Case: EEOC v. HITCHIN LUCERNE INC (d/b/a LUCERNE VALLEY MARKET IGA/ACE HARDWARE)

5:00-cv-00224 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: April 14, 2000

Closed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In April 2000, the EEOC brought this suit against Hitchen Lucerne, Inc., d/b/a Lucerne Valley Market/Ace Hardware, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The EEOC alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") by terminating the charging party, a sixty-two year old female employee because of her sex and age and failing to rehire her in retaliation for her complaints of the discrimin…

In April 2000, the EEOC brought this suit against Hitchen Lucerne, Inc., d/b/a Lucerne Valley Market/Ace Hardware, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The EEOC alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") by terminating the charging party, a sixty-two year old female employee because of her sex and age and failing to rehire her in retaliation for her complaints of the discrimination.

In June 2001, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. In May 2003, the motion was granted in part and denied in part, with the court rejecting the retaliation claims. The parties took part in a settlement conference in July 2003. After some discovery and scheduling orders, the parties settled in February 2004 through a consent decree.

The one-year decree, containing non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the defendant to: provide Title VII and ADEA training for its managers, expunge the charging party's personnel file from all references to the charges of discrimination, revise its staff handbook to include age as a protected EEO category, post a notice of employee rights, report to the EEOC every six months, and pay $9,500 to the charging party.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/5/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13893637/parties/us-eeoc-v-hitchin-lucerne-inc/


Judge(s)

Timlin, Robert J. (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Ingram, David (California)

Laura, Peter Francis (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Higgins, John J (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

5:00-cv-00224

Docket (PACER)

US EEOC v. Hitchin Lucerne Inc

Feb. 26, 2004

Feb. 26, 2004

Docket
32

5:00-cv-00224

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

EEOC v. Hitchin Lucerne Inc

May 16, 2003

May 16, 2003

Order/Opinion
60

5:00-cv-00224

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Hitchin Lucerne Inc

Feb. 26, 2004

Feb. 26, 2004

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13893637/us-eeoc-v-hitchin-lucerne-inc/

Last updated Oct. 6, 2026, 5:09 p.m.

Docket for: US EEOC v. Hitchin Lucerne Inc
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 14, 2000

COMPLAINT filed referred to Discovery Carla M. Woehrle; Demand for jury trial (am) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

RECAP
2 April 14, 2000

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff US EEOC (am) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

RECAP
3 June 2, 2000

NOTICE OF WAIVER OF SERVICE of SUMMONS by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc signed for by dft's atty on 5/31/00 (mrgo) (Entered: 06/07/2000)

RECAP
4 June 27, 2000

ANSWER filed by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc to complaint [1-1] (am) (Entered: 07/05/2000)

RECAP
5 June 27, 2000

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc (am) (Entered: 07/05/2000)

RECAP
6 June 30, 2000

JOINT REPORT OF EARLY MEETING OF COUNSEL filed. Estimated length of trial 5 days (am) (Entered: 07/06/2000)

RECAP
7 July 5, 2000

NOTICE AND REQUEST Of Settlement Procedure Selection fld Parties request to apr before Discovery Carla M. Woehrle for sttlmnt procdgs Order by Judge Robert J. Timlin granting settlement procedure selection request [7-1] (am) (Entered: 07/07/2000)

RECAP
8 July 14, 2000

MINUTES: ; mandatory status conference set on 9:30 10/19/00 by Judge Robert J. Timlin CR: n/a (am) (Entered: 07/19/2000)

RECAP
10 Oct. 11, 2000

NOTICE OF CHANGE Of Address filed by atty Alfred J Landegger for defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc (am) (Entered: 10/16/2000)

RECAP
9 Oct. 16, 2000

MINUTES: On crt's own mot, mandatory status conference set 10/19/00 @ 10:00 has been contd to 2:30 1/19/01 by Judge Robert J. Timlin (la) (Entered: 10/16/2000)

RECAP
11 Dec. 26, 2000

ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION: terminating attorney Frank A Magnanimo for Hitchin Lucerne Inc, attorney Alfred J Landegger for Hitchin Lucerne Inc by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc and substituting attorney John J Higgins by Judge Robert J. Timlin (am) (Entered: 12/27/2000)

RECAP
12 Jan. 5, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER cont MSC by Judge Robert J. Timlin ; mandatory status conference set on 1:30 3/23/01 (mrgo) (Entered: 01/08/2001)

RECAP
13 March 2, 2001

MINUTES: In chambers ; settlement conference 3:00 4/12/01 crtrm 630, Roybal Bldg, 6th Fl, Rm 630, Los Angeles ; ptys w/auth to negotiate to attend; ptys shl subm settlmt conf stmts direct to chambers nlt 3 crt days bf conf & to be exchg w/opp cnsl, and Not fld w/crt; proposals for settmt & cnsl's own evaluation of case not yet communicated to opp cnslmay be in sep confid doc subm to Judge Woehrle not exchg w/cnsl by Discovery Carla M. Woehrle CR: none (send) (lc) Modified on 03/16/2001 (Entered: 03/05/2001)

RECAP
14 March 14, 2001

MINUTES: Scheduling conference set on 4:00 5/25/01 Effectie 1/16/01 the USDC wil be located @ the address listed. by Judge Robert J. Timlin CR: None (am) (Entered: 03/15/2001)

RECAP
15 April 9, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Discovery Carla M. Woehrle IT IS SO ORD That the Stip be ent & that the settlement conference be taken off cal to be reset in the event that summary jgm is not granted on behalf of the dft (SEND) (ir) (Entered: 04/11/2001)

RECAP
16 May 3, 2001

MINUTES: by Magistrate Judge Carla M. Woehrle ; settlement conference 3:00 6/14/01 CR: N/A (SEND) (yc) (Entered: 05/07/2001)

RECAP
17 May 16, 2001

MINUTES: ; Scheduling conference set on 4:00 7/6/01 Effective 1/16/01 the USDC will be located @ the address listed by Judge Robert J. Timlin CR: None (am) (Entered: 05/17/2001)

RECAP
18 June 11, 2001

NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc for summary judgment ; memo of PA; decl of Michael Kruppe; motion hearing set for 10:00 7/16/01 Lodged propsd finding of fact & jgm (mrgo) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

RECAP
23 June 14, 2001

MINUTES: In chambers: sttlmnt conf held, no agreement reached; fur scheduling conf set for 3:00 9/27/01 following calendared hrg date on dfts pend mot for summ jgm by Discovery Carla M. Woehrle CR: none (send) (lc) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

RECAP
19 June 18, 2001

ORDER vacting ord dtd 7/28/95 & directing no oral arg on mos in civil acnts. by Judge Robert J. Timlin (am) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

RECAP
20 June 18, 2001

EX PARTE APPLICATION filed by plaintiff US EEOC to continue hrg on dfts mot for summ jgm set for 7/16/01 Lodged propsd ord (am) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

RECAP
21 June 21, 2001

ORDER by Judge Robert J. Timlin granting exparte motion to continue hrg on dfts mot for summ jgm set for 7/16/01 [20-1], cont'g hearing on motion for summary judgment [18-1] 10:00 8/27/01 (am) (Entered: 06/22/2001)

RECAP
22 June 21, 2001

OPPOSITION by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc to plf's exparte motion to continue hrg on dfts mot for summ jgm set for 7/16/01 [20-1]; decl of Michael A Kruppe (mrgo) (Entered: 06/28/2001)

RECAP
24 June 29, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Robert J. Timlin ; mandatory status/scheduling conference taken off cal to be reset in the event that summ jgm is not granted on behalf of the dft. (am) (Entered: 07/03/2001)

RECAP
25 Aug. 10, 2001

OPPOSITION by plaintiff US EEOC to motion for summary judgment [18-1] (am) (Entered: 08/14/2001)

RECAP
26 Aug. 10, 2001

STATEMENT OF GENUINE ISSUES IN OPPOSITION by plaintiff US EEOC re motion for summary judgment [18-1] (am) (Entered: 08/14/2001)

RECAP
27 Aug. 10, 2001

OBJECTIONS filed by plaintiff US EEOC to evidence in suppt of its motion for summary judgment [18-1] (am) (Entered: 08/14/2001)

RECAP
28 Aug. 16, 2001

REPLY by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc to plf's opp dft's motion for summary judgment [18-1] (mrgo) (Entered: 08/17/2001)

RECAP
29 Aug. 16, 2001

OBJECTIONS filed by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc to evid submitted by plf in opp to dft's motion for summary judgment [18-1] (mrgo) (Entered: 08/17/2001)

RECAP
30 Sept. 26, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Discovery Carla M. Woehrle Settlement conference cont to 3:00 11/14/01 (PSEND) (ir) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
31 Nov. 9, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Discovery Carla M. Woehrle that the settlement conference be continued until date & time to be set following summary jgm ruling, if necessary. Counsel to contact clerk. (bg) (Entered: 11/13/2001)

RECAP
32 May 16, 2003

MINUTES: Order GRANT in part DENY in part defendant's motion for summary judgment [18-1]; 1) Hitchin's motion for summary judgment on the Title VII & ADEA age discrimination claims is denied; 2) Hitchin's motion for summary judgment on the Title VII gender discrimination claim is denied; 3) Hitchin's motion for summary judgment on the Title VII retaliation claim is granted by Judge Robert J. Timlin CR: n/a (see document for specifics) (mrgo) (Entered: 05/19/2003)

RECAP
33 May 22, 2003

MINUTES: Order setting scheduling conference ; mandatory status/scheduling conf set for 9:00am on 8/18/03 by Judge Robert J. Timlin CR: n/a (mrgo) (Entered: 05/23/2003)

RECAP
June 18, 2003

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED Stipulation and Order Lodged 6/11/03 (seal) (Entered: 06/19/2003)

PACER
June 18, 2003

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED Stipulation and Order Lodged 6/11/03 (seal)

34 June 20, 2003

JOINT RULE 26 DISCOVERY PLAN filed; est length of trial 3-5 days (mrgo) (Entered: 06/23/2003)

RECAP
35 July 31, 2003

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Settlement conference held . Counsel are directed to contact the court to schedule further settlement proceedings in the event that it appears additional discussions could be productive by Magistrate Judge Carla M. Woehrle CR: N/A (rl) (Entered: 08/08/2003)

RECAP
36 Aug. 18, 2003

MINUTES: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (TELEPHONIC): DISOVERY has been completed; LAW/MOTION CUT/OFF-NONE; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE is set for 4:30 10/17/03; JURY TRIAL is set for 8:30 10/28/03, EST: 5 Days by Judge Robert J. Timlin; CR: Phyllis Preston (ad) (Entered: 08/19/2003)

RECAP
37 Sept. 10, 2003

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Robert J. Timlin continuing the Pretrial Conference to 10:30am on 1/12/04; & the jury trial to 8:30am on 2/3/04 (mrgo) (Entered: 09/17/2003)

RECAP
38 Dec. 18, 2003

JOINT EXHIBIT List by plaintiff US EEOC, defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc (ad) (Entered: 12/19/2003)

RECAP
39 Dec. 18, 2003

LIST OF TRIAL WITNESSES submitted by plaintiff US EEOC (ad) (Entered: 12/19/2003)

RECAP
40 Dec. 18, 2003

MEMO OF CONTENTIONS OF FACT and LAW by plaintiff US EEOC (ad) (Entered: 12/19/2003)

RECAP
41 Dec. 19, 2003

MEMO OF CONTENTIONS OF FACT and LAW by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc (ad) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

RECAP
42 Dec. 19, 2003

LIST OF TRIAL WITNESSES submitted by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc (ad) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

RECAP
Jan. 8, 2004

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re defendant's statement of uncontroverted facts and conclusions of law lodged 6/11/01 submitted by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/09/2004)

PACER
Jan. 8, 2004

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re proposed judgment lodged 6/11/01 submitted by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/09/2004)

PACER
Jan. 8, 2004

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re defendant's statement of uncontroverted facts and conclusions of law lodged 6/11/01 submitted by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc. (mrgo, )

Jan. 8, 2004

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re proposed judgment lodged 6/11/01 submitted by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc. (mrgo, )

