Case: EEOC v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

2:04-cv-00866 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: April 15, 2004

Closed Date: April 12, 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In April 2004, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, a national railroad, and several individuals in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. A female complainant intervened in the case. The complaints alleged that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (sex). Specifically, the female claimed that she was subjected to inappropriate comments, pornography, and indecent expo…

In April 2004, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, a national railroad, and several individuals in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. A female complainant intervened in the case. The complaints alleged that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (sex). Specifically, the female claimed that she was subjected to inappropriate comments, pornography, and indecent exposure.

After a defense motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction was denied, the parties settled. The EEOC consent decree states that the parties agreed that the defendant would pay the aggrieved party $260,000, refrain from retaliating and discriminating on the basis of sex, expunge the complainant's employment record of any reference to this litigation, would issue neutral references, distribute and post its anti-discrimination policy, provide three hours of EEO training, and submit semiannual compliance/complain reports to the EEOC. No fees or costs were awarded. The terms of the decree run for three years. The docket sheet does not show any further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2008.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/25/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:04-cv-00866

Docket (PACER)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

Docket
1

2:04-cv-00866

Complaint

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

April 15, 2004

April 15, 2004

Complaint
5-2

2:04-cv-00866

Intervenor's Complaint

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

April 29, 2004

April 29, 2004

Complaint
50

2:04-cv-00866

Order Denying Defendants Rail Terminal Services and Moench's Motion to Dismiss Intervention Plaintiff's Claims

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Nov. 22, 2004

Nov. 22, 2004

Order/Opinion
54

2:04-cv-00866

Order Denying Defendants Martin Howell and Carol Cates' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff in Intervention's Claims

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Dec. 17, 2004

Dec. 17, 2004

Order/Opinion
64

2:04-cv-00866

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

April 12, 2005

April 12, 2005

Settlement Agreement
70

2:04-cv-00866

Amended Consent Decree

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

Settlement Agreement

EEOC Litigation Settlement Report (April 2005)

EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

No Court

April 30, 2005

April 30, 2005

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 12, 2022, 3:13 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT and JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Summons(es) issued) (Receipt # fee waived) , filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PM, ) (Entered: 04/17/2004)

April 15, 2004

April 15, 2004

3

SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company on 4/22/2004. (LT, ) (Entered: 05/04/2004)

April 27, 2004

April 27, 2004

5

MOTION to Intervene and to file intervenor's complaint for damages by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. Noting Date 5/14/2004. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Proposed intervenor's complaint for damages)(MD, ) (Entered: 05/07/2004)

April 29, 2004

April 29, 2004

6

DECLARATION of Artis C Grant Jr re 5 MOTION to Intervene (MD, ) (Entered: 05/07/2004)

April 29, 2004

April 29, 2004

7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 5 MOTION to Intervene, 6 Declaration. (MD, ) (Entered: 05/07/2004)

April 29, 2004

April 29, 2004

2

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Timothy David Wackerbarth on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Wackerbarth, Timothy) (Entered: 04/30/2004)

April 30, 2004

April 30, 2004

8

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 6/30/2004; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (Goldberg, Rachel) (Entered: 05/19/2004)

May 19, 2004

May 19, 2004

9

ORDER Granting re 5 MOTION to Intervene and to file intervenor's complaint for damages filed by Jill Harp by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 06/10/2004)

June 10, 2004

June 10, 2004

10

INTERVENOR COMPLAINT , filed by Jill Harp.(MD, ) (Entered: 06/10/2004)

June 10, 2004

June 10, 2004

11

PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re 10 Intervenor Complaint by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. (Attachments: # 1 Summons to Alan Moench# 2 Summons Fletcher Jamison# 3 Summons to Martin Howell# 4 Summons to Rail Terminal Services# 5 Summons to Union Pacific Railroad# 6 Summons to Jane Doe Moench# 7 Summons to Jane Doe Jamison# 8 Summons to Jane Doe Howell)(Hardyns, Heather) Modified on 6/16/2004-issued s/c and mailed to cnsl of record for service(MD, ). (Entered: 06/15/2004)

June 15, 2004

June 15, 2004

12

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Timothy David Wackerbarth on behalf of Defendants Fletcher Jamison, Jane Doe Jamison, Union Pacific Railroad Company (Wackerbarth, Timothy) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

June 18, 2004

June 18, 2004

13

MINUTE ORDER extending deadline; Joint Status Report due by 7/30/2004; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (Goldberg, Rachel) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

June 18, 2004

June 18, 2004

14

ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Wackerbarth, Timothy) (Entered: 06/23/2004)

June 23, 2004

June 23, 2004

15

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Thao A. Tiedt on behalf of Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 06/28/2004)

June 28, 2004

June 28, 2004

16

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney William R Kiendl on behalf of Defendant Martin Howell (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 07/13/2004)

July 13, 2004

July 13, 2004

17

ANSWER to Intervenor Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services.(Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 07/13/2004)

July 13, 2004

July 13, 2004

18

INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 07/26/2004)

July 26, 2004

July 26, 2004

19

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by all parties. Est. Trial Days: 10. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 07/29/2004)

July 29, 2004

July 29, 2004

20

MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services. Noting Date 9/10/2004 and Proposed Order (Tiedt, Thao) Modified text on 8/17/2004 (MD, ). (Entered: 08/12/2004)

Aug. 12, 2004

Aug. 12, 2004

21

DECLARATION of R. Michael List filed by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

Aug. 12, 2004

Aug. 12, 2004

23

DECLARATION of Glenn Strieker filed by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

Aug. 12, 2004

Aug. 12, 2004

24

ANSWER to Intervenor Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Company and Fletcher Jamison.(Pond, Ralph) Modified on 8/23/2004; removed duplicative text added by counsel (AF, ). (Entered: 08/17/2004)

Aug. 17, 2004

Aug. 17, 2004

25

NOTICE by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services that the following is RE-NOTED: 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS Noting Date 9/17/2004. (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 08/26/2004)

Aug. 26, 2004

Aug. 26, 2004

26

SUPPLEMENT re 18 Initial Disclosures First Supplemental FRCP 26(a)(1) Disclosure by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 08/31/2004)

Aug. 31, 2004

Aug. 31, 2004

27

SUPPLEMENT re 18 Initial Disclosures First Supplemental FRCP 26(a)(1) Disclosure by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 08/31/2004)

Aug. 31, 2004

Aug. 31, 2004

28

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: 10 days. Jury Trial set for 9/19/2005 at 9:00 AM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Joinder of Parties due by 10/12/2004; Amended Pleadings due by 10/21/2004; Expert Witness Disclosure due by 3/23/2005; Motions due by 4/22/2005; Discovery due by 5/22/2005; Dispositive motions due by 6/21/2005; Settlement conference to be held by 7/21/2005; 39.1 Settlement Report due by 8/20/2005; Motions in Limine due by 8/22/2005; Pretrial Order due by 9/7/2005; Pretrial Conference set for 9/9/2005 at 1:30 PM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Trial briefs to be submitted by 9/14/2005; Voir dire/jury instructions due by 9/14/2005; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (ES) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

29

RESPONSE, by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp, to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Response to motion, pp 12-24# 2 Proposed Order # 3 Certificate of Service)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

30

DECLARATION of Artis C. Grant, Jr. filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 29 Response to Motion (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

31

DECLARATION of Jill Harp filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 29 Response to Motion (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

32

RESPONSE, by Defendants Fletcher Jamison, Union Pacific Railroad Company, to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

33

EXHIBIT 1 to Declaration of Artis C. Grant, Jr. re 30 Declaration by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. (Attachments: # 1 Ex 2# 2 Ex 3# 3 Ex 4# 4 Ex 5# 5 Ex 6# 6 Ex 7# 7 Ex 8# 8 Ex 9# 9 Ex 10# 10 Ex 11# 11 Ex 12)(Hardyns, Heather) Modified on 9/14/2004 to edit docket text (ECS, ). (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

35

DECLARATION of Martin Howell filed by Defendant Martin Howell re 34 Response to Motion (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

36

DECLARATION of Michael A. Patterson filed by Defendant Martin Howell re 34 Response to Motion (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 13, 2004

Sept. 13, 2004

37

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kristin Rose Nealey on behalf of Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 09/14/2004)

Sept. 14, 2004

Sept. 14, 2004

38

REPLY, filed by Defendants Alan Moench, Jane Doe Moench, Rail Terminal Services, TO RESPONSE to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

Sept. 16, 2004

Sept. 16, 2004

39

RESPONSE, by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company, to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

Sept. 16, 2004

Sept. 16, 2004

40

REPLY, filed by Defendants Fletcher Jamison, Union Pacific Railroad Company, TO RESPONSE to 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

Sept. 16, 2004

Sept. 16, 2004

41

ORDER regarding Defendants Howel and Gates' Joinder, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RG, ) (Entered: 10/07/2004)

Oct. 7, 2004

Oct. 7, 2004

Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response/joinder in the underlying motion to dismiss 41 Order; NOTED on motion calendar; Noting Date 10/29/2004. (MD, ) (Entered: 10/08/2004)

Oct. 8, 2004

Oct. 8, 2004

42

RESPONSE, by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp, to Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar;. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

Oct. 25, 2004

Oct. 25, 2004

43

DECLARATION of Jill Harp filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Attachments: # 1 Pages 11-19 of Harp Declaration)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

Oct. 25, 2004

Oct. 25, 2004

44

PRAECIPE to attach document (Proposed Order) re 42 Response to Motion by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

Oct. 25, 2004

Oct. 25, 2004

45

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 42 Response to Motion, 43 Declaration,, 44 Praecipe to attach Document. (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

Oct. 25, 2004

Oct. 25, 2004

46

REPLY, filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell, IN SUPPORT of Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 10/28/2004)

Oct. 28, 2004

Oct. 28, 2004

47

DECLARATION of Martin Howell (Supplemental) filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 10/28/2004)

Oct. 28, 2004

Oct. 28, 2004

48

SURREPLY filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 11/03/2004)

Nov. 3, 2004

Nov. 3, 2004

49

DECLARATION of Heather Hardyns filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re Defts Howell and Gates motion to dismiss 34 re 20 MOTION to Dismiss INTERVENTION PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS , 34 Response to Motion, 41 Order NOTED on motion calendar; (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 11/03/2004)

Nov. 3, 2004

Nov. 3, 2004

50

ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RG, ) (Entered: 11/22/2004)

Nov. 22, 2004

Nov. 22, 2004

51

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Kristin Rose Nealey for Defendants Jane Doe Moench, Alan Moench, Rail Terminal Services. (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 11/24/2004)

Nov. 24, 2004

Nov. 24, 2004

52

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Thao A. Tiedt for Defendants Jane Doe Moench, Alan Moench. (Tiedt, Thao) (Entered: 11/30/2004)

Nov. 30, 2004

Nov. 30, 2004

53

NOTICE by Defendants Jane Doe Moench, Alan Moench of Substitution of Counsel for Alan Moench and Jane Doe Moench, Substituting in David L. Shorett (Nealey, Kristin) (Entered: 12/03/2004)

Dec. 3, 2004

Dec. 3, 2004

54

ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RG, ) (Entered: 12/17/2004)

Dec. 17, 2004

Dec. 17, 2004

55

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell. Noting Date 12/30/2004. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kiendl, William) (Entered: 12/17/2004)

Dec. 17, 2004

Dec. 17, 2004

56

DECLARATION of Michael A. Patterson filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell re 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 12/17/2004)

Dec. 17, 2004

Dec. 17, 2004

57

RESPONSE, by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp, to 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl . (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Proposed Order Alternative)(Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 12/23/2004)

Dec. 23, 2004

Dec. 23, 2004

58

DECLARATION of Heather Hardyns filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Jill Harp re 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl (Hardyns, Heather) (Entered: 12/23/2004)

Dec. 23, 2004

Dec. 23, 2004

60

REPLY, filed by Defendants Jane Doe Howell, Martin Howell, TO RESPONSE to 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl (Kiendl, William) (Entered: 12/29/2004)

Dec. 29, 2004

Dec. 29, 2004

61

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL on behalf of Defendant Fletcher Jamison. Ralph Crockett Pond is substituted as counsel for Defendant. Attorney Ralph Crockett Pond terminated. Ralph Crocket Pond is Terminated, NOT substituted; Joyce L. Thomas is Substituted (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 12/29/2004)

Dec. 29, 2004

Dec. 29, 2004

62

ORDER GRANTING re 55 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for deft Martin Howell and Carol Cates by Michael A. Patterson and William R. Kiendl, Attorney William R Kiendl and Michael Alexander Patterson terminated., Motions terminated: by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD,copy to Pro Se Howell and Cates ) (Entered: 01/06/2005)

Jan. 6, 2005

Jan. 6, 2005

63

NOTICE by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company of Name Change of Attorneys of Record (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 01/07/2005)

Jan. 7, 2005

Jan. 7, 2005

64

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing Action by parties. (Cox, Lisa) (Entered: 04/06/2005)

April 6, 2005

April 6, 2005

65

NOTICE from Mediator Michele M Sales, that on 3/24/05, the parties participated in a mediation. This matter is now resolved. (MD, ) (Entered: 04/08/2005)

April 7, 2005

April 7, 2005

66

CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS OR ATTORNEYS' FEES TO ANY PARTY. The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of enforcing the consent decree approved herein by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD ) (Entered: 04/13/2005)

April 12, 2005

April 12, 2005

67

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal of Complaint In Intervention by parties. (Pond, Ralph) (Entered: 04/18/2005)

April 18, 2005

April 18, 2005

68

AMENDMENT to 64 PROPOSED Stipulation CONSENT DECREE by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Cox, Lisa) Modified text on 4/20/2005 (MD, ). (Entered: 04/19/2005)

April 19, 2005

April 19, 2005

69

STIPULATION AND ORDER of dismissal of complaint in intervention re 67 Stipulation filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

April 19, 2005

April 19, 2005

70

AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

April 20, 2005

April 20, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory: Washington

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 15, 2004

Closing Date: April 12, 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Carol Cates, Private Entity/Person

Rail Terminal Services, Private Entity/Person

Fletcher Jamison, Private Entity/Person

Jane Doe Jamison, Private Entity/Person

Alan Moench, Private Entity/Person

Jane Doe Moench, Private Entity/Person

Martin Howell, Private Entity/Person

Jane Doe Howell, Private Entity/Person

1-10 Does, Private Entity/Person

Union Pacific Railroad Company, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

State Anti-Discrimination Law

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 260000

Order Duration: 2005 - 2008

Content of Injunction:

Expungement of Employment Record

Provide antidiscrimination training

Neutral/Positive Reference

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Retaliation

Discrimination-area:

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit