Case: EEOC v. United Parcel Service

6:01-cv-00109 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: July 6, 2001

Closed Date: 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In July 2001, the San Antonio District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against United Parcel Service, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated and retaliated on the basis of race and national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant subjected the three charging parties and a class of similarly situated Hispanic and Black individ…

In July 2001, the San Antonio District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against United Parcel Service, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated and retaliated on the basis of race and national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant subjected the three charging parties and a class of similarly situated Hispanic and Black individuals to a hostile work environment and disparate treatment consisting of: false accusations of wrongdoings, conflicting work orders to encourage insubordination, unnecessarily harsh scrutinizing of work, and groundless reprimands, resulting in the constructive discharge of some of the class members. In addition, the defendant forced several of the class members to resign in retaliation for their complaints, opposition to the discrimination, or participation as witnesses.

One of the charging parties intervened in the suit in late August 2001. Shortly after, the defendant filed motions to dismiss the claims against the EEOC and the intervenor which were both denied in November 2001. In November 2002, another charging party intervened in the suit, but she voluntarily dismissed her intervention in January 2003. In March 2003, the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was denied, and the defendant's motion for complete summary judgment was granted in part and denied in part. After some discovery, the case was tried by a jury in late April and early May 2003 resulting in a jury verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant. Therefore, the EEOC and the intervenor received no relief.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (7/25/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29906425/parties/eeoc-v-united-parcel-servic/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

6:01-cv-00109

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

July 21, 2003

July 21, 2003

Docket
42

6:01-cv-00109

Order

EEOC v. UPS, Inc.

Nov. 30, 2001

Nov. 30, 2001

Order/Opinion
69

6:01-cv-00109

Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint

EEOC v. UPS, Inc.

Oct. 3, 2002

Oct. 3, 2002

Complaint
136

6:01-cv-00109

Order [Re: Various S/J Motions]

EEOC v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al

March 3, 2003

March 3, 2003

Order/Opinion
206

6:01-cv-00109

Jury Verdict

EEOC v. United Parcel Service, Inc, et al

May 7, 2003

May 7, 2003

Other

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29906425/eeoc-v-united-parcel-servic/

Last updated Nov. 4, 2026, 7:01 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. United Parcel Servic
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 July 6, 2001

DEMAND for jury trial by plaintiff EEOC (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
5 Aug. 27, 2001

DEMAND for jury trial by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia (mrr) Modified on 11/21/2001 (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
6 Aug. 31, 2001

ANSWER to Complaint by defendant United Parcel Servic (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
7 Aug. 31, 2001

ANSWER by defendant United Parcel Servic to [5-1] intervenor complaint (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
8 Aug. 31, 2001

MOTION by defendant United Parcel Servic to dismiss or in the alternative for more definite statement (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
9 Aug. 31, 2001

MOTION by defendant United Parcel Servic to dismiss Garcia's Complaint in Intervention or, in the alternative for more definite statement (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
20 Sept. 24, 2001

RESPONSE by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia to [8-1] motion to dismiss or in the alternative for more definite statement (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
22 Sept. 28, 2001

REPLY by defendant United Parcel Servic to response to [8-1] motion to dismiss or in the alternative for more definite statement (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
23 Sept. 28, 2001

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to [8-1] motion to dismiss or in the alternative for more definite statement (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
27 Oct. 5, 2001

REPLY by defendant United Parcel Servic to response to [8-1] motion to dismiss or in the alternative for more definite statement (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
28 Oct. 5, 2001

REPLY by defendant United Parcel Servic to response to defendant's motion to transfer venue [10-1] (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
35 Oct. 29, 2001

SUR-REPLY by plaintiff EEOC to reply to response to [9-1] motion to dismiss Garcia's Complaint in Intervention or, in the alternative for more definite statement (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
36 Oct. 29, 2001

ORDER granting defendant's motion to transfer venue [10-1]. this cause is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Texas San Angelo Division (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
37 Nov. 20, 2001

Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from District of WD/TX San Antonio Division (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
38 Nov. 20, 2001

UNFILED PER ORDER OF 11/27/01 DEMAND for jury trial by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia (mrr) Modified on 11/27/2001 (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
39 Nov. 21, 2001

SCHEDULING ORDER setting Joining of Parties on 3:00 2/15/02 ; Amending of Pleadings on 3:00 2/15/02 ; Experts disclosed by 3:00 5/15/02; Deadline for filing of dispositive motions (including motions for summary judgment) 3:00 7/15/02 ; Discovery cutoff 3:00 9/16/02 ; Deadlines will not be extended except upon good cause & by order of Court; Unless further ordered by Court parties are not required to make initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) Fed R Civ P; Counsel must comply with mandates set forth in Dondi; Counsel referred to Local Rules ND/TX, Civil Justice Cost & Delay Reduction Plan ND/TX & Local Rules of this Court; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 11/21/01 Page(s): 2 (mrr) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
40 Nov. 27, 2001

ADVISORY TO THE COURT REGARDING PENDING MOTIONS by defendant United Parcel Servic (3) (mrr) (Entered: 11/27/2001)

RECAP
41 Nov. 27, 2001

ORDER unfiling [38-1] intervenor complaint, unfiling [38-1] demand jury by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia due to the following deficiency: Leave of Court required Copies to counsel: 11/27/01 (signed by Judge Sam R Cummings ) Page(s) 2 (blr) (Entered: 11/27/2001)

RECAP
42 Nov. 30, 2001

ORDER denying [8-1] motion to dismiss or in the alternative for more definite statement, denying [9-1] motion to dismiss Garcia's Complaint in Intervention or, in the alternative for more definite statement; Deft's Motions to Dismiss are DENIED; Court does not find that either Pltf's Complaint or Intervenor's Complaint is "so vague & ambiguous" that Deft cannot frame responsive pleading; Deft's Alternative Motions for More Definite Statement are DENIED; **See order for specifics** ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 11/30/01 Page(s) 5 (mrr) (Entered: 11/30/2001)

RECAP
43 Dec. 28, 2001

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by plaintiff EEOC (4) (blr) (Entered: 12/28/2001)

RECAP
44 Jan. 8, 2002

(Disclosure of Interested Parties) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by defendant United Parcel Servic (3) (mrr) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

RECAP
45 Jan. 8, 2002

UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff EEOC (for leave to file 1st amended complaint) to amend [1-1] complaint (4+) (mrr) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

RECAP
46 Jan. 9, 2002

ORDER granting [45-1] motion (for leave to file 1st amended complaint) to amend [1-1] complaint ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 1/9/02 Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 01/09/2002)

RECAP
47 Jan. 9, 2002

DEMAND for jury trial by plaintiff EEOC **contained in 1st Amended Complaint** (mrr) (Entered: 01/09/2002)

RECAP
48 Jan. 18, 2002

(Disclosure of Interested Parties) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia (2) (mrr) (Entered: 01/18/2002)

RECAP
49 Feb. 15, 2002

MOTION by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia to amend [5-1] intervenor complaint, [5-1] demand jury, to add 3rd party defts (blr) (Entered: 02/15/2002)

RECAP
50 Feb. 15, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to amend [47-1] amended complaint (for leave to file second amended complaint) (blr) (Entered: 02/15/2002)

RECAP
51 Feb. 19, 2002

ORDER granting [50-1] motion to amend [47-1] amended complaint ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 2/19/02 Page(s) 1 (blr) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

RECAP
52 Feb. 19, 2002

ORDER granting [49-1] motion to amend [5-1] intervenor complaint, [5-1] demand jury, granting [49-2] motion to add 3rd party defts ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 2/19/02 Page(s) 3 (blr) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

RECAP
53 Feb. 19, 2002

AMENDED intervenor's COMPLAINT by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia amending [5-1] intervenor complaint (6) (blr) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

RECAP
54 Feb. 19, 2002

Second AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff EEOC, amending [47-1] amended complaint (blr) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

RECAP
55 April 2, 2002

ANSWER by third-party defendant Local 657 (Attorney James Lowery Hicks Jr) to amended third-party complaint: [53-1] intervenor complaint (2) (blr) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

RECAP
56 April 5, 2002

JOINT MOTION to Extend Discovery & Summary Judgment Deadlines by plaintiff EEOC, intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia, defendant United Parcel Servic, third-party defendant Intl Brotherhood, third-party defendant Local 657 (7) (mrr) (Entered: 04/05/2002)

RECAP
57 April 9, 2002

ORDER granting [56-1] joint motion to Extend Discovery & Summary Judgment Deadlines Reset scheduling order deadlines: Discovery deadline by 12/20/02 Deadline for filing of dispositive motions (summary judgment motions) by 1/22/03 ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 4/9/02 Page(s) 4 (mrr) (Entered: 04/09/2002)

RECAP
58 April 18, 2002

NOTICE of attorney appearance as co-counsel for defendant United Parcel Servic by Robert A Junell (blr) (Entered: 04/19/2002)

RECAP
59 April 22, 2002

STIPULATION of dismissal of All claims Against Deft International Brotherhood of Teamsters; Hereby stipulated by Equal Employment Opportunity Commissions, Pltf, Ernest Garcia,Intervenor, United Parcel Service, Deft & Teamsters Local 657, Deftt that action action of Ernest Garcia, Intervenor against Deft International Brotherhood of Teamsters be dismissed; (4) (mrr) (Entered: 04/22/2002)

RECAP
60 May 10, 2002

ANSWER by defendant United Parcel Servic (Attorney ) to second amended complaint (14) (blr) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

RECAP
61 May 10, 2002

ANSWER by defendant United Parcel Servic to [53-1] amended intervenor complaint (11) (blr) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

RECAP
62 May 15, 2002

JOINT MOTION to extend deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses by plaintiff EEOC, intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia, defendant United Parcel Servic, third-party defendant Intl Brotherhood, third-party defendant Local 657 (4) (mrr) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

RECAP
63 May 20, 2002

ORDER granting [62-1] joint motion to extend deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses; expert witness disclosure due 9/16/02; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 5/20/02 Page(s) 3 (blr) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

RECAP
64 Sept. 9, 2002

JOINT MOTION to extend time by plaintiff EEOC, intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia, defendant United Parcel Servic, intervenor-defendant United Parcel Servic, third-party defendant Intl Brotherhood, third-party defendant Local 657 (blr) (Entered: 09/09/2002)

RECAP
65 Sept. 10, 2002

ORDER denying [64-1] joint motion to extend time; Further parties state that "this case is a multi-party class action"; This case has not been certified as class action & parties are warned that sanctions will be imposed if further misrepresentations are made to Court; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 9/10/02 Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 09/10/2002)

RECAP
66 Sept. 16, 2002

NOTICE of Advisory to the Court by plaintiff EEOC regarding its failure to move for class certification; Pltf does not allege facts addressed to usual class representation requirements of FedRCivP 23 nor does it move for certification of classes of individuals upon whose claims the EEOC's complaints are based (3) (mrr) (Entered: 09/16/2002)

RECAP
67 Sept. 30, 2002

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 3D AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff EEOC to amend [54-1] amended complaint, [47-1] amended complaint, [1-1] complaint (15) (mrr) Modified on 10/01/2002 (Entered: 10/01/2002)

RECAP
68 Oct. 3, 2002

ORDER granting [67-1] motion to amend [54-1] amended complaint, [47-1] amended complaint, [1-1] complaint Parties are advised that no further extension of pretrial deadlines will be granted & case will be set for trial on Court's 4/21/03 trial docket ; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 10/3/02 Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 10/03/2002)

RECAP
69 Oct. 3, 2002

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff EEOC, amending [1-1] complaint, [47-1] amended complaint, [54-1] amended complaint (9) (mrr) (Entered: 10/03/2002)

RECAP
70 Oct. 4, 2002

SCHEDULING ORDER setting Jury trial set for 9:00 4/21/03 ; Pretrial materials due at least 30 days before trial date; Proposed pretrial order due at least 30 days before trial date ; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 10/4/02 Page(s): 3 (blr) (Entered: 10/04/2002)

RECAP
71 Nov. 4, 2002

(Unopposed) MOTION to intervene by movant Cherri Romo (blr) (Entered: 11/04/2002)

RECAP
72 Nov. 5, 2002

ORDER granting [71-1] motion to intervene by intervenor plaintiff Cherri Romo; Parties are advised that no further extensions of pretrial deadlines will be granted & this case remains set for trial on the Court's 4/21/03 trial docket; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 11/5/02 Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

RECAP
73 Nov. 5, 2002

DEMAND for jury trial by intervenor-plaintiff Cherri Romo (mrr) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

RECAP
74 Nov. 8, 2002

UNFILED per Order of 11/12/02: Signature pages for unopposed Motion by intervenor-plaintiff Cherri Romo (blr) Modified on 11/12/2002 (Entered: 11/08/2002)

RECAP
75 Nov. 12, 2002

ORDER unfiling [74-1] remark by intervenor-plaintiff Cherri Romo due to the following deficiency: Document must be in proper form; See LR 10.1; Copies to counsel: 11/12/02 (signed by Judge Sam R Cummings ) Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 11/12/2002)

RECAP
76 Nov. 25, 2002

UNFILED PER ORDER OF 11/26/02 - MOTION by third-party defendant Local 657 of Rule 19 Deft Temasters Local 657 to be Relieved from Further Pretrial & Trial Participation (4)(mrr) Modified on 11/26/2002 (Entered: 11/25/2002)

RECAP
77 Nov. 26, 2002

ORDER unfiling [76-1] motion of Rule 19 Deft Temasters Local 657 to be Relieved from Further Pretrial & Trial Participation by third-party defendant Local 657 due to the following deficiency: Brief in Support required per LR 7.1(d) Copies to counsel: 11/26/02 (signed by Judge Sam R Cummings ) Page(s) 1 (blr) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

RECAP
78 Dec. 2, 2002

MEMORANDUM by third-party defendant Local 657 in support of (Unfiled Motion to be Relieved from further Pretrial & Trial Participation) (blr) (Entered: 12/03/2002)

RECAP
79 Dec. 4, 2002

ORDER unfiling [78-1] support memorandum by third-party defendant Local 657 due to the following deficiency: Motion unfiled 11/26/02 not resubmitted with Brief therefore Memorandum in Support does not have document to support; Copies to counsel: 12/4/02 (signed by Judge Sam R Cummings ) Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 12/04/2002)

RECAP
80 Dec. 5, 2002

NOTICE of Joint Advisory to Court Regarding Deft Local 657's Motion to be Relieved from Further Pretrial & Trial Participation by plaintiff EEOC, intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia (5) (mrr) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

RECAP
81 Dec. 6, 2002

Unopposed MOTION of Rule 19 Deft by third-party defendant Local 657 to be Relieved from Further Pretrial & Trial Participation (3) (mrr) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

RECAP
82 Dec. 6, 2002

MEMORANDUM by third-party defendant Local 657 in support of [81-1] motion to be Relieved from Further Pretrial & Trial Participation (3) (mrr) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

RECAP
83 Dec. 9, 2002

ORDER granting [81-1] motion to be Relieved from Further Pretrial & Trial Participation; ORDERED that Rule 19 Deft Teamsters Local 657 is Relieved from further participation in this litigation; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 12/9/02 Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 12/09/2002)

RECAP
84 Dec. 12, 2002

MOTION with memorandum in support by defendant United Parcel Servic for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs (blr) (Entered: 12/12/2002)

RECAP
85 Dec. 13, 2002

Amended MOTION for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs by defendant United Parcel Servic referring to [84-1] motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs (blr) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

RECAP
86 Dec. 17, 2002

Second Amended MOTION for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs by defendant United Parcel Servic referring to [84-1] motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, [85-1] amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs (blr) (Entered: 12/17/2002)

RECAP
87 Dec. 17, 2002

MEMORANDUM by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [86-1] amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs (blr) (Entered: 12/17/2002)

RECAP
88 Dec. 17, 2002

APPENDIX by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [87-1] support memorandum (blr) (Entered: 12/17/2002)

RECAP
89 Dec. 26, 2002

MOTION by intervenor-plaintiff Cherri Romo (for) Stipulation of Dismissal of Intervention (6) (mrr) (Entered: 12/26/2002)

RECAP
90 Jan. 2, 2003

ORDER granting [89-1] motion (for) Stipulation of Dismissal of Intervention ; Intervention is dismissed w/out prejudice & Romo shall remain as a class member ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 1/2/03 Page(s) 2 (blr) (Entered: 01/02/2003)

RECAP
91 Jan. 3, 2003

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to [84-1] motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, [85-1] amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, [86-1] second amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs (blr) (Entered: 01/03/2003)

RECAP
92 Jan. 3, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in support of [91-1] cross motion for extension of page length of Summary Judgment Motions, [91-1] motion response (blr) (Entered: 01/03/2003)

RECAP
93 Jan. 3, 2003

APPENDIX by plaintiff EEOC in support of [92-1] support memorandum (blr) (Entered: 01/03/2003)

RECAP
94 Jan. 10, 2003

ORDER denying [84-1] motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, denying [85-1] amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, denying [86-1] amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, denying [91-1] cross motion for extension of page length of Summary Judgment Motions ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 1/10/03 Page(s) 2 (mrr) (Entered: 01/10/2003)

RECAP
95 Jan. 13, 2003

RESPONSE by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia in opposition to [84-1] motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, [85-1] amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs, [86-1] amended motion for leave to file Separate Motions for Summary Judgment for each of 3 named Pltfs (blr) (Entered: 01/13/2003)

RECAP
96 Jan. 13, 2003

MEMORANDUM by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia in support of [95-1] motion response (blr) (Entered: 01/13/2003)

RECAP
97 Jan. 14, 2003

Unopposed Expedited MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to extend Scheduling Order & Pretrial Order Deadlines (5) (mrr) (Entered: 01/14/2003)

RECAP
98 Jan. 14, 2003

ORDER denying [97-1] motion to extend Scheduling Order & Pretrial Order Deadlines ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 1/14/03 Page(s) 1 (mrr) (Entered: 01/14/2003)

RECAP
99 Jan. 22, 2003

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to strike Al Yonovitz's Testimony or in alternative motion to exclude purported expert witness testimony of Al Yonovitz (blr) (dss). (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
100 Jan. 22, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in support of [99-1] motion to strike Al Yonovitz's Testimony or in alternative motion to exclude purported expert witness testimony of Al Yonovitz (blr) (dss). (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
101 Jan. 22, 2003

APPENDIX by plaintiff EEOC in support of [100-1] support memorandum (blr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/10/2019: # 1 Appendix part 2, # 2 Appendix part 3, # 3 Appendix part 4, # 4 Appendix part 5) (dss). (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
102 Jan. 22, 2003

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
103 Jan. 22, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in support of [102-1] motion in limine (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
104 Jan. 22, 2003

APPENDIX by plaintiff EEOC in support of [103-1] support memorandum (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
105 Jan. 22, 2003

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia for partial summary judgment (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
106 Jan. 22, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC, intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia in support of [105-1] motion for partial summary judgment (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
107 Jan. 22, 2003

APPENDIX by plaintiff EEOC, intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia in support of [106-1] support memorandum (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
108 Jan. 22, 2003

MOTION by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia in limine (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
109 Jan. 22, 2003

MEMORANDUM by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia in support of [108-1] motion in limine (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
110 Jan. 22, 2003

MOTION by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia to strike Al Yanovitz's Testimony or in alternative to exclude purported expert testimony of Al Yanovitz (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
111 Jan. 22, 2003

MEMORANDUM by intervenor-plaintiff Ernest Garcia in support of [110-1] motion to strike Al Yanovitz's Testimony or in alternative to exclude purported expert testimony of Al Yanovitz (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
112 Jan. 22, 2003

MOTION by defendant United Parcel Servic for summary judgment (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
113 Jan. 22, 2003

MEMORANDUM by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [112-1] motion for summary judgment (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
114 Jan. 22, 2003

APPENDIX - Volume 1 of 3 by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [113-1] support memorandum (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
115 Jan. 22, 2003

APPENDIX - Volume 2 of 3 by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [113-1] support memorandum (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
116 Jan. 22, 2003

APPENDIX - Volue 3 of 3 by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [113-1] support memorandum (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
117 Jan. 22, 2003

MOTION by defendant United Parcel Servic in limine (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
118 Jan. 22, 2003

MEMORANDUM by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [117-1] motion in limine (blr) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

RECAP
119 Jan. 27, 2003

ORDER denying [102-1] motion in limine as untimely, denying [108-1] motion in limine as untimely, denying [117-1] motion in limine as untimely ; Response to motion reset to 2/5/03 for [99-1] motion to strike Al Yonovitz's Testimony or in alternative motion to exclude purported expert witness testimony of Al Yonovitz, reset to 2/5/03 for [110-1] motion to strike Al Yanovitz's Testimony or in alternative to exclude purported expert testimony of Al Yanovitz, reset to 2/11/03 for [105-1] motion for partial summary judgment, reset to 2/11/03 for [112-1] motion for summary judgment ; any reply to a response must be filed w/in 15 days from date the response is filed; no extensions will be granted ; ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 1/28/03 Page(s) 2 (blr) (Entered: 01/28/2003)

RECAP
120 Feb. 5, 2003

(Alternative) MOTION by defendant United Parcel Servic for attorney's fees & costs (3) (mrr) (Entered: 02/05/2003)

RECAP
121 Feb. 5, 2003

MEMORANDUM by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [120-1] motion response, [120-1] motion for attorney's fees & costs (18) (mrr) (Entered: 02/05/2003)

RECAP
122 Feb. 5, 2003

APPENDIX by defendant United Parcel Servic in support of [120-1] motion response, [120-1] motion for attorney's fees & costs (3+) (mrr) (Entered: 02/05/2003)

RECAP
123 Feb. 7, 2003

ORDER denying [110-1] motion to strike Al Yanovitz's Testimony or in alternative to exclude purported expert testimony of Al Yanovitz, denying [99-1] motion to strike Al Yonovitz's Testimony or in alternative motion to exclude purported expert witness testimony of Al Yonovitz ; Dr Yonovitz may testify as an expert witness on behalf of Deft ( Signed by Judge Sam R. Cummings ) Copies to counsel: 2/7/03 Page(s) 2 (blr) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 6, 2001

Closing Date: 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Local 657 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

United Parcel Service, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Texas 6:01-cv-00109

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discipline

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Race discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Hispanic

Indian

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation