Case: EEOC v. Randstad

8:03-cv-01449 | U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina

Filed Date: April 24, 2003

Closed Date: Sept. 30, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In April 2003, the EEOC's Greenville office filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina against an integrated and international network of corporations and partnerships owned by Randstad Holdings, a Dutch company, doing business as Randstad North America. The defendant employment agency was charged with violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it acquiesced to requests from client employers not to refer females for employment. A female employe…

In April 2003, the EEOC's Greenville office filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina against an integrated and international network of corporations and partnerships owned by Randstad Holdings, a Dutch company, doing business as Randstad North America. The defendant employment agency was charged with violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it acquiesced to requests from client employers not to refer females for employment. A female employee of the defendant complained when handing the requests for the client employer and was retaliated against for her opposition to the unlawful practice by being discharged. The EEOC brought this suit on her behalf and on the behalf of the class of females who were not referred for employment and were thereby deprived of federally protected rights. The parties quickly came to an agreement in the form of a consent decree that was adopted by the court in September 2003. It awarded the employee complainant $20,000 and awarded $27,000 to the aggrieved class of females. Further, the defendant was enjoined from acquiescing to discriminatory requests and was required to report to the EEOC when it received them.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/31/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11574019/parties/eeoc-v-randstad-staffing/


Judge(s)

Wooten, Terry L. (South Carolina)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Turnage, Edwin Lake (South Carolina)

Attorney for Defendant

Jr, Joseph A (South Carolina)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

8:03-cv-01449

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Randstand Staffing, et al

Jan. 20, 2004

Jan. 20, 2004

Docket
1

8:03-cv-01449

Complaint

EEOC v. Randstand Staffing, et al

April 24, 2003

April 24, 2003

Complaint
11

8:03-cv-01449

Amended Complaint

EEOC v. Randstand Staffing, et al

July 10, 2003

July 10, 2003

Pleading / Motion / Brief
21

8:03-cv-01449

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Randstand Staffing, et al

Sept. 30, 2003

Sept. 30, 2003

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11574019/eeoc-v-randstad-staffing/

Last updated Nov. 4, 2026, 4:18 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Randstad Staffing
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 24, 2003

COMPLAINT; Service due by 8/22/03 for Randstad Staffing (jtho) (Entered: 04/24/2003)

RECAP
2 April 24, 2003

SUMMONS issued for defendant Randstad Staffing (jtho) (Entered: 04/24/2003)

RECAP
3 April 24, 2003

ANSWER to Local Rule 26 Interrogatories by plaintiff EEOC; jury demand (jtho) (Entered: 04/24/2003)

RECAP
4 May 5, 2003

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of summons and complaint executed as to defendant Randstad Staffing 4/28/03 Assignment Interrogatories due on 5/28/03 for Randstad Staffing ; Answer due on 5/19/03 for Randstad Staffing executed by certified mail (jtho) (Entered: 05/05/2003)

RECAP
5 June 10, 2003

ANSWER to Complaint by defendant Randstad Staffing (Attorney Joseph A Rhodes Jr), Assignment Interrogatories due on 6/20/03 for Randstad Staffing ; (jtho) (Entered: 06/10/2003)

RECAP
6 June 11, 2003

CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER setting 26(f) Conference no later than 6/30/03 ; 26(a) Initial Disclosures served by 7/14/03 ; 26(f) Report filed by 7/14/03 ; Joining of parties,amending of pleadings on 8/11/03 ; Plaintiff's ID of Experts set for 9/8/03 ; Defendant's ID of Experts set for 10/8/03 ; Records Custodian Affidavit filed by 1/30/04 ; Discovery cutoff 12/17/03 ; Motion In Limine filed by 2/23/04 ; Deadline for filing of all motions 12/31/03 ; 26(a)3 Pretrial Disclosures filed by 1/30/04 ; Pretrial Brief filed by 2/16/04 ; Jury Selection deadline set for 3/1/04 ; ADR Statement/Cert due by 12/31/03 Mediation deadline for 1/30/04 ( signed by Judge Terry L. Wooten )eod 6/11/03, svd. (jtho) (Entered: 06/11/2003)

RECAP
7 June 20, 2003

Disclosure Statement of corporate affiliations filed by defendant Randstad Staffing (jtho) (Entered: 06/23/2003)

RECAP
8 June 20, 2003

ANSWER to Local Rule 26 Interrogatories by defendant Randstad Staffing (jtho) (Entered: 06/23/2003)

RECAP
9 July 7, 2003

MOTION with exhibits A-B by plaintiff EEOC to amend [1-1] complaint, for issuance of amended summons (jtho) (Entered: 07/08/2003)

RECAP
10 July 8, 2003

ORDER granting [9-1] motion to amend [1-1] complaint, granting [9-2] motion for issuance of amended summons ( signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Catoe ) eod 7/8/03, svd. (jtho) (Entered: 07/08/2003)

RECAP
11 July 10, 2003

AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff EEOC, (Answer due 7/21/03 for Randstad Staffing ) amending [1-1] complaint against defendant Staffing Resources, Randstad General, Randstad North; jury demand (jtho) (Entered: 07/10/2003)

RECAP
12 July 10, 2003

SUMMONSES issued for defendant Staffing Resources, defendant Randstad General, defendant Randstad North (jtho) (Entered: 07/10/2003)

RECAP
13 July 14, 2003

26(f) Report by EEOC, Randstad Staffing, Staffing Resources, Randstad General, Randstad N America L . Parties disagree to Conference and Scheduling Order, requesting more time as in proposed amended conference and scheduling order. (acas) (Entered: 07/15/2003)

RECAP
14 July 14, 2003

26(f) Answers to Local Rule 26 Interrogatories by EEOC . (acas) (Entered: 07/15/2003)

RECAP
15 July 15, 2003

26(f) Answers to Local Rule 26 Interrogatories by Randstad Staffing, Staffing Resources, Randstad General, Randstad N America L . (jtho) (Entered: 07/16/2003)

RECAP
16 July 16, 2003

AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER setting Joining of parties,amending of pleadings on 8/11/03 ; Plaintiff's ID of Experts set for 9/8/03 ; Defendant's ID of Experts set for 10/8/03 ; Records Custodian Affidavit filed by 3/1/04 ; Discovery cutoff 12/17/03 ; Motion In Limine filed by 3/25/04 ; Deadline for filing of all motions 1/10/04 ; 26(a)3 Pretrial Disclosures filed by 3/1/04 ; Pretrial Brief filed by 3/18/04 ; Jury Selection deadline set for 4/1/04 ; ADR Statement/Cert due by 12/31/03 Mediation deadline for 2/15/04 ( signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Catoe ) eod 7/16/03, svd. (jtho) (Entered: 07/16/2003)

RECAP
17 July 23, 2003

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of summons and complaint executed as to defendant Staffing Resources, defendant Randstad General 7/16/03 Assignment Interrogatories due on 8/15/03 for Randstad General, for Staffing Resources ; Answer due on 8/5/03 for Randstad General, for Staffing Resources executed by certified mail (jtho) (Entered: 07/23/2003)

RECAP
18 Aug. 5, 2003

ORDER reset answer due for 8/11/03 for Randstad N America L, for Randstad General, for Staffing Resources, for Randstad Staffing ( signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Catoe ) eod 8/5/03, svd.x (jtho) (Entered: 08/05/2003)

RECAP
19 Aug. 12, 2003

ANSWER by defendant Randstad Staffing, defendant Staffing Resources, defendant Randstad General, defendant Randstad N America L (Attorney Joseph A. Rhodes, Jr. ) to amended complaint (jtho) (Entered: 08/12/2003)

RECAP
20 Aug. 25, 2003

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of summons and complaint executed as to defendant Randstad N America L 8/1/03 Assignment Interrogatories due on 9/2/03 for Randstad N America L ; Answer due on 8/21/03 for Randstad N America L executed by certified mail (jtho) (Entered: 08/25/2003)

RECAP
21 Sept. 30, 2003

ORDER: Consent Decree approving settlement ( signed by Judge Terry L. Wooten ) eod 10/01/03, svd. (jtho) Modified on 10/01/2003 (Entered: 10/01/2003)

RECAP
Sept. 30, 2003

Case closed (jtho) (Entered: 10/01/2003)

PACER
Sept. 30, 2003

Case closed (jtho)

22 Jan. 20, 2004

ORDER that the Commission is granted an enlargement of time until February 18, 2004 to provide defendants the information required under paragraph 5 of the September 30, 2003 consent decree ( signed by Judge Terry L. Wooten ) eod 1/21/04, svd. (jtho) (Entered: 01/21/2004)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

South Carolina

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 24, 2003

Closing Date: Sept. 30, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Randstad General Partner (US) LLC

Randstad North America LP

Randstad Staffing Services, Inc.

Staffing Resources (SC) LP

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

District of South Carolina 8:03-cv-01449

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Expungement of Employment Record

Monitoring

Neutral/Positive Reference

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 47000

Order Duration: 2003 - 2006

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation