Filed Date: Sept. 21, 2004
Closed Date: May 9, 2008
Clearinghouse coding complete
The EEOC's Seattle office filed this suit on September 21, 2004 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, Tacoma Division. The EEOC alleged that defendant Allstar Magnetics, Inc. violated Title VII by discriminating against a female employee, and a class of female employees, because of their pregnancy by discharging them. After a trial date was set on March 4, 2005, the parties filed a proposed consent decree on May 3, 2005. The consent decree was entered into the record and the case was dismissed on May 9, 2005. The defendant agreed to pay the named female employee $25,000 in the decree. The defendant also agreed to review its anti-discrimination policies, provide training for its employees, report to the EEOC annually, and expunge the named female employee's personnel file. The settlement term was 3 years. The docket sheet does not show any further enforcement; the case was presumably closed in 2008.
Summary Authors
William Burns (10/27/2007)
Clearinghouse (6/12/2017)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4676385/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-allstar-magnetics-inc/
Bryan, Robert Jensen (Washington)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4676385/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-allstar-magnetics-inc/
Last updated April 18, 2025, 9:48 a.m.
State / Territory: Washington
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study
Key Dates
Filing Date: Sept. 21, 2004
Closing Date: May 9, 2008
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Allstar Magnetics, Inc. (Vancouver, Washington), Private Entity/Person
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Content of Injunction:
Expungement of Employment Record
Develop anti-discrimination policy
Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law
Provide antidiscrimination training
Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
Amount Defendant Pays: 25000
Order Duration: 2005 - 2008
Issues
Discrimination Area:
Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Discrimination Basis:
Affected Sex/Gender(s):
EEOC-centric: