Case: EEOC v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care

1:05-cv-00446 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Filed Date: June 28, 2005

Closed Date: 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In June of 2005, the Detroit District Office of the EEOC filed suit in U.S District Court for the Western District of Michigan against Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, a provider of in-home health care. The suit alleged that two female African-American employees were sexually and racially harassed and sexually assaulted by a patient to whom they were assigned. According to the EEOC, their employer violated Title VII when it failed to remedy or take steps to prevent this harassment. Shortly afte…

In June of 2005, the Detroit District Office of the EEOC filed suit in U.S District Court for the Western District of Michigan against Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, a provider of in-home health care. The suit alleged that two female African-American employees were sexually and racially harassed and sexually assaulted by a patient to whom they were assigned. According to the EEOC, their employer violated Title VII when it failed to remedy or take steps to prevent this harassment.

Shortly after the case was filed, the two employees intervened as plaintiffs. The defendant moved for summary judgment as to the EEOC's claims on the grounds that the EEOC had failed to make a good-faith effort to conciliate before filing suit. The court (Judge Gordon J. Quist) disagreed and the motion was denied on March 2, 2006. 2006 WL 519779.

The EEOC's suit was resolved on October 23, 2006 by a consent judgment which required the defendant to conduct anti-discrimination training of its employees and to report any future incidents of harassment or discrimination to the EEOC. The decree remained in effect until December 31, 2009.

But, the consent decree did not resolve the private suit. After a series of discovery disputes, and other motion practice (including motions for summary judgment on different claims, and a motion for separate trials), the defendant and the intervening plaintiffs eventually agreed on a settlement in June of 2007, right before the case was set for a jury trial before Judge Jack Zouhary. The terms of this settlement were not disclosed due to confidentiality. The case was dismissed with prejudice, no further activity occurred on the docket for years, and so the case is closed.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (5/21/2008)

Rachel Barr (1/3/2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4689634/parties/childrey-v-spectrum-health-worth-home-care-inc/


Judge(s)

Miles, Wendell Alverson (Michigan)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:05-cv-00446

Docket (PACER)

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

July 16, 2007

July 16, 2007

Docket
1

1:05-cv-00446

Complaint

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

June 28, 2005

June 28, 2005

Complaint
11

1:05-cv-00446

Complaint in Intervention and Jury Demand

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

Sept. 8, 2005

Sept. 8, 2005

Complaint
75

1:05-cv-00446

Opinion

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

March 2, 2006

March 2, 2006

Order/Opinion

2006 WL 519779

76

1:05-cv-00446

Order

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

March 2, 2006

March 2, 2006

Order/Opinion
172

1:05-cv-00446

Consent Decree

Childrey, et al v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

Oct. 23, 2006

Oct. 23, 2006

Settlement Agreement
208

1:05-cv-00446

Order Granting Motion to Compel

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

Nov. 28, 2006

Nov. 28, 2006

Order/Opinion
233

1:05-cv-00446

Order

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

Dec. 18, 2006

Dec. 18, 2006

Order/Opinion
294

1:05-cv-00446

Memorandum Order

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

June 11, 2007

June 11, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 WL 1701836

297

1:05-cv-00446

[Dismissal] Order

Childrey v. Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc.

July 16, 2007

July 16, 2007

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4689634/childrey-v-spectrum-health-worth-home-care-inc/

Last updated April 18, 2025, 9:49 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
75

OPINION; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

March 2, 2006

March 2, 2006

RECAP
233

ORDER denying 201 motion to compel, denying 210 motion to compel, finding as moot 224 motion to compel ; signed by Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman Jr. (Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr., fhw)

Dec. 18, 2006

Dec. 18, 2006

RECAP
294

(Amended) MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 239 Intervening Plaintiffs' consolidated motion to compel discovery of relevant financial and business records ; amended to correct signature line only; signed by Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman Jr. (Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr., fhw)

June 11, 2007

June 11, 2007

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Michigan

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 28, 2005

Closing Date: 2009

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc. (Grand Rapids), Private Entity/Person

Spectrum Health Worth Home Care, Inc. (Grand Rapids, Michigan), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

State Anti-Discrimination Law

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Monitoring

Order Duration: 2006 - 2009

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit