Case: EEOC v. DINE INC (d/b/a SILK CITY DINER)
2:04-cv-04523 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Filed Date: Sept. 27, 2004
Closed Date: 2007
Clearinghouse coding complete
Case Summary
The Philadelphia Office of the EEOC filed this action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Defendants were Dine, Inc., doing business as Silk City Diner, and two other individuals. The controversy involved alleged harassment, discipline, re-assignment, and retaliation against a female employee based on her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The lawsuit was filed in September 2004 and was resolved by consent decree in May 2005. The complainant intervened in the case. The consent decree required the defendant to: pay the complainant $22,5000, post notice, refrain from discrimination and retaliation, develop an anti-discrimination including prompt investigation of complaints, and furnish written compliance reports to the EEOC.The decree was entered in 2005 and scheduled to last 2007. No further docket entries exist, so the case is closed.Summary Authors
Kevin Wilemon (8/12/2007)
Clearinghouse (12/24/2018)
People
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11923875/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-dine-inc/
COOK, TERRENCE R. (Pennsylvania)
JENSEN, DEBRA A. (Pennsylvania)
MARINO, STEPHANIE (Pennsylvania)
MCNAIR, JACQUELINE H. (Pennsylvania)
CARFLEY, STEPHANIE (Pennsylvania)
Documents in the Clearinghouse
Resources
Docket
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11923875/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-dine-inc/
Last updated Nov. 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
Docket for: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. DINE INC.
Case Details
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Sept. 27, 2004
Closing Date: 2007
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Private Entity/Person
Dine, Inc.
George Barakos
Nicholas Barakos
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Other Dockets:
Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2:04-cv-04523
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed
Relief Granted:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Content of Injunction:
Develop anti-discrimination policy
Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law
Provide antidiscrimination training
Amount Defendant Pays: 22500
Order Duration: 2005 - 2007
Issues
General/Misc.:
Discrimination Area:
Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Discrimination Basis:
Affected Sex/Gender(s):
EEOC-centric:
Private Party intervened in EEOC suit
Case Summary of EEOC v. DINE INC (d/b/a SILK CITY DINER), Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/9309/ (last updated 12/24/2018).