Case: EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

3:04-cv-00231 | U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closed Date: Jan. 20, 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2004, the Seattle District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the consent decree that the complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the two charging parties on the basis of national origin, Alaska Native, and ethnicity, Hispanic, in violation of Title V…
In September 2004, the Seattle District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the consent decree that the complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the two charging parties on the basis of national origin, Alaska Native, and ethnicity, Hispanic, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to promote them because of their respective race or national origin. The charging parties intervened in the suit in March 2005. After some discovery, the parties settled in January 2006 through a consent decree. The two-year decree, containing non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the defendant to: provide the charging parties with neutral employment references, report to the EEOC annually, post a notice of the decree, and pay $70,000 to be distributed among five individuals.The docket sheet doesn't show any further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2008.The docket sheet shows that no further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2008.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (8/1/2007)

Clearinghouse (6/13/2017)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
23

3:04-cv-00231

Docket [ACMS]

Nov. 4, 2005

Nov. 4, 2005

Docket

3:04-cv-00231

Docket [PACER]

Feb. 24, 2006

Feb. 24, 2006

Docket
29-1

3:04-cv-00231

Consent Decree and Proposed Order Dismissing EEOC Action

Jan. 17, 2006

Jan. 17, 2006

Settlement Agreement
29-3

3:04-cv-00231

Notice to All Employees

Jan. 17, 2006

Jan. 17, 2006

Other
32-1

3:04-cv-00231

Stipulation for Dismissal of Intervenors' Claims with Prejudice

Jan. 31, 2006

Jan. 31, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 28, 2025, 8:05 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
23

Copy of ACMS docket. Click on the hyperlink to access docket entries 1-23 from prior ACMS system.(MXT, ) (Entered: 11/17/2005)

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

Clearinghouse

All future filings will be in the CM/ECF System. All documents filed prior to January 3, 2006, are available for review at the Clerk's Office.(MXT, ) (Entered: 11/17/2005)

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

25

ORDER granting stipulation to extend deadline for service and filing of final revised witness lists by 1/6/06. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 12/2/05. (PLD) Modified on 12/6/2005 (PLD, ). (Entered: 12/06/2005)

Dec. 6, 2005

Dec. 6, 2005

ACMS CONVERSION ENTRY Set Scheduling Order Deadlines: Discovery due by 1/15/2006. Motions due by 2/17/2006. (PLD) (Entered: 12/30/2005)

Dec. 30, 2005

Dec. 30, 2005

27

NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re 26 Stipulation [Proposed] Order on Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Service and Filing of Final Revised Witness Lists (Stanley, John) (Entered: 01/06/2006)

Jan. 6, 2006

Jan. 6, 2006

28

ORDER granting re 26 Stipulation filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 1/9/06. (PLD) (Entered: 01/10/2006)

Jan. 10, 2006

Jan. 10, 2006

29

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT /Consent Decree and Proposed Order Dismissing EEOC Action by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order# 2 Exhibit Notice to Employees# 3 Exhibit Release)(Stanley, John) (Entered: 01/17/2006)

Jan. 17, 2006

Jan. 17, 2006

30

ORDER approving Consent Decree. (JPS, ) (Entered: 01/20/2006)

Jan. 20, 2006

Jan. 20, 2006

31

MINUTE ORDER: By agreement of the judges, this case is hereby re-assigned to the Honorable Timothy M. Burgess for all further proceedings. (JAG) (Entered: 01/24/2006)

Jan. 23, 2006

Jan. 23, 2006

32

STIPULATION to Dismiss by Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eggers, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/31/2006)

Jan. 31, 2006

Jan. 31, 2006

33

ORDER granting 32 STIPULATION to Dismiss; The Court having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Intervenors' Claims filed by Plaintiff Intervenors, LEONA JOHNSON and ANTHONY NAVARRO, and Defendant, ALYESKA PIPELINE SERVICE COMPANY, (Docket 32) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims asserted, or that could have been asserted, in the above captioned case by Intervenors, or either of them, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. (DPM, ) (Entered: 02/24/2006)

Feb. 24, 2006

Feb. 24, 2006

Case Details

State / Territory:

Alaska

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closing Date: Jan. 20, 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

EEOC, on behalf of charging parties alleging discrimination on the basis of national origin (Alaska Native) and ethnicity (Hispanic)

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

District of Alaska 3:04-cv-00231

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Neutral/Positive Reference

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 70000

Order Duration: 2006 - 2008

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

National origin discrimination

Race discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Indian

Affected Race(s):

American Indian/Alaskan Native

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation