

April 1, 1999

April 1, 1999

Order/Opinion
44

1:98-cv-00515

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Waste Management of Texas, Inc.

April 1, 1999

April 1, 1999

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10786758/eeoc-v-waste-mgmt-of-tx/

Last updated Nov. 3, 2026, 5:23 p.m.

Docket for: E.E.O.C. v. Waste Mgmt. of TX
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 14, 1998

Complaint filed. Filing Fee: waived (Pages: 7) (mc2) (Entered: 08/14/1998)

RECAP
Aug. 14, 1998

Case assigned to Honorable James R. Nowlin (mc2) (Entered: 08/14/1998)

PACER
Aug. 14, 1998

Court file prepared and forwarded to Judge Nowlin. (mc2) (Entered: 08/14/1998)

PACER
Aug. 14, 1998

Case assigned to Honorable James R. Nowlin (mc2)

Aug. 14, 1998

Court file prepared and forwarded to Judge Nowlin. (mc2)

2 Sept. 16, 1998

Waiver of Service by Waste Mgmt. of TX ; Notice and Request Mailed on 8/21/98; Answer due on 10/20/98 for Waste Mgmt. of TX (mc2) (Entered: 09/17/1998)

RECAP
3 Oct. 8, 1998

Amended complaint by E.E.O.C. amending complaint [1-1] (Pages: 5) (mc2) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

RECAP
4 Oct. 8, 1998

Answer by Waste Mgmt. of TX (mc2) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

RECAP
5 Oct. 8, 1998

Motion by Waste Mgmt. of TX for Steven L. Mierl to appear pro hac vice (mc2) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

RECAP
6 Oct. 9, 1998

Intervenor's complaint by Jose D. Toscano (Pages: 8) (mc2) (Entered: 10/13/1998)

RECAP
7 Oct. 9, 1998

Motion by Jose D. Toscano for Trey L. Dolezal to appear pro hac vice (mc2) (Entered: 10/13/1998)

RECAP
8 Oct. 15, 1998

Order granting motion for Steven L. Mierl to appear pro hac vice [5-1]. (Mailed 10/15/98.) (mc2) (Entered: 10/15/1998)

RECAP
9 Oct. 16, 1998

Order denying motion for Trey L. Dolezal to appear pro hac vice [7-1]. (Mailed 10/16/98.) (mc2) (Entered: 10/16/1998)

RECAP
10 Oct. 21, 1998

Amended Motion by plaintiff Jose D. Toscano for Trey L. Dolezal to appear pro hac vice . (fe) (Entered: 10/21/1998)

RECAP
11 Oct. 22, 1998

Notice of attorney appearance for E.E.O.C. by R. Chris Pittard (fe) (Entered: 10/22/1998)

RECAP
12 Oct. 27, 1998

Order granting motion for Trey L. Dolezal to appear pro hac vice [10-1]. (Mailed 10/28/98.0 (mc2) (Entered: 10/28/1998)

RECAP
13 Oct. 28, 1998

Answer by Waste Mgmt., Inc. to amended complaint (mc2) (Entered: 10/28/1998)

RECAP
14 Oct. 29, 1998

Response by defendant Waste Mgmt. of TX to Toscano's Plea in Intervention. (fe) (Entered: 10/29/1998)

RECAP
15 Dec. 17, 1998

Designation of expert witness filed by Waste Mgmt., Inc. - Rule CV-16(e) Disclosures. (mc2) (Entered: 12/18/1998)

RECAP
16 Jan. 5, 1999

List of Witnesses, Designation of expert witness filed by E.E.O.C. and exhibits. (mc2) (Entered: 01/05/1999)

RECAP
17 Jan. 5, 1999

Designation of expert witness filed by Jose D. Toscano - Rule CV-16(e) Disclosures. (mc2) (Entered: 01/05/1999)

RECAP
18 Jan. 8, 1999

Motion by Waste Mgmt., Inc. to Require Plaintiffs to Show Good Cause for Failing to Comply With Local Rule CV-16(e), or, alternatively to Preclude Plaintiffs From Introducing Witnesses and Exhibits at Trial (mc2) (Entered: 01/08/1999)

RECAP
19 Jan. 8, 1999

Motion by Waste Mgmt., Inc. with memorandum in support to partially dismiss (mc2) (Entered: 01/11/1999)

RECAP
20 Jan. 11, 1999

Scheduling order setting Joining of parties, amending of pleadings on 2/19/99 Deadline for filing of all motions 5/28/99 Discovery cutoff 5/14/99 Pretrial conference of attorneys by 7/9/99 Pretrial order to be submitted on or before 7/16/99 ; Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 3/19/99. (Mailed 1/11/99.0 (mc2) (Entered: 01/11/1999)

RECAP
Jan. 11, 1999

Received, proposed Scheduling Order. (mc2) (Entered: 01/11/1999)

PACER
Jan. 11, 1999

Received, proposed Scheduling Order. (mc2)

21 Jan. 19, 1999

Response by plaintiff E.E.O.C. to defendant's Motion to Require Plaintiffs to Show Good Cause for Failing to Comply With Local Rule CV-16(e) [18-1] (fe) (Entered: 01/19/1999)

RECAP
22 Jan. 19, 1999

Response by E.E.O.C. to motion to partially dismiss [19-1] (td) (Entered: 01/20/1999)

RECAP
23 Jan. 19, 1999

Response by Jose D. Toscano to motion to Require Plaintiffs to Show Good Cause for Failing to Comply With Local Rule CV-16(e) [18-1], motion to Preclude Plaintiffs From Introducing Witnesses and Exhibits at Trial [18-2] (td) (Entered: 01/20/1999)

RECAP
24 Jan. 20, 1999

Reply by defendant Waste Mgmt. of TX to plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Require Plaintiffs to Show Good Cause for Failing to Comply With Local Rule CV-16(e) [18-1], or alternatively, to Preclude Plaintiffs From Introducing Witnesses and Exhibits at Trial [18-2] (fe) (Entered: 01/21/1999)

RECAP
25 Jan. 29, 1999

Motion by E.E.O.C. to quash videotape deposition of EEOC Investigator Denise Valuk, and for protective order (mc2) (Entered: 01/29/1999)

RECAP
26 Feb. 3, 1999

Order granting motion to partially dismiss [19-1] and dismissing Defendants Waste Management, Inc. and Texas Waste Systems, Inc. without prejudice (JN). (Mailed 2/4/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 02/04/1999)

RECAP
27 Feb. 4, 1999

Order denying motion to Require Plaintiffs to Show Good Cause for Failing to Comply With Local Rule CV-16(e) [18-1], denying motion to Preclude Plaintiffs From Introducing Witnesses and Exhibits at Trial [18-2] and denying Plaintiff Toscano's request for sanctions. (Mailed 2/4/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 02/04/1999)

RECAP
28 Feb. 5, 1999

Witness list by Waste Mgmt. of TX - Defendant's Supplemental Rule CV-16(e) Disclosures. (mc2) (Entered: 02/05/1999)

RECAP
29 Feb. 11, 1999

Order granting motion to quash videotape deposition of EEOC Investigator Denise Valuk [25-1], granting motion for protective order [25-2]. (Mailed 2/11/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

RECAP
30 Feb. 11, 1999

Motion by Waste Mgmt. of TX for reconsideration of Order Granting Plaintiff EEOC's Motion to Quash Videotape Deposition of EEOC Investigator Denise Valuk and for Protective Order (mc2) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

RECAP
31 Feb. 16, 1999

Order denying motion for reconsideration of Order Granting Plaintiff EEOC's Motion to Quash Videotape Deposition of EEOC Investigator Denise Valuk and for Protective Order [30-1]. (Mailed 2/16/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 02/16/1999)

RECAP
32 Feb. 18, 1999

Motion by Waste Mgmt. of TX to amend response [14-1] (mc2) (Entered: 02/19/1999)

RECAP
33 Feb. 19, 1999

Motion by Jose D. Toscano for leave to file first amended plea in intervention (td) (Entered: 02/22/1999)

RECAP
Feb. 19, 1999

RECEIVED Amended Plea In Intervention (td) (Entered: 02/22/1999)

PACER
Feb. 19, 1999

RECEIVED Amended Plea In Intervention (td)

34 Feb. 22, 1999

Order granting motion to amend response [14-1] [32-1]. (Mailed 2/23/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 02/23/1999)

RECAP
35 Feb. 22, 1999

Order granting motion for leave to file first amended plea in intervention [33-1]. (Mailed 2/23/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 02/23/1999)

RECAP
36 Feb. 22, 1999

Amended Answer by Waste Mgmt. of TX to intervenor complaint [6-1] (mc2) (Entered: 02/23/1999)

RECAP
37 Feb. 22, 1999

Amended intervenor's complaint by Jose D. Toscano: amending intervenor complaint (adding Longhorn Disposal) [6-1] (Pages: 9) (mc2) (Entered: 02/23/1999)

RECAP
38 March 5, 1999

Answer by Waste Mgmt. of TX to intervenor complaint [37-1] (mc2) (Entered: 03/05/1999)

RECAP
39 March 17, 1999

Alternate Dispute Resolution Report filed by E.E.O.C. ; Party(s) agree to Alternate Dispute Resolution (mc2) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

RECAP
40 March 19, 1999

Alternate Dispute Resolution Report filed by Waste Mgmt. of TX ; Party(s) do not agree to Alternate Dispute Resolution (mc2) (Entered: 03/19/1999)

RECAP
41 March 31, 1999

Joint motion by E.E.O.C., Waste Mgmt. of TX to Enter Consent Decree (mc2) (Entered: 03/31/1999)

RECAP
42 March 31, 1999

Agreed Motion by Waste Mgmt., Inc., Waste Mgmt. of TX to dismiss with prejudice (mc2) (Entered: 03/31/1999)

RECAP
43 April 1, 1999

Order granting motion to dismiss with prejudice [42-1], granting joint motion to Enter Consent Decree [41-1] (JN). (Noticed 4/2/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 04/02/1999)

RECAP
44 April 1, 1999

Consent judgment for E.E.O.C., Jose D. Toscano against Waste Mgmt. of TX, Longhorn Disposal (Pages: 6) (JN). (Noticed 4/2/99.) (mc2) (Entered: 04/02/1999)

RECAP
April 1, 1999

Case closed (mc2) (Entered: 04/02/1999)

PACER
April 1, 1999

Case closed (mc2)

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 14, 1998

Closing Date: April 1, 1999

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Texas Waste System, Inc.

Waste Management of Texas, Inc.

Waste Managment, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Western District of Texas 1:98-cv-00515

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Neutral/Positive Reference

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 85000

Order Duration: 1999 - 2001

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Indian

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation