Case: EEOC v. Adams Extract Company

1:01-cv-00262 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: May 1, 2001

Closed Date: March 28, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 2001, the EEOC's San Antonio office instituted this action against Adams Extract Company in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging discrimination and retaliation based on sex (female) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The parties did not agree to alternative dispute resolution but were able to propose a consent decree to the court in March 2002 which was subsequently approved. The decree provided monetary relief for one charging party in the amount of $32,000. It also enjoined the defendant from discriminating on the basis of sex and from retaliating against an employee for opposing such discrimination. In addition, the defendant was required to post an equal employment opportunity notice in its facilities and institute mandatory training sessions for all of its employees.

Summary Authors

Tony Friedman (7/8/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11209262/parties/eeoc-v-adams-extract-co/

Judge(s)

Nowlin, James Robertson (Texas)

Judge(s)

Nowlin, James Robertson (Texas)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
1:01-cv-00262	Docket (PACER) EEOC v. Adams Extract Co.	Nov. 22, 2002	Nov. 22, 2002 Docket
1 1:01-cv-00262	Complaint Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Adams Extract Co.	May 1, 2001	May 1, 2001 Complaint
13 1:01-cv-00262	Consent Decree Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Adams Extract Company	March 28, 2002	March 28, 2002 Settlement Agreement

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Under the Radar: Visibility and the Effects of Discrimination Lawsuits in Small and Large Firms Carly Knight, Frank Dobbin, Alexandra Kalev	Research on how discrimination lawsuits affect corporate diversity has yielded mixed results. Qualitative studies highlight the limited efficacy of lawsuits in the typical workplace, finding that lit…	March 2022	April 1, 2022 https://cris.tau.ac.il/...

show / hide resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11209262/eeoc-v-adams-extract-co/

Last updated April 8, 2025, 7:09 p.m.

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
	Case assigned to Honorable James R. Nowlin (mc2) (Entered: 05/02/2001)	May 1, 2001	May 1, 2001
1	Complaint filed. Filing Fee: waived (Pages: 5) (mc2) (Entered: 05/02/2001)	May 1, 2001	May 1, 2001 Clearinghouse
	Court file prepared and forwarded to Judge Nowlin. (mc2) (Entered: 05/02/2001)	May 2, 2001	May 2, 2001
2	Waiver of Service by Adams Extract Co. ; Notice and Request Mailed on 6/14/01 ; Answer due on 8/13/01 for Adams Extract Co. (mc2) (Entered: 06/22/2001)	June 22, 2001	June 22, 2001
3	Answer by Adams Extract Co. (mc2) (Entered: 08/14/2001)	Aug. 13, 2001	Aug. 13, 2001
4	Joint motion by EEOC, Adams Extract Co. to extend time for submission of proposed scheduling order (mc2) (Entered: 08/23/2001)	Aug. 22, 2001	Aug. 22, 2001
5	Order granting joint motion to extend time for submission of proposed scheduling order [4-1] until 11/12/01. (Noticed 8/23/01.) (mc2) (Entered: 08/23/2001)	Aug. 23, 2001	Aug. 23, 2001
6	Second Joint motion by EEOC, Adams Extract Co. to extend time - to extend deadline for submission of proposed scheduling order (mc2) (Entered: 10/30/2001)	Oct. 29, 2001	Oct. 29, 2001
7	Order denying joint motion to extend time - to extend deadline for submission of proposed scheduling order [6-1]. (Noticed 10/31/01.) (mc2) (Entered: 10/31/2001)	Oct. 30, 2001	Oct. 30, 2001
8	Scheduling order setting Joining of parties, amending of pleadings on 3/18/02 Deadline for filing of all motions 4/30/02 Discovery cutoff 4/15/02 ; Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 11/15/01 (fe) (Entered: 11/02/2001)	Nov. 1, 2001	Nov. 1, 2001
9	Joint discovery/case management plan (submitted by plaintiff and defendant). (mc2) (Entered: 11/02/2001)	Nov. 1, 2001	Nov. 1, 2001
10	Alternate Dispute Resolution Report filed by EEOC, Adams Extract Co., Party(s) do not agree to Alternate Dispute Resolution (mc2) (Entered: 11/16/2001)	Nov. 16, 2001	Nov. 16, 2001
11	Order set docket call for 1:30 4/3/02 (td) (Entered: 03/22/2002)	March 22, 2002	March 22, 2002
12	Joint motion by EEOC, Adams Extract Co. to enter consent decree (mc2) (Entered: 03/27/2002)	March 27, 2002	March 27, 2002
14	Judgment for EEOC against Adams Extract Co. (Pages: 1) (see consent judgment above). (Noticed 3/29/02.) (mc2) (Entered: 03/29/2002)	March 28, 2002	March 28, 2002
	Case closed (mc2) (Entered: 03/29/2002)	March 28, 2002	March 28, 2002
15	Unopposed Motion by Adams Extract Co. for Brian S. Greig and Thomas A. Nesbitt to withdraw as attorney (mc2) (Entered: 11/20/2002)	Nov. 19, 2002	Nov. 19, 2002
16	Order granting motion for Brian S. Greig and Thomas A. Nesbitt to withdraw as attorney [15-1] and substituting Sean E. Breen. (Noticed 11/22/02.) (mc2) (Entered: 11/22/2002)	Nov. 22, 2002	Nov. 22, 2002