43 Jan. 9, 2004

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of MOTION IN LIMINE to Admit the EEOC's Letter of Determination filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (ad, ) (Entered: 01/12/2004)

RECAP
44 Jan. 12, 2004

MINUTES: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: Court signs the Pre-Trial Conference Order; If the Court is unable to commence the trial on 2/3/04, the case will Trail and the Court will give counsel 48 hours notice of when the Trial will start by Judge Robert J. Timlin; Court Reporter: Walter Ledge (ad, ) (Entered: 01/12/2004)

RECAP
45 Jan. 12, 2004

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION IN LIMINE filed by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc to Bar irrelevant evidence regarding alleged retaliation and to bar documents, testimony and evidence eliminated by summary judgment (ad, ) (Entered: 01/13/2004)

RECAP
46 Jan. 12, 2004

OPPOSITION filed by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc to EEOC's MOTION IN LIMINE to Admit the EEOC's Letter of Determination 43 (ad, ) (Entered: 01/13/2004)

RECAP
47 Jan. 12, 2004

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER approved by Judge Robert J. Timlin: (see document for further details)(ad, ) (Entered: 01/13/2004)

RECAP
48 Jan. 20, 2004

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION IN LIMINE to Bar irrelevant evidence regarding alleged retaliation and documents, testimony and evidence eliminated by summary judgment 45 filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (am, ) (Entered: 01/26/2004)

RECAP
49 Jan. 22, 2004

TRIAL BRIEF filed by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/26/2004)

RECAP
50 Jan. 23, 2004

TRIAL BRIEF filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
51 Jan. 23, 2004

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
52 Jan. 26, 2004

REPLY to defendant's opposition to its MOTION IN LIMINE to Bar irrelevant evidence regarding alleged retaliation and documents, testimony and evidence eliminated by summary judgment 45 filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
53 Jan. 26, 2004

PROPOSED JOINT JURY INSTRUCTIONS and special verdict form filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (mrgo, ) Modified on 1/28/2004 (mrgo, ). (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
54 Jan. 26, 2004

ADDITIONAL PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS and special verdict form filed by defendant Hitchin Lucerne Inc. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
55 Jan. 27, 2004

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
56 Jan. 27, 2004

ADDENDUM filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to Joint Exhibit List 38 (mrgo, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
57 Feb. 2, 2004

OBJECTIONS filed by Plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to Defendant's Proposed Jury Instructions 53, 54 (ad, ) (Entered: 02/04/2004)

RECAP
58 Feb. 5, 2004

MINUTES: ORDER VACATING TRAILING STATUS AND SETTING TRIAL DATE: Court vacates the trial trailing status; The Trial will commence on 2/17/2004 at 08:30 AM by Honorable Robert J. Timlin (ad, ) (Entered: 02/06/2004)

RECAP
59 Feb. 11, 2004

MINUTES: NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE: Please take notice that on the Court's own motion, the Jury Trial is continued to 4/27/2004 08:30 AM by Honorable Robert J. Timlin; Court Reporter: None Present (ad, ) (Entered: 02/12/2004)

RECAP
60 Feb. 26, 2004

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Robert J. Timlin: This Settlement is final ad binding upon the Commission and Hitchin Lucerne as to all claims alleged in the Complaint filed in the Settled Action, the Court finds the following: A. The Court has jurisdiction over both the subject matter of the Settled Action and the parties to the Settled Action. B. The terms and provisions of this Decree are fair, reasonable and just. The rights of Hitchin Lucerne, the Commission and the Charging Party are adequately protected by this Decree; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 5. Hitchin Lucerne agree to tender a check of $9,500.00 and a 1099 form to Blanche Kraft at the address provided by the EEOC made payable to Blanche Kraft within ten days after this Decree has been entered. Within ten days of the entry of this Decree a copy of the check sent pursuant to this paragraph shall be submitted, with a copy of the 1099 form, to the Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; (see document for further details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(ad, ) (Entered: 02/26/2004)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 14, 2000

Closing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Hitchen Lucerne, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Central District of California 5:00-cv-00224

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Expungement of Employment Record

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 9500

Order Duration: 2004 - 2005

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation