Case: EEOC v. DIAL CORPORATION

1:99-cv-03356 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 20, 1999

Closed Date: 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against the Dial Corporation, who makes soap and other hygiene products, in May 1999, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The suit was based on sexual harassment and retaliation claims in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The docket indicates that the parties had numerous discovery motions, mostly protective orders and orders to compel, and two individuals intervened. The defendant file…

The Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against the Dial Corporation, who makes soap and other hygiene products, in May 1999, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The suit was based on sexual harassment and retaliation claims in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The docket indicates that the parties had numerous discovery motions, mostly protective orders and orders to compel, and two individuals intervened. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted in part and denied in part. The defendant filed an interlocutory appeal of that ruling, which was dismissed by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The terms of the consent decree included both injunctive and monetary relief. Dial had to pay $10,000,000 into a settlement fund that was to be dispersed to eligible class members. Because the suit was based on a general hostile work environment at the Montgomery, Illinois facility, the class was open to any female working at the facility before the suit was started, who provides evidence they were harassed. If they are admitted by the EEOC to the class then they are eligible to receive a portion of the settlement fund, up to a $300,000 maximum for any member of the class. The amount given to each member of the class is to be determined by the EEOC and the Court before the payments are made. Dial was ordered not to retaliate against any person who complains of harassment and they are not allowed to harass or discriminate based on gender. In addition they must rework their harassment policy and complaint procedures. Three decree monitors would provide assistance to Dial during to help ensure that they followed the required aspects of the decree, and would submit reports to the court. All current employees and managers at the Montgomery facility were required to undergo EEO training, and all future employees must undergo it as well. The decree included a dispute resolution policy to help avoid future court action; however, either party could seek court enforcement if the dispute resolution failed.  The decree was set to expire 30 months after entry.  The monitors issued their final report in this action on October 27, 2005.  This matter appears to be closed. 

 

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/11/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5092807/parties/eeoc-v-dial-corp/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Brennan, Noelle Christine (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Anderson, Kimball Richard (Illinois)

Burstein, James A. (Illinois)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Danneman, Dale A. (Illinois)

Fox, Shayle P. (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:99-cv-03356

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

Oct. 27, 2005

Oct. 27, 2005

Docket
1

1:99-cv-03356

Complaint

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

May 21, 1999

May 21, 1999

Complaint
80

1:99-cv-03356

Memorandum and Order [Motion to Reopen Discovery]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

April 28, 2000

April 28, 2000

Order/Opinion
86

1:99-cv-03356

Memorandum and Order [On EEOC's Motion to Reconsider]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

May 16, 2000

May 16, 2000

Order/Opinion

2000 WL 684195

110

1:99-cv-03356

Memorandum and Order [Motion to Compel]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

June 28, 2000

June 28, 2000

Order/Opinion
172

1:99-cv-03356

Memorandum and Order [Motions for Protective Orders]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

Nov. 28, 2000

Nov. 28, 2000

Order/Opinion
204

1:99-cv-03356

Memorandum and Order [Motion for Summary Judgment]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

Aug. 14, 2001

Aug. 14, 2001

Order/Opinion

156 F.Supp.2d 926

1:99-cv-03356

Federal Judge Rules EEOC Suit Against Dial Soap Can Proceed As Class "Pattern or Practice" Case

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

No Court

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

Press Release

1:99-cv-03356

Memorandum and Order [Motion to Exclude Evidence]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

Sept. 17, 2002

Sept. 17, 2002

Order/Opinion

EEOC Press Release [Single Jury Trial Decision]

EEOC v. Dial Corporation

No Court

Feb. 13, 2003

Feb. 13, 2003

Press Release

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5092807/eeoc-v-dial-corp/

Last updated July 15, 2026, 5:30 a.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Dial Corp
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 20, 1999

COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of John C. Hendrickson, Jean Powers Kamp, Noelle Christine Brennan as attorney(s) for plaintiff ( no summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (dmkf) (Entered: 05/21/1999)

Clearinghouse
May 26, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 5/26/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing is set for 10:00 7/9/99. Plaintiff is to advise defendant of status. Mailed notice (gl)

2 June 22, 1999

WAIVER of service of summons as to defendant Dial Corp sent on 5/20/99 (dmkf) (Entered: 06/23/1999)

RECAP
June 22, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 6/22/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing set for 7/9/99 is stricken and is reset to 10:00 7/23/99. Mailed notice (gl)

3 July 20, 1999

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Condon A. McGlothlen, Ellen E. McLaughlin, James A. Burstein, Robert L. Jackson III (dmkf) (Entered: 07/22/1999)

RECAP
4 July 20, 1999

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Sheldon Leigh Jeter (dmkf) (Entered: 07/22/1999)

RECAP
5 July 20, 1999

ANSWER to complaint by defendant [1-1] (dmkf) (Entered: 07/22/1999)

RECAP
July 23, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 7/23/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 8/27/99. Parties are to come in with a joint discovery plan. Mailed notice (gl)

6 July 26, 1999

REFERRAL ORDER of 07/23/99: The case is referred to the Honorable Ian H. Levin from Honorable Marvin Aspen pursuant to local general rule 2.41(b): Settlement conference. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 07/26/1999)

RECAP
7 Aug. 4, 1999

JOINT STATUS REPORT by plaintiff and defendant in referral case (yap) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

RECAP
Aug. 4, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 8/4/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held; continued to 8:45 8/20/99 . Settlement conference set for 1:30 8/24/99 in courtroom 2494 . Mailed notice (smm)

8 Aug. 9, 1999

AMENDED ANSWER to complaint [5-1] by defendant (dmkf) (Entered: 08/11/1999)

RECAP
Aug. 20, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 8/20/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held; continued to 9:30 10/8/99 . Settlement conference set for 8/24/99 is vacated. Mailed notice (smm)

Aug. 27, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 8/27/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 2/11/2000. Discovery ordered closed on 2/1/2000. Joint Pretrial order is to be submitted in open court on 10:00 2/11/2000. Real dates. No extensions of time will be granted. Filing of motions of any kind does not stay discovery or filing of pretrial order. Defendant is given to 11/1/99 any counterclaim. Plaintiff's expert(s) should be identified by 12/1/99. Defendant's expert(s) should be identified by 1/1/2000. Mailed notice (gl)

9 Sept. 9, 1999

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff by Ines M. Monte; Notice of filing. (dmkf) (Entered: 09/16/1999)

RECAP
10 Oct. 8, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 10/8/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held. Settlement conference set for 12/1/99 at 1:15p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted in accordance with the court's standing order settlement conferneces, which is enclosed. Parties with ultimate settlement authority must be personally present. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 10/12/1999)

RECAP
13 Oct. 28, 1999

MOTION by defendant to compel plaintiff EEOC to produce all questionnaires and related information received from alleged victims of sexual of sex-based harassment, and/or women who allege they have information concerning sexual or sex-based harassment (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

RECAP
11 Nov. 1, 1999

RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion to compel discovery. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

RECAP
12 Nov. 1, 1999

EMERGENCY MOTION by plaintiff for protective order (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

RECAP
18 Nov. 1, 1999

MOTION by defendant for leave to file second amended complaint (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/08/1999)

RECAP
14 Nov. 2, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 11/2/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate Judge Levin is enhanced to include defendant's motion to compel and motion for protective order re [12-1], re [13-1]. Telephoned notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

RECAP
15 Nov. 3, 1999

RESPONSE by defendant to EEOC's emergency motion for protective order [12-1] (Attachments). (dmkf) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

RECAP
16 Nov. 3, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 11/3/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin: Defendant's motion to compel is denied for the reasons stated of record [13-1]. No notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

RECAP
17 Nov. 3, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 11/3/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin: Motion hearing held. EEOC's emergency motion for protective order is granted [12-1] for the reasons stated and on the terms stated of record. Defendant and any of its officers, directors, managers, agents, or attorneys are prohibited from engaging in ex parte communication with any of subject 96 identified class members in EEOC's litigation in this matter. Plaintiff shall produce by 11/19/99 an attorney's affidavit on the terms stated of record. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

RECAP
19 Nov. 5, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 11/5/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Defendant counsel appears for motion. Defendant's motion for leave to file second amended answer is allowed [18-1], with the understanding that it is not goring to alter discovery timetable. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/08/1999)

RECAP
20 Nov. 15, 1999

MOTION by plaintiff to vacate the order entered by this court on 11/05/99 (Attachment); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/19/1999)

RECAP
21 Nov. 19, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 11/19/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Filed plaintiff's motion to vacate this court's order of 11/05/99. Answer brief to motion due 12/01/99. Reply to answer brief due 12/6/99. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/19/1999)

RECAP
Nov. 22, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 11/22/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Noticed motion set for 9:30 11/23/99. No notice (gl)

22 Nov. 23, 1999

MOTION by plaintiff to extend the time for disclosure of experts (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/24/1999)

RECAP
23 Nov. 23, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 11/23/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Plaintiff's motion to extend for disclosure of experts until 03/15/00 is granted [22-1]. The status hearing and for filing of the joint pretrial order set for 02/11/00 is reset to 3/31/00 at 10:00a.m. No further extensions. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/24/1999)

RECAP
24 Nov. 24, 1999

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): held on 11/03/99 before Honorable Ian H. Levin (dmkf) (Entered: 11/24/1999)

RECAP
26 Dec. 1, 1999

JOINT MOTION by plaintiff, defendant for entry of a stipulated protective order (Attachment); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 12/03/1999)

RECAP
Dec. 1, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 12/1/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Settlement conference held. Status hearing on settlement set to 9:00 1/10/00 . Mailed notice (smm)

25 Dec. 2, 1999

RESPONSE by defendant to motion to vacate the order entered by this court on 11/05/99 [20-1]; Notice of filing. (dmkf) (Entered: 12/03/1999)

RECAP
27 Dec. 3, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 12/3/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Joint motion for entry of a stipulated protective order is granted. (Enter stipulated protective order.) Telephoned notice (dmkf) Modified on 12/03/1999 (Entered: 12/03/1999)

RECAP
28 Dec. 6, 1999

REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to vacate [25-1] (Attachments). (dmkf) (Entered: 12/08/1999)

RECAP
Dec. 9, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 12/9/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing is set for 10:00 12/10/99. Telephoned notice (gl)

29 Dec. 10, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 12/10/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The court stands by its order of 11/05/99, and allows defendant's leave to file second amended answer with affirmative defenses conditional on the defendant answering outstanding disovery. Defendant is to produce documents as to the five previously identified plaintiffs within one week. Plaintiff's motion to vacate is denied at moot [20-1]. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 12/14/1999)

RECAP
Dec. 10, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 12/10/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 4/7/2000. Discovery is extended to 3/15/2000. Pretrial order is to be filed in open court on 4/7/2000 at 10:00 a.m. The status hearing and for filing of the pretrial order set for 3/31/2000 is stricken. Mailed notice (gl)

30 Dec. 30, 1999

MOTION by plaintiff to compel defendant to fully respond to certain interrogatories and document requests (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 01/04/2000)

RECAP
31 Jan. 4, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 1/4/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate Judge Levin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion to compel re [30-1]. No notice (dmkf) (Entered: 01/04/2000)

RECAP
32 Jan. 10, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 1/10/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin: Plaintiff's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part on the terms stated of record [30-1]. Status hearing held and continued to 1/24/00 at 11:00a.m. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 01/12/2000)

RECAP
33 Jan. 13, 2000

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Laura Anne Lindner, David Elliot Metz (dmkf) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

RECAP
35 Jan. 18, 2000

NOTICE of filing by defendant of hearing transcript; (Attachment). (mbw) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
34 Jan. 21, 2000

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff by John A. Knight (yap) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
36 Jan. 21, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense for failure to comply with this court's order (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 01/27/2000)

RECAP
Jan. 24, 2000

SCHEDULE set on 1/24/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held; continued to 9:30 3/13/00 . Mailed notice (smm)

37 Jan. 25, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 1/25/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Filed EEOC's motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense for failure to comply with this court's order [36-1]. Answer brief to motion due 02/03/00. Reply to answer brief due 2/8/00. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 01/27/2000)

RECAP
38 Feb. 3, 2000

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): held on 01/10/00 before Honorable Ian H. Levin (dmkf) (Entered: 02/03/2000)

RECAP
39 Feb. 4, 2000

RESPONSE by defendant in opposition to plaintiff's motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense [36-1] (Attachment). (dmkf) (Entered: 02/08/2000)

RECAP
40 Feb. 8, 2000

REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense [36-1] (Attachments). (dmkf) (Entered: 02/11/2000)

RECAP
41 Feb. 9, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff to compel discovery: For inspection of premises at which sexually hostile and abusive work environment maintained by Dial Corporation (Attachments); Notice (ar) (Entered: 02/11/2000)

RECAP
42 Feb. 10, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/10/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : The referral to Magistrate Judge Levin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion to compel [41-1]. No notice (ar) (Entered: 02/11/2000)

RECAP
47 Feb. 14, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/14/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate Judge Levin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense for failure to comply with this court's order. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 02/25/2000)

RECAP
48 Feb. 15, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff for an order to show cause why Paul Jones should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with deposition subpoena (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 02/28/2000)

RECAP
43 Feb. 17, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff for clarification of expert disclosure discovery schedule (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

RECAP
46 Feb. 17, 2000

AMENDED RESPONSE by defendant to plaintiff's motion to compel inspection of premises [41-1] (Attachment); Notice. (srb) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

RECAP
44 Feb. 18, 2000

REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel inspection of premises [41-1] (Attachment); Notice of filing. (dmkf) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

RECAP
45 Feb. 22, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/22/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Filed plaintiff's motion for clarification of expert disclosure discovery schedule [43-1]. Answer brief to motion due 02/29/00. Reply to answer brief due 3/2/00. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

RECAP
49 Feb. 25, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/25/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate Judge Levin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion for an order to show cause why Paul Jones should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with deposition subpoena. No notice (dmkf) (Entered: 02/28/2000)

RECAP
50 Feb. 25, 2000

NOTICE by plaintiff of motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense for failure to comply with this court's order [36-1] and motion to compel discovery: For inspection of premises . [41-1] (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
54 Feb. 28, 2000

MOTION by defendant to compel class member depositions plus related documents and testimony (Attachment); Notice. (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
57 Feb. 28, 2000

SURREPLY by defendant in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel inspection of premises [41-1] and plaintiff's motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense [36-1] (Attachments). (srb) (Entered: 03/03/2000)

RECAP
51 Feb. 29, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff EEEOC's motion to strike affirmative defense [36-1] and to compel discovery and inspection of premises is granted [41-1] in part and denied in part on the terms as stated. No notice (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
52 Feb. 29, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff's motion to strike [36-1] is denied. Defendant to submit supplemental responses by 03/07/00. Plaintiff to produce records by 03/08/00. No notice (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
53 Feb. 29, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff's motion for an order to show cause is withdrawn without prejudice. [48-1] No notice (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
55 Feb. 29, 2000

RESPONSE by defendant to EEOC's motion for clarification of expert disclosure discovery schedule; Notice. [43-1] (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
56 Feb. 29, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Defendant's motion to compel class member depositions plus related documents and testimony is granted in part and denied in part on the terms stated of record. [54-1] No notice (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

RECAP
58 March 2, 2000

REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response to plaintiff's motion for clarification of expert disclosure schedule [43-1] (Attachment); Notice of filing. (dmkf) (Entered: 03/15/2000)

RECAP
March 13, 2000

SCHEDULE set on 3/13/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held and continued to 10:15 a.m. 4/5/00 . Mailed notice (ldg)

59 March 15, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 3/15/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to magistrate Judge Levin is enhanced to include expeditious ruling on plaintiff's fully-briefed motion for clarification of expert disclosure schedule. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 03/16/2000)

RECAP
60 March 16, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 3/16/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff EEOC's motion for clarification of expert disclosure discovery schedule [43-1] to extend for disclosure of experts is granted to and including 04/30/00. (See reverse of minute order.) Notice mailed by Magistrate Judge's staff (ar) Modified on 03/21/2000 (Entered: 03/21/2000)

RECAP
62 March 23, 2000

MOTION by defendant to clarify/confirm expert disclosure schedule (Attachments); Notice (ar) (Entered: 03/30/2000)

RECAP
61 March 24, 2000

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 02/29/00 before the Honorable Ian H. Levin (1 vol.) (ar) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
63 March 28, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 3/28/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Defendant's motion to clarify/confirm expert disclosure schedule is hereby withdrawn without prejudice [62-1]. No notice (ar) (Entered: 03/30/2000)

RECAP
March 29, 2000

SCHEDULE set on 3/29/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing and for filing of the joint pretrial order set or 4/7/00 is stricken and reset to 10:00 4/18/00. Mailed notice (gl)

64 March 30, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff to reset due date for pretrial order (Attachments); Notice (rmm) (Entered: 04/06/2000)

RECAP
65 March 30, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff to continue pretrial order date ; Notice (rmm) (Entered: 04/06/2000)

RECAP
66 April 4, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/4/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Motion to reset due date for pretrial order is granted [64-1]. As stated in open court, fact discvoery is closed. All expert discovery is closed 8/31/00. The status hearing and for filing of the joint pretrial order set 4/18/00 is reset to 10:00 a.m. on 9/15/00. No further extensions. Mailed notice (rmm) (Entered: 04/06/2000)

RECAP
67 April 4, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/4/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Motion to continue pretrial order date is granted [65-1]. As stated in open court, fact discvoery is closed. All expert discovery is closed 8/31/00. The status hearing and for filing of the joint pretrial order set 4/18/00 is reset to 10:00 a.m. on 9/15/00. No further extensions. Mailed notice Mailed notice (rmm) (Entered: 04/06/2000)

RECAP
68 April 5, 2000

REASSIGNMENT ORDER of 4/5/00 Case reassigned to Hon. Warren K. Urbom from the Hon. Marvin Aspen pursuant to Rule 13 of the Internal Operating Procedures. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (ar) (Entered: 04/07/2000)

RECAP
April 5, 2000

SCHEDULE set on 4/5/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held; continued to 10:15 5/18/00 . Mailed notice (smm)

69 April 13, 2000

MOTION by defendant for leave to file summary judgment brief exceeding 15 pages and summary judgment submissions under seal pursuant to existing protective order (Attachment); Notice (ar) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

RECAP
70 April 13, 2000

MOTION by defendant for summary judgment ; Notice (ar) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

RECAP
71 April 18, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/18/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Defendant's motion for leave to file summary judgment brief exceeding 15 pages and summary judgment submissions under seal pursuant to existing protective order is allowed [69-1] [69-2]. Memo is to be 30 pages in length. Mailed notice (ar) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

RECAP
72 April 18, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/18/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Brief in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment due 05/02/00 [70-1]. Answer brief to defendant's motion for summary judgment due 05/17/00. Reply to answer brief due 05/24/00. Mailed notice (ar) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

RECAP
73 April 19, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff for reconsideration of order entered 04/17/00 (Attachment); Notice (ar) (Entered: 04/24/2000)

RECAP
74 April 21, 2000

MOTION by defendant to compel expert deposition per court-ordered briefing schedule (Attachments); Notice (ar) (Entered: 04/26/2000)

RECAP
75 April 25, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/25/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : The referral to Magistrate Judge Levin is enhanced to include defendant's motion to compel expert deposition [74-1]. Telephoned notice (ar) (Entered: 04/26/2000)

RECAP
76 April 27, 2000

DOCUMENT stricken pursuant to order of 04/28/00 [81-1] (ar) Modified on 05/02/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)

RECAP
77 April 27, 2000

RESPONSE by plaintiff to Dial's motion to compel expert deposition [74-1] (Attachments); Notice (ar) Modified on 04/28/2000 (Entered: 04/28/2000)

RECAP
78 April 27, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file summary judgment brief and for extension of time to file response (Attachment) (ar) (Entered: 04/28/2000)

RECAP
79 April 28, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, Dial's moton to compel expert deposition and plaintiff's motion for leave to file summary judgment brief exceeding fifteen pages and for extension, will be resolved after further conversation with counsel [73-1] [74-1] [78-1] [78-2]. (Entered Memorandum and Order on Three Pending Motions) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) Modified on 05/02/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)

RECAP
80 April 28, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery for limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe is granted [76-1]. (Entered Memorandum and Order on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Motion to Reopen Discovery for Limited Purpose of Conducting Deposition of Jane Doe) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

Clearinghouse
81 April 28, 2000

MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The Clerk of the Court is directed to substitute the EEOC's corrected motion to reopen discovery for limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe for EEC's motion to reopen discovery for limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe [76-1] and return the time-stamped original of the motion and copies of the exhibits accompanying the time-stamped original to the EEOC for destruction or to destroy the original motion and exhibits. (Entered Order to Substitute Motion in Court File) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

RECAP
82 April 28, 2000

CORRECTED MOTION by plaintiff to reopen discovery for limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe (Attachments); Notice (ar) Modified on 05/24/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)

RECAP
83 May 1, 2000

REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to reconsider [73-1]; Notice (ar) Modified on 05/02/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)

RECAP
89 May 2, 2000

NOTICE of removal of material from the the custody of the Clerk's office: EEOC's motion to reopen discovery for limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe; Notice (Exhibits A-E) [76-1]. Mailed to Noelle C. Brennan, counsel for EEOC. (ar) (Entered: 06/01/2000)

RECAP
May 2, 2000

MAILED to Noelle Christine Brennan, counsel for plaintiff, the original document entitled Notice of Filing; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Motion to Reopen Discovery for Limited Purpose of Conducting Deposition of Jane Doe with Exhibits A,B,C,D and E attached [76-1], via certified mail no. Z-332-066-032 (ar)

84 May 8, 2000

RETURN of certified receipt no. Z-332-066-032 (ar) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 20, 1999

Closing Date: 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Dial Corporation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:99-cv-03356

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Auditing

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Monitoring

Monitor/Master

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 10000000

Order Duration: 2003 - 2005

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation