Case: EEOC v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

2:04-cv-00866 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: April 15, 2004

Closed Date: April 12, 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In April 2004, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, a national railroad, and several individuals in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. A female complainant intervened in the case. The complaints alleged that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (sex). Specifically, the female claimed that she was subjected to inappropriate comments, pornography, and indecent expo…
In April 2004, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, a national railroad, and several individuals in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. A female complainant intervened in the case. The complaints alleged that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (sex). Specifically, the female claimed that she was subjected to inappropriate comments, pornography, and indecent exposure. After a defense motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction was denied, the parties settled. The EEOC consent decree states that the parties agreed that the defendant would pay the aggrieved party $260,000, refrain from retaliating and discriminating on the basis of sex, expunge the complainant's employment record of any reference to this litigation, would issue neutral references, distribute and post its anti-discrimination policy, provide three hours of EEO training, and submit semiannual compliance/complain reports to the EEOC. No fees or costs were awarded. The terms of the decree run for three years. The docket sheet does not show any further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2008.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/25/2007)

Clearinghouse (6/15/2017)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/12042936/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-union-pacific-railroad-company/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:04-cv-00866

Docket (PACER)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

Docket
1

2:04-cv-00866

Complaint

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

April 15, 2004

April 15, 2004

Complaint
5-2

2:04-cv-00866

Intervenor's Complaint

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

April 29, 2004

April 29, 2004

Complaint
50

2:04-cv-00866

Order Denying Defendants Rail Terminal Services and Moench's Motion to Dismiss Intervention Plaintiff's Claims

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Nov. 22, 2004

Nov. 22, 2004

Order/Opinion
54

2:04-cv-00866

Order Denying Defendants Martin Howell and Carol Cates' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff in Intervention's Claims

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Dec. 17, 2004

Dec. 17, 2004

Order/Opinion
64

2:04-cv-00866

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

April 12, 2005

April 12, 2005

Settlement Agreement
70

2:04-cv-00866

Amended Consent Decree

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

Settlement Agreement

EEOC Litigation Settlement Report (April 2005)

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

No Court

April 30, 2005

April 30, 2005

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/12042936/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-union-pacific-railroad-company/

Last updated Sept. 30, 2026, 12:25 a.m.

Docket for: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 15, 2004

COMPLAINT and JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Summons(es) issued) (Receipt # fee waived), filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PM, ) (Entered: 04/17/2004)

RECAP
3 April 27, 2004

SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company on 4/22/2004. (LT, ) (Entered: 05/04/2004)

RECAP
5 April 29, 2004

MOTION to Intervene and to file intervenor's complaint for damages by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. Noting Date 5/14/2004. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Proposed intervenor's complaint for damages)(MD, ) (Entered: 05/07/2004)

RECAP
6 April 29, 2004

DECLARATION of Artis C Grant Jr re 5 MOTION to Intervene (MD, ) (Entered: 05/07/2004)

RECAP
7 April 29, 2004

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 5 MOTION to Intervene, 6 Declaration. (MD, ) (Entered: 05/07/2004)

RECAP
2 April 30, 2004

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Timothy David Wackerbarth on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Wackerbarth, Timothy) (Entered: 04/30/2004)

RECAP
4 May 5, 2004

NOTICE of Appearance (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Grant, Artis) (Entered: 05/05/2004)

RECAP
8 May 19, 2004

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 6/30/2004; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (Goldberg, Rachel) (Entered: 05/19/2004)

RECAP
9 June 10, 2004

ORDER Granting re 5 MOTION to Intervene and to file intervenor's complaint for damages filed by Jill Harp by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 06/10/2004)

RECAP
10 June 10, 2004

INTERVENOR COMPLAINT, filed by Jill Harp.(MD, ) (Entered: 06/10/2004)

RECAP
11 June 15, 2004

PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re 10 Intervenor Complaint by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. (Attachments: # 1 Summons to Alan Moench# 2 Summons Fletcher Jamison# 3 Summons to Martin Howell# 4 Summons to Rail Terminal Services# 5 Summons to Union Pacific Railroad# 6 Summons to Jane Doe Moench# 7 Summons to Jane Doe Jamison# 8 Summons to Jane Doe Howell)(Hardyns, Heather) Modified on 6/16/2004-issued s/c and mailed to cnsl of record for service(MD, ). (Entered: 06/15/2004)

RECAP
12 June 18, 2004

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Timothy David Wackerbarth on behalf of Defendants Fletcher Jamison, Jane Doe Jamison, Union Pacific Railroad Company (Wackerbarth, Timothy) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

RECAP
13 June 18, 2004

MINUTE ORDER extending deadline; Joint Status Report due by 7/30/2004; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (Goldberg, Rachel) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

RECAP
14 June 23, 2004

ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Wackerbarth, Timothy) (Entered: 06/23/2004)

RECAP
15 June 28, 2004

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Thao A. Tiedt on behalf of Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 06/28/2004)

RECAP
16 July 13, 2004

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney William R Kiendl on behalf of Defendant Martin Howell (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 07/13/2004)

RECAP
17 July 13, 2004

ANSWER to Intervenor Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services.(Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 07/13/2004)

RECAP
18 July 26, 2004

INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 07/26/2004)

RECAP
19 July 29, 2004

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by all parties. Est. Trial Days: 10. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 07/29/2004)

RECAP
20 Aug. 12, 2004

MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services. Noting Date 9/10/2004 and Proposed Order (Tiedt, Thao) Modified text on 8/17/2004 (MD, ). (Entered: 08/12/2004)

RECAP
21 Aug. 12, 2004

DECLARATION of R. Michael List filed by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

RECAP
22 Aug. 12, 2004

DECLARATION of Alan Moench filed by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

RECAP
23 Aug. 12, 2004

DECLARATION of Glenn Strieker filed by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

RECAP
24 Aug. 17, 2004

ANSWER to Intervenor Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Company and Fletcher Jamison.(Pond, Ralph) Modified on 8/23/2004; removed duplicative text added by counsel (AF, ). (Entered: 08/17/2004)

RECAP
25 Aug. 26, 2004

NOTICE by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services that the following is RE-NOTED: 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS Noting Date 9/17/2004. (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 08/26/2004)

RECAP
26 Aug. 31, 2004

SUPPLEMENT re 18 Initial Disclosures First Supplemental FRCP 26(a)(1) Disclosure by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 08/31/2004)

RECAP
27 Aug. 31, 2004

SUPPLEMENT re 18 Initial Disclosures First Supplemental FRCP 26(a)(1) Disclosure by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 08/31/2004)

RECAP
28 Sept. 13, 2004

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: 10 days. Jury Trial set for 9/19/2005 at 9:00 AM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Joinder of Parties due by 10/12/2004; Amended Pleadings due by 10/21/2004; Expert Witness Disclosure due by 3/23/2005; Motions due by 4/22/2005; Discovery due by 5/22/2005; Dispositive motions due by 6/21/2005; Settlement conference to be held by 7/21/2005; 39.1 Settlement Report due by 8/20/2005; Motions in Limine due by 8/22/2005; Pretrial Order due by 9/7/2005; Pretrial Conference set for 9/9/2005 at 1:30 PM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Trial briefs to be submitted by 9/14/2005; Voir dire/jury instructions due by 9/14/2005; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (ES) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
29 Sept. 13, 2004

RESPONSE, by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp, to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Response to motion, pp 12-24# 2 Proposed Order # 3 Certificate of Service)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
30 Sept. 13, 2004

DECLARATION of Artis C. Grant, Jr. filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 29 Response to Motion (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
31 Sept. 13, 2004

DECLARATION of Jill Harp filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 29 Response to Motion (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
32 Sept. 13, 2004

RESPONSE, by Defendants Fletcher Jamison, Union Pacific Railroad Company, to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
33 Sept. 13, 2004

EXHIBIT 1 to Declaration of Artis C. Grant, Jr. re 30 Declaration by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. (Attachments: # 1 Ex 2# 2 Ex 3# 3 Ex 4# 4 Ex 5# 5 Ex 6# 6 Ex 7# 7 Ex 8# 8 Ex 9# 9 Ex 10# 10 Ex 11# 11 Ex 12)(Hardyns, Heather) Modified on 9/14/2004 to edit docket text (ECS, ). (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
34 Sept. 13, 2004

RESPONSE, by Defendant Martin Howell, to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Kiendl, William) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
35 Sept. 13, 2004

DECLARATION of Martin Howell filed by Defendant Martin Howell re 34 Response to Motion (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
36 Sept. 13, 2004

DECLARATION of Michael A. Patterson filed by Defendant Martin Howell re 34 Response to Motion (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
37 Sept. 14, 2004

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kristin Rose Nealey on behalf of Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 09/14/2004)

RECAP
38 Sept. 16, 2004

REPLY, filed by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services, TO RESPONSE to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

RECAP
39 Sept. 16, 2004

RESPONSE, by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company, to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

RECAP
40 Sept. 16, 2004

REPLY, filed by Defendants Fletcher Jamison, Union Pacific Railroad Company, TO RESPONSE to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

RECAP
41 Oct. 7, 2004

ORDER regarding Defendants Howel and Gates' Joinder, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RG, ) (Entered: 10/07/2004)

RECAP
Oct. 8, 2004

Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response/joinder in the underlying motion to dismiss 41 Order; NOTED on motion calendar; Noting Date 10/29/2004. (MD, ) (Entered: 10/08/2004)

PACER
Oct. 8, 2004

Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, 34 Response/joinder in the underlying motion to dismiss 41 Order; NOTED on motion calendar; Noting Date 10/29/2004. (MD, )

42 Oct. 25, 2004

RESPONSE, by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp, to Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar;. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

RECAP
43 Oct. 25, 2004

DECLARATION of Jill Harp filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Attachments: # 1 Pages 11-19 of Harp Declaration)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

RECAP
44 Oct. 25, 2004

PRAECIPE to attach document (Proposed Order) re 42 Response to Motion by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

RECAP
45 Oct. 25, 2004

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 42 Response to Motion, 43 Declaration,, 44 Praecipe to attach Document. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

RECAP
46 Oct. 28, 2004

REPLY, filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell, IN SUPPORT of Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 10/28/2004)

RECAP
47 Oct. 28, 2004

DECLARATION of Martin Howell (Supplemental) filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 10/28/2004)

RECAP
48 Nov. 3, 2004

SURREPLY filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 11/03/2004)

RECAP
49 Nov. 3, 2004

DECLARATION of Heather Hardyns filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 11/03/2004)

RECAP
50 Nov. 22, 2004

ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RG, ) (Entered: 11/22/2004)

RECAP
51 Nov. 24, 2004

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Kristin Rose Nealey for Defendants Jane Doe Moench, Alan Moench, Rail Terminal Services. (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 11/24/2004)

RECAP
52 Nov. 30, 2004

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Thao A. Tiedt for Defendants Jane Doe Moench, Alan Moench. (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 11/30/2004)

RECAP
53 Dec. 3, 2004

NOTICE by Defendants Jane Doe Moench, Alan Moench of Substitution of Counsel for Alan Moench and Jane Doe Moench, Substituting in David L. Shorett (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 12/03/2004)

RECAP
54 Dec. 17, 2004

ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RG, ) (Entered: 12/17/2004)

RECAP
55 Dec. 17, 2004

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell. Noting Date 12/30/2004. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kiendl, William) (Entered: 12/17/2004)

RECAP
56 Dec. 17, 2004

DECLARATION of Michael A. Patterson filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell re 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 12/17/2004)

RECAP
57 Dec. 23, 2004

RESPONSE, by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp, to 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Proposed Order Alternative)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 12/23/2004)

RECAP
58 Dec. 23, 2004

DECLARATION of Heather Hardyns filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 12/23/2004)

RECAP
59 Dec. 29, 2004

ANSWER to Intervenor Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell.(Kiendl, William) (Entered: 12/29/2004)

RECAP
60 Dec. 29, 2004

REPLY, filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell, TO RESPONSE to 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 12/29/2004)

RECAP
61 Dec. 29, 2004

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL on behalf of Defendant Fletcher Jamison. Ralph Crockett Pond is substituted as counsel for Defendant. Attorney Ralph Crockett Pond terminated. Ralph Crocket Pond is Terminated, NOT substituted; Joyce L. Thomas is Substituted (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 12/29/2004)

RECAP
62 Jan. 6, 2005

ORDER GRANTING re 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for deft Martin Howell and Carol Catesby Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl, Attorney William R Kiendl and Michael Alexander Patterson terminated., Motions terminated: by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD,copy to Pro Se Howell and Cates ) (Entered: 01/06/2005)

RECAP
63 Jan. 7, 2005

NOTICE by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company of Name Change of Attorneys of Record (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 01/07/2005)

RECAP
64 April 6, 2005

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing Action by parties. (Cox, Lisa) (Entered: 04/06/2005)

RECAP
65 April 7, 2005

NOTICE from Mediator Michele M Sales, that on 3/24/05, the parties participated in a mediation. This matter is now resolved. (MD, ) (Entered: 04/08/2005)

RECAP
66 April 12, 2005

CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS OR ATTORNEYS' FEES TO ANY PARTY. The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of enforcing the consent decree approved herein by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD ) (Entered: 04/13/2005)

RECAP
67 April 18, 2005

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal of Complaint In Intervention by parties. (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 04/18/2005)

RECAP
68 April 19, 2005

AMENDMENT to 64 PROPOSED Stipulation CONSENT DECREE by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Cox, Lisa) Modified text on 4/20/2005 (MD, ). (Entered: 04/19/2005)

RECAP
69 April 19, 2005

STIPULATION AND ORDER of dismissal of complaint in intervention re 67 Stipulation filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

RECAP
70 April 20, 2005

AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Washington

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 15, 2004

Closing Date: April 12, 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

1-10 Does

Alan Moench

Carol Cates

Fletcher Jamison

Jane Doe Howell

Jane Doe Jamison

Jane Doe Moench

Martin Howell

Rail Terminal Services

Union Pacific Railroad Company

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State Anti-Discrimination Law

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Western District of Washington 2:04-cv-00866

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Expungement of Employment Record

Neutral/Positive Reference

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 260000

Order Duration: 2005 - 2008

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation